🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

[Captain Manning]

The point I was trying to make is he's avoiding shitting within his circle of friends AND their haters because they're all potential pools of income which provoke reliable audience reaction. The important thing is other enemies he has and comments on won't ever come on his show, and fans of theirs won't watch. Which is why he hedges his bets when it comes to the conflict he's involved in.... tangentially.

EDIT: He can sit back and let other people draw him in, and when they do he can reel them in making more money off of streams about their responses, then accepting their apology later on and letting the cycle continue.

People who like PPP and co. will watch Rekieta because he's related to Ralph, and so Ralph's enemies become viable income also. He's hedging as it all burns down.

That could be true, but here's the issue:

Some people don't like that. Some people want people to be genuine. To hold genuine positions they stick to and stand up for. To speak things that aren't platitudes that can be discarded at a whim or as the winds change. Hating cancel culture and pedo defenders should mean exactly that.

All of this was so much simpler when YouTube was a hobby. As a business, I think it makes everybody a lot less admirable.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

I need the PPP nick stream this week, I need the nectar to quench my thirst.

 

[RalphsFailingKidneys]

from:TheRalphRetort ("viewers" OR "views" OR "watching")

View attachment 1606963
View attachment 1606962
View attachment 1606961
View attachment 1606959
View attachment 1606958
View attachment 1606957
View attachment 1606956
View attachment 1606954
View attachment 1606955

These are in reverse chronological order. He doesn't talk about his viewers at all before the Stream.me era. This constant need to defend his view count is definitely spurred on by the loss of viewership, because when it was doing well and he hadn't been shitting on Tonka for low views for months, he never mentioned it. At no point in 2016, 2017, or 2018 does he say "wow we have a lot of viewers tonight". Almost all of these mentions are from this year.

I posted it a while back but there's a few more:

While searching for the "viewers" tweets I found these, nothing new but funny to see in chronological order:

 

[Circumspicious]

That could be true, but here's the issue:

Some people don't like that. Some people want people to be genuine. To hold genuine positions they stick to and stand up for. To speak things that aren't platitudes that can be discarded at a whim or as the winds change. Hating cancel culture and pedo defenders should mean exactly that.

All of this was so much simpler when YouTube was a hobby. As a business, I think it makes everybody a lot less admirable.

Shit happens, I guess. Tough to put the genie back in the bottle now though when it comes to creator greed.

 

[Elric of Melnibone]

I don't get it either. He doesn't need Ralph. He could only prosper from getting the fuck away from Ralph.

So the Faith thing is kinda complex if you don't fully understand the backstory. Maybe he doesn't get it, or care. I can give people something of a pass on that one. It's a weird situation that requires intake of dangerous quantities of autism.

What's considerably less complex is Ralph trying to get his ex (@adezero) fired. I can 100% guarantee you he is aware of that happening. I can guarantee that, because I told him myself, and got a reply. It's an open and shut case that takes 30 seconds to explain and offer irrefutable proof.

He was doing good for a second there, but apparently lost his nerve again.

Ultimately, Nick does not believe "e-fights are silly." That is impossible.

Actually I think Nick specifically does not involve himself often in e fights between recurring guests on his show only because if he starts doing so then it has the possibility of scaring off future guests. If you remember his Tonka v Andy stream, the only reason he ultimatly got Tonka on was by promising him it would be a neutral and respectful interview. However he also kind of went against that logic when he let Andy in the back door so maybe I am just giving Nick way too much credit of thinking 3 moves ahead of the grift.

As for the possibility of Faith not being there, Mr. and Mrs V took down their twitter and aborted their planned parenthood website, so that could be the canary in the coal mine so to speak. I guess that means @theralph will just have to do a proof of life reveal otherwise we can all assume that Faith went home.

 

[Captain Manning]

Shit happens, I guess. Tough to put the genie back in the bottle now though when it comes to creator greed.

