Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

Rubberchickenchu said:
View attachment 1616267
View attachment 1616269
View attachment 1616272
View attachment 1616273
View attachment 1616275
View attachment 1616277
View attachment 1616279
View attachment 1616287
View attachment 1616289
View attachment 1616298
View attachment 1616299
View attachment 1616301
View attachment 1616302
View attachment 1616303
View attachment 1616304
View attachment 1616306
[:spoiler]
Click to expand...
Btw, this is the same Judith Butler, a pedo incest apologist against age of consent laws

In her 2004 book Undoing Gender, she wrote, “It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be--and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not--it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside.”[1]

She also wrote, “The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.”[2]

“So I keep adding this qualification: ‘when incest is a violation,’ suggesting that I think that there may be occasions in which it is not. Why would I talk that way? Well, I do think that there are probably forms of incest that are not necessarily traumatic or which gain their traumatic character by virtue of the consciousness of social shame that they produce.”[3]

“It might, then, be necessary to rethink the prohibition on incest as that which sometimes protects against a violation, and sometimes becomes the very instrument of a violation.”[4]
[1] Butler, Judith, Undoing Gender, Routledge, London, 2004, p. 155.
[2] Butler, Judith, Undoing Gender, Routledge, London, 2004, p. 155.
[3] Butler, Judith, Undoing Gender, Routledge, London, 2004, p. 157.
[4] Butler, Judith, Undoing Gender, Routledge, London, 2004, p. 160.
Click to expand...
 
  • Horrifying
  • DRINK!
  • Informative
Reactions: Marvin, Hongourable Madisha, madethistocomment and 8 others
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, madethistocomment, Norman B. Normal and 7 others
Billy shared a comic
1600951284397.png

Man Time #1 | IndyPlanet

indyplanet.com indyplanet.com
1600951523994.png


Buy my books!
1600951728492.png

1600951766410.png

 
  • Lunacy
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Toolbox, Sexy Senior Citizen and ThatDumbPhilosopher
Stalphos Johnson said:
View attachment 1619122
What is with the eyes going over the hair? Has Labelle gotten so lazy to even properly layer his art anymore?
Click to expand...
It's actually a trick borrowed from anime/manga. It saves time and removes ambiguity from a character's facial expression.
I0W6M.jpg
Of course, with Labelle's shitty art, it looks more like laziness than aesthetics.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: thermocline, Po's Cootah, White bubblegum and 8 others
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
It's actually a trick borrowed from anime/manga. It saves time and removes ambiguity from a character's facial expression.
View attachment 1619322
Of course, with Labelle's shitty art, it looks more like laziness than aesthetics.
Click to expand...
The hair is actually on top of the eye in that image, though.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Sexy Senior Citizen
Rubberchickenchu said:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is dead.
Trump will nominate a more conservative justice to make me more oppressed.
Buy my books!
View attachment 1609140
View attachment 1609138
View attachment 1609141

View attachment 1609146
View attachment 1609152
View attachment 1609153
View attachment 1609154
View attachment 1609155
theestablishment.co

Ruth Bader Ginsberg's Legacy Is Based On White Feminism

The issue is that, while privileged white women like Ginsburg were eager to destroy preferential policies for women for the mere symbolism of being considered equal to white men—the poor, queer, and non-white women who desperately need these programs far more than white women were left stranded.
theestablishment.co theestablishment.co
View attachment 1609147
View attachment 1609160
View attachment 1609161
View attachment 1609164
Click to expand...
Back to pretending we give a shit about Jews and not a raging Muslim brainwashed antisemite, I see.

Trombonista said:
Is he still a Quebec separatist, or did he give that up when he moved to Finland?
Click to expand...
Isn't Labelle's Quebec separatist stance based entirely on just being a contrarian, like most of his other beliefs?

Rubberchickenchu said:
The husband was mentioned last week

And the selfie is a repost,I found this one from the archives
View attachment 1612023
Click to expand...
Whoa. How long has it been since Labelle catifshed thirsty tranny chasers online with his badly photoshopped dainty pubescent futanari wet dream bullshit? Let's party like it's 2016.
FAD0D2FD-83CD-48A6-AD64-954D963BE8D2.jpeg
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
Reactions: AsianChris, madethistocomment, Sexy Senior Citizen and 2 others
Casta Spersions said:
Thank you! I referenced this in a post ages ago but explained there was no way I was going to put that into my search engine to find it.
Click to expand...
Yeah I thought about googling "vulva-toddler" then realised it would be far safer to use the kiwifarms search engine.

Amber the Hedgehog said:
Social gender norm have been different from society to society as well as how tightly they have to bee followed but general direction has always been the same. This is stuff like the woman is expected to take a larger role in raising kids especially with little kids. Men do physically more intenseve or dangerous labor. Higher sexual purity standards to women. There has never been sociaty where women do the fighting and war instead of men. At best women were allowed in war with men but they were never the primary fighting class. Usually women support men from home by running the daily life in their abstinence or by making food for the solders and caring those hurt.

