🐱 “American Hero” is a strange name for domestic terrorist Kyle Rittenhouse

CatParty


On Aug. 23, 2020, a Black man named Jacob Blake was shot seven times at point-blank range in front of his family. A video was released of Blake when he was shot by officers, and the reaction of the officers is quite telling. Blake held no weapon, and he wasn’t resisting arrest by a long shot, yet in this video, seven shots ring out and the bystanders are not screaming in terror and sadness. Blake survived, partially paralyzed, yet the police still handcuffed him to his bed.

In wake of his shooting, protests broke out in Kenosha, Wisconsin, where it all happened. On the night of one of the protests, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse showed up, armed and ready to cause problems. The Guardian posted the video of Rittenhouse opening fire at innocent protesters, and when people tried to take him down, he shot even more instead of stopping. Rittenhouse ended up murdering two protesters and injuring another. Make no mistake when calling him what he is: a domestic terrorist.

It seems that right-winged media outlets are trying to humanize this evil individual by saying that he was simply trying to defend businesses and acted in the realm of self-defense. I even saw a GoFundMe created by Christian right-wingers to help out Kyle and his family. Thankfully, both fundraising sites took these horrid fundraisers down. Since I am combating the “facts don’t care about your feelings” party, it should be acknowledged that Rittenhouse is 17 years old, therefore too young to buy a firearm legally. It is evident that guns are an issue in this country, but in the video of Rittenhouse walking towards police, he isn’t even handcuffed. Rittenhouse walked free, unharmed and wasn’t even arrested till the next day.


Still think this isn’t a race thing? I present the example of Philando Castile, a man who was fatally shot by police in 2016. In the video that went viral, Castile’s girlfriend records the altercation as Castile was reaching for his driver’s license and letting the officer know that he had a legal gun. As Castile reached for his I.D., the officer shot him repeatedly, despite the conservatives’ argument that he was “resisting arrest” or that he was “reaching”.

I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that conservatives are trying to protect this terrorist, as this isn’t the first time the police and media have treated white shooters with much more dignity and respect than their Black/brown counterparts. For example, Feb. 14, 2018, Nikolas Cruz shot and murdered 17 students and teachers at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Cruz walked away from the situation, unscathed as the police didn’t even fire at him, making great use of their de-escalation practices and techniques.


Of course, I am not saying that Cruz should’ve died. However, it is hard to look at this situation and see how Castile suffered a brutal death because the officer thought he was reaching for his legal gun. In an interview with Jeranimo Yanez, the officerwho shot Castile, Yanez “told them he stopped Castile not for a broken taillight, as he told the driver when the stop began, but because he thought Castile matched the description of a suspect in a robbery days earlier.”

This is sadly an excuse police frequently use to try to justify the wrongful deaths of police brutality victims. For example, Breonna Taylor was in her apartment with her boyfriend the night police entered her apartment and open fired. To be clear, Taylor’s boyfriend had a legal gun and was well within his rights to shoot back, especially when he wasn’t sure who was trying to get into their apartment. According to CNN, the police were raiding her apartment because they assumed that they had seen a drug lord leaving it before. There were no narcotics on the premises, and they had brutally murdered Breonna Taylor for this mistake.

It has become increasingly common over the last decade to coin white mass shooters as “mentally ill” or “troubled” whilst ignoring the fact that they are, in fact, terrorists and should be charged as such. While it is evident that there is a mental health crisis in the U.S., this doesn’t excuse these kinds of behaviors. Vice reported that, since the 1980s, there have been a little over 70 mass shootings in the U.S, and 44 of these terrorists were white males. This is telling because white men have committed approximately 63% of mass shootings during this time, despite the fact that they comprise a much smaller percentage of the population, according to Vice news.

When I Google Kyle Rittenhouse or any other white shooter, I’m sure it isn’t purely coincidental that they are not immediately referred to as domestic terrorists. When I searched for Dylann Roof, he is called a white supremacist instead, which seems a bit nicer than a domestic terrorist, which is exactly what he was. However, when I looked up the perpetrator of the Pulse nightclub shooting, I saw that he was titled a domestic terrorist in his description. This was because this shooter had connections to a militant jihadist group, and the U.S. is still wary of Muslim individuals. His name was Omar Mateen, and he was killed by a shootout with police following the shooting. White shooters have been able to waltz away from their horrible acts against humanity, but when a shooter is BIPOC, the police become trigger-happy. Even the shooter from the tragic UNC-C shooting last year didn’t get shot at and was arrested shortly after he murdered two students. He also isn’t labeled as a domestic terrorist.

