Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died at 87. - 🦀

1600522565010.png
 
She'll be missed.
Great woman with many accomplishments in the field of law. This is the 9/11 for american justice.

Agreed, culled the minority population for many decades. Imagine what this might mean for black birth rates. Anyway I don't get why people are so upset, she was just a decaying clump of cells.

Except for the pancreatic cancer.
 
50,000 people out of a population of 67 million is virtually nothing. My point still stands that abortion plainly isn't a contentious political issue in Europe. The consensus that abortion should be readily available (with some restrictions here and there) was reached decades ago here, and the issue simply isn't on the public radar.

It's only in the US and Ireland where the subject still causes division, and it's being driven primarily by single-issue obsessives who lack the courage to accept the practical consequences of what they advocate.
Not everyone shows up to marches in person, dude, you don't directly measure it compared to the total population. Just regarding the amount of people who show up, every single year they've done the march it's grown in size. And anything past first trimester being allowed only if there's a medical concern is more than "some restrictions here and there". It's stricter than 43 states, which allow abortions either deep into the second semester or up to viability. It might be a settled issue, but it's sure as hell because their laws are stricter than Democrats probably imagine them to be.
 
Last edited:
50,000 people out of a population of 67 million is virtually nothing. My point still stands that abortion plainly isn't a contentious political issue in Europe. The consensus that abortion should be readily available (with some restrictions here and there) was reached decades ago here, and the issue simply isn't on the public radar.

It's only in the US and Ireland where the subject still causes division, and it's being driven primarily by single-issue obsessives who lack the courage to accept the practical consequences of what they advocate.

We have assholes here who unironically call for post-birth sbortions, I shit you not.
 
Ballin out of control

View attachment 1607213
https://twitter.com/irtazaakhalid/status/1307111239802380288 (https://archive.vn/YHWL7)

Am I just some emotionless robot or do people really get this upset over someone they don't even know dying? I understand hysterical women freaking out because they're women, but do mentally well, straight men actually behave like this?

the thing about twitter is that you don't even have to perform to get attention. you just have to claim that you did
 
It isn't a contradiction for Bitch McConnell to not allow Obama to replace Scalia as a lame duck, but to allow Trump (who is not a lame duck) to replace RBG.

It is however a contradiction all the retards reeing about Trump replacing RBG who had no problem with Obama replacing Scalia.
I think McConnell opened the door to this problem, and he was warned that it would bite him in the ass. Incidentally, I thought it was fine when Obama wanted to replace Scalia, and it's fine that Trump wants to replace Ginsburg. There probably won't be a new justice before January though, because our federal politicians are all a bunch of in-fighting self serving bastards.
 
Ballin out of control

View attachment 1607213
https://twitter.com/irtazaakhalid/status/1307111239802380288 (https://archive.vn/YHWL7)

Am I just some emotionless robot or do people really get this upset over someone they don't even know dying? I understand hysterical women freaking out because they're women, but do mentally well, straight men actually behave like this?
Most of these kinds of people share these types of posts because it gives off the impression that you're a very empathetic and sweet person if you cry excessively over someone's death, even if they aren't close to you. And I'm sure that on Twitter, most replies will reward them for this kind of behaviour. From past experience, I'm also pretty sure that some of these people are exaggerating how emotionally distraught they are, or clinging to that sadness so they don't feel insensitive about getting over it quickly. Too many people take the whole "real men cry" thing to the degree that are less real men overall as a result- fragility isn't virtuous.
 
Most of these kinds of people share these types of posts because it gives off the impression that you're a very empathetic and sweet person if you cry excessively over someone's death, even if they aren't close to you. And I'm sure that on Twitter, most replies will reward them for this kind of behaviour. From past experience, I'm also pretty sure that some of these people are exaggerating how emotionally distraught they are, or clinging to that sadness so they don't feel insensitive about getting over it quickly. Too many people take the whole "real men cry" thing to the degree that are less real men overall as a result- fragility isn't virtuous.
It's like when a guy pretends to be 'sensitive' to fuck a girl.
 
Last edited:
This coming from a Supreme Court Justice? Who is supposed to follow the constitution to the letter?

nothing about the request is unconstitutional. the process can be as quick or as slow as they want - the document does not regulate very much about how the senate goes about approving or disapproving nominations, nor even how many justices need to be on the court.

her request is, however, very :optimistic:
 
Back