Law Justice Amy Coney Barrett Megathread

So the announcer at the rose garden announced her as she walked out with the president.

will find an article soon.

e: he official announced her as his third pick.

e2:

---------------------------------------------
Article Start

The long-term academic, appeals court judge and mother of seven was the hot favourite for the Supreme Court seat.

Donald Trump - who as sitting president gets to select nominees - reportedly once said he was "saving her" for this moment: when elderly Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died and a vacancy on the nine-member court arose.

It took the president just over a week to fast-track the 48-year-old conservative intellectual into the wings. This is his chance to tip the court make-up even further to the right ahead of the presidential election, when he could lose power.

Barrett's record on gun rights and immigration cases imply she would be as reliable a vote on the right of the court, as Ginsburg was on the left, according to Jonathan Turley, a professor of law at George Washington University.

"Ginsburg maintained one of the most consistent liberal voting records in the history of the court. Barrett has the same consistency and commitment," he adds. "She is not a work-in-progress like some nominees. She is the ultimate 'deliverable' for conservative votes."

And her vote, alongside a conservative majority, could make the difference for decades ahead, especially on divisive issues such as abortion rights and the Affordable Care Act (the Obama-era health insurance provider).

Barrett's legal opinions and remarks on abortion and gay marriage have made her popular with the religious right, but earned vehement opposition from liberals.

But as a devout Catholic, she has repeatedly insisted her faith does not compromise her work.

Barrett lives in South Bend, Indiana, with her husband, Jesse, a former federal prosecutor who is now with a private firm. The couple have seven children, including two adopted from Haiti. She is the oldest of seven children herself.

Known for her sharp intellect, she studied at the University of Notre Dame's Law School, graduating first in her class, and was a clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia, who, in her words, was the "staunchest conservative" on the Supreme Court at the time.

Like her mentor Scalia, she is an originalist, which is a belief that judges should attempt to interpret the words of the Constitution as the authors intended when they were written.

Many liberals oppose that strict approach, saying there must be scope for moving with the times.

Barrett has spent much of her career as a professor at her alma mater, Notre Dame, where she was voted professor of the year multiple times. One of students, Deion Kathawa, who took a class with her earlier this year, told the BBC she was popular because she involved everyone in discussions. He found her "collegial, civil, fair-minded, intellectually sharp, and devoted to the rule of law secured by our Constitution".

Another student told the WBEZ new site: "I feel somewhat conflicted because … she's a great professor. She never brought up politics in her classroom... But I do not agree with her ideologies at all. I don't think she would be good for this country and the Supreme Court."

Barrett was selected by President Trump to serve as a federal appeals court judge in 2017, sitting on the Seventh Circuit, based in Chicago. She regularly commutes to the court from her home - more than an hour and half away. The South Bend Tribune once carried an interview from a friend saying she was an early riser, getting up between 04:00 and 05:00. "It's true," says Paolo Carozza, a professor at Notre Dame. "I see her at the gym shortly after then."

Carozza has watched Barrett go from student to teacher to leading judge, and speaks about her effusively. "It's a small, tight-knit community, so I know her socially too. She is ordinary, warm, kind."

A religious man himself, he thinks it is reasonable to question a candidate about whether their beliefs would interfere with their work. "But she has answered those questions forcefully... I fear she is now being reduced to an ideological caricature, and that pains me, knowing what a rich and thoughtful person she is."

Her confirmation hearing for the appeals court seat featured a now-infamous encounter with Senator Dianne Feinstein, who voiced concerns about how her faith could affect her thinking on the law. "The dogma lives loudly within you," said Mrs Feinstein in an accusatory tone. Defiant Catholics adopted the phrase as a tongue-in-cheek slogan on mugs.

Barrett has defended herself on multiple occasions. "I would stress that my personal church affiliation or my religious belief would not bear in the discharge of my duties as a judge," she once said.

However, her links to a particularly conservative Christian faith group, People of Praise, have been much discussed in the US press. LGBT groups have flagged the group's network of schools, which have guidelines stating a belief that sexual relations should only happen between heterosexual married couples.

LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign has voiced strong opposition to Barrett's confirmation, declaring her an "absolute threat to LGBTQ rights".

The Guttmacher Institute, a pro-choice research organisation, declined comment on Barrett specifically, but said appointing any new conservative Supreme Court justice would "be devastating for sexual and reproductive health and rights".

To secure the position on the Supreme Court - a lifelong job - Barrett will still have to pass a gruelling confirmation hearing, where Democratic senators are likely to take a tough line, bringing up many of their voters' concerns.

Professor Turley thinks she will take it her stride, due to the "civil and unflappable disposition" she showed during the hostile questioning for the appeals court position.

"She is someone who showed incredible poise and control… her [appeals court] confirmation hearing was a dry run for a Supreme Court confirmation. She has already played in the World Series."

article end
---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------
Article Start

President Trump on Saturday announced he has chosen Amy Coney Barrett as his pick to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- a move that could significantly shift the nation's highest court to the right if she's confirmed by the Senate.

“Today it is my honor to nominate one of our nation's most brilliant and gifted legal minds to the Supreme Court," Trump said in the Rose Garden alongside Barrett. "She is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials and unyielding loyalty to the Constitution -- Judge Amy Coney Barrett.”

Trump announced Barrett, a judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, who had been considered by Trump for the vacancy left by the retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy in 2018. Trump eventually chose now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh instead.

Ginsburg, a liberal trailblazer who was a consistent vote on the court’s liberal wing, died last week at 87. The announcement sets up what is likely to be a fierce confirmation battle as Republicans attempt to confirm Barrett before the election on Nov. 3.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has promised to put the nominee up for a vote, despite the objections of Senate Democrats -- who cite McConnell’s refusal to give Obama nominee Merrick Garland a hearing in 2016.

A source familiar with the process told Fox News that Oct. 12 is the target date for the beginning of confirmation hearings. This means that Barrett, 48, could potentially be confirmed by the end of the month and just days before the election.

Barrett, a former Notre Dame professor and a mother of seven, is a devout Catholic and pro-life -- beliefs that were raised as a problem by Democrats during her 2017 confirmation hearing to her seat on the 7th Circuit.

"The dogma lives loudly within you, and that's of concern," Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., told Barrett. She was eventually confirmed 55-43.

Trump was also believed to have been considering candidates including 11th Circuit Judge Barbara Lagoa. Trump had said publicly that he had five potential picks he was considering.

A source told Fox News that Trump had taken note of how “tough” Barrett was when she faced the tough confirmation fight in 2017 and had kept her very much at the front of his mind since then.

The source said Trump met her during the considerations on who to replace Kennedy in 2018, talked to a lot of people about her and wanted to keep her in place through the Kavanaugh vetting process in case there was an issue. Kavanaugh did face hurdles in his confirmation battle, but that came after his nomination was announced.

The source said that after Ginsburg died, Barrett was the only candidate he met and spoke with at length, although he made a few calls to Lagoa because some people were pushing him very hard to do so. But ultimately Barrett was always at the front of Trump’s mind to fill a Ginsburg vacancy.

Should she be confirmed, Barrett would be Trump’s third Supreme Court confirmation. That’s more than two-term Presidents Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush -- who each put two justices on the court.

Democrats have vowed to oppose the pick, but the Senate math does not appear to be in their favor. Republicans have 53 Senate seats and Barrett only needs 50 to be confirmed -- with Vice President Mike Pence acting as a tie breaker in such a case.

So far, only Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Susan Collins, R-Maine, have indicated they oppose moving forward with a confirmation before the election. Murkowski has since suggested she still may vote for the nominee.

Fox News' John Roberts, Mike Emanuel and Tyler Olson contributed to this report.

article end
---------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:
4chan salt mining from twitter

E42F5D86-2BAD-4D2C-B8BF-4DC2A428A776.jpegED616846-8952-4A6A-9DB9-722668672E5B.jpeg37B85B48-00BE-470F-BB02-5523D56F3DE1.jpegBF899C9F-F192-4748-A723-85D4812D41BE.jpegBD5F6117-E495-4812-9203-0A95D9B97662.jpegEEDC469F-346F-424F-AC86-38199E16DD2A.jpegF18A6B26-39E5-4260-8100-9FB5838E9C4C.jpegDFBE22FE-5C0C-4B9B-B3E7-6AB0669F1010.jpegB1216B32-AEBD-4AEE-B197-C10DC9937E9A.jpeg0FA9CE88-1CF8-466A-95C2-92BEC24EC17A.jpegC3AC888A-8BF7-4A1F-A6A1-B432C4F3E872.jpeg


Edit:
No. All they will do is piss people off and envoke the wrath of every catholic in this country.
tradcath vs cathcuck reform movement when
 
Dianne Feinstein basically already said there's nothing Dems can do to stop this so there won't be any fight. That's my bet.
The fact that the best argument im seeing on leftitsr Twitter revolves around Haiti and indirectly implicates Feinstein, the clintons, and other power players says something. Plus shitting on someone for transracial adoption is only going to hurt the dems, the amount of cunts i know that have talked about looking into adopting a niglet or spiclet the last 5 years is huge. They're only going to hurt their own base if anyone in the national media or congress pulled that shit. Hell just look how many fags out there have adopted kids, you really think Anderson cooper wont look like a massive pussy who murdered his own brother in jealousy if he lets don lemon or one of the other co-workers talk shit about adoption.
She seemed collected and kind. On that note, I wanted a crazy wildcard, and she doesn't have that feel to her.


