- Joined
- Nov 11, 2016
I've never heard of a PPG before, but I know that a polygraph is pseudoscientific bullshit which incriminates the innocent and exonerates the guilty on the regular. There's simply no such thing as a device which can accurately tell if someone is lying or not, and I'm inclined to believe the same of a machine which can tell if you find something sexually stimulating.
That's about what I was going to post. I have to imagine PPG is just as bad but also more rapey. Strapping bands around someone's dick (or telling them to go to prison) and then showing them CP-adjacent stuff? This is some clockwork orange shit. And apparently it has dismal accuracy when tested.
The whole area of 'study' is rife with nonsense that depends on either the person confessing to something or the examiner using such a device to make it seem like their deductions are more scientific than they are.
We don't need this crap to tell that Russ is a sick puppy. All that should be needed for a mental health practitioner is to use the highlight function on this thread and see the things that Russell has publicly posted.
(edit: although tbh I don't think he's a sexual deviant, he's an emotional deviant)
Last edited: