- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
Squaw Chattering-Magpie here seems pretty unchill for a stoner.
Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging
- Thread starter José Mourinho
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2020
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2018
No, I think women lie about rape because there's been so many times where a woman has lied about rape.
Like every national news case seems like a result of a woman lying about it.
Like every national news case seems like a result of a woman lying about it.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2019
“If you try to argue against X that just means you’re secretly a racist/homophobe/rapist/pedophile/etc.”
Does it ever occur to these people there are less cynical reasons for someone to against or for a cause?
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
This should go without saying, but saying that "White people invented homophobia and that's what made them more successful" is absolutely fucking retarded. Let's ignore the woke revisionist history for a moment and address the giant flaw in their argument: the actual, tangible reason Europeans were generally more successful than the rest of the world is because they rolled a natural 20 on resources. For instance, Europe had access to all the best livestock (cows, chickens, horses, etc.), while Africa and the Americas had jack-shit by comparison. Furthermore, Europe had higher quality metals than the Far-East, Japan in particular. That answer makes far more sense as to how Europeans succeeded over the competition as opposed to saying stupid shit like "Whitey brainwashed Pea Oh Seas into being not gay and that SOMEHOW made them a more successful civilization."
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
This is a discredited Guns Germs & Steel tier argument. Europe is actually very resource-poor compared to Africa and China. Africans notably have the same livestock and better surface resources than European Whites. Which is actually part of their problem. You don't need to evolve cognitive talents or advanced social organization to survive in an Edenic paradise in the Tropics. The selection pressures in Africa and in Europe were towards different things, and ultimately we have Eurasians because of those selection pressures.
Fractal Lifeform
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
This argument "White people invented homophobia and that's what made them more successful" is retarded. If Homophobia leads to success, why is homophobia wrong again?
Also, Romans were hella gay and they conquered so much. So, no.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
Not to be that guy, but there's actually at least some truth to the Guns, Germs, & Steel argument even if it does get oversimplified by a lot of people. It's true that Africa had much of the same livestock as Europe and Asia except for the one species that counted the most: Horses.
Horses were one of the biggest reasons why Europeans and Asians more or less "won" the game of civilization in addition to other environmental and evolutionary factors. Keep in mind that the resources in Africa were more abundant than in Europe but are mostly in the harsher interior of the continent where it's extremely difficult to develop a civilization beyond the small tribal level
The "Tropical Eden" is mostly a thing for the coastal and island areas of tropical regions. As you get further inland, the tropics become less "Garden of Eden" and more "Cannibal Holocaust" and that's where the environment really starts to fuck with the development and evolution of human societies.
Tellingly, the only regions of Sub-Saharan Africa that had societies more complex than small tribes were generally in coastal areas and near major trade routes. Ethiopia is a prime example of this, being centered on the eastern coast of Africa and taking part in extensive trade with the Middle East since ancient times.
As were the Greeks and the Celts. Fuck, the Celtic peoples were even gayer than the Greeks or the Romans. Even the Germanic peoples tolerated homosexuality up to a point provided you toughed it out and fathered a son as well.
If any people can be credited with inventing homophobia, it's the Jews. The Israelites (of which the Jews were one tribe among twelve) were the first people to truly have a blanket ban on any kind of homosexuality. The Christian concepts of degeneracy are largely derived from the laws found in the Torah.
If you really think about it, Christianity is one of the Torah's three bastard daughters, the others being Islam and Judaism, although you could count atheism as well since atheism probably would not exist if it weren't for the dominance and austerity of Abrahamic monotheism.
The only reason why homosexuality became completely taboo in European society is because of Christianity, a Semitic religion. Yes, Jewish subversion of European White culture is really that old. The Edict of Milan is by far the most successful example of it.
The Church Fathers were more or less the Frankfurt School of the Greco-Roman world if we're being honest with ourselves. (((Traditionalists))) hate hearing that though.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2017
Serious, honest question: Why couldn't they domesticate and selectively breed zebras?
Was there NO equivalent to horses for beasts of burden? I know they had their versions of goats.
Why couldn't gazelles or wildabeasts be domesticated?
Sure, Europe had horses, but weren't those largely brought over from Arabia?
What about China? They had horses, so did the Mongols.
I mean, Europe had some pretty goddamn severe weather and some pretty severe geography, but what about Africa made it so you couldn't domesticate the equivalent of oxen and horses?
I mean, the fucking Vietnamese and Koreans were able to domesticate water buffalo, and those places were basically Green Hell with slanted eyes.
Fractal Lifeform
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Yep. I'm no actual conservative nor am I religious. I'm an apatheist. I honestly don't care about God or religion.
I found atheists and their raging cringy cause they are so militant but they served as a balance against the religious. But now, we know that they were never really against religions in of themselves. They just hated Christianity, likely cause personal issues which makes them all pathetic to me.
I was for gay marriage and acceptance of gays by society even though I didn't really care for the pride parades cause I didn't believe in the Slippery Slope and I found the idea of end of civilization to be nonsense cause many ancient cultures had gay in them and lasted for thousands of years without issue. And yet reality disappoints me cause the slippery slope has been proven true. And there is other shit that made me go "Oh my god, the evangelicals were right!!!!!"
