Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

It's worth nothing that Melinda's mom had a perfectly normal facebook account, with lots of proud photos of her other daughters and her other grandkids. She may have had a substance abuse issue in the past, but not in the recent past. She was living a cheerful and happy existence in at least the last few years.

Imagine how her mom felt. Couldn't see her grandkids, lost a daughter to mental/moral illness. All this AFTER she found out that Melinda carried on a years-long incestuous sexaffair with her ex-husband. Horrific.
 
So was it really intestate succession? If so how the fuck did she manage to lose that?
No idea. We never saw the suit. I imagine her sister gleaned stuff off here about her "ex-mother" and fought Melinda getting anything. Would love to see the paperwork. All we know is that Melinda lost, like she does every time.
Likely the sister pulled old letters/emails to the mother for use in proving Melinda disowned her, too
 
This, to us, weird callousness when it comes to other people losing property or even their lives, really does make it seem like she doesn't fully grasp that other people, billions of them, are just as real and multifaceted (as in - with aspirations, hopes, fears, love for others) as her.
Stuff like Covid-19 happening in the US (but also globally ofc.) being somehow tied to her god looking out for her not getting evicted, or that a hurricane tearing through Null's old area being a "messenger" or something - It genuinely makes me feel like she has some personality disorder that was never diagnosed, beyond just delusional grandeur. Then again, it might have been diagnosed and she just never acknowledged it. That aside, there is an "ability" (I am not sure that can be considered the proper word though) I am just not seeing here.

There is a term known as "Mentalization" that has been adopted more and more over the past 2 decades by various schools of psychology, initially to find new ways to help people with Borderline Personality Disorder.

It's essentially our ability to understand our own feelings and those of others properly, in a social context - your level of ability to mentalize is essentially how well you can recognize and interpret the complex state of mind and consequently the motivations of others (as well as yourself) correctly. This isn't just empathy. Empathy is feeling with someone else - You see someone cry, you might feel a portion of that sadness.
Mentalization however, is recognizing and dealing with it correctly in others as well as oneself. It is an essential skill, usually developed during early childhood and honed, trained and refined through socialization as we grow up.

Obviously everyone can see how this is important - if you see a person grinning and you are poor at mentalizing, you might immediately assume wrongly, that that person is ridiculing you. You might then assume that person is laughing at you maliciously. You might then assume that this maliciousness might translate into real, malicious action against you. Consequently your reaction might negatively influence the outcome of that situation.
You might make all these assumptions, even as you observe the person looking at their phone a moment before - which means they may have just read a funny message before looking up in your general direction. This is one side of mentalization, recognizing the complex state of mind of others and then adjusting our state of mind based on it.

The other side is then, introspective. Say that all the evidence, to me, points to that person grinning at me maliciously (because I'm in a bad mood and I didn't see them checking their phone). Someone who can mentalize properly internally (or recover from lapses in mentalization), will then categorize this in a healthy way. Perhaps they will see that their assumptions could be flawed, due to their mood. Perhaps they will realize that people grin all the time and it is therefore not relevant, or related, to them. Or, even if it WAS directed at them, it is a perceived slight that can easily be overlooked and ignored (in fact, overlooking it might be the best course of action overall - who cares who grins at whom). Thus, good mentalization is a shield against paranoia, unwarranted fear and anger.

Consequently, even if one's initial assumption (malicious grinning) is wrong, one's acute mentalization can still cause a positive outcome. It is pretty much a MUST, for any long term relationship, big or small, between someone as close as a spouse or as far as a bureaucrat, to work properly. Because misinterpreting the motivations of others and thus reacting in a manner utterly surprising and unfitting (to the other party), is a basic recipe for interpersonal disaster.

Sorry for the monologue / psychsperging, but you guys can probably see why I find this concept worth mentioning here.


