For me, avoiding the vaccine is not so much about possible adverse events, nor the tinfoil theory that it is a Trojan Horse for a quantum dot tattoo tracking device (although that does give me the heebie jeebies).
No, it is about not giving the VirusTyrants the satisfaction of making myself their property.
here's a big thunk, what if the vaccine isn't a vaccine? but not in the way you mean, but the other way around? (getting into drain totger territory here, so feel free to skip it)
1. politicians aren't dumb (even we think so, you don't get there being a retard, and even if they are you have the right people on your payroll). so they must know that pumping millions into shit while export and taxes are dropping like bass in a dubstep track, this shit isn't sustainable long term or even short term.
2. corona is a pretty big pile of nothing that would never warrant that effort or investment.
3. the population on the other hand IS dumb, and has been clamoring for a easily understandable magical mcguffin from the start. first it was tests, then masks, now vaccines.
4. you can't just open up everything at this point and walk back and all the crap from the last months. but
any vaccine would be a valid excuse to do so.
so if people want a vaccine that much, why not give it to them? we know by now corona's fatality rate, and no cure is perfect so you'll always have people dying. might as well say the placebo works and is the cause no one gets sick anymore, the remaining deaths are edge cases due to other factors (sound familiar?). it would also be much easier to hide in the long run instead of a pile of corpses or other effects a hardly tested vaccine used widely in the population would have. this way you could open everything back up, which is effectively what people want, and even if someone later comes out and claims it does nothing - who cares, we're long back to normal by then and the goldfish memory of the average population is already sperging about the other "bad thing" the news cycle pushes that week.
Hm, on one hand, there are some great ways to have space efficient interior design now, but on the other hand, those tiny houses are still designed to just spend as little time as possible inside. Would be interesting to try and use all the clever little tricks from the Tiny House movement and apply them in a space-efficient shelter underneath your house. Definitely need a bit more floor space than a Tiny House. They look cozy, but if you have to stay inside for longer periods of time I can't imagine that it's gonna be fun. Have provisions for some sort of physical activity at least.
This may sound weird but I actually love confined spaces. I like to be able to see any entrance and exit to any given room that I'm in.
bunkers are a meme unless they are either impenetrable or secret enough no one will try to get into yours. because when shit hit the fan and society collapses to a point you'd need a bunker, then what? sitting alone in your hole trying to fend of a bunch of desperate former neighbors that didn't prep 24/7? and if you try to keep it secret, are you willing to silence anyone who stumbles over your hidey hole so it doesn't lead to the previous situation? good luck calling the police.
TLDR: when society goes off the rails you want to be as far away as possible from said society. fucking off into the woods is a much easier chance for survival than sitting in a hole (if possible combine both and you're set).
EDIT: forgot to add, if you wanna know what I mean:
https://www.skyhorsepublishing.com/9781510707849/survival/
