- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
Amy formerly BossPuppy87 is back as has now set his profile to public.
A big announcement.
A big announcement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually wikipedia has a list of paraphilias.
What you describe is autopedophilia, autonepiophilia and pedovestism. Pretending to be a pet... Autoplushophilia? Autozoophilia ?
So #uktransrights is trending over here. I don't really get why there's all this commotion. Apparently one newspaper said that the government had now scrapped all plans to make self-ID legal. But that's not news? I could have sworn we already knew that. Anyway, anything for these idiots to cry and get some attention.
Why do they all sound like hysterical teenagers. The drama dripping from this tweet. I mean, "right to exist" - gosh, I wish you'd stop existing. But you won't, and neither will your 'right' to do so.
View attachment 1609547
View attachment 1609565
View attachment 1609567
Owen Jones might commit suicide at this rate.
There's a looooot of low key gems hidden in this craziness.
1. It's really hard to fall asleep on your dick without waking up and moving in your sleep. In fact it might never have happened before in all of human history... unless you're nodded off on opiates next to your Narc Anon date, which, guess what,
2. The bitching about his totally appropriate Oxy taper tells you he knows his opiates and he wants moar
3. Oh the floor staff assumed someone with a penile fracture is a man? Because they'd have seen so many women book in with blood in their scrote? How dare they
4. Full on batlike screeching at whatever consultant was "questioning them in a way not conducive to their care" lol bet that was about the opiate taper
5. "The quality of my care should not depend on how much my torturers like me" If you are a normal human who can get their own ice water and co-operate with your doctors, yes, you will get treated better than a drug addict who took drama at clown academy. This is because Jeff Bezos has yet to replace nurses with robots.
6. "A surgeon in America happened" oh he thinks Suporn wouldn't bounce right outta that shit? lolll good luck suing for malpractice in fucking Thailand idiot
It's true that being inpatient is a lot like being in jail... except the staff want you to walk out the door. Every healthcare worker you meet wants you better, and gone. Every action you take to make that harder makes it worse for everybody.
Oh yeah. There's no way someone this nuts never threatened to kill themselves to their care team. Even indirect shit like "This is making me so suicidal omg" "I'm going to rip my own dick off" gets you obs. But he might be on a medical obs unit and just totally fucking clueless, those later tweets are high as a heck.
Damn you, JK Rowling!!
View attachment 1609690
Literal troon genocide. She can't keep getting away with itDamn you, JK Rowling!!
View attachment 1609690
Literal troon genocide. She can't keep getting away with it
Don’t you know it’s *literally impossible* to use slurs against cis people? Those dang dirty cissies are privileged because we said so, which means they’re immune to any and all inconveniences and they all live perfect lives.almost like a slur, because the underlying intent of the people who use those terms is often negative.
I've been thinking about the terms "cis-man" and "cis-woman" lately and they just fucking irk me. If someone were to call me a "cis-man" I would tell them no, I'm just a man. It's almost like a slur, because the underlying intent of the people who use those terms is often negative. I don't care about the trannies and their advocates inventing their own lingo to discuss whatever esoteric nonsense they're interested in, but trying to impose their language on the rest of us just really fucking rubs me the wrong way. This fucking creeping subversion of language is a play for power.
It's subtle enough that it's hard to argue against, but it sort of puts "trans-men" and "cis-men" on equal footing. As if they were both subcategories of the overarching category "man". Then after they make everyone identify themselves as either a "cis-man" or a "trans-man", they can more easily pull back and say that they're all men. It's also subtle enough that it can be difficult for people to argue against. It's an effective means of subversion to make people make small concessions like this. You start small and then you build on it until eventually people are ready to accept their core philosophy which says that gender and sex are completely independent.
There are also examples of people attempting to use gender neutral pronouns for everyone and in a way it's easy to go along with. There are languages that use pronouns that don't always differentiate between male and female, commonly they tend to use pronouns to indicate social status or level of formality rather than gender and there may not be anything inherently wrong with that. Japanese and Thai are two examples but I'd make a semi-educated guess that it holds true for many more Asian languages, perhaps a majority of them.
Subverting language is a tool for acquiring power. If they successfully push their lexicon through to the mainstream they can demoralize you by forcing you to acquiesce, or shame you when you refuse to conform. If you let them get their foot in the door it won't end there. Subverting language is a way of normalizing their world view and it's having disastrous consequences for people who are too young or too naive to recognize it. How can you be against the "Green Party", do you want to see rain forests razed and the habitats of near-extinct animals destroyed? How can you be against the "Anti Fascists", that must mean you are pro-fascism, right? How can you argue with "Child Love", aren't children deserving of love?
I recall this debate with Ben Shapiro that went viral and thinking that maybe he was acting a bit obstinate but now I'm coming around to thinking that he only seems obstinate because of how far the trans-interest group has managed to push their agenda. That is what they're hoping for, that their opponents will either gradually acquiesce to demands that seem innocuous at first or come across as stubborn and rude so that they may never be won over, but the larger audience will discount them for sticking to their beliefs and principles.
