Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

[Faalbian]

Does anyone actually think this "louder is funnier", doughy, poodle-haired pedophile apologist is funny? He's just been milking his Dr. Phil appearance for a decade and a half. Every bit of content I've seen from him doesn't even get a chuckle. It's just cringeworthy tryhardism.

Have you ever listened to The Biggest Problem in the Universe? Dick is legit funny for most of it.

I'll say this. I don't like Dick anymore. The thing that did it for me was when Mr Vickers said he would do anything for his daughter, and Dick replied with "Would you suck a dick for her?" Like, who does that? That guy had a legitimate beef with Ethan Ralph and the conflict was between them, and Dick decided to bud in and insult him. A guy he doesn't know and who at that point wasn't even 'in the game'. Even if you don't agree with it, everyone can understand where he's coming from as a parent and Dick was just being a douchebag for no reason and is completely in the wrong.

But then on the other hand, I really don't care about his stance on loli, although everyone here seems to find that inexcusable.

 

[Sped Xing]

But then on the other hand, I really don't care about his stance on loli, although everyone here seems to find that inexcusable.

Everyone here finds it retarded, because his stance is "masturbating to illustrated child porn doesn't make you a pedophile, since it's not illegal in the US."

 

[Toast Sandwich]

He's just been milking his Dr. Phil appearance for a decade and a half.

Not just that but milking the opportunity he was given to sell himself as what people really wanted from Maddox. Maddox in audio and video form fell really short of his early internet written persona, and Dax filled that void in expectations.

He likes to present as if his success is a force of his personality, but it's all an accident. Without Maddox falling short of his prior fandom, Dax easily could have still been cosplaying as a brony once a month on a stage in L.A. for cheap reddit laughs.

 

[WeWuzFinns]

Watching that retard argue with diddler Dax was terrible. Just a pile of bitchlike emotionally driven crap. Dear feeder fared much better against his surrogate father.

 

[Toast Sandwich]

Watching that retard argue with diddler Dax was terrible. Just a pile of bitchlike emotionally driven crap. Dear feeder fared much better against his surrogate father.

There were times when Warski did a great job (for a retard) of being calm and composed, and letting Dax dig himself into looking desperate. Warski's biggest asset right now is that he is so pathetic and feeble that if he can make a halfway decent showing then it looks really bad for the other guy, because the expectation should always be that the other guy should definitively come out on top.

 

[Never Scored]

Let's just agree to cut the BS and admit that e-celebs will frequently use a strong implication to get the outcome they want while avoiding culpability. They do it all the time. There's a long history of it. Even cokehead Warski has the situational awareness as a host to recognize the effect. If Warski can intuit that then Dick can too. It's no mistake when they do something like this and then the expected outcome happens.

Absolutely. I'll admit to laughing when Bibble and Ralph would go on the Killstream and say stuff along the lines of "we definitely don't condone spamming the chat with cuck over and over again when Mundane Matt is streaming" but come on, we all know that's a way of telling people to do it while technically maintaining plausible deniability.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

There were times when Warski did a great job (for a retard) of being calm and composed, and letting Dax dig himself into looking desperate. Warski's biggest asset right now is that he is so pathetic and feeble that if he can make a halfway decent showing then it looks really bad for the other guy, because the expectation should always be that the other guy should definitively come out on top.

The spirit of the Dear Feeder moved through him when he said 'Fuck you, Dax. You're not my real Dad!'

 

[Faalbian]

Everyone here finds it retarded, because his stance is "masturbating to illustrated child porn doesn't make you a pedophile, since it's not illegal in the US."

I think his reasoning is more along the lines of "it's a drawing and no actual children are being abused, so it shouldn't be a crime". Which I don't think is a retarded take per se.

Dax does give of some pedo vibes sometimes though. Not gonna lie.

 

[Sped Xing]

You can think what you like, but my characterization of his insipid arguments is upheld by page after page of documentation in this thread.

 

[Never Scored]

I think his reasoning is more along the lines of "it's a drawing and no actual children are being abused, so it shouldn't be a crime". Which I don't think is a retarded take per se.

Dax does give of some pedo vibes sometimes though. Not gonna lie.

I don't think anyone here's been arguing it should be illegal though. Just that they find it disgusting and anyone who masturbates to drawing of children is still sexually attracted to children and is therefore still a pedo. Is Dax too retarded to understand that pedophilia is a psychiatric term and not a legal one?

 

[Had]

No, I don't follow. It looks pretty conclusive. It's a screenshot of Jesse heavily implying he made a fake Patreon for Madcucks, with his personal Facebook account, in the closed PodAwful group. And the thread has the original Madcucks weighing in.