For a quick overview, see Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2013). Mentalization-based treatment. Psychoanalytic inquiry, 33(6), 595-613.
Or really anything by those two, 's basically the only subject they get published on.
I'm not quite sure where you are here, but I'm going to take a stab at it to help you out, and this is a bit off topic, so I'm also going to bring it back into psycho b like you were in the very beginning. So are you referring to the Cartesian (as in Descartes) notion of consciousness which was later questioned then most recently denied by most philosophers in lieu of Daniel Dennett's preferred notion of the theory of evolution's explaining all natural and supernatural (so called) phenomena. However due to this fact we all have experiences that are known as, and this is where the psychological aspects come into it, subjective qualia. And we are able to enjoy things as subjective qualia. @TamarYaelBatYah may enjoy putting curses on people as a part of her subjective qualia. It may bring her a true sense of inner peace that we truly don't understand. I mean it may really get her off or like a high. It may make her feel like she's on drugs in a way that you and I can't understand. That doesn't mean that she is effecting other people with her so-called curses, but she might view these natural occurrences and tie them into her curses and get off on it in a way that we don't understand: subjective qualia. So even though Dennett and most of the philosophical

Or then there's
Okay, woah! Hit the brakes there.

I haven't overestimated my competence in anything. I have a Bachelor's degree. I am completely capable and trained to (1) find (2) read and (3) analyze scholastic articles.

For two, I have been taught by professors Biblical Hebrew, as well as done independent study. In every study that I have produced, I have (a) identified Hebrew verbs and nouns (b) identified their derivatives (c) used other resources like a lexicon and concordance to "dig deeper". These are all things I was trained to do. Like I said, I am a student of Biblical Hebrew for 15 years now. That't not overestimating one's competence. That's well within my skill and knowledge level.

I already explained to you -- not that I owe you an explanation -- but the fact is, I am a specimen to the outside world, as much as you are a specimen to me -- I already explained to you that I put away my work computer because I don't want any chance whatsoever to be mentally connected to work on a Shabbat. It works for me. Also, I play homeschool tutorials on that computer for the children and I often need a second one for myself. So it works in that way too.







This is completely inaccurate, since I read and study opposing views. I also engage in debates with people of all sects of Judaism: except Ultra-Orthodox because they don't use the internet. I'm completely capable of handling competing views, I just simply don't agree with them.

I have entire library of peer scholars papers that I have read. Some I agree with. Some I completely disagree with, and I state my reasons respectfully in writing.







I've got way more than 300 hours under my belt. Not sure how you came up with that number!








This was already discussed on this thread. You'll have to search








Because in 2019, I confronted her online publicly for feeding information to someone I had a protective order against. During that conversation, it was confirmed that she had knowledge of Kiwi Farms and read it. After I made it very clear to her that she better keep my name out of her mouth, I cut off contact again.

My belated mom and family Google searched my name after I cut them off. So they found Kiwi Farms.
Melinda: I took a break from bothering you because I was seeing too much similarity between you and CWC (Chris Chan). This isn't an insult, it's a matter of fact. You literally keep making the same errors over and over in your suits, are being guided by the legal system, do not correct them, yet you insist you are correct. Because of that, I was feeling mildly sympathetic for you, due to the fact that you must have a serious lack of critical thinking skills and at the very highest a low to moderate IQ. You will never see this because of this very fact.

There are, no matter how badly you don't want to admit it, many people on KFs who are either educated or intelligent, or both. Just because you have been unable to dox them, doesn't mean they don't exist. They've proved themselves by being able to truly create and defend themselves real arguments. You've deliberately avoided me, because you've discovered that I'm one. Letters like B.A. behind your name are not an indication of intelligence, particularly in this day and age of diploma mills. There are tens of thousands of so called learning institutions willing to provide those certificates (I won't call them diplomas) to anyone willing to write off their student loans in exchange for it. But alas, Melinda, don't hustle a hustler. You still can't cut it in the real world. Your continued pursuit of suits without merit are indicative of your real intelligence: suits without actual claims, claims without real damages. There is no way they will ever get there against Null, because it is absolutely impossible. He never damaged you to the tune of what you are asking even if you proved he damaged you at all even if you proved via a claim. Get a lawyer. That person will advise you of all of these things. Otherwise, sit the fuck down and shut up.

