U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
No one is suggesting that he shouldn't have been restrained (ignore BLM). That's why he was placed in handcuffs. Three officers, one suspect- prone, not moving, eventually non-responsive. Kneeling on a prone person's chest and neck for several minutes after they lose consciousness- whether due to positional asphyxia or drug overdose- is not objectively reasonable to an officer who is not a sociopath.

That's why least one officer saw the problem developing and tried to address it at the time. Another officer- who held rank- rebuffed him. Because of ego, or stubbornness, or who knows what else.

I sure hope you're not in the LE field. If so, your FTO has failed you and everyone else.

you're not doing yourself any favours when you link an article that repeats a BLM style chant within it's first few lines of text like a broken record, thinking that it's supposed to be some kind of a speech, especially when your next point of call is to just call whoever's disagreeing with you a sociopath.

Whether or not Floyd's detainers had a knee on his chest and neck is neither here nor there, everyone already knows what the autopsy found, and it's been discussed to death at this point. Not even the rioters care about Floyd anymore. It's time to move on.
 
"A pistol isn't even that deadly anyways"

That individual knows absolutely nothing about firearms. Wonder what that faggots opinion would be if Saint Kyle had used a pistol instead? God I hate reddit.
That Reddit post has ~23k upvotes but the YouTube video only has ~3k views. And that video is almost ratioed.

What a sad circle jerk.
 
Won't happen. First, most, if not every state has it stated in their constitution or laws a cutoff date for the appointment of electors. Whatever votes are counted up on that day would end up being used. No state wants to risk failing to appoint their electors on time and not being counted at all. They'll get that shit counted one way or the other.

Second, state legislators are ultimately responsible for how electors are selected. In non-purple states they can just amend the law if necessary. If done expect it to go in favor of whichever party is a majority. Hell, if they wanted they could say "voting is FUBAR this year, we're appointing electors ourselves" (might be political suicide in some states, but they can do that).

Third, unless congress changes it there's a specific date for the electoral college to meet. States either have their appointed electors by then or they don't, and if they don't they're SOL and the total number needed for a majority moves down.

The only way that would play out differently is if the Supreme Court intervenes to hold up the process, which they're unlikely to postpone beyond Jan 10th or so (transition teams need time to transition if Trump isn't elected). A postponement past Jan 20th is the only way Pelosi could be elevated up to POTUS, which is extremely unlikely to happen.


It's too convoluted and risky to be a plan the Dems would try, since it could just as easily backfire horrendously on them (imagine California or New York failing to appoint electors. That would all but guarantee a Trump victory).

No, their plan is much more simple. They're banking on an increased number of lazy unreliables who support them verbally but don't show up to polls (younger demographic, predominately) to actually vote if all they have to do is fill out and shove the thing in an outgoing mailbox. That alone would be enough to tip the scales in battleground states to Biden without having to get messy.

This will end up being the most legally contested election we've ever had though. Bush v Gore on steroids and PCP.
About Pelosi, somebody actually talked about that possibility.





 
Last edited:
Yellow Revolution (Philippines 1986), Purple Revolution (Iraq 2005), Orange Revolution (Ukraine 2004-2005), Cedar Revolution (Lebanon 2005), Blue Revolution (Kuwait 2005), Colourful Revolution (Macedonia 2016)...
:optimistic: ?
All the colors and more. Very funny guys, very funny. Is it time for the Black Revolution (USA 2020)?
 
If anyone is looking for a good primer on BLM being the new Red Guard, Paul Joseph Watson has this on ritual public shaming.

View attachment 1590713

So uh, how did we miss this?

View attachment 1590710


Fucking hell. Fentanyl Floyd was literally hospitalized for an OD after he ATE DRUGS instead of getting arrested for dealing.

You know, what he literally did on Camera when he died from an OD?

Not a knock on you because you are one of the more informative users on the thread, but we didn’t miss it, it was posted a couple days ago. The thread has become mostly unreadable, since people have started posting things that were posted a few hours before too. Anyway, I believe the judge ruled yesterday that he would not allow the Texas case information at trial. The Hennepin County incident is still in the mix though.
 
I'm more fearful that police will arrest the people who are trying to protect their communities while letting the arsonists go wild.

Watch what the county sheriffs do; so far I haven't seen anybody but antifa and Portland screeching about it.

