Jeremy Hambly / The Quartering / MTGHeadquarters / Unsleeved Media / Midwestly - Buttblasted manchild upset he was banned from a childrens' card game, Grifter, supporter of the cancel culture

Iron Hamster said:
He looks like he's literally about to cry in that pathetic thumbnail
Click to expand...
You'd cry too if you were too fat to see your own dick when you look down, your wife is talking to and possibly fucking a divorce lawyer, and you couldn't be bothered to figure out how to do proper beard hygiene.

If he's already doing a woe is me video of how he is a victim, the spicy tears will flow like a river.

Get blackout drunk and go on Twitch Quarterton. Give us another piss in the drain moment, you bumblefuck!!!
 
You'd think after someone stole his branding images for Exclusively Games, Jeremy would be a bit understanding towards someone protecting their artwork like this. But from calling them a kid and assuming their only reason is to take advantage of the copyright system, Jeremy pretty clearly has no remorse for what he did. At the end of the day, he took someone's original artwork and used in in a monetized video without permission or payment of anykind. Maybe the next time his cringe editor makes an intro, he should probably not just steal images.

Edit: He tells his viewers not to dogpile the artist but that's very clearly what he wants by sharing his online username and making the absurd claims that I listed above.

Edit 2: God, Jeremy even uses the fact that he's "friends" with IAG as a means to question the takedown. Like it absolves him from any wrong doing because he's friends with someone depicted in a piece of artwork neither owned or commissioned.

Edit 3: Looks like the artist has been getting dogpiled, as expected, and put Jeremy on ignore when he tried contacting on Twitter.


Even IAG himself knew to ask permission first before reusing artwork.


Edit 4: Lots of edits here, apologies. I just hate double-posting unless it's important.

So on Jeremy's Discord, the takedown is being widely discussed. However, a user noted how Jeremy's response video could actually deal him more damage in court and a moderator actually asked them to stop talking. When asked to clarify, the moderator was only asking that one user to stop discussing the takedown and was fine with everyone else discussing it. Once again, Jeremy's community is all for free speech until said speech is something they don't wanna hear.

Meant to say this earlier, but I can see Jeremy having his editor refrain from using fan-art completely going forward. You could already see in his response video that he was concerned about a precedent being set for artists taking down his videos. So instead of doing the normal thing and simply asking permission (which would take time to obtain which works against Jeremy's uploading schedule), Jer might just forgo fanart entirely.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Wedge and You
SecretChihiroResistance said:
Quarter-Pounder made a video on the Tik Tok ban. He has actually fallen for the narrative that it’s being banned because Trump got trolled and not because of it being a national security threat.

Click to expand...

Anyone with a modicum of sense and the ability to use google could find out the tiktok ban came "coincidentally" the day after the CCP basically said theyre going to absorb all chinese privately owned businesses within 5 minutes, so this just confirms there is absolutely no research put into his videos.

 
  • Agree
Reactions: WonderWino and SecretChihiroResistance
Virus418 said:
You'd think after someone stole his branding images for Exclusively Games, Jeremy would be a bit understanding towards someone protecting their artwork like this. But from calling them a kid and assuming their only reason is to take advantage of the copyright system, Jeremy pretty clearly has no remorse for what he did. At the end of the day, he took someone's original artwork and used in in a monetized video without permission or payment of anykind. Maybe the next time his cringe editor makes an intro, he should probably not just steal images.

Edit: He tells his viewers not to dogpile the artist but that's very clearly what he wants by sharing his online username and making the absurd claims that I listed above.

Edit 2: God, Jeremy even uses the fact that he's "friends" with IAG as a means to question the takedown. Like it absolves him from any wrong doing because he's friends with someone depicted in a piece of artwork neither owned or commissioned.

Edit 3: Looks like the artist has been getting dogpiled, as expected, and put Jeremy on ignore when he tried contacting on Twitter.


Even IAG himself knew to ask permission first before reusing artwork.

Click to expand...
just watching it now.

Hes correct, it is fair use, to be honest. He'll win in court.

Although it kind of funny hes just made a video telling people to go through his videos and strike him if they find images they can claim if they dont like him.

Only 2 strikes to go! I hope someone does that, thatll be hilarious.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: WonderWino, You, TheMadAutist and 2 others
fuck whales said:
just watching it now.

Hes correct, it is fair use, to be honest. He'll win in court.

Although it kind of funny hes just made a video telling people to go through his videos and strike him if they find images they can claim if they dont like him.

Only 2 strikes to go! I hope someone does that, thatll be hilarious.
Click to expand...

