- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
Isn't that what people bitched about during Bush's 8 years?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isn't that what people bitched about during Bush's 8 years?
Umm... the blacklist was created by the HOUSE on Unamerican Activities.
View attachment 1579022
Which would have been hard for SENATOR McCarthy to participate in.
The Tydings committee never investigated Hollywood.
You're basically mixing up 2 different events in American history and getting them kind of wrong.
If you don't want to read boring stuff, random youtubers can help.
It still doesn't change the fact that Joseph McCarthy was an idiot when it came to optics then.This is wrong mcCarthy never targeted the entertainment industry. Roy brewer was the one who spoke up against the communists there.
McCarthy's story and legacy was heavily edited by the media and was twisted.
This isn't how this works. This isn't how any of this works. Usually when a dictator rises to power the first thing that they do is to get rid of the elections and if they do keep elections then they're there for show only and then they abolish and purge anyone and anything that gets in their way anyway.
No, he's accusing Pentagon weenies and fucking Nobles and Sellouts of seeking to start wars to boost profits.
You know, like the Dems accused Bush, Halliburton, and the Military Industrial Complex as well as the US government since the 1940's?
Plus, it';s not an attack on the military.
It's coming right out and saying that the civvy scumbag contractors, the Nobles, and the Sellouts are shit-bags.
But can't expect a leftist or a neo-con to understand that.
I must've missed this, what happened?She was fired for brushing her interns' hair while she was butt-ass naked, so I'm not sure what the rules are for that.
The House has rules about fucking your Staffers. She was Fucking one of her StaffersI must've missed this, what happened?
You know, for all the sperging the left does about the military-industrial complex (when a Democrat isn't in the White House), none of them ever seem to have actually dealt with it. They just screech about how war is bad, and profit is evil, so put the two together and I just can't even.
If any of them had ever dealt with military contractors, on any side of the transaction (government, contractor, military user, supply chain, etc), they could understand just how banal it can be. They might understand how that banality is a specific kind of danger to the national character.
Yes, you can condemn it without condemning the country, or the military, or even some of the people who are putting in a good-faith effort at their jobs.
The House has rules about fucking your Staffers. She was Fucking one of her Staffers
I must've missed this, what happened?
Shocking photos of Congresswoman Katie Hill are revealed showing off Nazi-era tattoo while smoking a bong, kissing her female staffer and posing nude on 'wife sharing' sitesI must've missed this, what happened?
You know just because I have been working on putting my Theory about the Expansion of the Military Industrial Complex into other areas I have The Wiki article on it open.
gained popularity after a warning on its detrimental effects in the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 17, 1961.[8][9]
You should watch the video linked to you which you obviously didn't. McCarthy was wildly popular during his time as a senator and during his trials and after he resigned. The problem came from the media spin on it and that's a battle nobody could win pre-internet. It didn't matter what anyone did or said or how good their eyes for optics were if the media decided you were kaput. It tanked Orsen Welles career long term, it tanked Nixon's career and legacy. The saying "Don't pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel" is a saying for a reason. No amount of optic expertise could have saved McCarthy pre-internet. It's partly why they hate Trump. He is able to use the internet and the media themselves to get his message across and make them look like fools.It still doesn't change the fact that Joseph McCarthy was an idiot when it came to optics then.
If he played his own cards right back then during the whole thing and if he also had far better optics before he could decide to then make his next move then he would have never started attacking the U.S. Armed Forces then. He made far more enemies than friends and that's what finally did him in.
So while I don't deny that there were obviously communists at the time, Joseph McCarthy should have picked his battles more carefully then.
This is why if you're going to start shit then you better not make a total jackass of yourself because it won't end well anyway.
Kid shoots rioters in self defense while helping a town he works at: domestic terrorism.
Nah that's not even the interesting thing since they use it as a comparison to say "why worry about a Muslim when a white guy is worse!"I always love the "In the US, white supremacists/far-right extremists have committed nearly three times as many terror attacks on US soil than Islamic terrorists have" line that people post. Considering the demographics of the US, isn't this a terrible point to bring up if you're trying to show just how non-violent Muslims (who are typically Arab) are?
Also, one of the deadliest mass shooters in the US was Muslim (Pulse shooting).I always love the "In the US, white supremacists/far-right extremists have committed nearly three times as many terror attacks on US soil than Islamic terrorists have" line that people post. Considering the demographics of the US, isn't this a terrible point to bring up if you're trying to show just how non-violent Muslims (who are typically Arab) are?
These stats also use a very loose definition of terrorism when dealing with the “far right” while being ridiculously strict when dealing with Islamic terrorism. You’ll have non-political personal murders, such as a man killing his uncle to run away with his aunt, listed under “far-right terrorism” while Ahmed murdering people while screaming Allahu Akbar will be considered “workplace violence”.I always love the "In the US, white supremacists/far-right extremists have committed nearly three times as many terror attacks on US soil than Islamic terrorists have" line that people post. Considering the demographics of the US, isn't this a terrible point to bring up if you're trying to show just how non-violent Muslims (who are typically Arab) are?