Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

Yes we are living in anti-intellectual times, Judy, as evidenced by the fantastical notion that biological sex is imaginary and only genderfeels are real.

Oh, and numbers? Fuck off bitch, y’all are like the Wizard of Oz, using technology to give the impression of true power but in fact, you’re just faking support with ‘bots funded by non-Western governments set on destroying us. Normal people are not the ones with tiny levels of real support, you are.

 

[Positron]

It is a truism that you learn more about the vacuous thoughts of Judith Butler by reading her interviews, not her deliberately obtuse, fancy-pants books.

My wager is that most feminists support trans rights and oppose all forms of transphobia

Don't "wager"! You are a fucking academic; you are paid to do research!

If they understand themselves as belonging to that strain of radical feminism that opposes gender reassignment, why not call them radical feminists?

I don't think "radical feminists" are so defined. But as a arch-postmodernist Butler is not big on definition.

The feminist who holds such a view presumes that the penis does define the person, and that anyone with a penis would identify as a woman for the purposes of entering such changing rooms and posing a threat to the women inside. It assumes that the penis is the threat, or that any person who has a penis who identifies as a woman is engaging in a base, deceitful, and harmful form of disguise.

Except we don't solely define a person by genitals. We also defined them by their stereotypical, repeated behavior (in Butler's parlance, their performativity). We are disgusted by troons, denounce them as fake, and deem them threats to genuine women, not so much because their have penises, but because of their repeated fetishistic, misogynistic, often violent remarks on social media. Many of them have expressed the wish to obliterate genuine women. I cannot speak for any other people of course, but I had no problem with transsexuals in the 1990s, even though, then as now, transsexuals had penises. The difference was the "gender perfomativity" of transsexuals in that era: they kept to themselves and really tried to be like women.

If Butler were honest, she would have to admit that the present batch of "activist" transsexuals are frauds, because they keep performing maleness -- the worst examples of maleness -- while claiming womanhood.

On the other hand, the suggestion that gender can be "queered", whatever that means, is fantasy par excellence.

If trans-exclusionary radical feminists understood themselves as sharing a world with trans people, in a common struggle for equality, freedom from violence, and for social recognition, there would be no more trans-exclusionary radical feminists.

Troons don't want to share a world with normal people. As I've just said, many troons have downright expressed the wish to obliterate genuine women. Transsexual activists, like all activists, want to transform the world to their own liking, even if it means other people have to suffer.

 

[Brain Problems]

If Butler were honest

Think I found the problem.

 

[Smug Cat]

If trans-exclusionary radical feminists understood themselves as sharing a world with trans people, in a common struggle for equality, freedom from violence, and for social recognition, there would be no more trans-exclusionary radical feminists

And if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle. Imagine thinking women and troons share any common struggles lmao. Your average troon is a much bigger threat to women than your average normal man. And women don't need "social recognition" because women just are. They aren't trying to fool themselves like troons are.

 

[behavioral swamp thang]

I'd say put 'em in the special olympics, but some poor cripple would end up in the grave at the hands of Alice Lily Smith.

 

[ChaChaHeels:BlackOnes]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8759303/Transgender-thug-36-identifies-woman-jailed-male-prison.html

A transgender thug who identifies as a woman has been jailed in an all-male prison for 20 weeks following a racist rampage inside a Sainsbury's.

Rachelle Mikhnevich, 36, kicked and attempted to bite two police officers after shouting racial slurs at store employees when she struggled to scan items at a self-service checkout in Manchester.

Mikhnevich assaulted an assistant and kicked the store manager in the attack, before telling a security guard: 'Go away you fucking nigger, go away.

'Fucking look the other way lad before I fucking knock these cunts out, fuckk off you ugly cunt.'

Following the incident, which took place at a supermarket inside Manchester Piccadilly station on March 16, Mikhnevich claimed she had drunk three bottles of wine before the attack.