To some extent, I get that this is a full time job for him now, and he has a family. On the other hand, you begin to realize that the duty of proving for a family may override the ability to be completely honest and candid while doing so.

Interestingly, in this particular case, I think the money and the values actually coincide. Which makes this whole thing especially weird. I emphatically believe there is more money to be had from shitting on Ralph's shitty behavior than ignoring it. I would hope he'll get a reminder of that next week, and that might set the tone going forward.

If you remember his Tonka v Andy stream, the only reason he ultimatly got Tonka on was by promising him it would be a neutral and respectful interview. However he also kind of went against that logic when he let Andy in the back door so maybe I am just giving Nick way too much credit of thinking 3 moves ahead of the grift.

I remember Tonka v. Andy. Other people misremember Tonka v. Andy.

He asked Tonka if he would speak to Andy. Tonka said yes. Andy comes in. Hilarity ensued.

I don't get the "ambush" argument. That wasn't an ambush. Tonka sould have answered no if he didn't want to speak with Andy. The question and affirmative answer is in the archive. The interview itself was indeed very respectful and neutral.

 

[Elric of Melnibone]

I remember Tonka v. Andy. Other people misremember Tonka v. Andy.

Yeah now that you mention it I think you are right and I am misremembering the ambush part of it. So in that case yeah, I think Nick is more just trying to maintain his neutral platform, or at least some semblance of it so that it does to scare off future and or potential recurring guests. Even still though, Gunt has already publically lashed out at him personally, and he just kind of rolled over for him. The optics seem cucked to me. I admit I am a fan of Nick, but I am also not blind to his faults, sometimes the lengths he is willing to go to in order to maintain that neutrality seems suspect especially when compared to some of the people he has chimped out on. He (rightfully) rags on JMK and talks about how he does not let people bully their way on his show or dictate how his show is ran, but then PPP did exactly that and completely took over his show. At the end of the day I just write this stuff off as weird inconsistencies, but maybe there is more to it than that.

 

[Circumspicious]

To some extent, I get that this is a full time job for him now, and he has a family. On the other hand, you begin to realize that the duty of proving for a family may override the ability to be completely honest and candid while doing so.

Interestingly, in this particular case, I think the money and the values actually coincide. Which makes this whole thing especially weird. I emphatically believe there is more money to be had from shitting on Ralph's shitty behavior than ignoring it. I would hope he'll get a reminder of that next week, and that might set the tone going forward.

I emphatically disagree. There is obviously more money to be made from spurring demand from both sides of one conflict, and letting those fighting dictate the pace. If he's too involved, he risks losing cash from either side of the conflict. He's making the slow, easy money if he takes the shots he can where he can, without alienating anybody. As soon as someone fucks up, like Ralph, he can play coy, boot up a stream and make money on top of the money he was already stretching out of his audience.

His money and his values coincide? There is nothing weird about this at all to me.

 

[Physics Ninja]

from:TheRalphRetort ("viewers" OR "views" OR "watching")

View attachment 1606963
View attachment 1606962
View attachment 1606961
View attachment 1606959
View attachment 1606958
View attachment 1606957
View attachment 1606956
View attachment 1606954
View attachment 1606955

These are in reverse chronological order. He doesn't talk about his viewers at all before the Stream.me era. This constant need to defend his view count is definitely spurred on by the loss of viewership, because when it was doing well and he hadn't been shitting on Tonka for low views for months, he never mentioned it. At no point in 2016, 2017, or 2018 does he say "wow we have a lot of viewers tonight". Almost all of these mentions are from this year.

For comparison, Nick fuentes had 14k viewers tonight on Dlive and around 18k at his highest.

