JK Rowling’s latest book is about a murderous cis man who dresses as a woman to kill his victims - Discuss all the JK Rowling tranny shit here

This just popped up in my feed:

View attachment 1597959


LGBT activists are once again outraged at JK Rowling over something she didn't do. Writing under a pseudonym, Rowling's newest book, Troubled Blood, follows the story of an investigation into a cold case involving the disappearance of a woman in 1974. The fabricated controversy surrounds the villain of the story, a cisgender man who dresses as a woman.​
Editorial Director of the Huffington Post: Personal, Noah Michelson tweeted, "Imagine — just imagine! — how much of a garbage person you have to be to be one of the wealthiest people in the world and be able to spend your time doing literally ANYTHING YOU WANT and then choosing to dedicate your life to terrorizing trans people." Artist Kira Kosarin tweeted to her 274k followers, "RIP JK Rowling, she's not dead, we just don't acknowledge transphobes in this house."​
The hashtag #RIPJKRowling trended on twitter with Piers Morgan correctly arguing, "The fact #RIPJKRowling is trending says all you need to know about the woke brigade - they're nastier & more viciously intolerant than anyone they preach about."​
LGBT publication, Instinct Magazine referred to the book as "transphobic." LGBTQ Nation boiled down the overall argument stating, "The idea that cisgender men dress up or identify as women in order to access women’s facilities to attack them is an old anti-transgender myth often explicitly used to oppose transgender rights."​
Overall, the outrage appears misplaced at best and intentionally fabricated at worst, merely being justified as a means to continue hating the popular author for speaking up against LGBT bullying against critics of gender identity advocacy. To begin with, there is absolutely no indication the villain is transgender or representing transwomen in the slightest.​
The fictional character is a transvestite, which if you remember your Rocky Horror Picture Show history is a sexual fetish heterosexual men engage in. Cisgender, as is repeatedly mentioned, indicates the fictional male character identifies as male as well. A transvestite is not a drag queen and is not a transwoman. The issue has absolutely nothing to do with transgender people at all.​
Furthermore, heterosexual, cisgender men have stalked and assaulted women in women's restrooms and other private spaces while dressed as women for many years. In 2016, The Daily Signal reported six such examples. In 2018 in South Carolina, a heterosexual, cisgender man was arrested for recording women from an adjacent bathroom stall while dressed as a woman. In July of 2020, a heterosexual, cisgender man dressed as a woman stalked a woman to her home and attempted to sexually assault her at her front door.​
The argument has never been that transwomen are a threat to women and girls, but that heterosexual, cisgender male predators will abuse gender identity-inclusive policies to pursue their goals.​
A heterosexual, cisgender man who is sexually aroused by the idea of dressing as a woman, stalking and killing women is a perfectly realistic and terrifying setting for a novel. Just as Buffalo Bill in The Silence of the Lambs, demonstrated the difference between transgender individuals suffering from gender dysphoria and the highly disturbed world of a serial killer’s obsession and delusion. Buffalo Bill wanted to own women's bodies and acted out his obsession through literally skinning them to make a female body suit.​
Although there has been commentary arguing the movie is harmful to the LGBT community, it was, in reality, a positive social commentary on both misogyny and legitimate transgenderism. Ironically, while Bill's character was denied sex reassignment surgery by his psychologists for his mentally disturbed state, today's LGBT movement would argue he had a human right to taxpayer-paid medical transition.​
In the same way, what LGBT activists misinterpret as transphobia, in reality is commentary on the dangers of non-transgender people exploiting the valid interests of the LGBT community. The desire to be angry at Rowling overrides reason and a willingness to engage the context of the story. They just want to hate her and feel victimized while doing so.​
As Robbie Coltrane, who played Hagrid in the iconic Harry Potter movies responded to prior outrage targeting Rowling, "I don’t think what she said was offensive really. I don't know why but there's a whole Twitter generation of people who hang around waiting to be offended."​
Demonstrating this fact, Marti Gould Cummings, candidate for NYC Council, District 7, tweeted, "JK Rowling is dangerous. #TransRightsAreHumanRights." But by what logic? All Rowling has done is create a villain with a compelling backstory with a relevant perspective on violence towards women in our society. How is she "dangerous?"​
What should go without saying, of course, is that a serial killer can absolutely be transgender just as well as any other person of any other characteristic. It is not transphobic to cast a transgender person as an unsavory fictional character. It does not reflect on all transgender people or put transgender people into any specific harm by doing so. In fact, equality is most readily fulfilled through being treated equally with everyone else, good and bad. However, this particular outrage, as is true with all similar "transphobic" accusations against Rowling is purely manufactured and simply does not reflect the real story.​





She stands up for them while ignoring that she also has male fans. All this nonsense started because she's worried about the girls having mastectomies and given hormones and how those numbers have increased... she wasn't much worried when the number of BOYS was higher. I mean, the poster children of the trans kids insanity happen to be boys: Jazz, Desmond, Lactatia (not "trans", but "nb" bs).