Prosecuting, Eileen Rodgers explained how Mikhnevich was at the self-service till at around 9.15am

9.15 AM? NINE FIFTEEN AM?

 

[chickenbutt]

If any more of my dumbfuck liberal acquaintances post that vacuous Butler interview while frothing at the mouth about what a genius she is, high on the smell of her own farts... I don't even know.

I could see what a hack she was as a lowly undergraduate years ago, and she hasn't improved with age. Herself and Foucault are just two pawing, verbose, pedo-apologizing peas in a pod. I despise them both with a passion, and what I despise even more are people on my timeline who've never read a serious academic work in their lives fawning over the rhetorical equivalent of a wet shit covered in glitter because they're too stupid for analysis any more nuanced than "big words mean dis wammen think gud, hit share make difference".

They love to bang on and on about conservatives being the stupid ones, yet they're too dense themselves to look in a mirror. I'll take my tophats with grace, I'll admit this makes me MATI.

 

[SeniorFuckFace]

Confucius says:

No matter how hot tranny might be, you still fucking Dude in ass.

 

[Elwood P. Dowd]

The feminist who holds such a view presumes that the penis does define the person, and that anyone with a penis would identify as a woman for the purposes of entering such changing rooms and posing a threat to the women inside. It assumes that the penis is the threat, or that any person who has a penis who identifies as a woman is engaging in a base, deceitful, and harmful form of disguise. This is a rich fantasy, and one that comes from powerful fears, but it does not describe a social reality. Trans women are often discriminated against in men’s bathrooms, and their modes of self-identification are ways of describing a lived reality, one that cannot be captured or regulated by the fantasies brought to bear upon them. The fact that such fantasies pass as public argument is itself cause for worry.

This woman has drifted so far off to cloud cuckoo land I'm not even sure how to begin to articulate a response. Wow.

 

[AnOminous]

It assumes that the penis is the threat, or that any person who has a penis who identifies as a woman is engaging in a base, deceitful, and harmful form of disguise.

Good luck impregnating a woman by raping her with a vagina you dumb whore.

 

[Borrisokeane]

This is a troon. Article says woman but Ireland's a small country and we know all....

https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/judge-orders-release-of-dangerous-and-traumatised-woman-1018653.html

 

[OttoWest]

This is a troon. Article says woman but Ireland's a small country and we know all....

https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/judge-orders-release-of-dangerous-and-traumatised-woman-1018653.html

Any more details on this?

 

[Next Task]

Just a reminder of Judith Butler's hypocrisy: a previous thread here where she was involved.

 

[RodgerDodger]

This is a troon. Article says woman but Ireland's a small country and we know all....

https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/judge-orders-release-of-dangerous-and-traumatised-woman-1018653.html

And Apparently Irish Courts have never heard of the most basic element of a Psyche Eval "Danger to Self or Others"? (If YES then don't let wander the street!)

 

[Terrifik]

NO AGENDA
Don't Want to Wear an LGBT Pride Emblem? You're Fired.
Don't Want to Wear an LGBT Pride Emblem? You're Fired.
BY TYLER O'NEIL SEP 21, 2020 3:43 PM EST

Spoiler: agenda

With President Donald Trump in the White House, many conservative Christians may feel a false sense of security. Trump has used the administration to reverse many of Obama’s policies that restricted religious freedom. Trump even launched a religious freedom branch at the Department of Health and Human Services! Even so, the LGBT activist assault on religious freedom continues in many parts of American culture, and it is only likely to go into overdrive if Joe Biden becomes president next year.

Last week, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit against the Kroger Company after a grocery store in Little Rock, Ark., fired two Christian women who requested a religious accommodation when required to wear a rainbow-colored heart emblem on an apron. These women claimed that the emblem endorsed LGBTQ values and that wearing it would violate their religious beliefs.

This did not happen in a deep-blue bastion like New York City or Seattle. It didn’t happen in Portland or Los Angeles — it happened in Little Rock, Arkansas.

According to the EEOC lawsuit, the Kroger location “implemented a new dress code, which included an apron depicting a rainbow-colored heart emblem on the bib of the apron. The women believed the emblem endorsed LGBTQ values and that wearing it would violate their religious beliefs.”