And well that caused me to see the left for what they really are now.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
Horses are believed to have entered Europe from both Arabia and Central Asia in the Stone Age and as for why Africa never had horses, it's because zebras can't be domesticated. Even with the modern knowledge of animal husbandry and selective breeding, nobody's ever been able to successfully domesticate the zebra.
I do think parts of Sub-Saharan Africa had oxen prior to the arrival of the Europeans, although I'm unsure if they were domesticated locally or if they were originally imported from the Middle East or North Africa.
One of the biggest reasons why the coastal kingdoms and city-states sold chattel slaves to the Europeans and Turks was so they could exchange the slaves for horses.
Hey, I feel the same way on a lot of things and I honestly think the only reason why the whole slippery slope thing has been proven true is because the left has actively gone out of their way to make it a reality.
When you realize that a lot of the unique positions of the Woke Left are rooted in or at least are heavily influenced by a wider generational backlash against the Religious Right, it starts to make more sense why they take the ridiculous stances they do. The Millennial and Early Zoomer Left have been so consumed by their "Fuck You Dad!" mentality that they saw the slippery slope doomer antics of the Religious Right and the strawman villains depicted in Chick Tracts and The 700 Club as something to aspire to.
The Woke Left more or less saw the anti-Christian strawmen in Religious Right propaganda and rhetoric as something worth making into a reality. The communist subversion of academia and the crippling effects of the Great Recession on the most college-educated generation in American history were merely dumping a tanker of jet fuel onto an already blazing trash fire.
Last edited:
Fractal Lifeform
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Possible. The thing though is that even in the 1970s we had feminists advocate for Eugenics and destruction of male groups which is what they are doing now but feminists cry when men enter their groups.
Basically, this shit has been likely going on for longer then we suspect. I don't care for Trump but I do thank him for making the leftists reveal themselves. If he had not won in 2016, the leftists would have quietly continued their victory after victory and we would not be the wiser until pedo acceptance came into being and some of us would finally wake up and go wtf?!!!!!!! but it would have been too late.
At this point, I don't believe that the left really want equality nor do I believe that feminists want equality. They want power and supremacy.
Same with the insane LBGTQ+++. Seriously, what kind of fucked up message does one get from saying that Homophobia leads to success? Lets say that this is true, then why would homophobia be a bad thing then? These people constantly decry how oppressed they are and how society holds them down but if they were just homophobic, then they would be successful! Which means they don't want to be successful, they want to be failures to eternally rage about it.
As a society, there is something deeply wrong. How has it come that we have seemingly so many men working but have no future prospects of no family, no children and all they have as a future is to be paypigs to ethots?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
True, the hardcore misandrist/lesbian supremacist feminists go back to the late 60's and 70's but I think a lot of that has to do with the Soviet active measures regarding American academia in the 1950's and 1960's that eventually became self-sustaining (ironically after the USSR fell) and most of the insane elements of the Left were largely confined to academic circles until around the start of the 21st Century.
The Millennials are the most college-educated of any generation in American history but given how badly misinformed a lot of them were, the majority got their degrees in worthless fields that were usually the most compromised by the active measures of the Cold War. They were told their entire lives that a college degree was needed to succeed but weren't told some degrees were worth a lot more than others.
Combine the over-abundance of college-educated Millennials with the burning hatred that so many of them had for the Religious Right of their childhood and teenage years and you've got the petty vengeful mindset of the Woke Left becoming the norm.
The fact that the Religious Right happened to have their last years of power and influence in the Bush era likely also played a role in this as well, since Bush's administration was one of the worst in the post-WWII era.
The combination of compromised and deranged academic leftists, an entire generation that was already pissed off at their fundie parents and grandparents or were pissed off at how badly Bush was fucking things up along with that generation not only getting totally indoctrinated by the deranged academic leftists but also getting largely ratfucked by a massive economic recession and its aftereffects while an administration of corporatist neoliberals that mostly saw them as the perfect useful idiots all led to the Woke Left of today.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
If anything I would argue it was oxen, but oxen aren't unique to Europe. The ox-cart and pulled plow made civilized, agricultural life possible across Eurasia and Mediterranean Africa. Horses are good for fast travel from town to town, but were of little consequence to many civilized societies because they can't be made to do serious work. The Greeks, for example, spent much of their history running their messages from city to city on foot and delivering goods by ox-cart. Horses were a war animal when they did become commonplace. That's because Oxen will pull strongly against a load if they feel a snag, never faltering, but if a horse gets snagged on a load it can get spooked and hurt itself in the harness. They're really skittish animals and not suited for the labor that produces cities and a dense society.
And yet despite having access to domesticated oxen for thousands of years, Sub-Saharan Africans never invented the wheel. Nor the plow. We're talking about a people who are fundamentally intellectually impoverished. They were never going to make it no matter how good of a start they had.
This paper provides a good overview of the history of animal traction in Africa, in various regions. The tl;dr is that only the parts which were in contact with the outside developed the agricultural base necessary for structured societies.
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2018
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
"Sit down, shut up, let me scream at you and give me things or you're a racist."
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2020
Most people tend to consider random assholes screaming at their faces to be just that: random assholes. And the assholes wonder why they're surrounded by racists.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2018
You do such a great job finding this shit tell me do you see a pattern cause I'm picking up most of these clowns are a bunch of 1/64th East Coast mutts and not say Apaches, Navajo or Hopis from the Southwest is it just cause they think they're entitled to their own two bedroom in Manhattan cause they had a great great great paw-paw in the family?