Richard C. Kyanka v. Ashley K. Martin (2020) - Lowtax's second divorce

[I can't imagine]

There is a 0.00% chance Rich is selling or losing his pills. If he says he is allergic then he is a liar, because addicts lie about everything to keep the supply coming and to convice everyone that they are not an addict.

I have seen Rich on his GG streams, I have heard his voice and his shortness of breath, and I have witnessed his downward spiral for a year. This is classic opioid addiction behavior. He hit the tipping point where you lose control of the addiction and his spike in abusive behavior is another sign as well. Percocet Rage is a real thing.

Rich is an opiod addict.

I think everyone here knows that. The humor value is that he's lied himself into a corner in a court of law, and all the possible ways out of it will make him look worse than if he'd just admitted he had a drug problem. His main options now are to: deny that he's dealing drugs, and claim he's hoarding pills for...reasons (no judge will buy that one); say he really meant that he didn't like taking them and only used them when he really needed them (which, quite frankly, every family court judge in existence has heard before and never believes); or admit that he lied and give a half-assed explanation (which makes him a liar and, as above, will still make the judge think he's an addict). I suppose he could theoretically claim he actually is giving/selling the drugs to someone else, but that's such an absurdly stupid option that I don't think even he would use it.

So, in summary, the net result of his lying is that he'll still look like a junkie, but he'll also look like a liar. Because, y'know, he is a junkie and a liar. Still...not exactly an optimal position to be in during a custody battle.

 

[Ghostse]

I think everyone here knows that. The humor value is that he's lied himself into a corner in a court of law, and all the possible ways out of it will make him look worse than if he'd just admitted he had a drug problem. His main options now are to: deny that he's dealing drugs, and claim he's hoarding pills for...reasons (no judge will buy that one); say he really meant that he didn't like taking them and only used them when he really needed them (which, quite frankly, every family court judge in existence has heard before and never believes); or admit that he lied and give a half-assed explanation (which makes him a liar and, as above, will still make the judge think he's an addict). I suppose he could theoretically claim he actually is giving/selling the drugs to someone else, but that's such an absurdly stupid option that I don't think even he would use it.

So, in summary, the net result of his lying is that he'll still look like a junkie, but he'll also look like a liar. Because, y'know, he is a junkie and a liar. Still...not exactly an optimal position to be in during a custody battle.

He'll weasel out of it.
I can also promise you the weasel will look something like this:

"Well your honor, my client is allergic to SOME opioids, but not to Oxycotin. Because my client has a valid script, the lab report left off opioids as levels were within margin of error for my clients prescription. My client is a retard and didn't realize Oxycotin was an opioid as we are not trained medical personnel."

Which then Team Maple/Dana Outlaw would then have prove Lowtax isn't a retard, and that isn't happening. However it'll be clear to everyone what was really going on, and any further claims - especially medical ones - from Lowtax are going to be met with a much higher degree of scrutiny, as he's been forced to admit he's a retard.

 

[MirnaMinkoff]

He'll weasel out of it.
I can also promise you the weasel will look something like this:

"Well your honor, my client is allergic to SOME opioids, but not to Oxycotin. Because my client has a valid script, the lab report left off opioids as levels were within margin of error for my clients prescription. My client is a retard and didn't realize Oxycotin was an opioid as we are not trained medical personnel."

Which then Team Maple/Dana Outlaw would then have prove Lowtax isn't a retard, and that isn't happening. However it'll be clear to everyone what was really going on, and any further claims - especially medical ones - from Lowtax are going to be met with a much higher degree of scrutiny, as he's been forced to admit he's a retard.

If he behaved like a decent human being then he might be able to get away with it, but he doesn’t. He also has scripts for a benzo, Adderall, anti-depressants, tramadol on top of the real opiates he gets that he won’t discuss and is “allergic too.”

Legal or not a person taking benzos and opiates is a big red flag. I’d bet the scripts come from different doctors because only pill mills risk Rx’ing that combo due to the overdose risk. But Rich goes above and beyond by putting pharmaceutical speed on top of all of this. He is basically abusing every class Schedule II drug. He’s managed to get pharmaceutical grade equivalents to almost every popular illegal drug. Plus it’s documented he tops it all off with booze. Every script he takes has been ass warnings about not mixing alcohol with it.