The women came forward with proactive solutions. One woman offered to wear the apron with the emblem covered and the other offered to wear a different apron without the emblem. Kroger, however, “made no attempt to accomodate their requests.”

“When the women still refused to wear the apron with the emblem visible, the EEOC charged, Kroger retaliated against them by disciplining and ultimately discharging them.”

The lawsuit claims that this retaliation violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC first attempted to reach a pre-litigation settlement through a conciliation process, but Kroger apparently refused. The lawsuit seeks monetary relief in the form of back pay and compensatory damages, as well as an injunction against future discrimination.

“Companies have an obligation under Title VII to consider requests for religious accommodations, and it is illegal to terminate employees for requesting an accommodation for their religious beliefs,” Delner-Franklin Thomas, district director of the EEOC’s Memphis District Office (which oversees Ark., Tenn., and parts of Miss.,), said in a statement. “The EEOC protects the rights of the LGBTQ community, but it also protects the rights of religious people.”

This is not some local interest story or tiny news item. The Kroger Company is the largest supermarket by revenue in the U.S. and it is the second-largest general retailer. Last year, Kroger had 453,000 employees. It is no small matter if Kroger forces a political stance on its employees and retaliates against them when they ask for an accommodation.

SPLC Demands Big Tech Silence Conservatives in the Name of Fighting White Supremacist Terror
Why not just wear the pride emblem?
Democrats, LGBT activists, and an increasing number of cultural institutions celebrate the LGBT rainbow flag as a symbol of inclusion. So what’s the big deal? Why can’t these Christians just suck it up and wear the pride emblem?

The problem is, LGBT pride flags represent the antithesis of many things small-o orthodox Christians believe. While Christians need to be sensitive to the fact that people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender have been mistreated in the past, they cannot celebrate LGBT lifestyles. It is possible to treat people with respect while disapproving of their sexual activity or their cross-sex identity.

The Bible is clear that God made humans male and female (Genesis 1:27, Mark 10:6, Matthew 19:4) and that marriage is between one man and one woman (Genesis 2:24). The male-female definition of marriage is not just a lifestyle in the Bible — it is a mystery that prefigures the marriage between God and His church (Ephesians 5:31-32).

Homosexual activity is consistently denounced as sinful (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13; Romans 1:18-32; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; 1 Timothy 1:8-10). That does not mean that same-sex sexual relationships do not involve love and self-sacrifice, but they also involve sin.

Christians who believe the Bible is the authoritative and inspired Word of God cannot embrace LGBT lifestyles and LGBT pride. The Bible is also clear that they should love LGBT people and preach to them “with gentleness and respect, having a good conscience, so that when you are slandered, those who revile your good name in Christ may be put to shame” (1 Peter 3:15-17).

Tragically, many parts of American society today consider these beliefs bigoted, homophobic, transphobic, or just downright “hateful.” This likely explains why Kroger did not consider accommodation for the Christian women.

Big Tech Company Reconsiders Relying on the SPLC After Hearing About Scandals, Terror Attack
The LGBT assault on religious freedom
It may seem ironic to say that LGBT activists are attacking the religious freedom of conservative Christians. After all, aren’t Christians technically the majority of the American population? Didn’t Christians oppress LGBT people for decades if not centuries?

Over the past decade, however, LGBT activists have repeatedly targeted Christians for their beliefs, penalizing them for disagreeing with same-sex marriage or transgender identity.

Bakers like Jack Phillips gladly serve LGBT people, but they refuse to craft wedding cakes to celebrate a same-sex wedding. Florists and photographers have made the same decision.

State governments in the form of civil rights commissions have prosecuted these convictional Christians, claiming that their free-speech refusal to craft art to celebrate an event they disagree with constitutes discrimination. Jack Phillips won his Supreme Court religious freedom case last year, but the commission went after him again, anyway. A man who identifies as transgender tried to force Phillips to bake a cake to celebrate his gender transition. LGBT activists firmly declare that bakers like Phillips are guilty of discrimination.