TL;DR I'm baaaack. She's still fucking dumb.
 
Last edited:
No, wrong, idiot. That's not how it works at all, in Virginia or anywhere else. It's evenly when it's between identical types of descendants. So it would work that way if it was split entirely between children of the decedent. Otherwise it gets complicated.

It depends on what kind of descendants they are. From the intestate succession statute of Virginia.

§ 64.2-200. Course of descents generally; right of Commonwealth if no other heir.

A. The real estate of any decedent not effectively disposed of by will descends and passes by intestate succession in the following course:

1. To the surviving spouse of the decedent, unless the decedent is survived by children or their descendants, one or more of whom are not children or their descendants of the surviving spouse, in which case, two-thirds of the estate descends and passes to the decedent's children and their descendants, and one-third of the estate descends and passes to the surviving spouse.

2. If there is no surviving spouse, then the estate descends and passes to the decedent's children and their descendants.

3. If there is none of the foregoing, then to the decedent's parents, or to the surviving parent.

4. If there is none of the foregoing, then to the decedent's siblings, and their descendants.

5. If there is none of the foregoing, then one-half of the estate descends and passes to the kindred of one of the decedent's parents and one-half descends and passes to the kindred of the other of the decedent's parents in the following course:

a. To the decedent's grandparents, or to the surviving grandparent.

b. If there is none of the foregoing, then to the decedent's uncles and aunts, and their descendants.

c. If there is none of the foregoing, then to the decedent's great-grandparents.

d. If there is none of the foregoing, then to the siblings of the decedent's grandparents, and their descendants.

e. And so on, in other cases, without end, passing to the nearest lineal ancestors, and the descendants of such ancestors.

B. If there are no surviving kindred of one of the decedent's parents, the whole estate descends and passes to the surviving kindred of the other of the decedent's parents. If there are no kindred of either parent, the whole estate descends and passes to the kindred of the decedent's most recent spouse, if any, provided that the decedent and the spouse were married at the time of the spouse's death, as if such spouse had died intestate and entitled to the estate.

C. If there is no other heir of a decedent's real estate, such real estate is subject to escheat to the Commonwealth in accordance with Chapter 24 (§ 55.1-2400 et seq.) of Title 55.1.

Code 1950, § 64-1; 1956, c. 109; 1968, c. 656, § 64.1-1; 1977, c. 474; 1982, c. 304; 1985, c. 189; 1990, c. 831; 2012, c. 614; 2020, c. 900.
So glad you got there before I did. Yes, basically the case with a lot of case precedent mods from family court, but this will do for her numb skull ass, when she hasn't even managed a normal filing yet much less A FUCKING CLAIM!
 
Likely the sister pulled old letters/emails to the mother for use in proving Melinda disowned her, too

You need a written will to disown. So it would really be an epic failure for the actual child of a decedent who had no living spouse to somehow manage to get nothing. Of course if the mother divested herself of her possessions and any real estate before death by giving it outright to other children, so nothing was left when she died, that would work too, but a will is the direct way to disown.
 
So glad you got there before I did. Yes, basically the case with a lot of case precedent mods from family court, but this will do for her numb skull ass, when she hasn't even managed a normal filing yet much less A FUCKING CLAIM!
She probably went into Russel’s thread when I pointed out his ridiculous lolsuit. She needed a link despite it being on the front page because she’s an idiot. I imagine she immediately started taking notes on Russel’s excellent pro se skills. Or an even more amusing thought, she scoffed at his skill thinking herself superior as she would never make the same exact mistake over and over again in a lolsuit. And if she did it was because sexism!!! Dude, it’s not that hard to win competently written and filed lawsuits if you’re a woman, a trans woman or even a degenerate.

