- Joined
- Feb 19, 2020
So your IGG backers give you money to make your frog books, but the Breitweisers' IGG backers didn't give them money to make their chicken books. Is that correct?
I'm a bit surprised by the response to my posts. The most likely explanation for not producing that IGG book after three years is the IGG money being tied up elsewhere. I suspected it was used as front-money for the Walmart product. Frog disagrees and says Mitch didn't have to put up any money for the Walmart thing, which makes the IGG non-fulfillment even more baffling.
So I spent 5 minutes googling a few things.
First, Allegiance Art's "co-founder" is a guy named David Martin. He's the CEO of Allegiance Arts. He runs a "reputation rehabilitation" consultancy. Crisis-management, etc. It's named Allegiance. That Arkansas Times article might have a touch of crisis-management/reputation-rehab hokery to it, right? Just a coincidence I'm sure.

Martin-Wilbourn Partners rebrands as Allegiance - Talk Business & Politics
Market research firm Martin-Wilbourn Partners said it will rebrand and rename itself as Allegiance, a reputation management, crisis communications and business development services agency. The Little Rock-based company works with...

According to Martin's LinkedIn, they founded Allegiance Arts to acquire comics characters and license them to Hollywood, not to sell comic books. That seems important.
David is also a co-founder of Allegiance Arts & Entertainment (AAE). ... [acquisition] of character based intellectual property for licensing to the entertainment industry.
According to the Arkansas Times article that started this drama the big-money investor they found is Hunter Haynes, a commercial real estate guy in Arkansas. Commercial real estate is not a business I'd want to be in right now or the foseeable future but that's only relevant if they need more money from him. Perhaps that ArkTimes piece is meant to attract more investors?

Mitch and Elizabeth Breitweiser launch Allegiance Arts comics - Arkansas Times
For a pandemic moment, the duo's startup was the only comic book distributor in the U.S.

Allegiance Arts has four IP's currently according to their web site, of which Red Rooster is one. Norah's Saga, Bass Reeves and the Futurists. Bass Reeves is public domain so no value there.
Allegiance Arts corp filings are confidential so we can't say for sure what Mitch's ownership stake is but we do know that the company carries Martin's business name and Haynes' money. What exactly does Mitch bring to the table? Did he pledge Red Rooster as his stake? If so he doesn't own it any more, the LLC does. Even that doesn't seem like enough to back the whole Walmart venture. Was handing over the Red Rooster IP enough to earn Mitch an equal share of Allegiance Arts without any cash? Would his partners accept the Red Rooster IP alone and let Mitch keep that IGG money totally separate? Not unless Mitch's ownership stake in the company is pretty small would be my guess. As I posted originally, using Walmart to establish characters for Hollywood to license is a HUGE gamble, worse than a blackjack table.
Last edited: