JK Rowling’s latest book is about a murderous cis man who dresses as a woman to kill his victims - Discuss all the JK Rowling tranny shit here

Unfortunately all the other actors from HP threw her to the wolves, from Radcliffe to Emma to Rupert to the black Hermione that Rowling bent over backwards to try to justify. Fuck, even the chink actress felt it necessary to along with working in a BLM virtue signal.

Radcliffe - Daniel Radcliffe, who rose to fame playing Harry Potter, was one of the first to address the issue with a lengthy statement he released via The Trevor Project. "Transgender women are women. Any statement to the contrary erases the identity and dignity of transgender people and goes against all advice given by professional health care associations who have far more expertise on this subject matter than either Jo or I," he wrote, before speaking directly to fans of the series impacted by Rowling's remarks. "If you found anything in these stories that resonated with you and helped you at any time in your life — then that is between you and the book that you read, and it is sacred."

Emma Watson, another member of the core cast from a young age as witch Hermione Granger, turned to Twitter to express her support for the trans community. "Trans people are who they say they are and deserve to live their lives without being constantly questioned or told they aren’t who they say they are," Watson tweeted, before adding a second tweet reading, "I want my trans followers to know that I and so many other people around the world see you, respect you and love you for who you are."

Rupert Grint, who played Ron Weasley in the Potter films, also responded to Rowling's remarks, becoming the last of the three central cast members to do so. On Friday, Grint issued a statement to the UK's The Times, saying, “I firmly stand with the trans community and echo the sentiments expressed by many of my peers. Trans women are women. Trans men are men. We should all be entitled to live with love and without judgment."

Noma Dumezweni, who played Hermione Granger in the first run of both the West End and Broadway productions of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, responded to Rowling's initial tweets on Sunday with a list of names of transgender activists and individuals. "1. Dear Jo - Marsha P. Johnson. Sylvia Rivera. Indya Moore. Angelica Ross. Tamara Adrián. Rebecca Root. Isis King. Laverne Cox. Caitlyn Jenner. Lily and Lana Wachowski. Trace Lysette. Andreja Pejic. Tracey Norman. Janet Mock. APRIL ASHLEY... etc, etc, Wikipedia..," she wrote, before adding. "2. As I honour mine, and the trans friends in my life. I’ll defer to THEIR LIVED EXPERIENCES, not their erasure. And these are just the WOMEN! There is Magic in listening. This has stories for millennia. I know You Know All this...with love. Nx #TransRightsAreHumanRights."

Bonnie Wright, the actress who portrayed Ginny Weasley, also spoke out on Wednesday via Twitter. "If Harry Potter was a source of love and belonging for you, that love is infinite and there to take without judgment or question. Transwomen are Women. I see and love you, Bonnie x," she wrote.

On Wednesday, Eddie Redmayne, who stars in the Fantastic Beasts films as Newt Scamander, released his own statement on the situation. "Respect for transgender people remains a cultural imperative, and over the years I have been trying to constantly educate myself,” Redmayne said in the statement provided to EW (and first reported by Variety). “This is an ongoing process. As someone who has worked with both J.K. Rowling and members of the trans community, I wanted to make it absolutely clear where I stand. I disagree with Jo’s comments. Trans women are women, trans men are men and non-binary identities are valid."

Another cast member, Katie Leung, who played Cho Chang, put the spotlight on organizations that support Black trans women. "So, you want my thoughts on Cho Chang? Okay, here goes...(thread)," she began, before posting a thread to various funds supporting black trans people and the Black Lives Matter movement."
This has stories for millennia
I don't get this wording.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Emperor Yakub
PERF WITH TERF!

dani-detergent-hero.jpg


Yeah, yeah...
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Autistador
Benjamin Butterworth strikes again.

You can't script it, seriously.

View attachment 1604571
Why is it always him and Adrian Harrop that the TRAs put onto these shows? Can they not find an actual tranny? Boggles the mind. Every time I see these clips it’s Benjamin Button or Harrop screeching over mild-mannered old women. The optics are not good.
 
Why is it always him and Adrian Harrop that the TRAs put onto these shows? Can they not find an actual tranny? Boggles the mind. Every time I see these clips it’s Benjamin Button or Harrop screeching over mild-mannered old women. The optics are not good.
Perhaps they believe they'll be seen as being impartial? No skin in the trans game, so to speak. Just riding the SJW moral high ground.

Yet again, it's men advocating for men who want to be women. Then talking over actual women who dare to have an opinion.

It's sick.
 
Being aware that a book by a specific author was in your vicinity caused you physical pain?
This is why I often attempt limiting my ridicule of transgender people. They seem to experience such mental suffering that I cannot justify laughing at them, too much.


"JK Rowling is a gigantic TERF bigot who probably sneaks into clothing stores to sew women's pockets shut so she can enforce her views of gender essentialism"

Reads like an attempt to rationalize hatred towards JKR since no reason exists.
Unable to justify hatred but still feeling hatred they invent fantasies that would put reason behind their contempt even if said fantasy seem cartoonishly silly to bystanders. I by no means doubt that this individual actually believes his delusions out of sheer anger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Otterly
Sorry if this is off topic, but since Harry Potter fans are leaving the series due to their hate for J.K rowling, and now are negative rating the new game that will be coming out soon, do you think the Wizarding World of Harry Potter in Universal Studios might suffer a similar fate. Like fans no longer visiting the theme park or, heaven forbids, go there and start protesting for it shutdown?

Just wondering where the fans draw the line.
twitter has no effect outside the internet.
 
Null mentioned this thread on MATI.
<80 pages to go, about to get a reveal on the 'real killer'.
Save yourselves 700+ pages of anachronistic feminism. read the first 10 chapters, and the last 10. This is how book critics do it.
 
Perhaps they believe they'll be seen as being impartial? No skin in the trans game, so to speak. Just riding the SJW moral high ground.

Yet again, it's men advocating for men who want to be women. Then talking over actual women who dare to have an opinion.

It's sick.
I think it’s the first too, but the last is definitely what people see: “Cis” men fighting old, tired women. I do like that it exposes trans activism as the MRA-ism it is. I hope they keep trotting our these aggressive, screechy “cis” males to do their bidding.

also note that the woman in the video has a backdrop of books and reading material and is sitting at a desk while Button’s backdrop is his filthy wall.
 
Perhaps they believe they'll be seen as being impartial? No skin in the trans game, so to speak. Just riding the SJW moral high ground.

Yet again, it's men advocating for men who want to be women. Then talking over actual women who dare to have an opinion.

It's sick.

Its what they hope, but the minute they step outside the hug fest of their uni campus and try pulling this bollocks outside of it, they get dunked on or verbally battered more than a mars bar in a scottish chippie.

Its why the first gen of these fuckheads are so desperate to ensure blithely idiotic and unenforacble "hate crime" laws remain perpetually on the books and collated so they can at least feel they have power over people. With most of them being in the perpetual students union that was formerly known as the Labour Party (where the former shadow chancellor called the Prime Minister a "proto fascist" with no second of irony when he's an out and out maoist)

The reality is everyone and their dog fucking hates them, and their stupid fucking obsession with "hate" when they're some of the most apocalyptically eye swivellingly hate filled morons on the planet.
 
I think a lot of the spergs on Twitter vastly overestimate how much impact their retarded little circle-jerks have over the outside world. I know someone who works at a bookstore, and she says Harry Potter is still a big seller, because people either 1) don't know about the Twitter drama, or 2) simply don't give a shit. I suspect the theme park is similar. I'm sure a handful of people will boycott it, but there will never be a serious dent in ticket sales because of internet bullshit

Most trannies are autistic men and the only brand they could tank with a boycott is Sonic the Hedgehog.
The majority of the world acknowledges them as mentally ill men and only respects their pronouns in public so they don’t chimp out like the “it’s ma’am” guy.
They can be as mad as they want and retroactively say Harry Potter bad now but no one cares. Kids are still going to read it and parents are still going to take their kids to the theme park.
 
Eh. On one hand I respect her not giving a single fuck about the audience.
On the other hand, if I was her level of rich and famous, I don't think I'd be spending my time on tranny sperging. It's a little sad/pathetic when you're famous with fuck-you-money.
 
Eh. On one hand I respect her not giving a single fuck about the audience.
On the other hand, if I was her level of rich and famous, I don't think I'd be spending my time on tranny sperging. It's a little sad/pathetic when you're famous with fuck-you-money.
Idk.. if she was a victim of domestic abuse I can understand her using her prominence to speak for other women's safety and existence when the trans movement is erasing it.
 
Eh. On one hand I respect her not giving a single fuck about the audience.
On the other hand, if I was her level of rich and famous, I don't think I'd be spending my time on tranny sperging. It's a little sad/pathetic when you're famous with fuck-you-money.
That's my thought exactly - why is she choosing to die on this hill?
 
Eh. On one hand I respect her not giving a single fuck about the audience.
On the other hand, if I was her level of rich and famous, I don't think I'd be spending my time on tranny sperging. It's a little sad/pathetic when you're famous with fuck-you-money.

That's my thought exactly - why is she choosing to die on this hill?

I think you're looking at it the wrong way. She isn't doing this shit in spite of being rich, she's doing it because she knows she can and she isn't going to suffer a single, real consequence of it because online trannies have zero power over someone who just straight up doesn't give a fuck about their dumb agenda.
 
Idk.. if she was a victim of domestic abuse I can understand her using her prominence to speak for other women's safety and existence when the trans movement is erasing it.
Sure, but I doubt she was abused by a tranny. I see the connection, but it's still not like what she went through.


I think you're looking at it the wrong way. She isn't doing this shit in spite of being rich, she's doing it because she knows she can and she isn't going to suffer a single, real consequence of it because online trannies have zero power over someone who just straight up doesn't give a fuck about their dumb agenda.
I said that I respect her not giving shit about backlash. What I'm saying is, with that money I could think of better ways of spending my time than Twitter wars with SWJs or writing a 900 page book in response to TRAs. If she doesn't give a fuck about their agenda, why not, idk, buy a castle or get a pet tiger?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Piga Dgrifm
900 pages, holy shit, this is glorious, the terf bible is on and I might just read it.

it's fucking terrible, badly-written and full of garbage one dimensional characters. I read it before I knew it was written by some fanfinction-level Young Adult "writer" bitch.

almost as if... as if... this overhyped author who should stick to magic books for babies

I do like that the woke Twitter whitebread crowd who thinks the literary sun rises and sets on Harry Potter are now being forced to reconsider their choice of book, though. Maybe branch out to something that doesn't have a dragon on the cover?
 
Sure, but I doubt she was abused by a tranny. I see the connection, but it's still not like what she went through.



I said that I respect her not giving shit about backlash. What I'm saying is, with that money I could think of better ways of spending my time than Twitter wars with SWJs or writing a 900 page book in response to TRAs. If she doesn't give a fuck about their agenda, why not, idk, buy a castle or get a pet tiger?
Pretty sure she already bought a castle. I don't really follow Twitter, but I think she tweets sometimes, which upsets the crazies but she doesn't really engage with them, and she would have written this book either way, from what people said in the thread it doesn't have a tranny focus anyway. Remember that this all just started because she liked the wrong tweets and then said that using "people who menstruate" instead of "women" is dumb. I doubt she is spending a lot of time on the Internet and cares what those people say, but it's good to remind them from time to time that they cannot cancel her.
 
Back