Of course, when you’re a hillbilly with an undiagnosed personality disorder or intellect too minuscule to measure and walk into the courthouse (reeking of curdling breast milk, sweat, shit, smegma, and a horrendous mix of essential oils) and slap down pages full of terrible handwriting as a lawsuit... I’d imagine there’s some bias. Especially when the childish handwriting is actually read to reveal seeking damages against such prominent members of society as John Doe #2 for 50 dollars. And then out of curiosity the court decides to look into the past of this ratty-looking hillbilly and finds a record of 10 other suits all dismissed for the same reasons, (Oh and lots of traffic violations including a child’s car seat being insecure) and promptly puts it into a footnote of the court record sniggering at this future vexatious litigant unable to learn from mistakes.

perhaps she should flee to Israel. Or at least another state. Her district court is clearly fed up of her bullshit. I wouldn’t blame them one bit for laughing her out of court on sight. Certainly wouldn’t call is sexism or the patriarchy, but I’d call it common sense.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SloberrinJ
She probably went into Russel’s thread when I pointed out his ridiculous lolsuit. She needed a link despite it being on the front page because she’s an idiot. I imagine she immediately started taking notes on Russel’s excellent pro se skills. Or an even more amusing thought, she scoffed at his skill thinking herself superior as she would never make the same exact mistake over and over again in a lolsuit. And if she did it was because sexism!!! Dude, it’s not that hard to win competently written and filed lawsuits if you’re a woman, a trans woman or even a degenerate.

Of course, when you’re a hillbilly with an undiagnosed personality disorder or intellect too minuscule to measure and walk into the courthouse (reeking of curdling breast milk, sweat, shit, smegma, and a horrendous mix of essential oils) and slap down pages full of terrible handwriting as a lawsuit... I’d imagine there’s some bias. Especially when the childish handwriting is actually read to reveal seeking damages against such prominent members of society as John Doe #2 for 50 dollars. And then out of curiosity the court decides to look into the past of this ratty-looking hillbilly and finds a record of 10 other suits all dismissed for the same reasons, (Oh and lots of traffic violations including a child’s car seat being insecure) and promptly puts it into a footnote of the court record sniggering at this future vexatious litigant unable to learn from mistakes.

perhaps she should flee to Israel. Or at least another state. Her district court is clearly fed up of her bullshit. I wouldn’t blame them one bit for laughing her out of court on sight. Certainly wouldn’t call is sexism or the patriarchy, but I’d call it common sense.
Right, but you know, we, meaning all posting members of her thread on KFs, her sister who WON, the judges and clerks who write the dismissals, are the ones who are ignorant. She with her vast learning and high Internet IQ, Wiki knowledge, and Jews for Jesus Appalachian religion, is the one that is correct. So what the hell is wrong with you @ChariotOfMara? I mean, don't you understand that she is Queen of all higher education learning and smartest on The Farms? Fucking hell the thing that drives me craziest is when she does that initial cap for no reason at all. I have to admit, the few days I spent actually working and not here reading her treadmill lack of critical thinking bullshit gave me some respite...this one. I've never met anyone in person that's like this who isn't in real life either autistic or mentally/intellectually challenged, so I have to believe the same is the case with her; and I'm not just calling names. I'm being 100% sincere with that.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: ForscytheBat
I've seen no evidence Melinda actually went through with her threat to file suit against her sisters. I remember, around the time her mother died, Melinda both claiming that she needed inheritance money to pay for her mother's funeral and burial, and claiming that she would never pay to bury her mother, that no one in the western world did that. She got very very angry right around then, so she went to her go-to stress reliever: threatening to file a malicious lawsuit. Did she actually file a suit? I don't know about that. I do think she expected a payout from her mother's death and got pissed when an immediate payday wasn't in the offing.
 
