Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died at 87. - 🦀

ditto said:
There are plenty of evangelical protestants that hate Catholics.

If it's Barret they'll go after irregularities in the Hataian adoption records. Something where the Clinton Foundation can help.

Also expect 'Karen' to no longer be a slur..
Click to expand...
The dems are going to come off even more monstrous this time around. Since their going after a mother and her children.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Parthenos, ConfederateIrishman and 2 others
HandsomeDan said:
Should we place bets on when the accusation that she said nigger comes out?
Click to expand...

Given that she has adopted a Black Haitian daughter, probably never going to happen. It would have to be something in college or high school.

But the Black daughter can always rebuff those claims and the progressive making them is fucked. They might try to have the original parents (if they are alive) claim that Barrett engineered the adoption to rob the parents of their kids but that is dangerous as well.

All I can say is that the Democrats are probably cooking something up and they deserve to be marched in front of a firing squad for whatever shenanigans they pull.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HandsomeDan, DeadFish and Oats12345
Honestly, all the indicators have been for Barrett from the beginning so I don't know why everyone here got a massive hard on for Lagoa. I did agree she'd be the best for the idpol bullshit, but seemed a stretch to think Trump would pick her just on that.

While I'm not a fan of Barrett's entire record, there are no indicators she is a RINO. That's just doomering. At worst, she leans more towards the economic end of conservativism neutral on issues like gun rights, and is somewhat iffier on social conservatism. But she is a conservative one, which means she'll likely end up siding with the other conservative justices.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • DRINK!
Reactions: The Demon Pimp of Razgriz, Knyttet, Exterminatus and 4 others
LaxerBRO said:
View attachment 1621813

Catholic-phobia from the Democrats? That would be rich.
Click to expand...

It would cost them New York and Massachusetts. I don't think they are that stupid? At least not the ones in the Senate... Well excepting Feinstein, who already did just that last go round with Amy Barret Comey and got curbstomped by the Judge for it. Harris and Warren who hate Catholics and Christian's, and Schumer, who's just a fucking moron.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Kiwi FBI Liason and Getting tard comed
Barnes thinking that Barrett could lose both Trump and the senate.

1601092000864.png


Seeing a lot of conservative twitter go doomer on Barrett. Weird, since she's always been well liked until recently, I thought.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Naked Garlic, Knyttet, Exterminatus and 6 others
ditto said:
Barnes thinking that Barrett could lose both Trump and the senate.

View attachment 1621935

Seeing a lot of conservative twitter go doomer on Barrett. Weird, since she's always been well liked until recently, I thought.
Click to expand...
Its... stupid.

Personally, I think Barnes is just salty that Trump didn't pick his favoured candidate. Mind, Trump still could because he is playing coy with actually confirming it. Still, its stupidity.

While it would help in Florida to pick Lagoa... Lagoa also has less time on the bench, less of a track record, and thats SAYING something since I honestly hold that BARRETT has too little time on the bench.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: The Demon Pimp of Razgriz, Livecorpse, ConfederateIrishman and 5 others
ditto said:
Barnes thinking that Barrett could lose both Trump and the senate.

View attachment 1621935

Seeing a lot of conservative twitter go doomer on Barrett. Weird, since she's always been well liked until recently, I thought.
Click to expand...
While I don't necessarily think this is 100% the case, you should always remember that pundits need to say something, and that negative predictions always get more traction and attention than positive ones. Go back far enough and every positive decision as sitting president has made since Clinton, no matter how innocuous or positive, was criticized by at least one talking head supposedly "on their side".

In this case, I think they're paying too much attention to Barrett's alleged legal improprieties and not really thinking about the fact that according to most sources Barrett had already been considered and vetted by Trump for the position of SCOTUS judge back before Kavanaugh got in. Trump knows who she is and he knows what she's done. This wouldn't be a pick done on a whim no matter what the media narrative is, and if she's picked for the position there's a very good chance Trump has had a long and productive conversation with her before making his decision.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Knyttet, ConfederateIrishman, Oats12345 and 4 others
Anyone who watches late night "comedy" is already going to oppose Trump's pick.


ditto said:
Barnes thinking that Barrett could lose both Trump and the senate.

View attachment 1621935

Seeing a lot of conservative twitter go doomer on Barrett. Weird, since she's always been well liked until recently, I thought.
Click to expand...

I have no fucking idea why Barnes is cucking so hard. He said it himself:
Hypocracy.jpg


Which is it Barnes?
 
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Nguyen Van Phuoc, PESTPOOM, ConfederateIrishman and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back