 

[MeltyTW]

from:TheRalphRetort ("viewers" OR "views" OR "watching")

View attachment 1606963
View attachment 1606962
View attachment 1606961
View attachment 1606959
View attachment 1606958
View attachment 1606957
View attachment 1606956
View attachment 1606954
View attachment 1606955

These are in reverse chronological order. He doesn't talk about his viewers at all before the Stream.me era. This constant need to defend his view count is definitely spurred on by the loss of viewership, because when it was doing well and he hadn't been shitting on Tonka for low views for months, he never mentioned it. At no point in 2016, 2017, or 2018 does he say "wow we have a lot of viewers tonight". Almost all of these mentions are from this year.

Oh ethan raaaaaallppph the black hand of death inches ever closer . Best talk about mundane matt again to stave off the darkness, you do want to live to see your kid born after all

 

[Captain Manning]

Yeah now that you mention it I think you are right and I am misremembering the ambush part of it.

A lot of people do it. I think what happened here is that a few people have advanced that particular narrative, and everybody just accepts it and repeats it. I saw it even come up in this thread. @soy_king seems to think that's what happened.

But the archive is there for people to watch and judge for themselves. I don't see it as an ambush. Maybe Nick guided Tonka towards his answer, but consent was ultimately given.

At the end of the day, it's fucking Tonka. Like, who even cares? At worst, even if Nick is this hideous grifter, he simply owned a used car salesman in that circumstance. It's a weird thing to be salty about, even if it were true. He cost a fight promoter a lot of money, and angered a lot of people. Fuck Tonka.

There's valid complaints about Nick, and then there are silly ones.

 

[theguntsexpartner]

"I don't listen to myself"

Yeah Ralph. Is that fatfuck just tweeting.

Welcome back old friend

 

[Kenobi]

No. The former absolutely makes sense.

I'll let you in on a "secret."

Nick made a metric asston of money on that stream. I forget the exact figure, but I think it was mid four figures. PPP was very good for Nick. Having PPP debate Dick again, as he apparently tried to arrange, would have also been very good for Nick. But because Dick is a pussy (har har), having just PPP is "Plan B."

The only really bad thing about that stream was Zoom showing up. That was Masterson's fault. That necessitated Nick taking it down and editing out the part where Zoom "doxed" Dick (dox that was already on KF, but YouTube doesn't care). Overall, a minor annoyance.

There is very good money in shitting on e-celebs.

Well that and that he had some retarded qoutes in that debacle

The May 7rashfire Part II | Rekieta Law

There's no reason for a description here. We all know why you're here. Get your Popcorn, pull up your trashcan, and enjoy a nice cozy hour by the fire to war...

www.youtube.com

7:00 Dickshielding dick from JLH
27:00 Riketa: I dont care if zoom spraypaints Ralphs car! Why do you care what someone does to someone else! I have no obligation to care about Ralphs car!
42:30 PPP: Ralph is stupid
Riketa: You think Ralph is stupid?
PPP: Yes don´t you?
Riketa: I think Ralph makes some questionable choices but i wouldn´t call him stupid
1:11:00 Nick says the only reason he streams is for the money.

Talk about a fall from grace.

From 8k to 800 in less then 8 months

 

[theguntsexpartner]

Just going to post this link if it has not been done already subcultured discord link https://discord.gg/sFy2QAR
Edit: enter it but dont spam it just archive things in there

 

[MeltyTW]

From 8k to 800 in less then 8 months

800> actually. Lol

Just going to post this link if it has not been done already subcultured discord link https://discord.gg/sFy2QAR

Speaking of since we can make ralph avow past co hosts im throwing it out there that ralph is a cuck unless he brings on seattle4truth if he doesn't the alawgs officially win and the retrort is abort

 

[Captain Manning]

Well that and that he had some retarded qoutes in that debacle

The May 7rashfire Part II | Rekieta Law

There's no reason for a description here. We all know why you're here. Get your Popcorn, pull up your trashcan, and enjoy a nice cozy hour by the fire to war...

www.youtube.com

7:00 Dickshielding dick from JLH
27:00 Riketa: I dont care if zoom spraypaints Ralphs car! Why do you care what someone does to someone else! I have no obligation to care about Ralphs car!
42:30 PPP: Ralph is stupid
Riketa: You think Ralph is stupid?
PPP: Yes don´t you?
Riketa: I think Ralph makes some questionable choices but i wouldn´t call him stupid
1:11:00 Nick says the only reason he streams is for the money.


