U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
I get communists keep masquerading as '''''press''''' to throw police off and catch them out for doing basic work, but how come police aren't allowed to demand evidence there? Credentials? Fraudulently claiming immunity or neutrality when you're clearly accessory to a hostile faction should be treated with extreme prejudice
If some terrorist has a blog, he or she is technically "press." Press credentials are self-generated and there's no database to check them against. The first amendment as well ensures that any citizen can be press and be just as legitimate as any trained journalist.
 
I get communists keep masquerading as '''''press''''' to throw police off and catch them out for doing basic work, but how come police aren't allowed to demand evidence there? Credentials? Fraudulently claiming immunity or neutrality when you're clearly accessory to a hostile faction should be treated with extreme prejudice
Because there is no legal standard for "press" in the US (for good reason).
Antifa already did the "we will make our own credentials" then cry when police don't "respect them" as we are the first in line to enter the Federal Courthouse barriers.

The best way to not get arrested by the police as a jouranlist is to 1) Not break the law 2) Not embed your self with the protesters rioters, 3) obey all lawful orders issued by the police.
 
I get communists keep masquerading as '''''press''''' to throw police off and catch them out for doing basic work, but how come police aren't allowed to demand evidence there? Credentials? Fraudulently claiming immunity or neutrality when you're clearly accessory to a hostile faction should be treated with extreme prejudice
Being "press" doesn't mean you can just break the law with impunity. Journalists can't interfere with arrests or violate lawful orders either.
 
Try anywhere outside of a city in a blue state. Even the rural areas around places like Portland are just barely off of being 50-50 left and right.
50-50 left and right of the countryside around Portland may be accurate, but that has nothing to do with more than 50% of people supporting communism. There are people all over the political spectrum that have this white guilt communism in their hearts and I feel like it's a much bigger threat than we realize right now.

It's like, in the 30th century AD, I'm sure it'd be difficult to imagine Rome being a Christian empire. But it happened. The same applies to America and communism. It transcends a lot of structures we already have in place.
 
I could be biased based on where I live but I feel like more than 50% of American adults support radical communism. I'm sure at least 25% of Americans support violent purges in support of communistic ideas.
i'd say it's probably closer to the number of americans that use twitter (like 5-10%) that support radical communism, if that. everyone else is getting dragged along because shit like "black lives matter" sounds good on a surface level, and they don't understand to what ends that means is being used.

But... that doesn't make sense. Things like Soy work as a sort of universal jab because the group at large has an almost obscene fascination with the product. Thus, its jabbing at a commonality, while also having some backing in a factional note that ti raises estrogen in men.

Chicken Tenders are loved by a lot more than just them, and is... not even a commonality. It fails literally every metric of a good jab, and makes the person saying it sound like they have some sort of cognitive issue themselves considering they are the ones using kiddy language.




This would work... ifthe phrase was "Chicken Nuggets"
. "Tendies" though is just infantalized language towards a separate product entirely.
think of it in the same vein as minstrel shows, the person in question is mocking a fictitious NEET that never grew up. "tendies" or "nuggies" is just an additional element to show how childish the full grown adult that is the subject of the stories is.

1599266582408.png
 
i'd say it's probably closer to the number of americans that use twitter (like 5-10%) that support radical communism, if that. everyone else is getting dragged along because shit like "black lives matter" sounds good on a surface level, and they don't understand to what ends that means is being used.
I really believe that if you asked 50 random Americans if they supported communism, you'd get at least 25 supporters. This is an invisible enemy.
 
I really believe that if you asked 50 random Americans if they supported communism, you'd get at least 25 supporters. This is an invisible enemy.
you really need to move out of your city if you genuinely believe that. it's absolutely an 'invisible enemy,' there's a reason school districts don't want parents knowing what they're teaching their children, but i genuinely doubt that the vast majority of americans support or would tolerate communism. and anyone who knows what it's actually like instead of being a retarded shill for it would never want communism.

especially because a lot of things that people genuinely like, like being able to sell their nudes on onlyfans to make a comfortable living, are Peak Capitalism.
 
If some terrorist has a blog, he or she is technically "press." Press credentials are self-generated and there's no database to check them against. The first amendment as well ensures that any citizen can be press and be just as legitimate as any trained journalist.
If anyone can be press doesn't that open the powers of the press (i.e. attempting to obstruct state actors, rally mobs, distract officers) to serious abuse? We're dealing with millions of citizens infected with a mind plague that makes them assume the absolute worst of intentions out of law enforcement no matter what. Their thought leaders encourage this. The leaders want to abuse such freedoms until the state clamps down on this openly duplicitous behaviour-- and then treat the response as a rallying point for feigned oppression.
Activists like the girl in that clip feel empowered to get in the way all the time, and are only saved from total self-ruin by the cops knowing these people are just unthinking useful idiots themselves.

Being "press" doesn't mean you can just break the law with impunity. Journalists can't interfere with arrests or violate lawful orders either.
Because there is no legal standard for "press" in the US (for good reason).
Antifa already did the "we will make our own credentials" then cry when police don't "respect them" as we are the first in line to enter the Federal Courthouse barriers.

The best way to not get arrested by the police as a jouranlist is to 1) Not break the law 2) Not embed your self with the protesters rioters, 3) obey all lawful orders issued by the police.
I get that but these activists exploit the obvious PR disaster for police if they lay a finger on any such alleged 'journalist'.
Could you imagine the yarn the New York Times would spin if those officers arrested those girls on the freeway? They'd unironically say TRUMP is fabricating a police state in real time, even if they weren't even journalists.

What would kiwifarms do to fix this? I feel snookered but surely the forum could crowdsource a solution.
 
i'd say it's probably closer to the number of americans that use twitter (like 5-10%) that support radical communism, if that. everyone else is getting dragged along because shit like "black lives matter" sounds good on a surface level, and they don't understand to what ends that means is being used.


think of it in the same vein as minstrel shows, the person in question is mocking a fictitious NEET that never grew up. "tendies" or "nuggies" is just an additional element to show how childish the full grown adult that is the subject of the stories is.

View attachment 1572644
I understand the INTENT just fine, but a minstrel show only works because it is mocking things which correlate to the real world. A jester mocked the king because it gave him a different perspective. If your jab doesn't correlate to something in the real world, something which is a commonality such as, for example, soy.... its not a good one.

Or, to put it simply, if the purpose is to show how childish they are... you need it to actually link to something childish they as a group actually DO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back