Her daughter is expressing normal feelings of a child her age, she is a girl and doesn't want boys stuff. This normal period in growing up as she is learning to find patterns in people and her place in those patterns. She is a girl and she isn't a boy, she wants to express this to world and so will reject stuff that in her mind aren't for girls. This is perfectly normal behavior and soon she will grow out of it when she knows that her femaleness isn't depended on stuff or actions. Let her reject what she wants, let her know that's her choise, let her do her thing, just with that remaind her that doing boy stuff doesn't make not girl. Her gender is here to stay and doesn't change no matter what she likes or does.
Click to expand...

I suppose. It just seems to me like rejecting something because you think you're supposed to reject it in order to be a girl. It's like trying to put yourself into a box marked "girl" instead of making the box fit you. It is a pattern I see people falling into in my life with politics, ideology, etc, as adults, and this case seems to me to be the same thing young. When you're born with female genitals that makes you a girl. Other than that, "being a girl" means whatever you want it to mean.

If she genuinely doesn't like the item that is one thing. If she likes it but prefers to signal to others she is a girl because she wants to look stereotypically girly and fit in (and there is nothing wrong with wanting to find in), that is another. But if she likes it yet genuinely thinks she is not supposed to wear it because she is a girl, that's a problem.

It sounds like the second to me, but as you grow up its easy to conflate the concept of the second and the third. The distinction needs to be explained and reinforced. It seems to me that's how you help kids retain independence of thought.

"So you wear it" is a fucking classic line, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha
Rubberchickenchu said:
New comic, still waiting for English version
View attachment 1620159
View attachment 1620160
1 I just saw the funniest thing in the world, you'll love it.
2 Ah yeah! That's hilarious.
3 I wonder who could have posted it on my wall for you to see it
4 - ...you?
- This time, I've even tagged you on it!

Buy my book!
View attachment 1620165
Posted twice
View attachment 1620161
Click to expand...
Is this how flirting works?
Maybe I’ve been doing it wrong this whole time.
But seriously, what is the point of this comic in particular?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Norman B. Normal
Enoby Way said:
Yeah I thought about googling "vulva-toddler" then realised it would be far safer to use the kiwifarms search engine.



I suppose. It just seems to me like rejecting something because you think you're supposed to reject it in order to be a girl. It's like trying to put yourself into a box marked "girl" instead of making the box fit you. It is a pattern I see people falling into in my life with politics, ideology, etc, as adults, and this case seems to me to be the same thing young. When you're born with female genitals that makes you a girl. Other than that, "being a girl" means whatever you want it to mean.

If she genuinely doesn't like the item that is one thing. If she likes it but prefers to signal to others she is a girl because she wants to look stereotypically girly and fit in (and there is nothing wrong with wanting to find in), that is another. But if she likes it yet genuinely thinks she is not supposed to wear it because she is a girl, that's a problem.

It sounds like the second to me, but as you grow up its easy to conflate the concept of the second and the third. The distinction needs to be explained and reinforced. It seems to me that's how you help kids retain independence of thought.

"So you wear it" is a fucking classic line, though.
Click to expand...
The period extreme rejection of anything that the child perceives as belonging to the opposite sex is well know phenomenon in childhood physiology. It's perfectly normal to the point that almost all kids go trough it. It's normally pretty short period, usually not much longer than few weeks, but during that time the child is very particular about what they supposed to do and what aren't supposed to do according to gender. It's important to know that the child isn't intrested following social gender stereotypes but their own understanding of what boys and girls are and how they supposed to behave. So for example a boy might reject camouflage patterns as for girls if his mom in the army. This behavior eases up after while and might even disappear depending on various factors but is generally seen as part of learning to form self image and social skills. How you are similar and different to other people, what about you staple and what changes, what behavior patt can you observe and so on.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: madethistocomment, Sexy Senior Citizen, Next Task and 5 others
It's probably just a typo, but in the French version, Sophie says "Je t'ai même identifié", using the masculine form, therefore indicating that Ciel is male. Not that it would make any difference in pronounciation if it was "identifiée" (or as Labelle used in the caption, "identifié-e"), but it's kind of amusing that Labelle can't be assed to check his grammar.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: thermocline, Hongourable Madisha, Sí. and 9 others
Prince Jello said:
It's probably just a typo, but in the French version, Sophie says "Je t'ai même identifié", using the masculine form, therefore indicating that Ciel is male. Not that it would make any difference in pronounciation if it was "identifiée" (or as Labelle used in the caption, "identifié-e"), but it's kind of amusing that Labelle can't be assed to check his grammar.
Click to expand...
Freudian slip perhaps?
 
  • Like
Reactions: thermocline, Sí., madethistocomment and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back