Yeah, they're getting squirrely about it. They're usually all 100% PROUD ANTIFA, but whenever they get a little heat from the general public they go "lol you actually believe in spooky antifa supersoldiers? watch less FOX news, rube"

It's not just that; they know there's a lot of firebugs in their ranks, and burning forests guarantees a 100% Grade-A Organic assfucking by The Man. They're well aware of the teeth their own side provided the government, when it comes to fucking with the environment.

It's like the hangman being hung from the gallows he built.
 
Won't happen. First, most, if not every state has it stated in their constitution or laws a cutoff date for the appointment of electors. Whatever votes are counted up on that day would end up being used. No state wants to risk failing to appoint their electors on time and not being counted at all. They'll get that shit counted one way or the other.

Second, state legislators are ultimately responsible for how electors are selected. In non-purple states they can just amend the law if necessary. If done expect it to go in favor of whichever party is a majority. Hell, if they wanted they could say "voting is FUBAR this year, we're appointing electors ourselves" (might be political suicide in some states, but they can do that).

Third, unless congress changes it there's a specific date for the electoral college to meet. States either have their appointed electors by then or they don't, and if they don't they're SOL and the total number needed for a majority moves down.

The only way that would play out differently is if the Supreme Court intervenes to hold up the process, which they're unlikely to postpone beyond Jan 10th or so (transition teams need time to transition if Trump isn't elected). A postponement past Jan 20th is the only way Pelosi could be elevated up to POTUS, which is extremely unlikely to happen.


It's too convoluted and risky to be a plan the Dems would try, since it could just as easily backfire horrendously on them (imagine California or New York failing to appoint electors. That would all but guarantee a Trump victory).

No, their plan is much more simple. They're banking on an increased number of lazy unreliables who support them verbally but don't show up to polls (younger demographic, predominately) to actually vote if all they have to do is fill out and shove the thing in an outgoing mailbox. That alone would be enough to tip the scales in battleground states to Biden without having to get messy.

This will end up being the most legally contested election we've ever had though. Bush v Gore on steroids and PCP.

I agree with your last sentence but disagree about the Jan 20th date. We will be lucky to have a President by March.

This is going to be an absolute Constitutional crisis, and the rioting will go on every night. I think if Trump loses in a landslide, he'll give up. If it's close, he'll contest. The Democrats will not give up under any circumstances, they will declare Biden won, begin forming a Cabinet, and set up a shadow govt, all while fighting it in the media, the courts, and the streets.

The riots will really amp up, because the implication will be that if America gives in and declares Biden the winner the violence will stop. This stuff now is all rehearsal. Expect tons more funding, more corrupt DAs letting them off the hook, more cops quitting, more of the media carrying their water and defending the rioters as peaceful protesters. They will really start to move into suburbs and small towns to terrorize Americans into begging for Biden.

The extra spice will be if Biden dies or becomes incapacitated while all this is going on, because there is no provision in the Constitutiion for that, that I know of.
 
If anyone is looking for a good primer on BLM being the new Red Guard, Paul Joseph Watson has this on ritual public shaming.



Not a knock on you because you are one of the more informative users on the thread, but we didn’t miss it, it was posted a couple days ago. The thread has become mostly unreadable, since people have started posting things that were posted a few hours before too. Anyway, I believe the judge ruled yesterday that he would not allow the Texas case information at trial. The Hennepin County incident is still in the mix though.

Speaking of the BLM being the new red guard, that article mention then the left use the black as raw material for revolution.
https://www.americanthinker.com/art...e_once_again_raw_material_for_revolution.html ( https://archive.vn/s1Yiv )
September 12, 2020
For the Left, Blacks are Once Again ‘Raw Material for Revolution’
By Joel Gilbert
Pitting one race or one ethnic group against another is a game the Left has been playing for a very long time. In my 2014 documentary film, There’s No Place Like Utopia, I explored the rarely told history of Leftist exploitation of race and ethnicity, a practice that dates back to the 1930's.
Soviet leader Josef Stalin focused his American propaganda efforts not on fomenting a workers’ revolution - unlikely given America’s free market history - but on discrediting the very idea of America both to its own citizens and the world. The Soviets decided the easiest way to discredit America was through racial division. The Soviet involvement began in 1932, after nine young black Americans were accused of raping two white women on a freight train in Alabama. Even before most Americans had heard of the so-called “Scottsboro Boys,” even before their guilt or innocence was determined, the Soviet Union’s most famous propaganda artist had created a poster, “Freedom to the Prisoners of Scottsboro!”
The Soviets instructed their international apparatus, the COMINTERN, to employ its legal arm called "International Labor Defense," to push the NAACP aside and defend the young men, much as BLM has pushed the NAACP away today. In his book Black Bolshevik, party regular Harry Haywood proudly owned up to the strong-arm Communist tactics in Alabama.
“Scottsboro represented our first serious challenge to recognized Black reformist leadership,” wrote Haygood. For the Soviets and their Leftist American allies, the Scottsboro boys provided a field of battle. If the Communists were to seize that field, liberal black reformers had to be eliminated. “It was necessary to struggle on two fronts,” Haywood wrote, “for both deviated from the line of proletarian internationalism.”
The case of the Scottsboro boys dragged on for years, and Communist Party USA exploited the young men at every turn. For the COMINTERN the goal was not justice for the "boys" or racial equality. The goal was disruption and revolution.

