U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cats are not anarchists. They are libertarians.


Off the top of my head:
  • Ferngully
  • Captain Planet
  • Just a Dream (book)
  • Wall-E
  • The Lorax (original)
  • Avatar
  • Pocahontas
  • Princess Mononoke
  • Nausicaa
  • Once Upon a Forest
  • Bambi
  • The Wild Thornberries (Show)
Cats are straight up kikes. Or Ferengi. Same shit, different pile.
 
Anyone talking about a civil war is silly. There won't be a civil war. No-ones livelyhood is being threatened at the moment, you'd need major supply lines being cut to the point where the average "I just wanna grill" guy comes out of his house. You only have the 6000 or so Antifa being bussed around, this will end up being tied up in the courts, if it comes to that. Perhaps there will be small clashes in some places. With the Blue states burning peoples homes to the ground and 50 Kenosha Kyles killing Antifa in the street in red states. Remember the establishment wants power, not anarchy.

If the Military decides to step in through cajoling. That will make people sit up and take notice. The military is supposed to serve the President, elected by the people. If they decide to put their support behind one candidate or the other. Now you are in South America. I mean I would've never said this a year ago, but that scenario is on the table in November now.
I generally don't think there'll be an all-out civil war and I think the people who are saying one will happen are overdosing on doompills. I do think this is going to be a redux of our own early 70s and Italy's Years of Lead on steroids.
 
There was this one time some people from a city went to a small town and tried to rob the c-store/gas station. The lady behind the counter was middle eastern and chased them down main street at noon with an axe. Minorities do not care about the feels of blacks.

It's really rather funny that, while people of different backgrounds argue and disagree on a whole lot of fundamentals, the one thing that will always bring whites, asians, hispanics, natives, non-negro blacks and arabs together is their mutual hatred of black foolishness. Multiculturalism is at it's best when a whole bunch of people of different creeds and cultures can get together and get aggravated by niggers doing nigger things.

Though I do have to say, I've never seen anyone react as poorly to black foolishness as an older black dude. Jesus, white leftists and some black people think the "Nazis" are bad, they ought to listen to a 72 year old black man go on a rant about niggers once.
 
They're not even in the top 10 cities for homicides in the US.

They DO however have a disproportionate amount of officer involved shootings, considerably higher than the rest of the country.
In terms of violent crime rates per 100,000 people Tulsa is 19th in the country for overall violent crime, 18th for murder and non-negligent manslaughter and 10th for property crime. It's not in the top 10 for violent crime, but it's not a great place to be in terms of those categories.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Spastic Colon
Untitled.png



 
Every single person I have ever spoken to with even a little experience in the culinary/restaurant industry DREADS black customers. They're rude, they don't tip, they don't watch their kids and they flip shit over minor inconveniences.
And they're always complete and utter fucking cunts, every single one, no exception when they come in to pig out and binge eat on Sunday after going to Church. Way to keep the sabbath, by spending money in a business open on the Sabbath day and being a disgusting glutton.

Rate me MOTI but there is some shit you make like Princess Unikitty with when it comes hospitality work once you leave and for me it's fat black bastards waddling in, acting holier than though because they turned over their gibs and income they'll never pay taxes on to a fat parasite and hypocrite masquerading as a "Man of the LAAAWWDDDD!!", trashing the place, eating 3/4 of their plate of food, saying the "dint like it", and being utter pricks when you refuse to give them a free replacement meal.


Honest to God, I would go back to hospitality in a hot minute if we bought back in segregation.

So let me get this straight. When BLMtards (the Koon Klux Klan, if you will) and pantifa go doing this, it's fine. When she get s adise of what the spastics on her side have been dishing out it's LiKe LiTeRaLlY h8 cRiM
Cats are not anarchists. They are libertarians.


Off the top of my head:
  • Ferngully
  • Captain Planet
  • Just a Dream (book)
  • Wall-E
  • The Lorax (original)
  • Avatar
  • Pocahontas
  • Princess Mononoke
  • Nausicaa
  • Once Upon a Forest
  • Bambi
  • The Wild Thornberries (Show)


Er, Treasure Planet is where pls?? Also Animaniacs and Pinky and the Brain. Kids these days don't know they're born, animaniacs was amazing and rammed full of innuendo that went waaaay over my grade school head.
 