Kyle Rittenhouse is not an American hero, or anything close to it. He is a domestic terrorist and is responsible for the death of two innocent protesters. What he did that night was premeditated, and he deserves to be locked away to the full extent of the law. It’s very embarrassing and quite disheartening for the right to try and defend an actual murderer.
 
Isn't that a jew surname?
Does this answer your question?

Screenshots_2020-09-03-15-08-35.png
 
My whole point is how egregious/violent will BLM have to get for the media to stop sucking their dick? I hope we don't have to find out.
you are delusional if you think the media will ever change their tune. nigs could drag the CEO of CNN out in the streets and disembowel him on an altar while praising moloch, and the next day CNN would report a mostly peaceful ceremony against racism and white supremacy.

they want you broke, dead, your kids raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny. this has never been a meme or a joke, but the accurate truth, and they will not stop unless violently put down.
 
Since it's all the rage right now, let's fact check this.
On Aug. 23, 2020, a Black man named Jacob Blake was shot seven times at point-blank range in front of his family.
Partial truth. He was shot in front of his children and their mother, but they were definitely not a family.

Blake held no weapon,
Lie. He had a knife.

and he wasn’t resisting arrest by a long shot
Lie. He was on video fighting with the cops and trying to flee.

On the night of one of the protests, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse showed up, armed and ready to cause problems.
Partial truth. Whether what he caused were "problems" depends on if you're communist scum or not.

The Guardian posted the video of Rittenhouse opening fire at innocent protesters,
Lie. This never happened.

and when people tried to take him down, he shot even more instead of stopping.
Dishonest wording. "Stopping" here means "letting the mob beat him to death and then take his gun".

Rittenhouse ended up murdering two protesters and injuring another.
Lie. He hasn't been convicted of murder. "Murder" doesn't mean "kill, but scarier".

It seems that right-winged media outlets are trying to humanize this evil individual
I don't even know what to call this. They're upset that some media outlets are calling a human a human instead of reducing him to an object to hate and destroy. We may need to create a new fallacy for this one.

it should be acknowledged that Rittenhouse is 17 years old, therefore too young to buy a firearm legally.
Mixture. He didn't buy the gun, so it doesn't matter if he did so legally or not. There is also no federal minimum age for the purchase or possession of a rifle. There is a minimum age in Wisconsin for the possession of a rifle (but not a handgun, oddly), which means Kyle is guilty of a class A misdemeanor. He could go to prison for a maximum of nine months, at the judge's discretion.

Skipping the next few paragraphs because they're just a bunch of meaningless pearl clutching about how evil white people are. Might as well try to fact check a white noise machine.

Vice reported that, since the 1980s, there have been a little over 70 mass shootings in the U.S, and 44 of these terrorists were white males.
Mostly a lie. By the most common definition of "mass shooting", there have been hundreds of mass shootings since the 1980s, but most of them are small gang skirmishes that nobody cares about.

This is telling because white men have committed approximately 63% of mass shootings during this time, despite the fact that they comprise a much smaller percentage of the population, according to Vice news.
Multiple compounded lies. If you include all mass shootings, not just bombastic random killings, the real number is 22%, with blacks at 50%. Even if you do only include random mass killings, blacks still commit approximately 18% of mass shootings, which is 1.4x overrepresentation. At 63%, whites are near perfect representation (61%).

When I Google Kyle Rittenhouse or any other white shooter, I’m sure it isn’t purely coincidental that they are not immediately referred to as domestic terrorists.
Lie. Patrick Crusius and Robert Bowers both are, as are the Boston marathon bombers (who weren't shooters, but regardless). In fact, relatively few people are considered "domestic terrorists", because there's an actual definition that goes beyond "people who did a bad thing that I'm scared of".

White shooters have been able to waltz away from their horrible acts against humanity, but when a shooter is BIPOC, the police become trigger-happy.
Lie. There are numerous non-white (I refuse to use that acronym even as a quote) mass shooters currently in custody. In fact, only 6% of mass shooters are killed by police. Two thirds are apprehended alive.

Even the shooter from the tragic UNC-C shooting last year didn’t get shot at and was arrested shortly after he murdered two students. He also isn’t labeled as a domestic terrorist.
Lie by omission. He wasn't shot at because he dropped his weapon and let himself be apprehended. I thought we didn't want cops killing people out of fear or revenge?

Kyle Rittenhouse is not an American hero, or anything close to it. He is a domestic terrorist and is responsible for the death of two innocent protesters.
Lie. They were both felons actively engaged in criminal activity.
 
