Culture Oscars Adding ‘Inclusion Standards’ To Award Eligibility Amid Black Lives Matter Movement - Expect more black people, women and gays to win awards that they didn’t really need, earn or deserve

55C6E8C1-D934-4D6C-85FC-0D935AC0BCDD.jpeg




The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences will require films to meet “representation and inclusion standards” prior to eligibility for awards.

The Oscars didn’t reveal any details of the new standards, according to a news releaseshared by the organization Friday.

“While the Academy has made strides, we know there is much more work to be done in order to ensure equitable opportunities across the board,” Academy CEO Dawn Hudson said in a statement. “The need to address this issue is urgent. To that end, we will amend—and continue to examine—our rules and procedures to ensure that all voices are heard and celebrated.”

“Through the dedication, focus, and concerted effort of our Board of Governors and members on the branch executive committees, the Academy has surpassed the goals of our A2020 initiative,” Academy President David Rubin said. “But to truly meet this moment, we must recognize how much more needs to be done, and we must listen, learn, embrace the challenge, and hold ourselves and our community accountable.”

The initiative was created to “advance inclusion in the entertainment industry and increase representation within its membership and the greater film community.”

A task force consisting of industry leaders will be formed by the end of July, according to the news release.

The move to become more inclusive comes after the Oscars were criticized in 2016 under the hashtag #OscarsSoWhite after no people of color were nominated for awards for two years in a row.
 
If you actually wanted the Oscars to be diverse that truly represent different cultures and perspectives, then you'd make it a 100% international awards show. Which wouldn't be a bad thing, all told, especially since making movies is more accessible than ever globally.

The rub is that they don't want actual diversity, they want to put different sprinkles on the same liberal swill. (Just look at the reception of Parasite.) Which is a damn shame because while I'd love to see a Wakaliwood movie get an Oscar, the cowards will never do it.

Also as an animation enthusiast I'll just add that the Oscars ain't shit in that regard either, Annecy is where it's at.
 
So finally the oscars will have an objective metric to which award things, number of blacks followed by how black are they and ratio of white to black. I approve, some strict guidelines instead of buying em backstage a worthy equal competition to most blacked cinema.
 
They gave Dances with Wolves Best Picture over GoodFellas, Ordinary People Best Picture over Raging Bull, Forrest Gump Best Picture over Pulp Fiction, Crash Best Picture over virtually every other more qualified nominee that year. The Oscars suck.
 
The diversity and inclusion initiative has been a heavy focus for the Oscars the past few years, shown by the expansive membership initiative. As part of the Academy Aperture 2025 initiative, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced Tuesday new representation and inclusion standards in order to be eligible in the best picture category.

For the 94th and 95th Oscars ceremonies, scheduled for 2022 and 2023, a film will submit a confidential Academy Inclusion Standards form to be considered for best picture. Beginning in 2024, for the 96th Oscars, a film submitting for best picture will need to meet the inclusion thresholds by meeting two of the four standards.

All other Academy categories will keep their current eligibility requirements. For categories such as animated feature, documentary feature and international feature, that submit for best picture consideration, they will be addressed separately.


For a number of years, the Academy has struggled to nominate films that are diverse in its cast, directors, and technical craftspeople. In 2016, after they failed to nominate any person of color among their 20 acting nominees, Cheryl Boone Isaacs, who was Academy President at the time, took historic action by committing to doubling the number of women and diverse members by 2020, which they have achieved.

Academy President David Rubin and Academy CEO Dawn Hudson said in a joint statement, “The aperture must widen to reflect our diverse global population in both the creation of motion pictures and in the audiences who connect with them. The Academy is committed to playing a vital role in helping make this a reality.” They continued, “the Academy is committed to playing a vital role in helping make this a reality.”

The standards are as follows:

STANDARD A: ON-SCREEN REPRESENTATION, THEMES AND NARRATIVES

To achieve Standard A, the film must meet ONE of the following criteria:

A1. Lead or significant supporting actors

At least one of the lead actors or significant supporting actors is from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group.

• Asian
• Hispanic/Latinx
• Black/African American
• Indigenous/Native American/Alaskan Native
• Middle Eastern/North African
• Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
• Other underrepresented race or ethnicity

A2. General ensemble cast

At least 30% of all actors in secondary and more minor roles are from at least two of the following underrepresented groups:

• Women
• Racial or ethnic group
• LGBTQ+
• People with cognitive or physical disabilities, or who are deaf or hard of hearing

A3. Main storyline/subject matter

The main storyline(s), theme or narrative of the film is centered on an underrepresented group(s).

