That's your take on this, huh? I don't know where you're pulling the "none of this is new" angle from, since the $3.5 million that was transferred from Yelena Baturina to Hunter's firm is definitely new information. That's all but a
direct bribe; the kind of thing that Mueller's investigation was desperate to find on Trump and the kind of thing that
you impeached Trump for trying to investigate. Baturina is a prominent figure in organized crime allegations at the moment and I'm
reasonably certain that the son of the former Vice President and current Presidential hopeful being directly tied to a Russian mobster and being paid millions of dollars by aforementioned mobster is
something worth knowing about.
Trump Jr. can comb his hair the wrong way or Baron Trump can
exist and these people lose their minds, but Hunter Biden can be involved in
human trafficking (Which we used to call
slavery) and Russian bribery and Chinese bribery and that's totally fine. Nothing to see here. That has
nothing to do with Joe Biden and how dare you even bring it up.
The partisanship is cute and all, but I can guarantee you that the average person on the street isn't interested in defending a coke-addicted, bribe-taking, slave-fucker just because his father has a (D) next to his name. If this is the angle you're going to use to approach the Biden investigation, you're going to need all of the luck that you can scrape up, because that shit's not gonna' fly in the court of public opinion.