Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

Why do socialists always make Nazis out to be a big deal of all the players in WW2? The Nazis were socialists, and almost every despot in WW2 was a Communist, except for Mussolini who invented his own ideology, but it's always Nazis when it comes to socialists.
Because Muh Nazi’s are ashkually Fascist and you are a Nazi if you say otherwise, as Vaush would say
 
Vaush continues in the clip by apologizing for his words in the clip but only to Kimberly. He further states that he doesn't care what she thinks since she's a Republican and that all online conservatives don't actually care. When questioned about giving an apology to offended leftists, he gives off a shrug apology.

That was the most pathetic non apology ever. He didn't even bothered to say her name even though he admits seen her tweet and having her name displayed in there. Same thing when he "aplogized' to Poppy in a lengthy Reddit post he goes through extreme lenghts to make it about him, and inform everyone how he was taken out of context or how he has done oh so many wonderful things for the left but he never ever truly apologizes. Pretty telling considering his audience is composed of people that are pro deplatforming and cancelling wrong think.
 
Vaush has probably said more and worse racist and sexist shit on stream than most of the conservatives he's criticized.
Reminder that he did a video on getting laid before where he basically just said to make unwarranted sexual comments to women and point blank ask them if they wanna fuck, pretty sure I archived the whole thing in this thread somewhere.
 
Vaush has probably said more and worse racist and sexist shit on stream than most of the conservatives he's criticized.
Reminder that he did a video on getting laid before where he basically just said to make unwarranted sexual comments to women and point blank ask them if they wanna fuck, pretty sure I archived the whole thing in this thread somewhere.

:story:

The quality of woman he attracts seems to oscillate between Captain Caveman and amorphous blobs, so I have no doubt this works for him.
 
I'm a lefty and honestly finding about him has made me... very suspicious of the left. Most people I know don't like him, which is reassuring, but the subsection of socialists or liberals that do like him make me constantly rethink where my politics lie. This is the first month in years where I've actually wanted to build coalitions with people across the political spectrum because I think it would be valuable in snuffing out pedos and real racists.

I think Vaush is wrong. I genuinely don't think most conservatives are racists at all. I do think he is one though. The way he speaks about black peoples' bodies, hair, attitudes makes me think that 100% of his comments are just projection.

So yes, 100%, I agree with you. He is a boon for the right/centre and possibly the far left. He is basically just the amalgamation of every crony capitalist neoliberal wetdream: a rich Californian sexpest with daddy's money who says terrible shit about average working class people who challenge him (be they "nazis" or black people).

The only audience he can attract are gullible children. He reminds me so much of Onision: the narcissism, the harem, the pedophilia, talking about black women's hair, stupid political opinions, viewing himself as a god, the repulsive physique.
Well you can be left and hold opinions that people would say are right/conservative thoughts. We as humans are very nuance beings and as such can have nuance thoughts and discussions regarding our thoughts. A good example would be is that I would honestly think the leftists if they want socialized medicine and healthcare in the US, we should embolden our immigration policy and crack down on illegal immigration, while at the same time encourage the birthrate to increase and revamp the education system to create more wealth, but they seem to be keen on doing the opposite.

In my experience, people who tend to say x is y is actually x and they are hiding behind other people. Damn, that's what I keep saying about the dude to my RM and he's just like 'wHo CaReS, hE hAs SoMe GoOd IdEaS'. I would like to a see Onison tier meltdown from Vaush, but that won't happen unless something controversial really happens, not some disgusting discord hot takes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gunt.Inc
I'm a lefty and honestly finding about him has made me... very suspicious of the left. Most people I know don't like him, which is reassuring, but the subsection of socialists or liberals that do like him make me constantly rethink where my politics lie. This is the first month in years where I've actually wanted to build coalitions with people across the political spectrum because I think it would be valuable in snuffing out pedos and real racists.
Questioning is good. I urge you to think long and hard. Leftist politics have become an out of control treadmill, where people are not allowed to get off even when their movement has been successful (such as: women and feminism, gays and gay marriage, they're all "bigots" now if they're not currently screaming about the latest issue every 10 minutes)... 90% of the people the present day left is criticizing were hard democrats of 10 or 15 years ago. Leftism will use you by: 1 pretending to care about your rights 2 asking for your activism until 3 you are chewed up, then they will spit you out and shit on you.