It won't surprise me if he wins in court, I just believe Jeremy's response video only served to rally his troops, and if it is shown in court, helps the artist more than himself. That, and it's a common courtesy to ask artists for permission to use their artwork in monetized videos, kinda like an unwritten rule. Even IAG did so with the exact same image involved in this takedown:


It doesn't surprise me why Jeremy doesn't ask though. He operates by pumping out 4-6 videos daily as things are happening, and he can't afford to waste precious hours for permission on a two-second scene in a thirteen-minute video. Hell, Jeremy claims to have never known about the image's existence until now because his editor made the intro:


I'm convinced after today, Jeremy has given his editor a strict warning about fanart in intros. He might be willing to fight this specific case, but I can't imagine Jeremy wants to make a habit of this or develop a pattern of using artwork without permission, even if it's fair use.
 
Virus418 said:
You'd think after someone stole his branding images for Exclusively Games, Jeremy would be a bit understanding towards someone protecting their artwork like this. But from calling them a kid and assuming their only reason is to take advantage of the copyright system, Jeremy pretty clearly has no remorse for what he did. At the end of the day, he took someone's original artwork and used in in a monetized video without permission or payment of anykind. Maybe the next time his cringe editor makes an intro, he should probably not just steal images.

Edit: He tells his viewers not to dogpile the artist but that's very clearly what he wants by sharing his online username and making the absurd claims that I listed above.

Edit 2: God, Jeremy even uses the fact that he's "friends" with IAG as a means to question the takedown. Like it absolves him from any wrong doing because he's friends with someone depicted in a piece of artwork neither owned or commissioned.

Edit 3: Looks like the artist has been getting dogpiled, as expected, and put Jeremy on ignore when he tried contacting on Twitter.


Even IAG himself knew to ask permission first before reusing artwork.


Edit 4: Lots of edits here, apologies. I just hate double-posting unless it's important.

So on Jeremy's Discord, the takedown is being widely discussed. However, a user noted how Jeremy's response video could actually deal him more damage in court and a moderator actually asked them to stop talking. When asked to clarify, the moderator was only asking that one user to stop discussing the takedown and was fine with everyone else discussing it. Once again, Jeremy's community is all for free speech until said speech is something they don't wanna hear.

Meant to say this earlier, but I can see Jeremy having his editor refrain from using fan-art completely going forward. You could already see in his response video that he was concerned about a precedent being set for artists taking down his videos. So instead of doing the normal thing and simply asking permission (which would take time to obtain which works against Jeremy's uploading schedule), Jer might just forgo fanart entirely.
Click to expand...
This dude and his fanabse are the biggest bunch of fucking sissies on the planet.

Does anyone who doesn't like him or anything wish to come and argue that point?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Elwood P. Dowd and Virus418
Virus418 said:
It won't surprise me if he wins in court, I just believe Jeremy's response video only served to rally his troops, and if it is shown in court, helps the artist more than himself. That, and it's a common courtesy to ask artists for permission to use their artwork in monetized videos, kinda like an unwritten rule. Even IAG did so with the exact same image involved in this takedown:


It doesn't surprise me why Jeremy doesn't ask though. He operates by pumping out 4-6 videos daily as things are happening, and he can't afford to waste precious hours for permission on a two-second scene in a thirteen-minute video. Hell, Jeremy claims to have never known about the image's existence until now because his editor made the intro:


I'm convinced after today, Jeremy has given his editor a strict warning about fanart in intros. He might be willing to fight this specific case, but I can't imagine Jeremy wants to make a habit of this or develop a pattern of using artwork without permission, even if it's fair use.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah the "dont dogpile him" is from the keemstar school of "definitely dogpile him"

but the dogpiling wouldnt help the artist in court, hed have to file a separate case on that, that wouldnt be relevant in the argument. it is fair use, because if it wasnt, every game review using footage of game designers artwork would be actionable. the law doesnt give a fuck about unwritten rules.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Dumb
Reactions: Elwood P. Dowd and You
Long time KF lurker here, I’ve been following many cows but The Quartering for some reason is the reason I decided to make this account.

The Quartering is something else, and not because he’s worse than other cows, in fact he’s not even much of a cow imo, just someone who I cannot stand. I’m actually a huge fan of social commentary channels like G+G, YellowFlash2, and Hero Hei(though the guy is pretty autistic he seems down to earth and find enjoyable to listen to).

