JK Rowling’s latest book is about a murderous cis man who dresses as a woman to kill his victims - Discuss all the JK Rowling tranny shit here

[Fromtheblackdepths]

Is she?

People? I do not know.

Her first non-Harry Potter book suffered heavily from children's author writing for adults now and overusing vulgarities to show the book is for adults, really, people swear in it. Her detective novels are supposed to be at least competent within the genre.

Really now? That sounds kinda interesting.

 

[starborn427614]

Wait, you mean this ISN'T just an Onion headline? I was under the impression it was just another round of shitting on JK.

 

[P. Barnes' THOT]

I’ve just started it, and it’s okay so far. But I haven’t got to the tranny murderer parts

 

[Fromtheblackdepths]

Wait, you mean this ISN'T just an Onion headline? I was under the impression it was just another round of shitting on JK.

Justifiable, I thought so too. But no, we're getting, as other people noted, Psycho by J.K Rowling.

 

[You]

The greatest thing about this is Rowling is a shining bastion example of what the left believes in and wants everyone to think about social programs: she was a single mom on welfare who got her degree and became a billionaire but always made sure to pay an excess in taxes as a 'thank you' and to help others and believing that she deserved to pay it forward.

But because she has one tiny, absolutely trivial belief that's different than what they want, the liberals want her dead.

lol no.
She basically said biological women have rights and safety concerns and that men in dresses need to respect that and troons reeeeed because Harry Potter is the only book they’ve read.
But because they’re mentally ill men, they’ve gone off the deep end, harassing her, death threats and the like, so she probably is a TERF now.

What? You just said she wasn't a TERF and then described a TERF. If she doesn't even think men cutting their dicks off are even women then naturally she isn't going to think they deserve the same rights as them. The opposite of including someone is excluding.

 

[Corn Flakes]

What? You just said she wasn't a TERF and then described a TERF. If she doesn't even think men cutting their dicks off are even women then naturally she isn't going to think they deserve the same rights as them. The opposite of including someone is excluding.

I think you're focusing too hard on the Trans-Exclusionary part and forgetting the Radical Feminist part. As far as anyone knows, JK Rowling isn't a radical feminist. At most she's a Trans-Exclusionary Peak-Trans Person.

 

[You]

I think you're focusing too hard on the Trans-Exclusionary part and forgetting the Radical Feminist part. As far as anyone knows, JK Rowling isn't a radical feminist. At most she's a Trans-Exclusionary Peak-Trans Person.

Oh, no sir. For the last decade until this trans shit went off she was absolutely fucking insufferable on twitter about feminism. I just thought people knew that so was only focusing on the TE part.

 

[Tasty Tatty]

This just popped up in my feed:

LGBT activists are once again outraged at JK Rowling over something she didn't do. Writing under a pseudonym, Rowling's newest book, Troubled Blood, follows the story of an investigation into a cold case involving the disappearance of a woman in 1974. The fabricated controversy surrounds the villain of the story, a cisgender man who dresses as a woman.​

​

Editorial Director of the Huffington Post: Personal, Noah Michelson tweeted, "Imagine — just imagine! — how much of a garbage person you have to be to be one of the wealthiest people in the world and be able to spend your time doing literally ANYTHING YOU WANT and then choosing to dedicate your life to terrorizing trans people." Artist Kira Kosarin tweeted to her 274k followers, "RIP JK Rowling, she's not dead, we just don't acknowledge transphobes in this house."​

​

The hashtag #RIPJKRowling trended on twitter with Piers Morgan correctly arguing, "The fact #RIPJKRowling is trending says all you need to know about the woke brigade - they're nastier & more viciously intolerant than anyone they preach about."​

​

LGBT publication, Instinct Magazine referred to the book as "transphobic." LGBTQ Nation boiled down the overall argument stating, "The idea that cisgender men dress up or identify as women in order to access women’s facilities to attack them is an old anti-transgender myth often explicitly used to oppose transgender rights."​

​

Overall, the outrage appears misplaced at best and intentionally fabricated at worst, merely being justified as a means to continue hating the popular author for speaking up against LGBT bullying against critics of gender identity advocacy. To begin with, there is absolutely no indication the villain is transgender or representing transwomen in the slightest.​

​

The fictional character is a transvestite, which if you remember your Rocky Horror Picture Show history is a sexual fetish heterosexual men engage in. Cisgender, as is repeatedly mentioned, indicates the fictional male character identifies as male as well. A transvestite is not a drag queen and is not a transwoman. The issue has absolutely nothing to do with transgender people at all.​