Nothing is ever actually good enough, look how much time they really spend tearing down "last year's leftists."

People like Vaush and his supporters are the future of the left. Rabid social justice warriors. Convinced capitalism is oppressing them even though they know nothing about REAL poverty in the third world. Everything is generalized to "they're bad because I said they're Nazis, you can only trust ME." For crying out loud, now they're telling us pedophilia is a sexuality and people are actually mindlessly accepting this shit because they "can't leave" the left, or they're just straight up actual pedos. When will it end? Fuck the left in 2020. And I do not say that as someone who is even remotely right wing or a Trump fan, far from it. I hit several "woke/minority/non-privileged" check boxes or whatever, and let me tell you, for the last several years I have felt NOTHING but used and gaslighted by the people on the left who claim to speak for me and fight for my rights.
 
Why do socialists always make Nazis out to be a big deal of all the players in WW2? The Nazis were socialists, and almost every despot in WW2 was a Communist, except for Mussolini who invented his own ideology, but it's always Nazis when it comes to socialists.
Nazis were opposed to socialist the only reason I remember them having socialism in their name is because they were fighting with the German Communist party and wanted to secure socialist so they could gain power. Other than that, their not really socialist other than their opposition of capitalism while most of the Socialist people in the party were killed in the Night of long Knives . Imo its wrong to call them socialist just because they nationalized industries since in the end their goal was not for the workers to own the means of production like socialist but instead self sufficiency of the German state plus they kept private property rights which is contrary to what socialist.

The Nazis were fascist with German traditions thrown on top some of the German inferences were belief in the occult, anti antisemitism, and belief that Aryans where the top of the hierarchy.Fascism from what I remember from Mussolini has four distinct components extreme nationalism, Centralization of authority, militarization of economy and citizenry, and the people of the state above all other people which the Nazis fit into.

At the end their hyper socialist fixation on Nazi's is because they embody a lot of what left wing politics despises and to provides a great boogeymen while communism/socialist leaders during that time would make their side look bad if talked about. There reactions to right wingers can be equated to the red scare were everyone that fell into the socialist category was a communist and although there were Communist this was a widely disproportionate response. I haven't read a lot about WW2 in a while so there might be some inaccuracies.

Vaush has probably said more and worse racist and sexist shit on stream than most of the conservatives he's criticized.
Reminder that he did a video on getting laid before where he basically just said to make unwarranted sexual comments to women and point blank ask them if they wanna fuck, pretty sure I archived the whole thing in this thread somewhere.
Is he sill denying that he basically sexually harassed a women and by his own standard should not have a platform to speak?
 
Last edited:
I would like to a see Onison tier meltdown from Vaush, but that won't happen unless something controversial really happens, not some disgusting discord hot takes.

He has a revolving door of young femboys who come through. He lives with a BPD landwhale who frequently starts drama in other communities, and is currently questing after an objectively "hotter" but also crazy (arguably less crazy) shoe0nhead, who is honestly only after him for clout and has a history of being irrationally jealous of other women.

It's only a matter of time until all of this implodes. It'll be worse than Onision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: By Yaniv's Beard
I'm a lefty and honestly finding about him has made me... very suspicious of the left. Most people I know don't like him, which is reassuring, but the subsection of socialists or liberals that do like him make me constantly rethink where my politics lie. This is the first month in years where I've actually wanted to build coalitions with people across the political spectrum because I think it would be valuable in snuffing out pedos and real racists.

I think Vaush is wrong. I genuinely don't think most conservatives are racists at all. I do think he is one though. The way he speaks about black peoples' bodies, hair, attitudes makes me think that 100% of his comments are just projection.

So yes, 100%, I agree with you. He is a boon for the right/centre and possibly the far left. He is basically just the amalgamation of every crony capitalist neoliberal wetdream: a rich Californian sexpest with daddy's money who says terrible shit about average working class people who challenge him (be they "nazis" or black people).