The Quartering was one I tried to get into, I tried getting past his obnoxious fat neck beard appearance but he would only more and more do something that got on my nerves. For awhile I thought I was being biased based on his ugly neck beard appearance, but I only realized that him being morbidly obese fatass wasn’t what bothered me about him, it was just the tip of this iceberg.

The Quartering is an arrogant self righteous pseudo intellectual who acts like he is so humble and down to Earth but actually thinks he’s hot crap and is some sort of leading voice to social commentary. This about him I cannot stand. He’s obnoxious, he has horrible takes on things, and he barely does research on the things he covers.

Say what you want about G+G but they often admit they are wrong if they happen to be about something, plus they don’t bend the knee to people they may have upset unlike the Quartering.

The biggest thing that has made my gears grind is how much he cucks out when talking about certain people or when the people he talks about eventually call this neckbeard out for the loser he is. 25 cent Hamburger cucking out when talking about Ethan Klein is what really made me realize this guy is a weak, lame, pathetic loser.

Ethan is a classic example of being a greedy Jew con artist who deserves no respect what so ever. Ethan has turned his back on everything he claimed to be for and stole the fupa money for himself. I’m not sure what the Quartering does nowadays when talking about him, but when I watched him pre Summer 2020 he would always be SO CAREFUL when talking about Ethan. He would do everything in his power to try to be respectful to him and act like Ethan was still a good guy or some crap. Look I somewhat don’t blame him because of how Ethan doesn’t back on people when you make him sperg, but The Quartering does this for everyone that has a small dose of influence. The Quartering is all one sided and is too much of a pussy to have a real debate with someone or stand his ground. Whenever someone calls him out he retracts and whimps out like as seen with how he acted to AngryJoe a few pages back in this thread.

The Quartering I’ve noticed is this weird mix of being conservative, libertarian, and centrist at the same time, and that has seemed to give him some sort of brain damage. That weird mix of those things seems to be why he acts as retarded as he does. Ive seen some of his most stupid moments come out because of it and not enough people talk about that.

Instead of giving long ass explanations for this next few things I’m going to just list some other things he has said that annoy me with shorter explanations.

1. I remember him saying something stupid along the lines of “Everyone thinks it’s ok to be gay, you gotta be some strange person not to think so.” For the record I don’t give a crap if someone is gay, but it doesn’t mean that I don’t find being gay disgustingly degenerate. Him thinking there is only a minority of “weird” people who dislike gay crap irks me. So either he actually believes that or is cucking out real hard on that one.

2. He’s admitted to actually unironically liking the Handmaid’s Tale, and that show is one of the most degenerate and morally degrading shows out there, him liking that makes him a huge hypocrite or just plain brainlessly unaware.

3. He actually believes big people watch his videos and if they haven’t they eventually will. It’s hilarious, he even freaking thinks Susan of YouTube has seen his stuff. He thinks he is way bigger than he actually is when in reality only has 10,000-20,000 people watch his garbage. He uses the fact that he knows people connected to Pewdiepie or “youtube insiders” to make him bigger than he actually is. No regular person knows who this fat idiot is.

TLDR: Post probably comes off angry, not angry just think this guy is a huge retard and hypocrite.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • TMI
  • Feels
Reactions: SuiSui1, Wilhelm Bittrich, GenericReviewerDraco and 6 others
fuck whales said:
just watching it now.

Hes correct, it is fair use, to be honest. He'll win in court.

Although it kind of funny hes just made a video telling people to go through his videos and strike him if they find images they can claim if they dont like him.

Only 2 strikes to go! I hope someone does that, thatll be hilarious.
Click to expand...
The argument Jeremy uses is bullshit. Pounder like all YouTube idiots knows bum fuck all about fair use. So, time for me to do an autism and set this shit straight once and for all. Here is a point for point rebuttal.

One: The YT copyright system is not broken, it is actually working as fucking intended. You see, the copy strike system for YT is not there to protect creators it is there to protect YT. If YT left videos up after people made a copyright claim to them then YT would be liable for any damages should the copyright claim be upheld in court because YT would in essence be making a determination that they believe the video is fair use. To put it in terms you can understand, it would be like seeing your buddy steal but not saying nothing only to get yourself arrested as an accomplice.

Two: It doesn't matter how long the image was in the video, that never had any bearing on a fair use defense. The fact is Jeremy showed the entire image, the entire copyrighted work in his video without permission.

Three: The fact that a watermark is on the image doesn't mean Jeremy credited the artist. Fair use is very clear as to how a person is to be credited when using their work. Jeremy failed to do what he was suppose to do because he is a lazy fuck.