Animus against conservative Christians has emerged at Google and at Yale Law School. Facebook blocked evangelist Franklin Graham on Christmas week over a two-year-old post about transgender identity. Cities have banned Chick-fil-A from their airports — most recently San Antonio, Texas, and Buffalo, N.Y. — because the owner has donated to Christian organizations that uphold traditional sexual ethics. Conservatives are even finding themselves expelled from the scientific community over LGBT issues.

Yet that’s not the worst of it. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has branded conservative Christian nonprofits like Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) and FRC “hate groups” due to their beliefs on marriage and sexuality, listing them along with the Ku Klux Klan. ADF has won nine Supreme Court cases in seven years. A terrorist attempted to kill everyone at FRC, thanks to the SPLC’s “hate map.”

Todd Starnes: LGBT Activists ‘Want to Shut Down Every Church in America’ and Burn the Bible
The SPLC also marked the small Catholic charity the Ruth Institute a “hate group,” citing the Catechism of the Catholic Church as a “hate” document.

The SPLC is quite mainstream. Big Tech companies like Amazon use it to screen out “hate groups.” Schools across America receive its “Teaching Tolerance” materials. Democratic senators have cited the SPLC to demonize Trump’s administration and judicial appointees. In once case, Sen. Dianne Feinstein said of Amy Coney Barrett, “The dogma lives loudly” within her so she can’t be trusted. In another, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said that Russell Vought is “really not someone who is what this country is supposed to be about,” because he thinks Muslims do not go to heaven.

But the vitriol against Christians is not limited to this powerful organization. When news broke that Karen Pence, wife of Vice President Mike Pence, had gone back to teaching at a Christian school — that, SHOCKER, holds to the Bible on sexuality issues — outrage ensued, with people declaring, “f**k these homophobes!”

In the book So Many Christians, So Few Lions: Is There Christianophobia in the United States? sociology professors George Yancey and David Williamson painstakingly document the presence of bias against conservative Christians, proving that it is as real as animus against Muslims and Jews. Indeed, Yancey’s most recent research shows that animus against Christians leads some people to support LGBT activism, even when they have a low opinion of LGBT people.

Many Christians have found themselves penalized, investigated, or fired for daring to contradict LGBT pride.

So, when employers ask conservative Christians to wear an emblem celebrating LGBT pride, Christians hear that they must wear the symbol of people who hate them, who want to weaken their constitutional rights, and who fundamentally disagree with their view of the world, celebrating the sin that they think separates people from God. If that’s not a case for religious accommodation, I don’t know what is.

The EEOC was right to file this lawsuit, and this is yet more proof of just how much is at stake in this election. LGBT activists seek to demonize conservative Christians and boot them from polite society, and the Trump administration is standing in their way. I shudder to think about what will happen if Joe Biden removes that restriction.

Many Christians have found themselves penalized, investigated, or fired for daring to contradict LGBT pride.

So, when employers ask conservative Christians to wear an emblem celebrating LGBT pride, Christians hear that they must wear the symbol of people who hate them, who want to weaken their constitutional rights, and who fundamentally disagree with their view of the world, celebrating the sin that they think separates people from God. If that’s not a case for religious accommodation, I don’t know what is.

 

[queue-anon]

Part of the entire fevered fantasy is just that, though. I mean, there are I guess straight men who are so inobservant that they get fooled because every once in a while they kill a troon who faked them out, but women and in particular lesbians? Lesbians are I’m fairly certainly the world’s greatest experts in telling the difference, even more than straight women. They just don’t seem to realize that women can tell due to evolutionary reasons. The only troons who might fly under my radar only do so because there is nothing about them that makes me take that first actual look. So, small gays. A small gay might not hit my radar because of small size and the fact that he isn’t vibrating with sexual intent in a female space since as an HSTS being in the female space isn’t an act of sexual gratification for him in and of itself. But a troonbian is, and women can feel it radiating from him, and we take a real look, and there it is. Evolutionary reasons, it is a critical skill to be able to sense predatory sexual intent. The HSTS only gets by because he doesn’t vibrate with anything that causes us to look more closely. At that point, y’all, the skin alone...there’s just that thick greasier look to male skin, and makeup makes it stand out even more, as we all know from tranny porn. And very few men gay or straight aren’t bigger with a heavier frame. A taller guy could weigh the same as a very short obese woman and there is still something more solid and dense at the core about the way he moves and connects to the ground, while she just seems out of balance and like a big fat ball teetering around.