The only audience he can attract are gullible children. He reminds me so much of Onision: the narcissism, the harem, the pedophilia, talking about black women's hair, stupid political opinions, viewing himself as a god, the repulsive physique.
People like Vaush make leftists realize that the left has completely abandoned the working class and has been coopted by big money which uses lumpenproles as their new attack dogs. It's not anything new, I've seen the writing on the wall a decade ago when I was at university. I've seen nuLeftists firsthand talk hours on end about protecting and lionizing criminals, rich libertines, people completely fucked up on drugs and every other completely dysfunctional and useless class of people that nobody else would shed even half a tear for if they were either institutionalized or turned into fertilizer, depending on how extreme you personally wanna go. Then when you try to ask something like "How the fuck is giving criminals carte blanche to do anything they want gonna help the working class?" you're suddenly a reactionary fascist who wants to gas minorities and beat women daily (twice on Sundays).

It made me start self-describing as a third positionist, though I'd probably be closest to a run-of-the-mill leftist from my country, after all most self-described centre-leftists from my country still didn't get infected by the bio-Leninist virus and basically want a system similar to what we already have, but with less bullshit omnipresent bureaucracy that we inherited from our former state. I myself am gonna fight tooth and nail so that our left isn't gonna become the pedo clownshow that it is in the West. Which brings me to the next thing I'm gonna bitch about, I remember him stating in one debate that he sees himself as having more in common with a factory worker from SE Asia or something than another American. Wrong, a regular factory worker from SE Asia isn't some fat jobless sex pest with rich parents who plays video games and gets gullible teenagers to part with their parents' money. A prostitute or drug dealer from SE Asia? Maybe he's got more in common with those.
 
Other than that, their not really socialist other than their opposition of capitalism while most of the Socialist people in the party were killed in the Night of long Knives . Imo its wrong to call them socialist just because they nationalized industries since in the end their goal was not for the workers to own the means of production like socialist but instead self sufficiency of the German state plus they kept private property rights which is contrary to what socialist.
Of course they had socialism. It's well known that they were giving funds, clothing, shoes, jewelry, housing, and more, to "proper aryans" with blond hair and blue eyes so long as they were supporting das aryan reich and popping out Pure Aryan Kids (tm). They also got all these funds and property from the Jews, Polacks, genetic undesirables, and other groups they were mass murdering. Which is completely, 100%, indisputably in line with literally every communist regime we've ever had on the planet. ("Kill some of the people and redistribute their stuff, boom, communism works, eat the rich LOL")

A few decades ago, it was widely agree that Nazis were socialists. We can't say that now because we've been gaslight as a culture into thinking is good and communism is great. And they don't want people to draw the parallels between mass-murder and wealth-redistribution. The reason we're discouraged to call the Nazis "socialists" is because it would fuck up the whole current narrative. It's basically the ultimate "That wasn't REAL communism/socialism!!!1" going around.

1599410176094.png


The name "nazi" literally comes from national socialist. You look at this and tell me you aren't even a bit suspicious of the reams of blog-posts and tweets telling people not to equate "REAL" socialism with Nazism specifically because they (communists) want to kill people (gulag) off of "class" instead of "race."
 
Here's the clips from Vaush's vod about the pedo and racism allegations towards him
View attachment 1575614
He says his consent view were hot takes. That it was a hypothetical related to England's and France's consent laws and that he may have even been joking bro.
But if he wasn't joking, his take was that women were not economically empowered in the past and thought that same take somehow applied to screwing kids.
Current day Vaush; however, has changed. This Vaush cares more than most about increasing the age of consent and also that everyone talking about his past statements are feigning concern.

View attachment 1575613
16 is the bare minimum AOC I could tolerate. But I still think thats pushing it. 15 is a no go, and I’d oppose it regardless of which country has a law for it. Japan’s AOC is 13 (with cavaets), is that ok because its a law somewhere?
“Oh but it doesn’t mean my position is that weird!”
He did the same thing during Kenosha Destiny debate. Why is a fucking anarchist constantly trying to appeal to the legality of things as the legitimacy of his argument.