She'll do good.
Theyre saving that for reelection, thomas is getting up there and the last Clinton appointment is in his 80s. If trump can get thomas out, thats half the seats in one term. And if Thomas says hes staying on until the day his replacement is sworn in then they can take 3 years of craziness. And trump's daughter tiffany just graduated law school. She passed the bar in 2021 and trump gets a 27 year old on court. The youngest ever was 32, Kim Kardashian is 40 and passed the bar recently too. Im sure theres at least one right wing radical 32 year old that passed the bar in this country
 
I remember when Tamron Hall and the rest of the menstrual cycle on MSNBC commented on Mitt Romney's adoption of a black child into his family. The words were "that child doesn't belong". It really pisses them off when someone on the right adopts black children.

IDK what else they can throw at her to drag shit out like they did with Thomas and Kavanaugh. Roe vs Wade is one, but that isn't scandalous, that's her viewpoint on a judicial matter. A sexual assault allegation from some bint 30 years ago would be beyond ridiculous. Best choice I can imagine (in terms of mental gymnastics and lols) would be an utterly hypocritical allegation of her "sleeping her way to the top" and one about illicit sexual relations with her co-workers to social climb.

Anyone here have any ideas how the Dems might make this appointment into another international circus with bullshit hearings and grandstanding?
5D38849C-EA3A-4465-B702-35F8E5936211.jpeg8EA32D21-3DED-45E7-BA69-EC2F8D46856E.jpeg
 
The fact that the best argument im seeing on leftitsr Twitter revolves around Haiti and indirectly implicates Feinstein, the clintons, and other power players says something. Plus shitting on someone for transracial adoption is only going to hurt the dems, the amount of cunts i know that have talked about looking into adopting a niglet or spiclet the last 5 years is huge. They're only going to hurt their own base if anyone in the national media or congress pulled that shit. Hell just look how many fags out there have adopted kids, you really think Anderson cooper wont look like a massive pussy who murdered his own brother in jealousy if he lets don lemon or one of the other co-workers talk shit about adoption.
No shit! The left has nothing really to attack her and they know it's inevitable Amy takes Ruth seat on the Supreme Court. What I could see happening is they paint only conservative Christian families as being terrible foster parents to their trans racial adoptees, while praising progressive parents like a same-sex couples who adopt different colored children. Bonus points if the same-sex couples are interracial themselves and victims of racism/homophobia.
 
Watched the Trump announcement. Small thing unrelated to the speech. After he conducts his speech and hands it over to Barrett, he steps to the side, then comes back and lowers the mic for her, and she thanks him. Maybe it's because I'm used to seeing leaders of countries having hundreds of guards, interns and toadies running around wiping their ass, cleaning their shoes, and doing everything for them, but that small part stood out. It's a nothing gesture that none of us would think about, but it stuck out to me.
Trump really is the jesus christ of small stuff, he basically would hang out at his own clubs in case anyone wanted a picture, he always carried exact change, he always thanks anyone that shouts him out in a positive way. He called that one UFC guy within minutes of the guy praising him during the post fight interview. My parents wouldnt even do that.
 
Anyone here have any ideas how the Dems might make this appointment into another international circus with bullshit hearings and grandstanding?

Idk, they'll probably go for the fag angle along with tone-deaf anti-Catholic dogwhistle stuff that just annoys some of the people they need to vote for them in November.

"Judge Cheekbones, why do you and other bigoted, intolerant, fish-eating, Pope-worshipping cannibal cultists hate Anal-Americans? :smug: "
 
How the hell is someone that is educated and accomplished before marriage, never home because of her job, brings home the bacon and then some and now being nominated for the Supreme Court...a handmaiden totally subservient to her husband?

These people say things and it is almost like they have no idea what they speak of.
 
How the hell is someone that is educated and accomplished before marriage, never home because of her job, brings home the bacon and then some and now being nominated for the Supreme Court...a handmaiden totally subservient to her husband?

These people say things and it is almost like they have no idea what they speak of.
You got a point. Of course, you're questioning the same people who said not voting for Hillary is basically a slap in the face to all women.
 
Hey. it's the chink who got destroyed by Ted Cruz.

Also, CNN's pundits can't conjure any bullshit on Barrett:



















































 
Back