I've seen no evidence Melinda actually went through with her threat to file suit against her sisters. I remember, around the time her mother died, Melinda both claiming that she needed inheritance money to pay for her mother's funeral and burial, and claiming that she would never pay to bury her mother, that no one in the western world did that. She got very very angry right around then, so she went to her go-to stress reliever: threatening to file a malicious lawsuit. Did she actually file a suit? I don't know about that. I do think she expected a payout from her mother's death and got pissed when an immediate payday wasn't in the offing.
I was referring to the fact that her sister received all of the money. Either way, she got it all. So either Melinda knew she couldn't cut the mustard up against her sister in court or she tried and failed.

P.S. I corrected my grammar in my long post to read "either or" rather than "either and." I should have left it to see if she could have caught it, but we would have been waiting for a cold day in hell. I think she simply skips my posts. They aren't worthy of her big brain b/c of my reaction score. She has no idea who I am.
 
I was referring to the fact that her sister received all of the money. Either way, she got it all. So either Melinda knew she couldn't cut the mustard up against her sister in court or she tried and failed.

P.S. I corrected my grammar in my long post to read "either or" rather than "either and." I should have left it to see if she could have caught it, but we would have been waiting for a cold day in hell. I think she simply skips my posts. They aren't worthy of her big brain b/c of my reaction score. She has no idea who I am.

God you're sexy when you get worked up. Keep tootin that shiny green booty all over this thread.
 
Aaaaaaaaand times up! Time to cut your screen time Mel. You’ve been responding for the past 4 hours consistently. Definitely exceeded 60 minutes of Internet by now, most of which spent on the farms.

If anyone wants alcohol poisoning, take a shot each time she screeches for kiwis to get some new material while she’s crawling back every time a reply is made to her thread like a crack whore.

It doesn't take 4 hours to write the responses. You're an idiot.
And quite frankly, I don't owe you an explanation for how I spend my day. If I want to spend 4 minutes, 4 hours, or 14 hours online, I decide that for myself.


Do you think your sister read the part where I made a sex fantasy where Marshall has a perma prolapsed butt and when he sits down cum, poop, and blood wipe all over the floor? Or also the part where I said it would be hilarious if you suction cupped a dildo to tbe floor and sucked the dildo into you using your anus??


hm, I dunno. She owned a dildo years ago when I knew her. I don't know what her sexual fetishes are though. Maybe her husband's family would know?




Lmao even your mom agreed with us you're a fucking nutjob.

Say what? How did you get that out of what I wrote?




No, wrong, idiot. That's not how it works at all, in Virginia or anywhere else. It's evenly when it's between identical types of descendants. So it would work that way if it was split entirely between children of the decedent. Otherwise it gets complicated.

It depends on what kind of descendants they are. From the intestate succession statute of Virginia.

§ 64.2-200. Course of descents generally; right of Commonwealth if no other heir.

A. The real estate of any decedent not effectively disposed of by will descends and passes by intestate succession in the following course:

1. To the surviving spouse of the decedent, unless the decedent is survived by children or their descendants, one or more of whom are not children or their descendants of the surviving spouse, in which case, two-thirds of the estate descends and passes to the decedent's children and their descendants, and one-third of the estate descends and passes to the surviving spouse.

2. If there is no surviving spouse, then the estate descends and passes to the decedent's children and their descendants.

3. If there is none of the foregoing, then to the decedent's parents, or to the surviving parent.

4. If there is none of the foregoing, then to the decedent's siblings, and their descendants.

5. If there is none of the foregoing, then one-half of the estate descends and passes to the kindred of one of the decedent's parents and one-half descends and passes to the kindred of the other of the decedent's parents in the following course:

a. To the decedent's grandparents, or to the surviving grandparent.

b. If there is none of the foregoing, then to the decedent's uncles and aunts, and their descendants.

c. If there is none of the foregoing, then to the decedent's great-grandparents.

d. If there is none of the foregoing, then to the siblings of the decedent's grandparents, and their descendants.

e. And so on, in other cases, without end, passing to the nearest lineal ancestors, and the descendants of such ancestors.

