U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, that didn't take long. It's not even dinnertime yet.
View attachment 1616315

I love it when they attempt this sort of moronic glow argument. It removes any and all agency from the "black bodies" and their "allies" and portrays them as easily led automatons who actually want to cause chaos. And all it takes is a mysterious and unaffiliated U-Haul distributing paraphernalia/palette of bricks et al to spur them into full-fledged rioters. :story:
 
AmeriKKKa is trending on Twitter right now, with people demanding things be burned. So is No Knock and Ms. Taylor.
get in the van.png
 
The delivery man was getting impatient. Here's your Wonton special.

And whose fault was that, she was made into memes? Blame BLM for that shit. And the Internet. Putting her name in anything and everything.
Apparently twitter is so retarded that they haven't noticed making things popular on the internet means memes and hentai will happen. They probably thought Coronachan was some sort of Viral Sensation if they're that retarded then.

Or they think they deserve special privileges, which is irony at it's finest.

The fact that they cannot weaponize any meme for their purposes shows the disconnect with internet people, the fact that they think setting things on fire is a solution shows the disconnect with everyone else.

For people so addicted to the internet they're pretty isolated, and it's hilarious.
 
I love it when they attempt this sort of moronic glow argument. It removes any and all agency from the "black bodies" and their "allies" and portrays them as easily led automatons who actually want to cause chaos. And all it takes is a mysterious and unaffiliated U-Haul distributing paraphernalia/palette of bricks et al to spur them into full-fledged rioters. :story:
It's like that guy in Minnie they claimed was an agent provocateur of the cops/KKK who allegedly started attacking the Auto Zone. Dumbasses, if the protesters are so peaceful, then why did they join in the vandalism instead of stopping him?
 
It almost looks like there is some sort of... group... or clique behind all these attacks on our civilization.
Trying to figure out how to get a local archive of that video, but having trouble snagging it from the news story. Needs to be grabbed since it will get shoahed.
 

Going through the redline, and fuck they're going to break the goddamn internet with this shit

1600891423820.png


So, in plain English, this means that someone can tell your ISP, webhost, domain registrar, Cloudflare, etc, that they have a "court order" that requires them to "remove, restrict access or availability to, or prevent dissemination" of your website. They're liable for your content if they don't do it, and they cannot be sued for what they do in response to the court order, so their process for handling this shit is to rubber-stamp it and provide no appeals process.

Like, this counts if the "court order" sent to the service provider doesn't even exist. If someone fraudulently generates a fake court order and your ISP negligently permissive removal process kills your website and causes you millions of dollars of damages, well, you're just shit out of luck. Good luck finding and suing the broke fuck in Nigeria messing with you. Or the "court order" could be valid, but generated through a fraudulent process - eg, having a friend agree to be the "author" of someone else's negative Yelp review for lawsuit purposes and "settling" with you. Poof, easy valid court order that you can ship off to any piece of internet infrastructure to get whatever you want taken down.

And I can't stress enough how much of a difference laws like this make to the business processes of the various internet infrastructure companies. If they don't take action within a "reasonable time", they're liable for frankly scary amounts of money - eg, Sandmann sued WaPo for $250m. If they take action, they are 100% immune to liability for said action. Under the proposed law, most companies would immediately figure out how to go from "receive a court order" to "remove content" in the cheapest and fastest way possible. The fact that targeting third parties to get removal is so easy will foment people generating court orders for the purpose of shipping them to said third parties. It's a vicious circle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back