But imagining fooling a woman, and a lesbian in particular, is like the final boss they all think they can defeat.

Like literally every time I see a tranny reeing that lesbians won't fuck him, he's obviously a man, usually a hilariously hideous one. The only pro-corrective-rape tranny I've seen who wasn't hideous is Riley Dennis, and he's still obviously a dude.

It's similar to how whenever I see a tranny crying about some dumb bullshit only a child would care about, I go to his profile, and he's like 30.

 

[LateNightMuffin]

Judith Butler also has argued that parent/child incest isn't necessarily harmful, and that proscriptions against parent/child incest possibly do more harm than the incest itself.

 

[GenitalFetishist]

Judith Butler also has argued that parent/child incest isn't necessarily harmful, and that proscriptions against parent/child incest possibly do more harm than the incest itself.

And on that note, have some wicked TERF propaganda:

Part 1 The Trojan Unicorn

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

 

[Positron]

Judith Butler also has argued that parent/child incest isn't necessarily harmful, and that proscriptions against parent/child incest possibly do more harm than the incest itself.

She would probably say that parenthood and childhood are nothing but perfomativity. If you "queer" that performativity the boundary dissipates.

I'm amused that such self-styled "historical" intellectuals as Butler and Foucault are so ill-adapted to changes of ideas throughout history, especially since this is what they study. Again, if they were honest about what they claim, that "we depend on gender as a historical category, and that means we do not yet know all the ways it may come to signify, and we are open to new understandings of its social meanings", then they shouldn't be surprised, much less scandalized like Butler, who claimed in the same breath "it would be a disaster for feminism to return either to a strictly biological understanding of gender." They would simply accept as a fact that the current historical era, having witnessed the havoc of postmodernism and rampant moral relativism, has started to develop its own (strictly biological, trans exclusive) notion of gender. They might speculate or investigate the underlying reason, but they won't, like Butler, denounce this era as "anti-intellectual". Biological essentialism is "anti-intellectual" in one facile, purely descriptive sense: it divests the discursive power of "intellectuals" like Butler while at the same time empowers the normal person. But it is obvious that both Butler and her interviewer use the term "anti-intellectual" in the normative, judgmental sense. It is somehow bad to be "anti-intellectual" even though it was precisely these "intellectuals" who led the world astray.

 

[Literally Murdered]

I'm amused that such self-styled "historical" intellectuals as Butler and Foucault are so ill-adapted to changes of ideas throughout history, especially since this is what they study. Again, if they were honest about what they claim, that "we depend on gender as a historical category, and that means we do not yet know all the ways it may come to signify, and we are open to new understandings of its social meanings", then they shouldn't be surprised, much less scandalized like Butler, who claimed in the same breath "it would be a disaster for feminism to return either to a strictly biological understanding of gender." They would simply accept as a fact that the current historical era, having witnessed the havoc of postmodernism and rampant moral relativism, has started to develop its own (strictly biological, trans exclusive) notion of gender. They might speculate or investigate the underlying reason, but they won't, like Butler, denounce this era as "anti-intellectual".

It's just all so intellectually dishonest. I also enjoyed one of the twitter terfs pointing out that she denounces tervenism as a "marginal position" that good people are morally obligated to shut down, despite having built her career on the premise that any disruption to mainstream discourse from the margins is noble and worthy of defence. She'll defend the marginalised interests of pedos, but couldn't possibly be seen with those nasty terfs. Lol.