B. If there are no surviving kindred of one of the decedent's parents, the whole estate descends and passes to the surviving kindred of the other of the decedent's parents. If there are no kindred of either parent, the whole estate descends and passes to the kindred of the decedent's most recent spouse, if any, provided that the decedent and the spouse were married at the time of the spouse's death, as if such spouse had died intestate and entitled to the estate.

C. If there is no other heir of a decedent's real estate, such real estate is subject to escheat to the Commonwealth in accordance with Chapter 24 (§ 55.1-2400 et seq.) of Title 55.1.

Code 1950, § 64-1; 1956, c. 109; 1968, c. 656, § 64.1-1; 1977, c. 474; 1982, c. 304; 1985, c. 189; 1990, c. 831; 2012, c. 614; 2020, c. 900.

That's exactly what I said, how dumb can you be?

ew, you're such a fat tub of lard. your avatar makes me sick


Imagine how her mom felt. Couldn't see her grandkids, lost a daughter to mental/moral illness. All this AFTER she found out that Melinda carried on a years-long incestuous sexaffair with her ex-husband. Horrific.
It's worth nothing that Melinda's mom had a perfectly normal facebook account, with lots of proud photos of her other daughters and her other grandkids. She may have had a substance abuse issue in the past, but not in the recent past. She was living a cheerful and happy existence in at least the last few years.
Imagine being a mostly normal Appalachian woman and having her as a daughter.

My mother died of a drug overdose. That's anything but "well adjusted".
My deceased mother could have said anything about me. I'd say in return: "consider the source"!




Yeah, but I thought you completely estranged yourself from her, to where you don't consider her family and call her an "ex-mother".


The law has nothing to do with your feelings.




You literally keep making the same errors over and over in your suits, are being guided by the legal system, do not correct them, yet you insist you are correct.

This is your hypothesis. Where are the facts to support that claim?




Letters like B.A. behind your name are not an indication of intelligence, particularly in this day and age of diploma mills. There are tens of thousands of so called learning institutions willing to provide those certificates (I won't call them diplomas) to anyone willing to write off their student loans in exchange for it


Anyone who pursues higher education has already demonstrated their intelligence by making a commitment to expand their mind.

Higher education eliminates idiot thinking in the world. I mean, look at most of you KF people. The reason you talk this way is because you are UNEDUCATED.

In addition, it has been repeatedly reported by important institutions, government and otherwise, that having a Bachelor's degree, Master's degree and PhD increased one's earning potential. Lots of vacant job positions require a Bachelor's or higher. $$$




You need a written will to disown. So it would really be an epic failure for the actual child of a decedent who had no living spouse to somehow manage to get nothing. Of course if the mother divested herself of her possessions and any real estate before death by giving it outright to other children, so nothing was left when she died, that would work too, but a will is the direct way to disown.


Actually, in Virginia law there are ways to sue for being cut out of a will. Depends on the circumstances that led to being omitted. It's called an "omitted heir", legally speaking.





John Doe #2 for 50 dollars


Inaccurate. We don't use commas in the United States of America. It was $50,000 with a missing zero. A missing zero because I was interuppted in writing.





childish handwriting


I have messy handwriting when I have to write quickly in large print lines. Not a big deal in the big scheme of things.





I was referring to the fact that her sister received all of the money. Either way, she got it all. So either Melinda knew she couldn't cut the mustard up against her sister in court or she tried and failed.


No, I postponed it because my oldest sibling stepped in to divide the assets. She doesn't have the same issues my middle ex-sister has. A whole lot less drama.
 