Some American blacks bought into the idea of socialism. They became known as "Black Bolsheviks." Hoping to embarrass the United States during the Depression, the Soviets lured many to the Soviet Union. Prominent among the Black Bolsheviks was an activist named Lovett Fort-Whiteman. In fact, the then conservative Time magazine called Fort-Whiteman “the reddest of the blacks.” A true believer in Communism and a willing propagandist, Fort-Whiteman proved to be a highly successful recruiter as well. Thousands of black Americans flocked to the Soviet Union during the Depression, Fort-Whiteman among them.

Unbeknownst to them, Communists viewed American blacks as “the raw material for revolution” according to former KGB spy Konstantin Preobrazhensky. In this regards, Fort-Whiteman served as something of a prototype. The Left would use African Americans like Fort-Whiteman for their propaganda value and dispense with them when that value was exhausted. In the Soviet Union, that value was short-lived.
The Black Bolsheviks in Russia proved to be too Americanized to yield to the mindless brutality of the Soviet regime. In time, Stalin did with them what he did with other troublesome minorities. He eliminated them. In 1938, Lovett Fort-Whiteman, the reddest of the blacks, was dispatched to the notorious Kolyma Gulag in Siberia, and he was dead within a year. No black American survived to tell the tale of the purge by the Communists that killed Fort-Whiteman and uncounted other “Black Bolsheviks.”

And there's a good vlog about the lives of innocent black kids don't matter.
 
Weird. I remember my old CO's 30 years later.

Hell, I remember the name of the guy who packed around the M60 like he was Animal Mother or some shit.

It's all about context.

I remember my AG because he was an Asian who got waivered in on the height requirement, had a comically un-asian last name, plus a penchant for perching on barracks furniture, vehicles, & jersey barriers like a vulture.

He could also swap belts like a sushi chef on speed; reloads sounded like bursts, and it fucked with haji's timing hard.
 
Last edited:
Not a knock on you because you are one of the more informative users on the thread, but we didn’t miss it, it was posted a couple days ago. The thread has become mostly unreadable, since people have started posting things that were posted a few hours before too. Anyway, I believe the judge ruled yesterday that he would not allow the Texas case information at trial. The Hennepin County incident is still in the mix though.

Sorry, by "how did we miss this" I meant say, back when this started. I wish we had seen it back then, but if nothing else the Journalists had to have pulled those old files and known that he had already OD'd once in a police encounter. That would have been VERY VERY INTERESTING INFORMATION to have the first week of this mess.

We heard from the very beginning that he supposedly dropped white packets on the ground and stuff, and apparently the body cam footage shows him downing pills very, very blatantly, and his symptoms and blood work show fentanyl overdose (3 times lethal dosage, IIRC).

To put it bluntly: The man had a history of eating pills to hide evidence and overdosing on them because of it. He apparently died when he tried it this time. Did the journoactivsts find this out and just decide to hide it from us to let the riots continue?

Hell, did the fucking DA find this out? Is this why the body cam footage was blocked from public release, to prevent autists like us from catching that little detail?
 
Interesting. I looked further into Alissa Eleanor Azar (1991-02-12). She has one of those 'linktr.ee' little miniwebsites to link to all her stuff at https://linktr.ee/R3volutionDaddy. That page links to her Paypal account.. which is '@mayafoxxx'.

That is a username of interest, especially given Azar's frequent tweets about 'sex positivity', giving 'sex education' to very young children , and even 'sex work'- seemed like a woman very poisoned by America's rulers. And what did I find when I plugged 'Maya Foxxx' into Google? Disused Twitter and 'tryst.link' accounts. among other websites involved in prostitution. Was this woman involved in prostitution before taking part in the local color revolution?
View attachment 1590659
EDIT: And among the ways she's making money at the moment, she has an account tied to her directly on 'depop', trying to resell $850 sneakers. Sounds like someone who was making large sums of money that she spent very unwisely at some point, hmmm?
View attachment 1590684

The DePop stuff .... high-end bags, shoes, clothes presented as gifts etc can be a way for clients to pay some sex workers wihout cash changing hands or a record of any financial transaction. Goods that can be returned or sold on for a high dollar value.

