Found this poking around some archives I had, this is a response to a response to a tweet by Kamala in support of making "lynching" a federal hate crime. So this guy is supporting what Kamala is suggesting and specifically replying to the obvious counterpoint: "murder is already illegal".
I had never really understood the obsession with criminalizing lynching specifically decades after it stopped being and thing, outside of gay ideological wins that mean nothing but energize the footsoldiers.
This guy had a take that is potentially explanatory and terrifying given what these people think constitutes a "hate crime".
View attachment 1572825
So, commit hate crime, get land and other property civil asset forfeitured appears to be the scenario he's jerking it to.
I did some googling, but wasn't able to find a good answer to whether this is at all true as the law is currently implemented. That said, this may explain some of the obsession people on the left have with making things hate crimes.
If anyone has any insight to whether this guy is full of shit or not I'd appreciate it, google was being a cruel mistress when I tried looking into this as there's a lot of law dealing with forfeiture which muddies things.