​

Furthermore, heterosexual, cisgender men have stalked and assaulted women in women's restrooms and other private spaces while dressed as women for many years. In 2016, The Daily Signal reported six such examples. In 2018 in South Carolina, a heterosexual, cisgender man was arrested for recording women from an adjacent bathroom stall while dressed as a woman. In July of 2020, a heterosexual, cisgender man dressed as a woman stalked a woman to her home and attempted to sexually assault her at her front door.​

​

The argument has never been that transwomen are a threat to women and girls, but that heterosexual, cisgender male predators will abuse gender identity-inclusive policies to pursue their goals.​

​

A heterosexual, cisgender man who is sexually aroused by the idea of dressing as a woman, stalking and killing women is a perfectly realistic and terrifying setting for a novel. Just as Buffalo Bill in The Silence of the Lambs, demonstrated the difference between transgender individuals suffering from gender dysphoria and the highly disturbed world of a serial killer’s obsession and delusion. Buffalo Bill wanted to own women's bodies and acted out his obsession through literally skinning them to make a female body suit.​

​

Although there has been commentary arguing the movie is harmful to the LGBT community, it was, in reality, a positive social commentary on both misogyny and legitimate transgenderism. Ironically, while Bill's character was denied sex reassignment surgery by his psychologists for his mentally disturbed state, today's LGBT movement would argue he had a human right to taxpayer-paid medical transition.​

​

In the same way, what LGBT activists misinterpret as transphobia, in reality is commentary on the dangers of non-transgender people exploiting the valid interests of the LGBT community. The desire to be angry at Rowling overrides reason and a willingness to engage the context of the story. They just want to hate her and feel victimized while doing so.​

​

As Robbie Coltrane, who played Hagrid in the iconic Harry Potter movies responded to prior outrage targeting Rowling, "I don’t think what she said was offensive really. I don't know why but there's a whole Twitter generation of people who hang around waiting to be offended."​

​

Demonstrating this fact, Marti Gould Cummings, candidate for NYC Council, District 7, tweeted, "JK Rowling is dangerous. #TransRightsAreHumanRights." But by what logic? All Rowling has done is create a villain with a compelling backstory with a relevant perspective on violence towards women in our society. How is she "dangerous?"​

​

What should go without saying, of course, is that a serial killer can absolutely be transgender just as well as any other person of any other characteristic. It is not transphobic to cast a transgender person as an unsavory fictional character. It does not reflect on all transgender people or put transgender people into any specific harm by doing so. In fact, equality is most readily fulfilled through being treated equally with everyone else, good and bad. However, this particular outrage, as is true with all similar "transphobic" accusations against Rowling is purely manufactured and simply does not reflect the real story.​

https://thepostmillennial.com/rowling-wasnt-even-writing-about-trans-people-and-lgbtq-activists-freaked-out

JK Rowling is and always has been standing up for women, but ironically, SJWs can't see or accept that.

She stands up for them while ignoring that she also has male fans. All this nonsense started because she's worried about the girls having mastectomies and given hormones and how those numbers have increased... she wasn't much worried when the number of BOYS was higher. I mean, the poster children of the trans kids insanity happen to be boys: Jazz, Desmond, Lactatia (not "trans", but "nb" bs).

IICR, Magdalen Berns also worried about boys, even when she often talked about lesbians and even if she did through a feminist perspective. Jo doesn't really seem to care much for all those botched "vagina" surgeries so far.

Harry Potter is the closest thing many millenials had to the bible and it's amazing to see them go from getting tattoos, putting their Hogwarts house name on their Tinder bio, referencing Hermione on protest signs like she's a real person, etc. to acting like JK is Hitler over opinions on gender.

Amazing, but also worrying. While it's good that people are able to separate the person from their art, most SJWs focus rather on the "art" (or belief) than the person. A person is only valid as long as they have the right set of beliefs and once they stop, they deserve to die. It's worrying how quick they're able to make the switch from "I love you" to "I would kill you myself" only due to a small disagreement.

 

[one_time_user]

I mean, she's literally doing the exact same thing they do- if a tranny gets caught doing a crime they're not a tranny, they're a man in a dress just pretending to be a tranny. they should be thanking her for saying exactly what they tell us every time a tranny murders/rapes/chops your face with an ax etc

 

[Crinoids]

Many pseudonyms are branding at this point.