Or she might just be a very silly spender. Or a very good shoplifter. Bu given you mentioned sex work, it's a possibility.
 
The DePop stuff .... high-end bags, shoes, clothes presented as gifts etc can be a way for clients to pay some sex workers wihout cash changing hands or a record of any financial transaction. Goods that can be returned or sold on for a high dollar value.

Or she might just be a very silly spender. Or a very good shoplifter. Bu given you mentioned sex work, it's a possibility.

Can confirm.

As contracted security, I had several clients who'd leave meetings with such things; almost always with tags still attached, receipts stapled to them.

The next stop was almost always the shop of origin, and I found it amusing that clients' customers often spent far more on swag than if they'd just ponied up cold cash, or bought drinks at the club. Then again, those girls were good at their jobs; otherwise they couldn't have afforded to pay me.

To play devil's advocate here though; a lot of low-tier models are paid in swag by desperate photographers, to sweeten gigs that otherwise wouldn't pay enough, so it's not just hookers taking pay in barter.

Except she ain't even got that going for her; she's a straight up whore.
 
I wonder for a lot of the anti-9/11 sentiment from people in NYC are recent arrivals that came after and why they complain about the memorials because they weren’t there.
Well, 19 years ago, a lot of these idiots from Antifa/BLM were probably kids, if they were even around. They don't remember what happened in 2001. They didn't watch two of the largest trade buildings in the world get destroyed in a few hours, live on tv. It didn't matter that I wasn't an American, it still affected me to watch thousands die due to terrorism, and the world started to fall into darkness. The signs were there, back then, that something changed. We didn't know it was changing into Clownworld.

Have they been brainwashed to think mass destruction and murder is funny? I don't think any of them really understand what they are pushing for, in the eyes of many around the world. Even pozzed history shows us that generally, being shitheads towards your own people leads to two outcomes. A rope. Or exile.

It's easy enough to realize they've compartmented every thought that comes into their head as it's own thing, unconnected to the rest. If everyone you talked to was gaslighting you from the moment you were old enough to understand them, you probably wouldn't understand whats happening, ever. The Truman Show, anyone?

These people see themselves as the proud rebels against an evil establishment, a la France 1942. Which is ridiculous on it's own, but there's a hidden common message that seems to come through all of their propaganda and when these idiots talk.

It's never, ever, their fault. 'I reacted to the neoKKK/nazis/proud patriots protesting there and it made me uncontrollably angry.'

I wanna know who let these people grow up thinking if they crybully enough they can get anything? Just lost my d&d group because of the same crybully zoomer bullshit. 'It's not my fault I derailed a friendship! It's not like I'm the one who started going off on everyone' when literally theres proof of him starting it. I think thats whats been bugging me so much for 3 weeks now. It's been taught so thouroughly to this newest generation of 'adults' that if they want to change something, the only way to do it is through either division or violence.

They are so non confrontationable at the same time that actually sitting down and talking in person or over the phone is too scary for them, because words they don't like = violence.
 
Oh no, It seems that George Floyd was a snitch.

NoticeofMotion08272020-page-001.jpg NoticeofMotion08272020-page-002.jpg NoticeofMotion08272020-page-003.jpg

1599920198462.png
And it seems he was not only addicted to hard drugs, he also was dealing it.
When police arrested him in 2019 he quickly swallowed his stash, acted like a toddler and cried like a baby.
They also had to call an ambulance. Where have I heard this before?

FentyMcFentanyl.jpg
 

Attachments

Oh no, It seems that George Floyd was a snitch.
And it seems he was not only addicted to hard drugs, he also was dealing it.
When police arrested him in 2019 he quickly swallowed his stash, acted like a toddler and cried like a baby.
They also had to call an ambulance. Where have I heard this before?
saint floyd
a snitch, a twitch, and a bitch
 
Catching up on all of this shit, and now I can't help but be even more furious at the straight-up propaganda bullshit the NFL was doing earlier tonight.
Perhaps optimistic :optimistic: , but the pushback from the fans that booed is telling. The more BLM and other stuff permeates people's entertainment and recreational activities, the more sick and tired they get of it. If the NFL plans to be like other sports and allow kneeling and BLM/SJW messages on fields or uniforms, they just might see a huge drop off of viewership by the time the Super Bowl is played. A drop off for the Super Bowl could be more inevitable if the match-up is unimpressive, most of the multi-million dollar commercials are blah, and -- Godbear forbid -- the halftime show includes a political pro-BLM/SJW statement.