IICR, Magdalen Berns also worried about boys, even when she often talked about lesbians and even if she did through a feminist perspective. Jo doesn't really seem to care much for all those botched "vagina" surgeries so far.



Amazing, but also worrying. While it's good that people are able to separate the person from their art, most SJWs focus rather on the "art" (or belief) than the person. A person is only valid as long as they have the right set of beliefs and once they stop, they deserve to die. It's worrying how quick they're able to make the switch from "I love you" to "I would kill you myself" only due to a small disagreement.
The villains of yesterday became the heroes of today.
I can't wait to see the movies/ read the books that Gen Z makes. Such fertile ground. I'm so jealous.
 
Isn't that the plot for the movie psycho? Or am I retarded?
It is, and it also has parallels with Silence of the Lambs, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and so on. Because most classic thriller/serial killer tropes draw heavily from the real life story of Ed Gein, who was the first serial killer to get mainstream press attention, long before people even really understood what a 'serial killer' was. When that concept started to get more fleshed out in the 60s and 70s with guys like BTK and Ed Kemper, that only helped to cement the stereotype of the typical serial killer as a loner man with repressed mommy/sexual issues who dresses up as a woman in a shed in the woods.

It might be a trope, but its a trope because this shit does happen. Troons are only pretending this is transphobic because they have a bone to pick with Rowling, not because this story even involves trannies. Hell, it's not even the first British crime novel written by a Scot that features a cross-dressing murderer as antagonist: Irvine Welsh wrote Filth like 20 years ago, and I'll bet dollars to donuts that book is still going to be way less PC than whatever JK has planned.
 
You ever had that urge to shove someone in a locker?
Lol.png
 
This is from Harry Potter and The Chamber of Secrets.

That was written before idpol took over and is a pretty good indication she was written to be white.
You don't need to even open the books to know Hermione was always supposed to be white before the "controversy" started. Every single illustrated book cover in which she appears shows Hermione as a white girl. And Rowling herself picked Emma Watson, a white girl, to play the role of Hermione in the movies.

I agree with Rowling that Hermione could have been black because her race had no relevancy in the story, but her whole "Hermione was never written to be white" take was so disingenuous.

Back to the thread topic, nice to see J.K. still refuses to bend the knee to these people. Hope the government doesn't do something stupid to her but it's the UK so who knows.
 
Tempted to pirate a PDF of this (I'm not spending my hard earned cashola on something by J. K. Rowling because she's a fucking hack) and fisk it on here. Because it'll be both lulzy and stupid.

But first, I have Joe Abercrombie's "The Trouble with Peace," released just today, and which my copy is approaching from Amazon, to go through.
 
the fuck you on about john?
View attachment 1596393

Aside from that fact anybody talking about 'transgender children' should immediately be looked at with suspicion, every child is guaranteed access to public school in 2020. At least in western countries. 'Transgender' or otherwise. Its legally mandated that they attend up until like age 16. Wu must be stupider than a bag of rocks

Leonard Helplessness said:
They keep making comparisons to Buffalo Bill in the film The Silence of the Lambs, a fictional guy who was diagnosed as transgender but couldn't get the surgeries he wanted so he abducted women and tortured them into slathering lotion on themselves all day to soften up their skin, in preparation to kill them and make a skinsuit out of female human leather.

.....Why do I get the feeling that buffalo bill is a rimworld player after reading that. I can just see him coming out with a mod called precious mod that involves wearing skinsuit armor, keeping prisoners in dank pits and forcing them to rub lotion on their skin as part of the recruitment process

Fandom Trash said:
She has enough money to live the rest of her days without worry

I'm not so sure about that. All it would take to cause her serious problems would be for some pissed off troon or group of troons to decide all this anti toon stuff is some kind of hate crime and try to cause her serious legal problems, hit her with some anti troon class action and essentially make her life miserable by litigating her into oblivion. Remember, shes british and the law is pretty lenient when it comes to going after people for such things. a few years in jail on some trumped up hate speech charge, a ruined reputation and losing a big chunk of her money to lawsuits, confiscation of money earned through 'hate crimes' and legal fees could do a considerable amount of damage to her future if someone was determined enough to start something. I wouldn't put it past some troon advocacy group to try it, especially if she keeps putting stuff out like that

That said, putting stuff out like this draws heat to the publisher as well as locations selling it. They could easily make it a nightmare for her to find a publisher or anyone willing to sell her books if anybody starts causing trouble for them over this. There are many ways to fuck up her future without having to go after her directly

Tovarisz said:
Also the cult around Harry Potter is screwy as all hell, maybe the nutty evangelists weren't completely wrong about the books.

Well.....


She isn't that far off from the sjw mentality when you think about it. I wonder how long it'll be before we see twitter going off like that about harry potter
 
daily reminder that every single tranny is the product of being addicted to pornography and a product of being groomed by an early age by fags, online or irl.
Also of idiotic cultural norms where women own all rights to self-expression, but men are thrown deeper and deeper into a tiny box.
 
Back