Last edited:
Looks like a judge in Lancaster, PA is cutting these "protesters" no slack. Welcome to America, shiteaters. Good. And if any of these cocksuckers goes over to Hersheypark and causes trouble, you know what to do.

Motherfucker if they fuck around in Hershey, be prepared for execution via Augustus Gloop. The smell of chocolate will cover up the stench of blood, mark my words.

But anyway, fucking based. Glad my state ain't fuckin around.
 
With the Blue states burning peoples homes to the ground and 50 Kenosha Kyles killing Antifa in the street in red states. Remember the establishment wants power, not anarchy.

Partially agreed - ultimately this "establishment" so corrupt and so Hellbent on polluting Western society to the point of decay desires power, not anarchy, for the sake of preservation, but are rational citizens and rational people supposed to passively help preserve this system and status quo forever? Again, agreed, talking of civil war a single year into national unrest is pretty fucking offbeat when one looks at history and the breakdown of every other contiguous nation: it takes time, is a slow, tumultuous process and shifts the Overton window of both sides of politics into the twilight zone...but eventually this melting pot will boil right the fuck over, and little can be done to stop that now - a Trump victory at least ensures a period of stability, growth, and preparation for the left to totally go fucking AWOL over the coming years - you can think this is AWOL, but consider the fact the majority of oncoming and young Democratic politicians are all the most fucking radical and eager to jump into these politics, years of work ahead of them.

Let's be rational, yes, let's refuse pessimism, and judge from the cyclical nature of history (and the similarity our unrest bears to other episodes across history) that we are in the early stages of this trainwreck - but let's not embrace total optimism and gullibility in the process; this situation, this clusterfuck..it isn't sustainable forever, and we've only entered the height of episodic unrest.

Realism is the approach here, not optimism, and realism will tell you that this is all heading towards an unfortunate breaking point, and eventually the constant tides of shifting unrest and ideologies will erode the concept of stability, more and more - ever considered the future of American democracy and moderate politics after Trump, a series of events which has totally and drastically shifted the American political theater, in addition to the rise of a generation of citizens that are largely radicalized? We're in for one Hell of an episode.
 
On the positive side, it seems like they have overused the "surround normies and hound them then film them and try to make twitter do their thang so they will be shamed and lose their job" gambit so much it doesn't really work anymore. No one cares. There are too many "Subaru Sally" or "Gas Pedal Gary"s for anyone to give a shit.
 
It's really rather funny that, while people of different backgrounds argue and disagree on a whole lot of fundamentals, the one thing that will always bring whites, asians, hispanics, natives, non-negro blacks and arabs together is their mutual hatred of black foolishness. Multiculturalism is at it's best when a whole bunch of people of different creeds and cultures can get together and get aggravated by niggers doing nigger things.

Though I do have to say, I've never seen anyone react as poorly to black foolishness as an older black dude. Jesus, white leftists and some black people think the "Nazis" are bad, they ought to listen to a 72 year old black man go on a rant about niggers once.

Previous black generations (dating from the old foundations of the Moorish Temple in the U.S. and the rise of Wallace Fard Muhammad, the saviour of the NOI) were all fairly fucking unstable but had a sense of cultural cohesion and an attachment to educational and religious values, typically granted to them by their time in the South (not as fucking slaves, obviously.) and weren't the total fucking circus niggers are today so when they see today, they don't see just "instability", they see a literal fucking fever dream.

Niggers today are very reminiscent of the old 80's-90's "shuck 'n jive" stereotypes that old blacks claimed did nothing but entertain whites and portray blacks as animals; probably tends to the moderate Suburbanite liberal view of blacks: like zoo entertainment, locked in the cages of poverty and the ghetto.
 
View attachment 1598881
View attachment 1598883

I hope they put their money where their mouth is so the worst of these Bolshevik wannabes can get ventilated already.
They all, without exception, have that voice. That fucking voice. That fucking claws-on-a-chalkboard autistic harpie screech. That voice has made me more misogynistic than any shitty manosphere blog post.
 
I doubt it will result in genocide, but we will definitely see atrocity. The current political environment is aligning more similar to the start of the Spanish Civil War rather then the Rwandan.
The left got their asses kicked in that war. Even when they had superior weapons and technology their lack of organisation made them less imposing than they thought. One example was when a soldier was able to ambush one and steal a tank from them!
 