• Women
• Racial or ethnic group
• LGBTQ+
• People with cognitive or physical disabilities, or who are deaf or hard of hearing

STANDARD B: CREATIVE LEADERSHIP AND PROJECT TEAM

To achieve Standard B, the film must meet ONE of the criteria below:

B1. Creative leadership and department heads

At least two of the following creative leadership positions and department heads — Casting Director, Cinematographer, Composer, Costume Designer, Director, Editor, Hairstylist, Makeup Artist, Producer, Production Designer, Set Decorator, Sound, VFX Supervisor, Writer — are from the following underrepresented groups:

• Women
• Racial or ethnic group
• LGBTQ+
• People with cognitive or physical disabilities, or who are deaf or hard of hearing

At least one of those positions must belong to the following underrepresented racial or ethnic group:

• Asian
• Hispanic/Latinx
• Black/African American
• Indigenous/Native American/Alaskan Native
• Middle Eastern/North African
• Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
• Other underrepresented race or ethnicity

B2. Other key roles

At least six other crew/team and technical positions (excluding Production Assistants) are from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group. These positions include but are not limited to First AD, Gaffer, Script Supervisor, etc.

B3. Overall crew composition

At least 30% of the film’s crew is from the following underrepresented groups:

• Women
• Racial or ethnic group
• LGBTQ+
• People with cognitive or physical disabilities, or who are deaf or hard of hearing

STANDARD C: INDUSTRY ACCESS AND OPPORTUNITIES
To achieve Standard C, the film must meet BOTH criteria below:

C1. Paid apprenticeship and internship opportunities

The film’s distribution or financing company has paid apprenticeships or internships that are from the following underrepresented groups and satisfy the criteria below:

• Women
• Racial or ethnic group
• LGBTQ+
• People with cognitive or physical disabilities, or who are deaf or hard of hearing

The major studios/distributors are required to have substantive, ongoing paid apprenticeships/internships inclusive of underrepresented groups (must also include racial or ethnic groups) in most of the following departments: production/development, physical production, post-production, music, VFX, acquisitions, business affairs, distribution, marketing and publicity.

The mini-major or independent studios/distributors must have a minimum of two apprentices/interns from the above underrepresented groups (at least one from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group) in at least one of the following departments: production/development, physical production, post-production, music, VFX, acquisitions, business affairs, distribution, marketing and publicity.

C2. Training opportunities and skills development (crew)

The film’s production, distribution and/or financing company offers training and/or work opportunities for below-the-line skill development to people from the following underrepresented groups:

• Women
• Racial or ethnic group
• LGBTQ+
• People with cognitive or physical disabilities, or who are deaf or hard of hearing

STANDARD D: AUDIENCE DEVELOPMENT

To achieve Standard D, the film must meet the criterion below:

D1. Representation in marketing, publicity, and distribution

The studio and/or film company has multiple in-house senior executives from among the following underrepresented groups (must include individuals from underrepresented racial or ethnic groups) on their marketing, publicity, and/or distribution teams.

• Women
• Racial or ethnic group:
•Asian
•Hispanic/Latinx
•Black/African American
•Indigenous/Native American/Alaskan Native
•Middle Eastern/North African
•Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
•Other underrepresented race or ethnicity
•LGBTQ+
• People with cognitive or physical disabilities, or who are deaf or hard of hearing

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Oscars extended the 2020 eligibility year until Feb. 28, 2021. The 93rd Academy Awards ceremony is currently scheduled to take place on Sunday, April 25.


 
Affirmative Oscars. As if it wasn't enough of a worthless circle jerk already. The next award show is going to be so stuffed with left wing preaching and masturbating about race it's going to probably be the most unbearable Oscars ever.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: tehpope
Prediction: Large numbers of (((white))) actors, producers, and directors will suddenly announce that they are gay, bisexual, transsexual, polyandrowhateverthefuck-sexual, etc in order to not get shut out. The Oscars (and the industry as a whole) will be dominated by Jews with unusual sex preferences and, in a sense, nothing will have changed.
 
There is statistical evidence suggesting that most Hispanic people don't like being referred to as 'latinx', yet they use that term anyway. It is like they don't actually care about the people they're supposed to be pandering to.
"Hey Spanish is a gendered language so could you quit--"
Some stupid California liberal: "But I'm just being courteous! LATINXLATINXLATINXLATINX"

now answer me this, is Latinx supposed to be that stupid cringey nuEnglish thing where any letter you don't like is replaced by an x (womxn), or is it since it's a romance language they're trying to make it more like latin with the "x". I know, I'm incredibly optimistic thinking it's anything more intelligent than the former. Saw some poor guy from Ecuador use "latinx" and I'm hoping the poor sap, being ESL got confused and thought "latinx" was how it was called in English.
 
now answer me this, is Latinx supposed to be that stupid cringey nuEnglish thing where any letter you don't like is replaced by an x (womxn), or is it since it's a romance language they're trying to make it more like latin with the "x".
The former. "Latinx" is even more unpronounceable nonsense in Spanish than it is in English.
In internet-speak sometimes Spanish-speakers use @ to mean "a or o", but of course "Latin@" didn't make any inroads with the soy crowd.
 
Back