Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 14.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 115 24.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 84 18.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 193 41.7%

  • Total voters
    463
I mean, I generally agree that loli porn shouldn't be criminalized, because no actual children were harmed, muh freeze peach, etc.

That said, if you Digibro'd me and told me you got a stiffy from watching a cartoon 9-year-old getting stuffed, you're definitely never babysitting my kids. Or coming within 50 yards of them.

This section of the stream is A-ok. Less internet drama sperging (of which I don't give a shit about), and more discussion between two guys who generally agree on something, but disagree on some of the details.
 
Last edited:
Blessed stream. I love this.
Had a very low opinion of PPP and Masterson during that one trainwreck stream. Had never watched either of them before, and I didn't care much for Masterson's attitude and PPP's anti-Dick sperging.

PPP's not so bad once Nick steered him away from his Masterson hate. He's got interesting opinions, and he agrees with Nick enough (e.g. religion and loli) that they have common ground, but disagrees enough that they can have a discussion instead of some onstream circlejerk.

PPP's roomate(?) randomly snarking things is also moderately funny/
 
PPP's not so bad once Nick steered him away from his Masterson hate. He's got interesting opinions, and he agrees with Nick enough (e.g. religion and loli) that they have common ground, but disagrees enough that they can have a discussion instead of some onstream circlejerk.

PP has been great, until hes trying pin nick to the wall over dicks capos. He actually has a great personality, but he is taking everything so literally, like actual autism-tier focus.
 
One of Nicks mods just quit on stream, Geth Walker. Did he rage quit over PPP or something? Only been watching the past 20 mins or so and it doesn't seem too spergy.

Of course 5 minutes after I post this, PPP goes off.
 
Last edited:
I don’t think PPP understands what a joke is sometimes, and really takes things way too literally.
it was pretty clear when he thought that the most important thing to Nick in the world is video games, and then when de doesn’t get Dick’s jokes on Twitter.

I have come to the conclusion that Dick should relaunch TBPITU with PPP, or Maddox restarts The Best Debate with PPP.
 
Welp, things were too good to be true. PPP is sperging, thinking Nick has been lying (because lawyer).

EDIT: NM, seems to have passed. PPP flip flops between emotions so hard.
Yeah, he's got some mental issues.
He plays the your shit stinks worse than mine.

A guy who posts his asshole on the internet and sounds like Scott Thompson tries to say he's a better person than Rackets who actually takes his surrogate father role seriously.
 
GELTH quit around the time PPP brought up Juju the Cow. (Around the 4:03:20 timestamp to 4:06:20)
In response to Nick asking why they were quitting in chat:
GELTH Walker said:
cos I'm asking I'm leaving YouTube and discord and a few others I'm done
Might have been because Nick was entertaining some of the stories told by Dick's ex, I don't know. Honestly I wasn't paying attention to the chat that much.
 
I mean, I generally agree that loli porn shouldn't be criminalized, because no actual children were harmed, muh freeze peach, etc.
It's a divisive topic because it could go either way.

I agree with what you said because, as you say, no real children are abused. and maybe pedos can get their rocks off to that instead of actual CSAM, which might cut down the market, meaning fewer victims.

That said, I disagree as well. The problem is mentally-ill people might find it to be a "gateway drug" that leads to children being abused, even if they aren't physically doing it themselves and are "just" downloading actual CSAM, which then creates a market.

It's not a simple subject to discuss either, because of the subject matter someone is bound to get angry, either because they think the other person is paedophile, or because they're being called a paedophile. I'm curious if there's actually been any studies done regarding this, and if there were what the results ended up being.
 
Back