U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gossip:
Untitled.png
Untitled.pngUntitled.png
 
The Democrats wil1 complain but nothing will happen, except for some Antifags and BLM retards that didn't get the memo.

This isn't like some fringe right wing theory like "Obama will refuse to give up the Presidency" hysteria in 2016. Hillary says on TV, "Biden should not concede under any circumstances". Podesta says the military should get involved if the election is contested.

 
Are the NLG only backing certain protest groups? I've received (non-confidential) word that a Portland protest group is looking for lawyers to represent them in state/fed crim and possibly civil matters, which I'd expect the NLG to have covered. Possible sign they've pulled up stakes?
 
This isn't like some fringe right wing theory like "Obama will refuse to give up the Presidency" hysteria in 2016. Hillary says on TV, "Biden should not concede under any circumstances". Podesta says the military should get involved if the election is contested.

Hillary is a has-been that's hated even in ultra-liberal woke utopia New York City and no one knows or cares who Podesta is. Those people have no power and I doubt they get invited to sample Pelosi's expensive ice cream.

Is this your first election? Because the thought of the military rising up to Podesta's call is hilarious.
 
Received a Minnesota election poll via text message, here are the main questions:
View attachment 1583956
View attachment 1583957
View attachment 1583959
View attachment 1583960

I suspect this was not a poll written by a Democrat firm. :story:
Idk how much I can get into this since it's not riots-related, but the rhetoric they use is very interesting, along with word choice and order.

Q1.
The first answer usually sets the tone for the rest. In a multiple choice, your mind will automatically pick the first, and then go through the rest to test against the first to see which is correct. Having the first choice being "defunding the police is bad and will cause rise in crime" makes readers lean more towards that.

Q2.
Same as above, where the first choice given is "disagree". It primes your mind into immediately thinking more into the statement, as asking someone if they disagree is more active than asking if they agree.

Q3 & Q4.
This one doesn't need to be commented on, as while the others were leading questions this one is very obvious. It's also interesting (and frustrating admittedly) that they are conflating anti-Israel and anti-Jew. I know this is a natural consequence of it being an ethnostate, but it's still frustrating. I also find it a bit chilling that I agree with her on some points, such as the buying politicians and saying that it has hypnotized the world. Total clown world.
 
https://unitedwildlifeunion.com/2020/08/01/why-white-people-owning-dogs-is-racist/

Donate your family pets to a more deserving BIPOC family you filthy white savage racists.

I have really, truly seen it all now

Am sure you are being sarcastic, so I'll contribute a mite.

When everything and everyone is "racist", then nothing and nobody is "racist".

Now, nothing and nobody is actually "racist". It's just a term that is meaningless to anyone with more than a room-temperature IQ.


@Feline Supremacist - You are absolutely correct that the military will not rise to John Podesta's call. He is nobody, not in any chain of command. Podesta can say anything he pleases and the military shall ignore him.

Folks, as a retired senior officer (scrambled eggs on the hat visor), here's how it is. The US military's subordination to civilian control is very, very deeply ingrained. They know the chain of command. Nobody outside that chain of command can make them do anything. When we enlist/are commissioned, we take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, and to follow the orders of the officers above us. Period. We have never taken an oath pledging loyalty to ANYONE. Haven't checked, but could be that the US military is the only military in the world that pledges loyalty to the nation's Constitution above anything or anyone else. Anyone who believes the US military would launch a coup against a sitting President is sadly mistaken, obviously never spent a day in uniform. When the President gives a lawful order to the military, that order shall be obeyed, regardless of the feelings of the people carrying out the order. That's the way it is.
 
Last edited:
Hillary is a has-been that's hated even in ultra-liberal woke utopia New York City and no one knows or cares who Podesta is. Those people have no power and I doubt they get invited to sample Pelosi's expensive ice cream.

Is this your first election? Because the thought of the military rising up to Podesta's call is hilarious.

Well I hope you prove me wrong and it's all just hot air.
 
You'd wonder of some of these high IQ people, maybe some of those people have already imagined the end result of such persuasions. Their own personal wish fulfillment? Hedonistic desires? What does that give you but a temporary high? Theres nothing there in the end. No true meaning. Sure... they may be extremely intelligent. But do they have any perspective? Wow, you were able to work the hierarchy so you are successful and land a hot model. So what? What have you accomplished other than avaricious desire? Have you improved the world? Have you improved society? No. You've just used the society that currently exists for your own personal gain.