Also he isn’t addressing the shota shit in his search or the hebe art that he liked on twitter.

But lets say everything he’s saying is genuine, and he wants to raise it past 18 now. I think thats in contradiction with his libertarian beliefs.

Most conservatives wouldn’t raise it past 18, so this is well to the right of the mainstream. And considering how ravenous he is about excising authoritarian attitudes from society, this doesn’t mesh well.

I’m inclined to think he’s just bullshitting and going over board on AOC to protect himself. Its either that or he has Authoritarian Left tendencies that he lets slip every now and again.
 
That was the most pathetic non apology ever. He didn't even bothered to say her name even though he admits seen her tweet and having her name displayed in there.
Bet you that when it came out that Congressman Yoho called AOC a “fucking bitch” Vaush eviscerated his non-apology for not mentioning her name once in his speech. Though when it comes to his own inability to name the person, that’s all good.
 
16 is the bare minimum AOC I could tolerate. But I still think thats pushing it. 15 is a no go, and I’d oppose it regardless of which country has a law for it. Japan’s AOC is 13 (with cavaets), is that ok because its a law somewhere?
“Oh but it doesn’t mean my position is that weird!”
He did the same thing during Kenosha Destiny debate. Why is a fucking anarchist constantly trying to appeal to the legality of things as the legitimacy of his argument.

Also he isn’t addressing the shota shit in his search or the hebe art that he liked on twitter.

But lets say everything he’s saying is genuine, and he wants to raise it past 18 now. I think thats in contradiction with his libertarian beliefs.

Most conservatives wouldn’t raise it past 18, so this is well to the right of the mainstream. And considering how ravenous he is about excising authoritarian attitudes from society, this doesn’t mesh well.

I’m inclined to think he’s just bullshitting and going over board on AOC to protect himself. Its either that or he has Authoritarian Left tendencies that he lets slip every now and again.

It really is the Twitter account and the Shota that does it for me. Jokes aside, the rest of that shit could be dismissed as some dumb wanna be intellectual overthinking things to try and come off as SmRt.

Nazis were opposed to socialist the only reason I remember them having socialism in their name is because they were fighting with the German Communist party and wanted to secure socialist so they could gain power. Other than that, their not really socialist other than their opposition of capitalism while most of the Socialist people in the party were killed in the Night of long Knives . Imo its wrong to call them socialist just because they nationalized industries since in the end their goal was not for the workers to own the means of production like socialist but instead self sufficiency of the German state plus they kept private property rights which is contrary to what socialist.

The Nazis were fascist with German traditions thrown on top some of the German inferences were belief in the occult, anti antisemitism, and belief that Aryans where the top of the hierarchy.Fascism from what I remember from Mussolini has four distinct components extreme nationalism, Centralization of authority, militarization of economy and citizenry, and the people of the state above all other people which the Nazis fit into.

At the end their hyper socialist fixation on Nazi's is because they embody a lot of what left wing politics despises and to provides a great boogeymen while communism/socialist leaders during that time would make their side look bad if talked about. There reactions to right wingers can be equated to the red scare were everyone that fell into the socialist category was a communist and although there were Communist this was a widely disproportionate response. I haven't read a lot about WW2 in a while so there might be some inaccuracies.


Is he sill denying that he basically sexually harassed a women and by his own standard should not have a platform to speak?

The labels of Capitalism and Socialism are so useless at this point that their meanings shift based on what is rhetorically useful at the moment. Venezuela is doing well, sounds like socialism to me - what, no that's state capitalism.
People will unironically laugh at people who say Socialism is just when the government does stuff, then call a successful government programme socialism.
If people spend more time debating what a category invented by some fucking dead guy actually means, than gleaning insight from labeling things with said category it's fucking useless and should be binned.

Nazis and Fascism were bad, we shouldn't attempt to emulate their societies. We don't need to know if they're "socialist" or not to do that.
 
16 is the bare minimum AOC I could tolerate. But I still think thats pushing it. 15 is a no go, and I’d oppose it regardless of which country has a law for it. Japan’s AOC is 13 (with cavaets), is that ok because its a law somewhere?