It doesn't take 4 hours to write the responses. You're an idiot.
And quite frankly, I don't owe you an explanation for how I spend my day. If I want to spend 4 minutes, 4 hours, or 14 hours online, I decide that for myself.





hm, I dunno. She owned a dildo years ago when I knew her. I don't know what her sexual fetishes are though. Maybe her husband's family would know?






Say what? How did you get that out of what I wrote?






That's exactly what I said, how dumb can you be?

ew, you're such a fat tub of lard. your avatar makes me sick






My mother died of a drug overdose. That's anything but "well adjusted".
My deceased mother could have said anything about me. I'd say in return: "consider the source"!







The law has nothing to do with your feelings.






This is your hypothesis. Where are the facts to support that claim?







Anyone who pursues higher education has already demonstrated their intelligence by making a commitment to expand their mind.

Higher education eliminates idiot thinking in the world. I mean, look at most of you KF people. The reason you talk this way is because you are UNEDUCATED.

In addition, it has been repeatedly reported by important institutions, government and otherwise, that having a Bachelor's degree, Master's degree and PhD increased one's earning potential. Lots of vacant job positions require a Bachelor's or higher. $$$







Actually, in Virginia law there are ways to sue for being cut out of a will. Depends on the circumstances that led to being omitted. It's called an "omitted heir", legally speaking.








Inaccurate. We don't use commas in the United States of America. It was $50,000 with a missing zero. A missing zero because I was interuppted in writing.








I have messy handwriting when I have to write quickly in large print lines. Not a big deal in the big scheme of things.








No, I postponed it because my oldest sibling stepped in to divide the assets. She doesn't have the same issues my middle ex-sister has. A whole lot less drama.
If you have legal standing to get a cut of the will why did you lose?
 
It doesn't take 4 hours to write the responses. You're an idiot.
And quite frankly, I don't owe you an explanation for how I spend my day. If I want to spend 4 minutes, 4 hours, or 14 hours online, I decide that for myself.





hm, I dunno. She owned a dildo years ago when I knew her. I don't know what her sexual fetishes are though. Maybe her husband's family would know?






Say what? How did you get that out of what I wrote?






That's exactly what I said, how dumb can you be?

ew, you're such a fat tub of lard. your avatar makes me sick






My mother died of a drug overdose. That's anything but "well adjusted".
My deceased mother could have said anything about me. I'd say in return: "consider the source"!







The law has nothing to do with your feelings.






This is your hypothesis. Where are the facts to support that claim?







Anyone who pursues higher education has already demonstrated their intelligence by making a commitment to expand their mind.

Higher education eliminates idiot thinking in the world. I mean, look at most of you KF people. The reason you talk this way is because you are UNEDUCATED.

In addition, it has been repeatedly reported by important institutions, government and otherwise, that having a Bachelor's degree, Master's degree and PhD increased one's earning potential. Lots of vacant job positions require a Bachelor's or higher. $$$







Actually, in Virginia law there are ways to sue for being cut out of a will. Depends on the circumstances that led to being omitted. It's called an "omitted heir", legally speaking.








Inaccurate. We don't use commas in the United States of America. It was $50,000 with a missing zero. A missing zero because I was interuppted in writing.








I have messy handwriting when I have to write quickly in large print lines. Not a big deal in the big scheme of things.








No, I postponed it because my oldest sibling stepped in to divide the assets. She doesn't have the same issues my middle ex-sister has. A whole lot less drama.
Ok, so just addressing your responses to me:

Facts that I have nothing to support my claim. Here they are. I've read every single one of the dismissals to your suits. HERE ARE MY FACTS:

The dismissals read that in every single one of your attempts to sue, you never had a claim. I'm not sure if you even know what that is, but it means that when you file a suit, you must, with each action, cite a case that supports your action. The Judge Parker and his clerks have repeatedly advised you of this in each dismissal, yet you've responded in kind by repeatedly filing another suit without a claim. Fact enough?