Anyway, it's just something I've been thinking about. I'm not a "cis-man" and anyone who calls me one can get fucked.
I've been thinking about the terms "cis-man" and "cis-woman" lately and they just fucking irk me. If someone were to call me a "cis-man" I would tell them no, I'm just a man. It's almost like a slur, because the underlying intent of the people who use those terms is often negative. I don't care about the trannies and their advocates inventing their own lingo to discuss whatever esoteric nonsense they're interested in, but trying to impose their language on the rest of us just really fucking rubs me the wrong way. This fucking creeping subversion of language is a play for power.
It's subtle enough that it's hard to argue against, but it sort of puts "trans-men" and "cis-men" on equal footing. As if they were both subcategories of the overarching category "man". Then after they make everyone identify themselves as either a "cis-man" or a "trans-man", they can more easily pull back and say that they're all men. It's also subtle enough that it can be difficult for people to argue against. It's an effective means of subversion to make people make small concessions like this. You start small and then you build on it until eventually people are ready to accept their core philosophy which says that gender and sex are completely independent.
There are also examples of people attempting to use gender neutral pronouns for everyone and in a way it's easy to go along with. There are languages that use pronouns that don't always differentiate between male and female, commonly they tend to use pronouns to indicate social status or level of formality rather than gender and there may not be anything inherently wrong with that. Japanese and Thai are two examples but I'd make a semi-educated guess that it holds true for many more Asian languages, perhaps a majority of them.
Subverting language is a tool for acquiring power. If they successfully push their lexicon through to the mainstream they can demoralize you by forcing you to acquiesce, or shame you when you refuse to conform. If you let them get their foot in the door it won't end there. Subverting language is a way of normalizing their world view and it's having disastrous consequences for people who are too young or too naive to recognize it. How can you be against the "Green Party", do you want to see rain forests razed and the habitats of near-extinct animals destroyed? How can you be against the "Anti Fascists", that must mean you are pro-fascism, right? How can you argue with "Child Love", aren't children deserving of love?
I recall this debate with Ben Shapiro that went viral and thinking that maybe he was acting a bit obstinate but now I'm coming around to thinking that he only seems obstinate because of how far the trans-interest group has managed to push their agenda. That is what they're hoping for, that their opponents will either gradually acquiesce to demands that seem innocuous at first or come across as stubborn and rude so that they may never be won over, but the larger audience will discount them for sticking to their beliefs and principles.
Anyway, it's just something I've been thinking about. I'm not a "cis-man" and anyone who calls me one can get fucked.
I haven't checked in on this thread in a while, so it may be late but the tranny with the plushy shark photo and giga-regret over their surgery had a second revision surgery. Looks like it didn't work out so good, they posted this an hour ago:
View attachment 1609770
Some of the comments are harsh but truthful
View attachment 1609774
I haven't checked in on this thread in a while, so it may be late but the tranny with the plushy shark photo and giga-regret over their surgery had a second revision surgery. Looks like it didn't work out so good, they posted this an hour ago:
View attachment 1609770
Some of the comments are harsh but truthful
View attachment 1609774
Oh, hey. That's Sharkboy again. Bad luck, buddy.I haven't checked in on this thread in a while, so it may be late but the tranny with the plushy shark photo and giga-regret over their surgery had a second revision surgery. Looks like it didn't work out so good, they posted this an hour ago:
View attachment 1609770
Some of the comments are harsh but truthful
View attachment 1609774
I met a ‘non-binary’ today. Now let me just say I clocked him as an FTM immediately when I saw him but didn’t know him, but 99% of people would think oh, a manlet. It was really weird. Here’s this guy looking like a construction worker in his paint stained jeans and Timberlands and talking about how he works as a contractor and then is...non-binary? Is a ‘they/them’? It was the total opposite from the usual.
He also whined that he couldn’t enter a monastery because they don’t admit non-binaries (and like...probably wouldn’t admit FTMs either). This was an Episcopal monastery, so I’m glad mainline Protestants are cracking down a little. And his home diocese wouldn’t sponsor him for the priesthood for the same reason (The Episcopal church ordains women, but clearly there’s a line being drawn).
There’s a difference between female enbies who have sex with men and those who don’t, regardless of how they look, because of the risk of pregnancy.
That's all part of the fantasy for them. Half the high they get off trooning out is trying to force other people to treat them as whatever the fuck they "identify" as. That's why the most revoltingly ugly ones are also the loudest about it: the more cognitive dissonance they cause on the normies, the sweeter the hit is for them.I have noticed a recurring trend with troons of either sex of wanting to force themselves into places where they are not wanted. I can almost guarantee you that the only allure life in a monastery holds for that "non-binaree" FTM you mentioned is that it's men-only and (so far) imposes that standard. Any kind of institution with firm boundaries are like catnip to troons. They just have to break them down.