Four: YT isn't forcing you to give your information to anyone. The God damn law of the US of fucking A is the reason you need to provide this information to fight a strike. If the person striking you wishes to take you to court they need that information.

Five: The guy did Tweet Jeremy but was ignored. However, it is not on the person who had his work used without permission to seek you out. No, it is on you to seek the person out and correct your mistake.

Six: You don't just get to return the car you stolen and not get arrested. Jeremy saying he would have removed the image does not negate the fact he committed a copyright violation.

Seven: Jeremy's intent doesn't matter. The law doesn't go away if you do something by accident. The law also doesn't forgive a speeding ticket because "well, I didn't MURDER anyone."

Eight: It is not other people's responsibility to worry about your livelihood or the consequences of your actions. Does Jeremy think its okay if we steal from him because him calling the cops and us going to jail would ruin our lives?

Nine: YT has no responsibility to fix your mistakes and black out things you shouldn't have put in there.

Ten: Jeremy's appeal to the masses that this will set a terrible precedent if he doesn't sue is just fear mongering to rile his base and try to bully the guy into dropping his strike. Fair Use doctrine doesn't have legal precedent because it is fluid and up to the judges discretion. This whole point by Jeremy is due to his ignorance as to how the Fair Use doctrine actually functions.

Eleven: It wasn't a mistake and you trying to appeal to him and give him an out is pathetic.

Twelve: No the use of the image was not fair use in my autistic opinion. You did nothing to transform the work. However, your opinion, my opinion, and Pounder's opinion have 0 bearing on whether a judge believes it to be fair use. Fair Use isn't a term you yell out then get your way. Fair Use is an affirmative defense, which means you admit to committing the act in question BUT believe you were allowed to do it because X. Claiming Fair Use over a copy strike is akin to claiming Self Defense in a murder trial. We all know that the government doesn't let people on trial for murder wander the streets just because they claimed Self Defense. No, they got to go through the legal process and have a judge rule it as Self Defense. Same thing with Fair Use.

Thirteen: Jeremy does need to argue Fair Use despite his insistence he doesn't. That is how the fucking process works. You claim Fair Use then you have to explain why you believe it is so. BTW, saying the image adds flavor to your argument is not Fair Use. The image should be transformed by your words/video and not the other way around.

Fourteen: It doesn't matter if he submitted the strike because "he doesn't like you" as that has no bearing on whether or not you did what he claimed you did.

:::Just a side note but I'm sick and tired of YouTube idiots saying shit like "bogus claim" or "false strike" The only time a claim would be deemed false by the courts is if you could prove the person doing the strike believed it was Fair Use but did it anyways or if the person didn't actually own the copyright to what they struck. The Fair Use system is set up to be used by copyright owners to strike everything they feel infringes on their copyright and let the courts decide what is or isn't Fair Use. Again, the opinion of the person getting hit with a strike doesn't mean shit.

Fifteen: Doesn't matter if your friends with ItsAGundam because he didn't create the image.

Sixteen: You 100% care about the money Pounder.

Seventeen: Issuing a false copy strike is a crime. You don't have to prove you own a thing to issue a strike because it is expected you would be taken to court and fined or jailed for your stupidity. Jeremy is basically complaining that candy bars aren't locked up so anyone could steal one therefore Wal-Mart has a broken checkout mechanic.

Eighteen: Trademarks and licenses are not the same as a copyright you dumb fuck! Yes, a company will not print known trademarked stuff for some fat slob off the street without a license agreement. That has shit to do with YT videos and copyright.

TLDR: Pounder fucked up and this whole video is a gaslight attempt to get the guy to back off so Pounder can make his money.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: southpawdagon, zigstardust, Ged! and 15 others
Jeremy is one of the biggest clout chasing faggots on the internet along with all the others within the commentary community. The fact he whips up quick videos within minutes with a clickbaitey title/thumbnail goes to show people like him deserve to be deplatformed. Not only does he NOT research but he just goes out of his way to make 1 video and then when he's done move onto another subject that will inflate his views/subscribers but your probably get that from watching him beg for his viewers to subscribe. The guys like a human cockroach that deserves no platform just another retard ralph.

>TFW you get knockes the fuck out by a guy in drag.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: DerSandstrom, Peep Plops, big ups liquid richard and 6 others
I'm going to chime in on this.
I have IP's. As stated before I have IP attorneys that handle my affairs. A lot of my IP's are of major artistic value and will automatically begin the legal process against that individual in question. AS IMPORTANT AS THIS IS... You never want to be viewed as the arrogant asshole. 95% of my civil cases were worked out to my satisfaction and that is because you begin with an open dialog with the person in question. You will find that a lot of things will be worked out in a civil and polite manner if done right. And it can be done with little or not cost to yourself.