I'm trying to remember what that rifle over the star is from, but I'm drawing a blank. It's obviously reminiscent of the RAF:
View attachment 1597614
But I feel like this is just a generic commie insurgency appearance. It's not the FARC, it's not Shining Path, it's not Che shit; I can't remember where it's stripped from at all.
But it really is fascinating. It's oxymoronic - yes, yes, sure, it's a pun, but you're contrasting 'proletariat' with... a puppet of the music industry? An exorbitantly wealthy person for whom waste is the name of the game? Yes, yes, rich kids adopting the language of the working class and pretending desperately to be proletariat has been the name of the game of virtually every revolutionary "vanguard" in existence, but it still boggles the brain to have this contradiction laid out in such a vapid, oxymoronic, consumerist manner and to STILL have it escape them.
Were you perhaps thinking of the Mozambique Flag?
View attachment 1598593

Cheong will probably be banned soon.
Is that the guy who did a facebook live broadcast immediately after the shooting while in the vicinity of the shooting where he was laughing and showing cars that were driving down the street? That dude pretty obviously wasn't the shooter but uh...

If facebook live guy and this guy are one and the same so I have a strong suspicion there was an easy solution to his "problem".

If not then IMC is a tard, news at 11. He's been useful lately but he's still very much a tard and will regress to the mean.
Professional foresters are always bitching, at least offline, that most of America's forests weren't here when Europeans got here and we're really fucking up by keeping them everywhere. It's more nuanced than that, but I am an engineer and can't be bothered to look into it.
It's definitely more nuanced, from what I've gleaned over the years the basic argument goes that forests didn't exist as any of us know them because nature was allowed to do its thing. As a result fires didn't tend to have piles of litter feet deep which are a big part of how everything goes up in flames and stays like that, and the fires themselves wouldn't burn for as long or as hot. As a result the overall destruction wouldn't be as severe, it would clear out the litter, wouldn't scorch the earth so severely that trees have trouble regrowing, to say nothing to trees being able to survive the fire while some smaller trees and dead trees would not, which spaced things out somewhat better than uncontrolled growth allows for, which in turn helps keep fires from being a fucking nightmare.

That said, the root cause we have is people wanna live in the woods.

There's nothing inherently wrong with living in the woods. It's nice in the woods.

Until the woods turn into a firestorm, so the recent history of forest management (think past century or so) has been a see-saw of generally bad decisions, from "keep fires from spreading we wanna be in the woods" (this builds up detritus) to "oh fuck that is a bad idea let it burn" to "oh fuck letting it burn when we gave it several extra decades of fuel is BAAAAAAD" all of which has to then be balanced with the people living in the woods which dictates a level of fire suppression to prevent loss of life which continues to let the tinder build up. To say nothing of the overbroad protection laws environmentalists have pushed and passed. If you can't manage the forest because it's illegal...well fuck.

Compound this with the more recent proliferation of the bark beetle which kills trees and provides ever better fuel in the form of huge swathes of dead, dry, trees and we've got a bunch of firetraps especially in the western US. I don't want to speculate as to why the beetle is proliferating because frankly it doesn't matter and is just a climate change rabbit hole because everything gets turned into that by environmentalists, but the results cannot be ignored whatever the cause.

The answer to the problem is forest management, real-ass-fucking-forest-management. That requires the boots of hard men working hard on the fucking ground, and lots of them at least initially, and "initially" could be years because of the state of things. That takes money to pay people, and lots of it. Because that kind of management at least initially would be very involved and due to accessibility issues limits the machinery available to help so you need manual labor and lots of it. After all, you need to undo decades of fuckshit built by overprotective environmentalists (protecting like you do doesn't work, fuckos) and shortsighted Republicans (cutting funding to "useless programs" has had some bad outcomes) which exacerbates the see-sawing of what the fuck we're doing with the forests.

Basically we need to pay the fucking piper and be smart about it or it will ALL burn, and if we don't work to then ensure the areas which get scorched are managed AFTER they get cleared by massive fires, we'll be right back where we started...


Sorry, that was a lot of text unrelated to the riots and I can't claim it was completely organized thoughts, but this is one topic that gets me on a tilt.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back