To be accurate, Japan's federal age of sexual consent is 13. However, there are separate obscenity and child protection laws that criminalize sexual activity with juveniles (people under 20) unless you either have their parent's permission or the relationship is determined to be "sincere" and consensual. De facto age of consent in Japan is actually higher than the vast majority of the world, 18 or even 20 depending on prefecture.
 
Vaush has uploaded a video of him addressing racism accusations:

He mentions Kat Blaque’s comment chain. He means several massive tweet threads she posted.
Initial reaction to the clip:
On accusing people of being self-hating:
On leftists and anti-Blackness, anti-Semitism:
On leftists weaponising white supremacy:
On desperate fans of leftist daddies:
On not wanting to waste time speaking to Vaush:
On not suggesting people unfollow Vaush:
On talking about Black people’s hair:
On talking about Black people’s hair, part two:
On Trump-supporting Black women with natural hair:
Closing statements:

Bonus content; Kat Blaque on the Destiny — Trihex N-word drama:

What is going on in this screenshot? Looks like massive balls and a small cock. I wonder how this happens and why he does not buy trousers that fit him.
notices_bulge_owo_whats_dis.png
 
16 is the bare minimum AOC I could tolerate. But I still think thats pushing it. 15 is a no go, and I’d oppose it regardless of which country has a law for it.
The first time I read your post I only read this part before being distracted and thought you were advocating for fucking a 16 year old Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

I’m inclined to think he’s just bullshitting and going over board on AOC to protect himself. Its either that or he has Authoritarian Left tendencies that he lets slip every now and again.
Its seems to be a reactionary opinion to get people of his back more than anything. You have to remember he defended child porn for the sake of consistency but all the sudden when age of consent the inconsistency with his anti-authoritarian beliefs don't matter

On a side note I thought the U.S had age of consent at 16 in some states but they just couldn't be with someone over 18 or some weird legal mess. The reason I ask is cause I remember this weird story where this guy in the U.S. had sex with someone underage but was only arrested because nudes counted as child porn and not for having sex. It might have been fake that is why I'm asking
 

He is very dumb. In recent years, oil and mining companies using foreign slave labour has been litigated in the UK and Canada successfully, and the courts have set a precedent against any corporation whose subsidiaries exploit such labour.

To be a functioning and contributing member of society, you have to take your chances and purchase a phone or a computer or a car or food, and trust that the system will correct itself. Exploitation may exist everywhere but we are not actively looking for it, we happen upon it. Sometimes for convenience, sometimes for necessity.

Whereas child porn is already banned and heavily frowned upon. You have to seek it out. Your average person probably can't just find child pornography easily, whereas they can drive to a store and buy a mass-produced object within 15 minutes.

Unlike a computing device, you can live a normal life without child porn (although pedos like Vaush will argue otherwise).

Also... there is a huge difference between buying and using an object that is 500 steps removed from exploitation and specifically designed to make you feel emotions such as comfort and desire (i.e. a nice laptop) and videos of a child getting violently abused on camera.

If I show someone a random computer, there is no way they can confirm that the object was produced by slaves. If I show someone child pornography, it is abusive in itself (although pedos like Vaush will argue otherwise).

I don't understand why people call him a good rhetorician. He sucks. He just makes dumbass analogies to justify his own shitty biases (marvel movies comment re gore to justify succumbing to mob violence, african silica mining to justify child porn). Sure, he has a conventional radio voice but if you write down the shit he says on paper it's CRAZY stupid.

His argument here is akin to me saying it is okay to consume (mind you, jerk off to) videos of puppies getting murdered because other people eat meat. How do people fall for this disingenuous shit?
 
He can front it out all he likes but he's getting a lot of heat from a lot of people from all sides so it's got to be hurting.

I would have some sympathy for the guy, but the amount of times someone says something and he instantly starts screaming shit like "sArGoN oF akKaD aDmiTs tO beInG a WhItE NaTiOnaLisT" as if those labels don't do serious harm to people out in the real world - and it's not like Carl needs any help in that department 😂
 
Back