Da Bears throwing living legend Brian Urlacher under the bus for not sucking BLM's dick. It's like the NFL wants to fail this year.
Yet another example, sadly, of "You can have your opinion, it just has to be like everyone else's."

It's too bad Snopes got so bad though because it used to be a near-universal argument-ender. It got worse and worse with the lack of involvement by the Mikkelsons, who did a mostly excellent job through the history of the site.
This is probably more meta/OT, but is there any sort of replacement for Snopes that debunks internet hoaxes/myths without leaning too far in any particular direction?

What the 🦆 is the point “in theory” of the snack cans anyway? Are BLM idiots incapable of finding water in a 🦆ing city? Are they so weak they can’t riot all night without snacks?
I think someone largely answered this, but the snack vans appear to be a front for more surreptitious stuff. To an unknowing outsider, each van looks like any other food truck that provides food, beverages, etc. to people. What they might not realize is that these snack vans also include stuff to help further the rioting such as weapons, ammo, etc. In the case of the Portland Snack Van, it looks like drugs were also available -- whether they were being given to others or solely for Snack Van Guy's personal use -- based on his run-in with Idaho authorities.

Another example that comes to mind is the (now defunct?) rib van. At one point in this thread, someone posted the operating entity's spreadsheet of income and expenses. Ribs and food made up just 2% of the expenses; most of the money going out was reported as donations with no further detail or breakdown of who received the donated money. It was both alleged and suspected here that these donations were some combination of money given to freedom funds/the NLG and a mutual circle jerk where people/groups would donate the same money back and forth to each other a la Patreon and other online donation platforms.
 
Well, 19 years ago, a lot of these idiots from Antifa/BLM were probably kids, if they were even around. They don't remember what happened in 2001. They didn't watch two of the largest trade buildings in the world get destroyed in a few hours, live on tv. It didn't matter that I wasn't an American, it still affected me to watch thousands die due to terrorism, and the world started to fall into darkness. The signs were there, back then, that something changed. We didn't know it was changing into Clownworld.

Have they been brainwashed to think mass destruction and murder is funny? I don't think any of them really understand what they are pushing for, in the eyes of many around the world. Even pozzed history shows us that generally, being shitheads towards your own people leads to two outcomes. A rope. Or exile.

It's easy enough to realize they've compartmented every thought that comes into their head as it's own thing, unconnected to the rest. If everyone you talked to was gaslighting you from the moment you were old enough to understand them, you probably wouldn't understand whats happening, ever. The Truman Show, anyone?

These people see themselves as the proud rebels against an evil establishment, a la France 1942. Which is ridiculous on it's own, but there's a hidden common message that seems to come through all of their propaganda and when these idiots talk.

It's never, ever, their fault. 'I reacted to the neoKKK/nazis/proud patriots protesting there and it made me uncontrollably angry.'

I wanna know who let these people grow up thinking if they crybully enough they can get anything? Just lost my d&d group because of the same crybully zoomer bullshit. 'It's not my fault I derailed a friendship! It's not like I'm the one who started going off on everyone' when literally theres proof of him starting it. I think thats whats been bugging me so much for 3 weeks now. It's been taught so thouroughly to this newest generation of 'adults' that if they want to change something, the only way to do it is through either division or violence.

They are so non confrontationable at the same time that actually sitting down and talking in person or over the phone is too scary for them, because words they don't like = violence.
I was in elementary when those towers fell and it stuck with me. We didn't watch it (no TVs in the classroom) but the school did go into lockdown (because that's what happened on army bases) and someone high ranking in dress blues removed me from the classroom to escort me to my mom so we could flee the area as at the time the 2nd plane just hit and we didn't know what was next. My husband was on the other side of the world and originally thought it was a skit or movie except it was on every channel (his parents originally didn't believe someone flew planes into a building when he started freaking out).

A majority of people who were born after or were too young to remember don't care much about what happened that day. My sister doesn't remember the event because she was so young but at least she's respectful enough to not dance on the graves of the people who died in the current year. But even people my age would speak with such apathy when it came to this day after a handful of years passed and we were approaching adulthood.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back