Look, politics aside- I can't hate a man who drops nonces. Even if he didn't know he was a nonce when he took the shot. Same goes for wife beaters

Too bad, both retards he killed were actual scum, he took out the trash for all I'm concerned. Find another man to demonise like this and I'll maybe give it the time of day.
 
Mixture. He didn't buy the gun, so it doesn't matter if he did so legally or not. There is also no federal minimum age for the purchase or possession of a rifle. There is a minimum age in Wisconsin for the possession of a rifle (but not a handgun, oddly), which means Kyle is guilty of a class A misdemeanor. He could go to prison for a maximum of nine months, at the judge's discretion.

I've corrected this a couple times already but I'll continue to do it until the charge gets thrown out and everyone gets the message since this is the least subjective one of the charges against Kyle. There is no minimum age for possessing a rifle in Wisconsin because rifles and shotguns are excluded from the law he was charged under. Subsection 3C of the law he was charged under states that the section prohibiting under 18s from possessing dangerous weapons does not apply to shotguns and rifles unless it is an SBR/SBS or if under 16 and engaged in hunting without the right permits. That law is intended to cover handguns and ninja weapons (because '80s kung-fu movie parinoia) but is worded stupidly like most laws are. Rekieta even pulled up the law and one of the notes from when it was last updated states explicitly that it is to prevent under 18s from possessing handguns.

Unsupervised possession of a handgun by a person under 18 is illegal everywhere under federal law and pretty much every state has a state level equivalent which is what the law he was charged with is.
 
Still think this isn’t a race thing? I present the example of Philando Castile, a man who was fatally shot by police in 2016. In the video that went viral, Castile’s girlfriend records the altercation as Castile was reaching for his driver’s license and letting the officer know that he had a legal gun. As Castile reached for his I.D., the officer shot him repeatedly, despite the conservatives’ argument that he was “resisting arrest” or that he was “reaching”.

Anyone whose ever watched this video knows this isn't even remotely true.

Castile was told MULTIPLE times to stop reaching into his pants and still reached into his pants

His girlfriend even acknowledged this in an exchange with the officer after he shot him.
 
It really is entertaining to see liberals' recent flop sweat, now that it has dawned on them that there are people in this country outside of their Twitter and dinosaur media echo chambers, and that said people may have comparable numbers to them.
It's more that they thought they could easily win by blaming everything Covid and BLM on Trump, but have realised that people aren't buying the 'mostly peaceful protests' line unless they're already voting Democrat.

They never seem to think about how they simply don't have the numbers, mostly due to an oft-demonstrated unwillingness to compromise and constant purity testing and struggle sessions for anyone not 100% on board.

It gets said here a lot, but it really is startling just how much the current left is emulating the worst traits of the Moral Majority from 30 years ago, but with the added poison of removing any capacity for redemption or forgiveness.
 
The author's Facebook:

She's a Zoomer.

Her other articles:




Such big-brained takes for one so young, only a couple of years older than Kyle Rittenhouse.
 
Last edited:
Kyle while is 17 years old he has a job life guard who stayed at the town this shooting takes place. He actually had job that day and stayed to help community because he thought that was the right thing to do. He had a gun for for safety because of the violent riots but all indicators pointed out his intentions were peaceful. He cleaned graffiti from a scholl and he was asked to help guarding by the owner his two remaining car workshop after the rioters destroyed his car dealership. Kyle put out fires and gave first aid and directions to hospital to anybody in need regardless of side. He has first aid training for as a life guard so he had pretty good idea what he was doing there. He even brought with him his own first aid kit and used disposable glowes for extra hygiene. Alot evidence for this was posted in video by other people before the shooting ever happened.

He shoot people because he was attacked and that did result two people loosing their lifes and one being crippled. Not only was that clearly self defense but he also gave himself up to police twice. How I understood is that first time the police didn't take him because of all the chaos, and they needed all the man power to help the people that got badly hurt just there. Criminals can be tracked but the dead can't be brought back to life principle. Also he was acting as compliant and looking for help from police, so he didn't seem that dangerous let alone crazed shooter probably played part. Even after that Kyle got contact with police at his home town when got home.

This doesn't seem at all like a case of terrorist but a really good young man who had do defend himself. What he should have been there in first place is debatable as the riots are dangerous but he didn't seem to be looking for fight. He was there to help and he did, unfortunately he also had use deadly force to defend himself. Calling Kyle a hero does seem reasonable.
 
Back