I will (IHMO) say that Jeremy messed up. I believe he is in the wrong here as so many youbtubers are as how they do their commentary. All that Jeremy is doing is adding additional problems to himself and making it easier for the plaintiff to win in court.

He should have never done this youtube rant. It does not look good if he continues this route of taking action.

I hope Jeremy is smart enough to archive his work when the 3rd strike is given.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SuiSui1 and SecretChihiroResistance
TheRedChair said:
I hope Jeremy is smart enough to archive his work when the 3rd strike is given.
Click to expand...

Not sure if it would even matter for a channel like Jeremy's. His videos center around issues happening here and now, no one is going to re-watch a video about the box office of Captain Marvel or the Twitter feud between Keemstar and H3H3. Save for some of Jeremy's top performing videos, none of his content retains relevancy after the first week.

And let's face it, if Jeremy lose his YouTube channel, he's finished. He would likely never reclaim the almost 900k subscribers, and his would have statistics slightly higher than MisWestly. He utterly failed when he tried throwing his Twitch stream, only garnering 100 live viewers and a few pay-piggies gift-subbing left and right, and he's now having to beg people for likes and subscriptions. When Jeremy loses his channel, and I saw when because it's only a matter of time before he pisses off the wrong person, it will be a glorious day.
 
Virus418 said:
Not sure if it would even matter for a channel like Jeremy's. His videos center around issues happening here and now, no one is going to re-watch a video about the box office of Captain Marvel or the Twitter feud between Keemstar and H3H3. Save for some of Jeremy's top performing videos, none of his content retains relevancy after the first week.

And let's face it, if Jeremy lose his YouTube channel, he's finished. He would likely never reclaim the almost 900k subscribers, and his would have statistics slightly higher than MisWestly. He utterly failed when he tried throwing his Twitch stream, only garnering 100 live viewers and a few pay-piggies gift-subbing left and right, and he's now having to beg people for likes and subscriptions. When Jeremy loses his channel, and I saw when because it's only a matter of time before he pisses off the wrong person, it will be a glorious day.
Click to expand...
When Pounder loses his channel he will suck up to some smaller YouTuber who has stars in their eyes and Jeremy will attach himself to their channel before claiming HE brought the fans in and demand the channel be handed over to his full control.
 
Virus418 said:
Not sure if it would even matter for a channel like Jeremy's. His videos center around issues happening here and now, no one is going to re-watch a video about the box office of Captain Marvel or the Twitter feud between Keemstar and H3H3. Save for some of Jeremy's top performing videos, none of his content retains relevancy after the first week.

And let's face it, if Jeremy lose his YouTube channel, he's finished. He would likely never reclaim the almost 900k subscribers, and his would have statistics slightly higher than MisWestly. He utterly failed when he tried throwing his Twitch stream, only garnering 100 live viewers and a few pay-piggies gift-subbing left and right, and he's now having to beg people for likes and subscriptions. When Jeremy loses his channel, and I saw when because it's only a matter of time before he pisses off the wrong person, it will be a glorious day.
Click to expand...

Which makes me think, I don’t think anyone actually likes Quarter Pounder, he’s more of a gateway into social commentary videos. My theory is people are desperate to hear social commentary videos that aren’t leftist biased and once they find a better channel they watch them instead and don’t bother unsubbing from the Quartering. Hence why the subs but almost no views.

Sort of like how No Bullshit is a gateway into right wing political videos but people leave once they find someone better to listen to than that retard.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Blitzkrieger and TheMadAutist
SecretChihiroResistance said:
Which makes me think, I don’t think anyone actually likes Quarter Pounder, he’s more of a gateway into social commentary videos. My theory is people are desperate to hear social commentary videos that aren’t leftist biased and once they find a better channel they watch them instead and don’t bother unsubbing from the Quartering. Hence why the subs but almost no views.

Sort of like how No Bullshit is a gateway into right wing political videos but people leave once they find someone better to listen to than that retard.
Click to expand...

Even the most friendly Reddit board outside of his own, KotakuInAction, admits they don't actually like him or his material. They see him as a useful hammer to bludgeon SJWs with and that's what his use is and why they support him. If anyone even a hint more charismatic bothered doing 2015-era anti SJW style content, he'd be finished. Nobody does, so those scraps are his for the taking.
 
  • Disagree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: BlackBallz, You, GenericReviewerDraco and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back