Excuse me for the continuation of this conversation possibly on the wrong thread...

More detail on the genius and model quip... That the genius I knew was pigeon-toed, introverted, overweight, and nonathletic. Despite these physiological unattractive features, he managed to get a runway model (did I mention she was also a lawyer?) to adore him and do anything for him. He did not treat the HS quarterback / head cheerleader rule/stereotype as being relevant to him, so he made his own rule and got the girlfriend he wanted. I have no idea how he did it. The goal for him was not just to have hot sex with a hot woman. Anyone can accomplish the sex part legally with a few thousand dollars and a trip to Nevada. He wanted an attractive, smart, and devoted woman to share his life, and he figured out how to do it. Needless to say, at the time I knew him, I was single and very envious of him. Perhaps he was motivated by avarice, I don't know. I do know that whatever I saw him set as his goal, he accomplished the goal with greater ease than I could.
 
Am sure you are being sarcastic, so I'll contribute a mite.

When everything and everyone is "racist", then nothing and nobody is "racist".

Now, nothing and nobody is actually "racist". It's just a term that is meaningless to anyone with more than a room-temperature IQ.

yes...I should've put the tl/dr before my comment about the article! The article is utter horseshit and I'm really hopeful that the idiot who wrote it is just a giant shitposter :optimistic:
 
What's the good word?
Oh, perhaps I should have said that being a while male at the university, I did not benefit from the affirmative action. At the time 90% to 95% of the scholarships at the school were minority and/or female preferred. The minimum SAT scores for acceptance were something like 200 points (on the 1600 scale) between in state female versus out-of-state male. Instate versus out-of-state for the same sexes was possibly only 100 points.
 
Totally apropos of nothing, Portland City Council decided to ban its bureaus from using facial recognition technology. Funny how all of a sudden they care about protecting people's anonymity.

https://techcrunch.com/2020/09/09/facial-recognition-ban-portland-oregon/

It isn't even subtle at this point. Does that even matter though? It sounds like state and Feds could still do it. Unless Portland wants to go to court again.

The closer we get to November, the more things look like how people predicted. Even the people in South America. That there's a soft coup planned.

View attachment 1585460
Actual wargame simulations (like those conducted in the Pentagon) use complex algorithms to simulate these kind of scenarios. What they did was conduct an election themed DnD meeting. They stand no chance.

A few months ago a friend of mine expressed the concern that "Trump wouldn't leave willingly." The idea has been out there. The DNC has gone all in on fear mongering. This is stoking the fires so that more people come out.

This reeks of desperation though.
 
Totally apropos of nothing, Portland City Council decided to ban its bureaus from using facial recognition technology. Funny how all of a sudden they care about protecting people's anonymity.

https://techcrunch.com/2020/09/09/facial-recognition-ban-portland-oregon/
I’ve probably sperged about this before, but you wanna talk manipulation? Everyone thinks they’re in the clear because facial recognition is banned. Lol, there already is cheaper and better shit that is being used/admissible in court.

Major stores, hospitals (Lots of privacy issues in the US), etc... have been using a combination of Van eck to track a persons wearabouts even where cameras aren’t located. My favorite because this is such an old technique now is ID via jean creases. That’s not even getting into more sophisticated methods like gait recognition.

So, anyways industrial society
 
A few months ago a friend of mine expressed the concern that "Trump wouldn't leave willingly." The idea has been out there. The DNC has gone all in on fear mongering. This is stoking the fires so that more people come out.

This reeks of desperation though.
The problem is that low iq Antifags will use it as an excuse to keep sperging and maybe become Weatherxir 2.0. Personally I'm looking forward to the NewSLA and a rich heroin addicted slut cosplaying as Patty Hearst threatening to blow up Facebook HQ wth her black bf before nodding out.
 
The problem is that low iq Antifags will use it as an excuse to keep sperging and maybe become Weatherxir 2.0. Personally I'm looking forward to the NewSLA and a rich heroin addicted slut cosplaying as Patty Hearst threatening to blow up Facebook HQ wth her black bf before nodding out.
But only after they have completed their mission. In Chuck Yeager's Advanced Flight Simulator.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back