He’s fucked. Even if he can prove he has a legal script for all his drugs he’s still taking opiates, benzos, speed and booze. No judge is going to think a person taking that many intoxicating drugs should supervise a toddler, especially when he claims his back is so bad he can sit or get out of bed (when it’s convenient). The cherry on top is domestic violence reports with a new young girlfriend he moved into the home as a “caretaker”and stated is a mentally ill, bi-polar, alcoholic. Sure sounds like a dad making responsible decisions for the well-being of his small child.

They could let him save face by letting him agree to partial custody with supervised visits (ala grandma or sis) due to his “crippling back pain” but Rich won’t allow that since the whole issue is about paying child support. I’m sure if Ashley could offer to forego any child support if Rich would relinquish all claims to custody, he’d do it.

 

[Fareal]

I also want to underline how incredibly fucking bad it looks that the police assisted Ashli and the small child involved to flee to a domestic violence shelter.

Actually fleeing to a shelter is a serious step and the court views that differently from showing up in the course of divorce proceedings with historical abuse accusations that are difficult to substantiate. If you got your ass together and ran, you also have some supporting evidence from shelter workers or police that you were in a dangerous situation. If the police have bought your allegations of violence and your fear for your safety, the court probably will too.

There‘s kind of a rule of thumb that a good parent doesn’t drive their kids into a DV shelter. This plus the oxy question starts to paint a picture and it’s not pretty.

 

[MirnaMinkoff]

I’m sure Rich will try to petition for a greatly reduced child support amount since his income had radically dropped since the original paperwork was filed. The judge will want to know why he’s now making $100,000 less a year.

I’d love to hear him explain the chick he cheated with and moved into his home accused him of domestic violence causing him to lose 85% of donations to the Lowtax charity fund...and rant how that’s totally unjust, she’s just a bi-polar alcoholic and he will be vindicated in Sept but that won’t change the income situation.

 

[AnOminous]

I’m sure Rich will try to petition for a greatly reduced child support amount since his income had radically dropped since the original paperwork was filed. The judge will want to know why he’s now making $100,000 less a year.

I’d love to hear him explain the chick he cheated with and moved into his home accused him of domestic violence causing him to lose 85% of donations to the Lowtax charity fund...and rant how that’s totally unjust, she’s just a bi-polar alcoholic and he will be vindicated in Sept but that won’t change the income situation.

But she's just a lying WHORE, like the WHORE in the domestic violence shelter, and that other WHORE before her. Why can't these stupid judges understand that these whores are all just liars?

 

[break these cuffs]

The hearing on the temporary restraining order filed by The Outlaw was scheduled for 8:45am this morning. Am I correct in assuming this hearing is to determine whether or not the temp order should be made a full order of protection? I can't wait to see how Richard gets vindicated today!

 

[Leonard Helplessness]

Welp.

 

[break these cuffs]

View attachment 1561505
Welp.

It makes sense it would be rescheduled for the same day at the divorce hearing. That's at 9:00am. I will admit that I'm not to happy about getting cockblocked out of Lowtax facebook blubbering.

 

[Leonard Helplessness]

It makes sense it would be rescheduled for the same day at the divorce hearing. That's at 9:00am. I will admit that I'm not to happy about getting cockblocked out of Lowtax facebook blubbering.

Don’t hold your breath for the 9th; it looks like a motion for continuance may be in the works as well.

 

[break these cuffs]

Don’t hold your breath for the 9th; it looks like a motion for continuance may be in the works as well.

Would they really schedule a continuance date for a second hearing on a date that already has a hearing if they were just planning to continue to continue the original hearing as well? The motion from Ashlii counsel for continuance was filed the 25th. Who am I kidding? The courts are retarded. Of course they would.

 

[waffle]

They're probably going to hear the restraining order on the 9th and then also set a new trial date while everyone is there with their calendars. If the court just picks a date out of a hat then there's a good chance it'll double book a lawyer and have to be changed, so it's easier to just do it once when everyone is around.

 

[Beavis]

Gah now lowtax has to wait nine more days for VINDICATION.

 

[Null]

Information on case number 1916-FC11146 - RICHARD C KYANKA V ASHLEY K MARTIN has been added or updated. Please see the details below:


Docket Entries that have been made or updated on this case.

Filing Date	Description	Text *	Last Activity Date
9/4/20 12:46 PM	Motion for Attorney's Fees	Motion for Attorney Fees and Fee Allowance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.	9/4/20 2:28 PM
9/4/20 12:46 PM	Proposed Order Filed	Order for Fees and Fee Allowance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.	9/4/20 2:28 PM
9/4/20 2:12 PM	Motion for Protective Order	Motion for Protective Order; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.	9/4/20 4:07 PM
9/4/20 2:12 PM	Proposed Order Filed	Order for Protective Order; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.	9/4/20 4:07 PM

Bench trial is in 3 days and this is the 3rd protective order she has filed for. She's also filing for fees. I'm guessing she filed protective orders for both children and now Ashley specifically.