It's definitely branding, and to stop kids from thinking "I like J.K Rowling! She wrote Harry Potter ! I'm going to read this too!"

A lot of kids walk into a library with a list of authors they like and choose books based on that. Even when that author entirely or mostly writes a series, a lot of kids say "I'm looking for Brian Jacques books" , "Where are Jeff Kinney books at", or "I am looking for Carolyn Keen books, duddee... how'd she write so many books?! She must be ancient by now."

Some kids make it a goal to read everything by their favorite author. It's definitely not a good idea to have the most popular juvenile book series and a name kids recognize and then go and use that name to publish creepy adult serial killer books.

 

[Corn Flakes]

Oh, no sir. For the last decade until this trans shit went off she was absolutely fucking insufferable on twitter about feminism. I just thought people knew that so was only focusing on the TE part.

I think we have definitions of what "radical" means. Being loud and insufferable does not mean a feminist is a radical. Hell, I consider being loud and insufferable to be required in order to be a feminist, period. Wake me up when Rowling starts tweeing about #killallmen.

Regardless of whether or not she's a TERF, though... this shit is funny.

 

[TheScooper]

Isn't this a Brian De Palma film?

 

[alreadyhome]

I mean, she's literally doing the exact same thing they do- if a tranny gets caught doing a crime they're not a tranny, they're a man in a dress just pretending to be a tranny. they should be thanking her for saying exactly what they tell us every time a tranny murders/rapes/chops your face with an ax etc

I think the "man in a dress" phrase was used by an outlet that was summarizing the novel, and not used by the author. Hopefully J.K. Rowling understands that trans really does mean mentally ill men who wear women's clothes.

 

[one_time_user]

I think the "man in a dress" phrase was used by an outlet that was summarizing the novel, and not used by the author. Hopefully J.K. Rowling understands that trans really does mean mentally ill men who wear women's clothes.

she absolutely does. but she is also playing ball by their rules by bouncing their tropes right back into their faces

 

[Xolanite]

Can’t wait for the bs theories she’ll make to retain relevancy.

 

[alreadyhome]

she absolutely does. but she is also playing ball by their rules by bouncing their tropes right back into their faces

Chic

 

[CatParty]

 

[Don't Tread on Me]

Is JK an actual TERF? I just thought people were projecting after they felt “betrayed” by her.

Oh yeah.

J.K. Rowling Writes about Her Reasons for Speaking out on Sex and Gender Issues - J.K. Rowling

Warning: The below content is not appropriate for children. Please check with an adult before you read this page. To go back to the children’s page, please click here. This isn’t an easy piece to write, for reasons that will shortly become clear, but I know it’s time to explain myself on an...

www.jkrowling.com

She's an articulate, well-spoken and careful writer penning TERF essays and the twenty year old troons who can't flip burgers at a McDonald's without burning themselves are seething about it.

 

[You]

Can’t wait for the bs theories she’ll make to retain relevancy.

Probably going to be waiting a long fucking time because this stuff has been going on for awhile with her and she does the ultimate no-no: listing statistics about how fucked up the trans community is.

"The fourth is where things start to get truly personal. I’m concerned about the huge explosion in young women wishing to transition and also about the increasing numbers who seem to be detransitioning (returning to their original sex), because they regret taking steps that have, in some cases, altered their bodies irrevocably, and taken away their fertility. Some say they decided to transition after realising they were same-sex attracted, and that transitioning was partly driven by homophobia, either in society or in their families.

Most people probably aren’t aware – I certainly wasn’t, until I started researching this issue properly – that ten years ago, the majority of people wanting to transition to the opposite sex were male. That ratio has now reversed. The UK has experienced a 4400% increase in girls being referred for transitioning treatment. Autistic girls are hugely overrepresented in their numbers."

Big LOL at "not only are you not the other gender but you're also probably autistic"

 

[Chan the Wizard]

The greatest thing about this is Rowling is a shining bastion example of what the left believes in and wants everyone to think about social programs: she was a single mom on welfare who got her degree and became a billionaire but always made sure to pay an excess in taxes as a 'thank you' and to help others and believing that she deserved to pay it forward.

But because she has one tiny, absolutely trivial belief that's different than what they want, the liberals want her dead.



What? You just said she wasn't a TERF and then described a TERF. If she doesn't even think men cutting their dicks off are even women then naturally she isn't going to think they deserve the same rights as them. The opposite of including someone is excluding.

She acknowledges them as trans women instead of men in dresses, so she’s not peak TERF.