Fact #2 You called me uneducated:
This is your attempt to get me to dox myself. I've repeatedly told you that I'm not as gullible as you. However, if you've read even a fraction of my posts you'd have gleaned that yes, I'm quite well educated from real institutions of higher learning, not diploma mills. The pursuit of learning, and not the pursuit of education, is of itself an indication of intelligence. You didn't even get that right. Aristotle would be ashamed. And you did write MOST of KF members, because I'm sure you're aware that I'm not the only one here with an education far greater than yours, and even those without RIDICULOUS letters behind their names are far more intelligent than you.
 
It doesn't take 4 hours to write the responses. You're an idiot.
And quite frankly, I don't owe you an explanation for how I spend my day. If I want to spend 4 minutes, 4 hours, or 14 hours online, I decide that for myself.





hm, I dunno. She owned a dildo years ago when I knew her. I don't know what her sexual fetishes are though. Maybe her husband's family would know?






Say what? How did you get that out of what I wrote?






That's exactly what I said, how dumb can you be?

ew, you're such a fat tub of lard. your avatar makes me sick






My mother died of a drug overdose. That's anything but "well adjusted".
My deceased mother could have said anything about me. I'd say in return: "consider the source"!







The law has nothing to do with your feelings.






This is your hypothesis. Where are the facts to support that claim?







Anyone who pursues higher education has already demonstrated their intelligence by making a commitment to expand their mind.

Higher education eliminates idiot thinking in the world. I mean, look at most of you KF people. The reason you talk this way is because you are UNEDUCATED.

In addition, it has been repeatedly reported by important institutions, government and otherwise, that having a Bachelor's degree, Master's degree and PhD increased one's earning potential. Lots of vacant job positions require a Bachelor's or higher. $$$







Actually, in Virginia law there are ways to sue for being cut out of a will. Depends on the circumstances that led to being omitted. It's called an "omitted heir", legally speaking.








Inaccurate. We don't use commas in the United States of America. It was $50,000 with a missing zero. A missing zero because I was interuppted in writing.








I have messy handwriting when I have to write quickly in large print lines. Not a big deal in the big scheme of things.








No, I postponed it because my oldest sibling stepped in to divide the assets. She doesn't have the same issues my middle ex-sister has. A whole lot less drama.
Dear, I didn’t say 4 consecutive hours. But that you had been frequenting for the past 4 hours meaning you had definitely met your max allotted screen time within that frame of reading and writing responses. You don’t need to tell me how you spend your day, but you already have. Breaking it down so far to give me your 60 minutes of screen time on average. You’re well past it. Go home. You’re drunk.

the thing about commas. In your childish handwriting that apparently isn’t a big deal, (other than extremely unprofessional. Just print out a fucking document, you dumb cunt) one cannot accurately assume that it was 50,00. America goes by numbers, not commas. The numbers are more important than the comma. You should know this, honey. You claim to go grocery shopping all the time. Computers pay attention to zeroes. There aren’t even comma options, let alone decimal options. Next time you buy groceries try paying 50,00 off your bill. It’s not going to be 50,000. It’s going to be 50 dollars and 00 cents. Maybe you should hire an editor to proofread everything you do since you can’t be fucked to. Even when it matters.
 
The law has nothing to do with your feelings.

Well it's not actually my feelings, it's yours. Although I do find it funny that you would backtrack on your "religious growth" of cutting off your evil goy family because it was financially beneficial for you.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: SloberrinJ
When it comes to getting money, Melinda is quite adept at putting her moral judgments aside. Witness her solicitation and acceptance of money from Andrew, someone who she thinks is evil and demon-possessed.
I wonder where she's gonna get her money from now that even Andrew ain't that interested in her anymore, she's got no income besides a tugboat sooooo
 
That we know of. I'd bet she has a few sad grifts going on in the Messianic/Hebrew Roots/'Netzarim' community. Probably not very successfully, the organized communities seem well aware of Melinda and individual cultists are generally poorer than dirt.
 
Back