Bench trial means this man is the person who gets to decide how utterly fucked LowT is

 

[Beavis]

Sorry to nitpick, but lowtax has three kids. Everyone seems to forget about the second daughter he has with his first wife.

 

[break these cuffs]

Sorry to nitpick, but lowtax has three kids. Everyone seems to forget about the second daughter he has with his first wife.

Speaking of, a meeting for Megan's custody case is scheduled for 10/13.

Why would the GAL be filing for only one of Megan's children in Ashley's case? Could these newest POs be against Rich and Momtax for Ashley? Given Momtax's abuse of the immigration process and the emails she's allegedly been sending, I don't think it's out of the question that she'd get a PO as well. Who knows what she has been doing.

 

[sperginity]

Speaking of, a meeting for Megan's custody case is scheduled for 10/13.
View attachment 1575966

Why would the GAL be filing for only one of Megan's children in Ashley's case? Could these newest POs be against Rich and Momtax for Ashley? Given Momtax's abuse of the immigration process and the emails she's allegedly been sending, I don't think it's out of the question that she'd get a PO as well. Who knows what she has been doing.

Maybe it is a mistake, or maybe they already agreed that the unnamed child won't have visitation so it isn't necessary. I am sure it will come up at the hearing.

 

[Sabrina]

Speaking of, a meeting for Megan's custody case is scheduled for 10/13.
View attachment 1575966

Why would the GAL be filing for only one of Megan's children in Ashley's case? Could these newest POs be against Rich and Momtax for Ashley? Given Momtax's abuse of the immigration process and the emails she's allegedly been sending, I don't think it's out of the question that she'd get a PO as well. Who knows what she has been doing.

It was Lowtax that was sending emails to Ashli and Momtax was threatening to pull out of his case over it.

I have no doubt however that she could also be sending messages to her however since Logan claimed Momtax was sending her messages asking about her Facebook posts.

And yeah there are 3 kids, 2 with Megan. Two moms, 3 kids, how many restraining orders?

 

[break these cuffs]

It was Lowtax that was sending emails to Ashli and Momtax was threatening to pull out of his case over it.

I have no doubt however that she could also be sending messages to her however since Logan claimed Momtax was sending her messages asking about her Facebook posts.

And yeah there are 3 kids, 2 with Megan. Two moms, 3 kids, how many restraining orders?

There are a total of 3 POs in Ashley's case. The original one filed Aug. 25th we know was filed for Sloane thanks to his social media blubbering. Then there was one filed Aug. 28th and another Sept. 4th. There have been none filed in Megan's case.

 

[AnOminous]

Information on case number 1916-FC11146 - RICHARD C KYANKA V ASHLEY K MARTIN has been added or updated. Please see the details below:


Docket Entries that have been made or updated on this case.

Filing Date	Description	Text *	Last Activity Date
9/4/20 12:46 PM	Motion for Attorney's Fees	Motion for Attorney Fees and Fee Allowance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.	9/4/20 2:28 PM
9/4/20 12:46 PM	Proposed Order Filed	Order for Fees and Fee Allowance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.	9/4/20 2:28 PM
9/4/20 2:12 PM	Motion for Protective Order	Motion for Protective Order; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.	9/4/20 4:07 PM
9/4/20 2:12 PM	Proposed Order Filed	Order for Protective Order; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.	9/4/20 4:07 PM

Bench trial is in 3 days and this is the 3rd protective order she has filed for. She's also filing for fees. I'm guessing she filed protective orders for both children and now Ashley specifically.

Bench trial means this man is the person who gets to decide how utterly fucked LowT is
View attachment 1575727

Nice to see that GameStop kid grew up well.

There are a total of 3 POs in Ashley's case. The original one filed Aug. 25th we know was filed for Sloane thanks to his social media blubbering. Then there was one filed Aug. 28th and another Sept. 4th. There have been none filed in Megan's case.

The order of the motions is somewhat interesting. Apparently the other two could wait a few days.

Or they came up during the course of the litigation, like LowT started harassing the ex and/or his social media chimpouts had to be stopped.

Three days until TOTAL VINDICATION CONTINUATION.