Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.9%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,594
Breaking news from the future. The Judge has made a ruling on the lawsuit.
shredder.gif
 
lol why 5.3 million specifically?
I’m sure he has some twisted math he’s done to figure out his losses from the infringement. It won’t make any sense.
I've pondered this, and the only way $5.3mil makes sense is if you keep in mind that Russell is really, really fucking stupid.

Thanks to this thread, any employer who googles Russell Greer is going to know what they're getting. He's even admitted in the past that the existence of this thread is why he can't get a paralegal job, and is stuck doing lower-paid, menial, office and janitorial work. So (in his mind) we're responsible for a major loss in earnings across his working life--40-45 years of working as a paralegal, and adjusting for potential inflation, could maybe come out to around $5.3million (I suck at math, so anybody who wants to flex their autism is welcome to do so).

What makes that really, really stupid is that if he wants to sue for that amount on those grounds, he should have sued for defamation of character, which led to loss of reputation, thus destroying a budding paralegal career that could have lasted 40-45 years. Sure, he would have absolutely no case, but it would at least make a bit more sense.

Suing for copyright infringement? Russell will have to prove that he suffered $5.3million in lost revenue from the alleged infringement, and/or that Lolcow LLC/Joshua Moon made $5.3million in profits specifically from the infringed-upon materials. But since he has made no money from any of his allegedly infringed-upon creative endeavors (and neither has Lolcow LLC/Joshua Moon in allowing them to be posted to Kiwi Farms), there are no damages.

Since he has filed for copyrights on everything, he could potentially be awarded statutory damages, in the unlikely event he proves his case. But those max out at $150,000 per incident of infringement, and to get that much you have to not only prove that the infringement was knowing and willful, but that the defendant has profited substantially from it. The financial status of the defendant is taken into account. No offense to Josh, but the broke-ass owner of an internet forum is not going to get hit with a $5.3million judgment. Not even close.

So the only thing I can figure is that Russell is suing for a financial judgment appropriate to a defamation case, but for some fucktarded reason has decided to fight it out over copyright infringement. And no, it makes no sense at all--until you remember that Russell is really, really fucking stupid.
 
I've pondered this, and the only way $5.3mil makes sense is if you keep in mind that Russell is really, really fucking stupid.

Thanks to this thread, any employer who googles Russell Greer is going to know what they're getting. He's even admitted in the past that the existence of this thread is why he can't get a paralegal job, and is stuck doing lower-paid, menial, office and janitorial work. So (in his mind) we're responsible for a major loss in earnings across his working life--40-45 years of working as a paralegal, and adjusting for potential inflation, could maybe come out to around $5.3million (I suck at math, so anybody who wants to flex their autism is welcome to do so).

What makes that really, really stupid is that if he wants to sue for that amount on those grounds, he should have sued for defamation of character, which led to loss of reputation, thus destroying a budding paralegal career that could have lasted 40-45 years. Sure, he would have absolutely no case, but it would at least make a bit more sense.

Suing for copyright infringement? Russell will have to prove that he suffered $5.3million in lost revenue from the alleged infringement, and/or that Lolcow LLC/Joshua Moon made $5.3million in profits specifically from the infringed-upon materials. But since he has made no money from any of his allegedly infringed-upon creative endeavors (and neither has Lolcow LLC/Joshua Moon in allowing them to be posted to Kiwi Farms), there are no damages.

Since he has filed for copyrights on everything, he could potentially be awarded statutory damages, in the unlikely event he proves his case. But those max out at $150,000 per incident of infringement, and to get that much you have to not only prove that the infringement was knowing and willful, but that the defendant has profited substantially from it. The financial status of the defendant is taken into account. No offense to Josh, but the broke-ass owner of an internet forum is not going to get hit with a $5.3million judgment. Not even close.

So the only thing I can figure is that Russell is suing for a financial judgment appropriate to a defamation case, but for some fucktarded reason has decided to fight it out over copyright infringement. And no, it makes no sense at all--until you remember that Russell is really, really fucking stupid.
If he didn't want people talking about his behavior on the internet, then he shouldn't have stalked and harassed women. It's our right to call him out as an abuser.
 
I've pondered this, and the only way $5.3mil makes sense is if you keep in mind that Russell is really, really fucking stupid.

Thanks to this thread, any employer who googles Russell Greer is going to know what they're getting. He's even admitted in the past that the existence of this thread is why he can't get a paralegal job, and is stuck doing lower-paid, menial, office and janitorial work. So (in his mind) we're responsible for a major loss in earnings across his working life--40-45 years of working as a paralegal, and adjusting for potential inflation, could maybe come out to around $5.3million (I suck at math, so anybody who wants to flex their autism is welcome to do so).