From 8k to 800 in less then 8 months

PPP is right that Ralph is an absolute moron. Mind you, this was pre-sex tape. He's gotten worse since then. It ought to be harder for Nick to defend Ralph's behavior, not easier.

Still looking forward to next week.

 

[soy_king]

A lot of people do it. I think what happened here is that a few people have advanced that particular narrative, and everybody just accepts it and repeats it. I saw it even come up in this thread. @soy_king seems to think that's what happened.

But the archive is there for people to watch and judge for themselves. I don't see it as an ambush. Maybe Nick guided Tonka towards his answer, but consent was ultimately given.

At the end of the day, it's fucking Tonka. Like, who even cares? At worst, even if Nick is this hideous grifter, he simply owned a used car salesman in that circumstance. It's a weird thing to be salty about, even if it were true. He cost a fight promoter a lot of money, and angered a lot of people. Fuck Tonka.

There's valid complaints about Nick, and then there are silly ones.

I said this before when it happened, but I don't care that it happened to Tonka or that I am in any way sympathetic to him. He was a grifter LARPing as an internet tough guy, and deserved to get snaked on just like he snaked on others.

My problem is that Rekieta pretends to be some moralfagging righteous Christian and pulls shit like this. He obviously got Tonka to agree to the interview on the basis that it would be a one-on-one, spent about the first half an hour trying to get Tonka to agree to talk to Warski, and when Tonka said that he would agree to talk to Warski at some point, Nick immediately sends Warski the link and sits back smugly as the two go at each other (queue the famous thumbs up to the camera shot). Afterwards, Warski being the tard that he is gives the link to the rest of his butt brigade so that they could each take turns dunking on the paraplegic Injun while Rackets watched like a smug prick. He didn't even have the balls to admit that he had set up the entire thing when Tonka called him out during that stream. So yes, there's a reason why I think Rekieta is a massive piece of shit, and it's not because I'm a butthurt Kumitard.

In terms of advancing the narrative, I'm fairly certain that Rekieta himself admitted it a few days later during a conversation with Doug Tenappel, and said he would do it again if given the chance.

 

[theguntsexpartner]

Alright i have been silent/gone for a while but it seems interesting on what is happening:
- First Vickers bails out (unsure as to why, most likely because of the pregnancy)
- Dame leaves the Gunt
- Gunty has destiny on and it looks like Destiny was taking shots at Gunty

Is there anything else i missed?

Also Ralph, what are you doing? you're not winning by any stretch of the imagination, your self destructive tendencies has leaked now onto those around you and they are starting to bail. Can you not see that more and more people are leaving you each day? yes you may still have some sort of audience but how long will they last or even stay around when you treat them like dirt or you cuck to others on stream.

It will be interesting to see what will happen in the coming months and how things turn out for you.

 

[Takayuki Yagami]

Pinky Culture is a superchatter like mentioned above, but the name is in reference to something JF used to say that means high class, like when you hold your pinky out while drinking tea. This makes it so much more gay.

Except no one actually does that. Rules of etiquette usually very much frown on it. Is JF the French Canadian equivalent to white trash?

 

[Captain Manning]

My problem is that Rekieta pretends to be some moralfagging righteous Christian and pulls shit like this.

You're gonna have to illuminate us on the part of the Bible that says you can't bring on a Canadian cokehead to scream at a LARPing used car salesman. I must have missed that one. Admittedly, I do tend to skip over Leviticus, because it's a turgid legal document, largely considered inapplicable to gentiles, that is about as fun as reading municipal fire codes.