Here is Jesse's reply to the n-word thing plus supposedly what got him kicked off Patreon

https://twitter.com/OnlineRetard/status/1301808011481055232?s=20

 

[break these cuffs]

It's absolutely a retarded take because in making this point, he's trying to redefine "pedophilia" as being the act of abusing a child, all as a cope so he won't have to admit his friend and fellow grifter fits the dictionary definition of "pedophile". I've seen this same argument he's making here from other brainlets and they're always doing the same mental gymnastics. It's pretty much a natural human instinct to want to see pedophiles and child molesters hanged or at least jailed, but how do you reconcile basic morality with the fact that half your internet friends openly jerk off to drawings of children?

It's easy for Dax because he believes that whatever he thinks is acceptable in the moment is correct no matter how stupid or contradictory it is. He doesn't have any sort of coherent set of beliefs beyond that.

 

[Sped Xing]

When you have to go full @BoxerShorts47 to keep your friends, it's time to cut ties.

 

[Faalbian]

It's absolutely a retarded take because in making this point, he's trying to redefine "pedophilia" as being the act of abusing a child, all as a cope so he won't have to admit his friend and fellow grifter fits the dictionary definition of "pedophile". I've seen this same argument he's making here from other brainlets and they're always doing the same mental gymnastics. It's pretty much a natural human instinct to want to see pedophiles and child molesters hanged or at least jailed, but how do you reconcile basic morality with the fact that half your internet friends openly jerk off to drawings of children?

I don't want to call you out @BIG_BRAD. I like your posts here and your shitposting in the Dickshow Reddit. But I do think you are being disingenious.

In the first sentence you're implying Dick is doing this to justify his friendship with Digibro, but in the last sentence you're saying 'half of his internet friends jerk off to drawings of children'. Who besides Digibro (and his girlfriend) are friends of his that are into this shit? My perception is that most of his 'internet friends' disapprove of what he's saying. Null, Rekieta, Warski, etc. have all spoken out against it.

Also, you're saying it's basic human instinct to want to see pedo's and child molesters killed or jailed, and I agree with that if we're talking about an actual child abuser. But someone who jerks it to loli is not on that same level degeneracy.

View attachment 1571488View attachment 1571489

https://twitter.com/OnlineRetard/status/1301808011481055232?s=20

I wasn't implying the Madcucks impersonation/n-word thing lead to him getting kicked from Patreon. I was just replying to that guy who didn't believe Jesse impersonated Madcucks' Patreon in the first place because there was no proof. There seems to be evidence of that (i.e. Jesse more or less admitting it himself).

 

[Kenobi]

Polcompass time!

 

[Sped Xing]

Jerking off to loli and jerking off to Guernica are the same fetish.

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

As I recall, Jesse got booted for making a fake Madcux patreon.

It's entirely possible for everyone involved to be a stupid, unfunny faggot.

I have noted a lot of people online think "I told a lie and someone believed me" is a joke.

Dick brags about shitting his pants all the time. Are you his capo, Gustav?

Does anyone actually think this "louder is funnier", doughy, poodle-haired pedophile apologist is funny? He's just been milking his Dr. Phil appearance for a decade and a half. Every bit of content I've seen from him doesn't even get a chuckle. It's just cringeworthy tryhardism.

The C U Next Tuesday guide to comedy:

- I was only “pretending” to be retarded
- Louder is funnier
- Pissing and shitting your pants is funny
- Anything legal is fair game and anything else is a wink and a nod
- Double down and when that fails, triple down
- Any hole is a goal

Even the really shitty Vince Offer-style comedy shoots higher than this. I’m not surprised that it’s almost all a rationalization of just sticking their dicks in whatever they feel like. That’s the only way this type of comedy actually makes sense.

 

[Unog]

I think his reasoning is more along the lines of "it's a drawing and no actual children are being abused, so it shouldn't be a crime". Which I don't think is a retarded take per se.

Yes, that is his reasoning.

The problem is that it has nothing to do with what he originally got shit on for and what people here are saying is so bad.

The original premise was that Digibro, and people who are sexually aroused by lolicon and whatnot in general, are pedophiles because pedophilia is the sexual attraction to children. Dax was arguing that no, it doesn't make Digibro or anyone else like him a pedophile, because it's not actual children that they're fantasizing about.

Or at least he was arguing that until it occurred to him how fucking indefensible it was, and has since tried to rewrite what happened into what you described above, the old "should drawn child porn be legal or not" internet argument. It was never about legality until he at one point very stupidly tried to say that people shouldn't morally judge people who masturbate to such shit because there's nothing legally wrong with doing so. Which had people respond with the rebuttals to such an idiotic statement that you'd expect.

 

[Sped Xing]

Imagine a libertarian using whether or not the state allows something to determine its morality.

 

[Faalbian]

The original premise was that Digibro, and people who are sexually aroused by lolicon and whatnot in general, are pedophiles because pedophilia is the sexual attraction to children. Dax was arguing that no, it doesn't make Digibro or anyone else like him a pedophile, because it's not actual children that they're fantasizing about.

Did he argue that? I don't remember that. But if that is legit his argument than I will agree that that's retarded.