What makes that really, really stupid is that if he wants to sue for that amount on those grounds, he should have sued for defamation of character, which led to loss of reputation, thus destroying a budding paralegal career that could have lasted 40-45 years. Sure, he would have absolutely no case, but it would at least make a bit more sense.

Suing for copyright infringement? Russell will have to prove that he suffered $5.3million in lost revenue from the alleged infringement, and/or that Lolcow LLC/Joshua Moon made $5.3million in profits specifically from the infringed-upon materials. But since he has made no money from any of his allegedly infringed-upon creative endeavors (and neither has Lolcow LLC/Joshua Moon in allowing them to be posted to Kiwi Farms), there are no damages.

Since he has filed for copyrights on everything, he could potentially be awarded statutory damages, in the unlikely event he proves his case. But those max out at $150,000 per incident of infringement, and to get that much you have to not only prove that the infringement was knowing and willful, but that the defendant has profited substantially from it. The financial status of the defendant is taken into account. No offense to Josh, but the broke-ass owner of an internet forum is not going to get hit with a $5.3million judgment. Not even close.

So the only thing I can figure is that Russell is suing for a financial judgment appropriate to a defamation case, but for some fucktarded reason has decided to fight it out over copyright infringement. And no, it makes no sense at all--until you remember that Russell is really, really fucking stupid.

According to PayScale, the median annual income for a paralegal is about $49k, with the top 10% making $71k. Even if you make the bold assumption that Russ would be paid in the top 10% of his field for the entirety of his career, and you assume that inflation is 2% each year, after 40 years his total earnings would be just shy of $4.3 million. So even in the absolute best case scenario, he's still asking for too much. But yeah, as you point out it's moot since he's not suing for defamation, and even if he did, his inability to be employed as a paralegal is 100% due to him deciding to be the Don Quixote of the legal system. I suspect that his figure is pulled out of his ass what he thinks he would have earned if his quest for fame and fortune had followed the script he wrote in his head instead of being derailed by us ducking trolls.
 
That psych eval could certainly recommend that Russ needs treatment, or potentially banning from social media. It all depends what Russ says in the evaluation. I hope he has someone who comes across as quite sympathetic and understanding so he can be lured in to feeling comfortable to let his guard down and be open and honest on his true feelings and thoughts. He has an ugly mind and I hope the evaluator uncovers most of what goes on in his messed up head as surely they will see he needs treatment or some kind of monitoring or control or something to deal with his warped brain. Could he be prescribed medications as a result of the evaluation? Does anyone know with any specificity exactly what the evaluation components are (written tests, verbal conversations, subjected to certain stimuli, ink blot tests (LOL), how long it will take, etc) that Russell will be subjected to?
I genuinely don’t think he can actually dodge looking bad in a real psych eval. I’m pretty sure he’s said that up till now he’s had therapists, not actual psychologists. Therapists are there on the assumption you’re actually trying to get better. If you don’t want to, or you don’t actually think you have a problem, you can absolutely play games with them and get out looking sympathetic. Psychs have a lot more structure and more importantly, training. Not to say people can’t still play games with psychs, but it‘s definitely a more “adversarial” (or “cooperative” optimally) relationship than a therapist which is a supportive relationship.

In other words, as we’ve seen before, he can bullshit people who are paid to listen to his bullshit. But anyone who isn’t sees through him in about 15 minutes.
 
I'm sure the 5.3 million number is as autistic as anything else he does. IIRC he had some stupid reason for the number he chose for the Swift suit and had obviously just constructed his way to that number using nonsense arguments.
There wont be any proceedings. Greer is most likely too stupid to know he has to pay someone to properly serve Jersh. International Service is especially a bitch, particularly to whatever slavic shithole dear leader is living in this year.
Null has specifically said how he will accept service and basically dared Russ to do it

Russ may STILL be too stupid to follow the instructions
 
I've pondered this, and the only way $5.3mil makes sense is if you keep in mind that Russell is really, really fucking stupid.

Thanks to this thread, any employer who googles Russell Greer is going to know what they're getting. He's even admitted in the past that the existence of this thread is why he can't get a paralegal job, and is stuck doing lower-paid, menial, office and janitorial work. So (in his mind) we're responsible for a major loss in earnings across his working life--40-45 years of working as a paralegal, and adjusting for potential inflation, could maybe come out to around $5.3million (I suck at math, so anybody who wants to flex their autism is welcome to do so).

What makes that really, really stupid is that if he wants to sue for that amount on those grounds, he should have sued for defamation of character, which led to loss of reputation, thus destroying a budding paralegal career that could have lasted 40-45 years. Sure, he would have absolutely no case, but it would at least make a bit more sense.

Suing for copyright infringement? Russell will have to prove that he suffered $5.3million in lost revenue from the alleged infringement, and/or that Lolcow LLC/Joshua Moon made $5.3million in profits specifically from the infringed-upon materials. But since he has made no money from any of his allegedly infringed-upon creative endeavors (and neither has Lolcow LLC/Joshua Moon in allowing them to be posted to Kiwi Farms), there are no damages.

Since he has filed for copyrights on everything, he could potentially be awarded statutory damages, in the unlikely event he proves his case. But those max out at $150,000 per incident of infringement, and to get that much you have to not only prove that the infringement was knowing and willful, but that the defendant has profited substantially from it. The financial status of the defendant is taken into account. No offense to Josh, but the broke-ass owner of an internet forum is not going to get hit with a $5.3million judgment. Not even close.

So the only thing I can figure is that Russell is suing for a financial judgment appropriate to a defamation case, but for some fucktarded reason has decided to fight it out over copyright infringement. And no, it makes no sense at all--until you remember that Russell is really, really fucking stupid.
If you're right, this would interestingly put Russell in the Phil-esque position of waging a war against us that he wouldn't know what to do if he somehow actually won. If Kiwi Farms didn't exist, then who would he blame for his continued lack of employment as a paralegal, both to himself and his parents? Because it has to be because of us, certainly not because he's stupid, smalls bad, creeps on women, and misuses services provided by his employer to stalk his victims. Like Phil, Russ needs an enemy to explain why his life is shit. Because it's never his fault. But of course he does not realize this, because he has no conception of continuing to fail in his greater goals even if he wins his latest lawsuit.

Russ probably thinks that when he defeats the evil Kiwi Farms, that the money and fame he gets from it will turn his whole life around. Why, Taylor Swift will be so impressed, that she'll drop to her kness and blow him on the spot! Of course, even if he somehow won, the only blowjobs on offer would be from the likes of Vordrak, which he doesn't actually want. It wouldn't surprise me if winning this suit this becomes his all-purpose solve-all-his-problems-at-once fantasy like he had for those suits against Swift, Grande, etc. Because as a narc, he thinks he is destined for great things, and because he is a low-effort person, he thinks that this greatness is just around the corner instead of at the end of a long hard road that will make him get out and push a few times.
 

Finally he includes an actual url that works:

It's to the OP. He claims his content is there. But he admits it actually isn't.

The actual links aren't to Kiwifarms.

There's another link to the same Google Drive. The text says "Megaupload" but it actually just links to the Google Drive instead.

Russ is suing the wrong person, he should have sent his DMCA to Google where the infringing content actually is.

The book is on google drive but, as Null wrote back to him, the song is hosted and is inarguably Russ's IP. He nevertheless refused to honor the DMCA and specifically waived safe harbor on it. Were Russ a competent litigant I think Null would be in trouble.
 
I genuinely don’t think he can actually dodge looking bad in a real psych eval. I’m pretty sure he’s said that up till now he’s had therapists, not actual psychologists. Therapists are there on the assumption you’re actually trying to get better. If you don’t want to, or you don’t actually think you have a problem, you can absolutely play games with them and get out looking sympathetic. Psychs have a lot more structure and more importantly, training. Not to say people can’t still play games with psychs, but it‘s definitely a more “adversarial” (or “cooperative” optimally) relationship than a therapist which is a supportive relationship.
You're absolutely right. I wish I could hear what he has to say to a fed/pd employed psychologist when confronted with the mountain of evidence he's left behind versus the nice lady that just told him to "do better." Note: I'm not shitting on people that go through therapy. Russell is the type of cunt that uses therapy as excuse to be shitty.
 
Again, what country is Josh in? I'd like to see if they are in the Hague Convention or what the requirements would be for Russell to have service effected. Also, since Josh is an American by birth, and depending on Josh's "resident" status where he currently is, Russ probably wouldn't have to have the doc translated now that I think about it. Just back to my jurisdiction regarding service, I am pretty sure a motion was also required on the case I was involved in to actually get an order to allow for ex-jurisdictional service. It was a fair amount of time ago so its kind of jumbled recalled. In any event, if Russ also has to make an app for ex-juris service, that will be an additional cost perhaps. He still would need to pay Fed Ex charges, and quite possibly need a translator if the company he will need to hire to effect service doesn't speak English! Either way, it isn't going to be cheap to even make the effort to serve Josh, let alone actually successfully effect service on him. Being in Canada, I only have my knowledge of how it works up here when it comes to certain legal proceedings and discussions, but I assume there are some similarities with how it works in US. But rely on @AnOminous and the other great KFers with the legal skillz and knowledge when it comes to the minute and processes of how things go in a us proceeding.
According to the State Department:

Party to Hague Service Convention?
Yes
Party to Hague Evidence Convention?
Yes
Party to Hague Apostille Convention?
Yes
Party to Inter-American Convention?
No
Service of Process by Mail?
No

Translations are required. Service cannot be done by mail. That's going to cost a damn fortune. IF he can even find out where Dear Leader lives.
 
Back