Law Justice Amy Coney Barrett Megathread

So the announcer at the rose garden announced her as she walked out with the president.

will find an article soon.

e: he official announced her as his third pick.

e2:

---------------------------------------------
Article Start

The long-term academic, appeals court judge and mother of seven was the hot favourite for the Supreme Court seat.

Donald Trump - who as sitting president gets to select nominees - reportedly once said he was "saving her" for this moment: when elderly Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died and a vacancy on the nine-member court arose.

It took the president just over a week to fast-track the 48-year-old conservative intellectual into the wings. This is his chance to tip the court make-up even further to the right ahead of the presidential election, when he could lose power.

Barrett's record on gun rights and immigration cases imply she would be as reliable a vote on the right of the court, as Ginsburg was on the left, according to Jonathan Turley, a professor of law at George Washington University.

"Ginsburg maintained one of the most consistent liberal voting records in the history of the court. Barrett has the same consistency and commitment," he adds. "She is not a work-in-progress like some nominees. She is the ultimate 'deliverable' for conservative votes."

And her vote, alongside a conservative majority, could make the difference for decades ahead, especially on divisive issues such as abortion rights and the Affordable Care Act (the Obama-era health insurance provider).

Barrett's legal opinions and remarks on abortion and gay marriage have made her popular with the religious right, but earned vehement opposition from liberals.

But as a devout Catholic, she has repeatedly insisted her faith does not compromise her work.

Barrett lives in South Bend, Indiana, with her husband, Jesse, a former federal prosecutor who is now with a private firm. The couple have seven children, including two adopted from Haiti. She is the oldest of seven children herself.

Known for her sharp intellect, she studied at the University of Notre Dame's Law School, graduating first in her class, and was a clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia, who, in her words, was the "staunchest conservative" on the Supreme Court at the time.

Like her mentor Scalia, she is an originalist, which is a belief that judges should attempt to interpret the words of the Constitution as the authors intended when they were written.

Many liberals oppose that strict approach, saying there must be scope for moving with the times.

Barrett has spent much of her career as a professor at her alma mater, Notre Dame, where she was voted professor of the year multiple times. One of students, Deion Kathawa, who took a class with her earlier this year, told the BBC she was popular because she involved everyone in discussions. He found her "collegial, civil, fair-minded, intellectually sharp, and devoted to the rule of law secured by our Constitution".

Another student told the WBEZ new site: "I feel somewhat conflicted because … she's a great professor. She never brought up politics in her classroom... But I do not agree with her ideologies at all. I don't think she would be good for this country and the Supreme Court."

Barrett was selected by President Trump to serve as a federal appeals court judge in 2017, sitting on the Seventh Circuit, based in Chicago. She regularly commutes to the court from her home - more than an hour and half away. The South Bend Tribune once carried an interview from a friend saying she was an early riser, getting up between 04:00 and 05:00. "It's true," says Paolo Carozza, a professor at Notre Dame. "I see her at the gym shortly after then."

Carozza has watched Barrett go from student to teacher to leading judge, and speaks about her effusively. "It's a small, tight-knit community, so I know her socially too. She is ordinary, warm, kind."

A religious man himself, he thinks it is reasonable to question a candidate about whether their beliefs would interfere with their work. "But she has answered those questions forcefully... I fear she is now being reduced to an ideological caricature, and that pains me, knowing what a rich and thoughtful person she is."

Her confirmation hearing for the appeals court seat featured a now-infamous encounter with Senator Dianne Feinstein, who voiced concerns about how her faith could affect her thinking on the law. "The dogma lives loudly within you," said Mrs Feinstein in an accusatory tone. Defiant Catholics adopted the phrase as a tongue-in-cheek slogan on mugs.

Barrett has defended herself on multiple occasions. "I would stress that my personal church affiliation or my religious belief would not bear in the discharge of my duties as a judge," she once said.

However, her links to a particularly conservative Christian faith group, People of Praise, have been much discussed in the US press. LGBT groups have flagged the group's network of schools, which have guidelines stating a belief that sexual relations should only happen between heterosexual married couples.

LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign has voiced strong opposition to Barrett's confirmation, declaring her an "absolute threat to LGBTQ rights".

The Guttmacher Institute, a pro-choice research organisation, declined comment on Barrett specifically, but said appointing any new conservative Supreme Court justice would "be devastating for sexual and reproductive health and rights".

To secure the position on the Supreme Court - a lifelong job - Barrett will still have to pass a gruelling confirmation hearing, where Democratic senators are likely to take a tough line, bringing up many of their voters' concerns.

Professor Turley thinks she will take it her stride, due to the "civil and unflappable disposition" she showed during the hostile questioning for the appeals court position.

"She is someone who showed incredible poise and control… her [appeals court] confirmation hearing was a dry run for a Supreme Court confirmation. She has already played in the World Series."

article end
---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------
Article Start

President Trump on Saturday announced he has chosen Amy Coney Barrett as his pick to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- a move that could significantly shift the nation's highest court to the right if she's confirmed by the Senate.

“Today it is my honor to nominate one of our nation's most brilliant and gifted legal minds to the Supreme Court," Trump said in the Rose Garden alongside Barrett. "She is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials and unyielding loyalty to the Constitution -- Judge Amy Coney Barrett.”

Trump announced Barrett, a judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, who had been considered by Trump for the vacancy left by the retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy in 2018. Trump eventually chose now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh instead.

Ginsburg, a liberal trailblazer who was a consistent vote on the court’s liberal wing, died last week at 87. The announcement sets up what is likely to be a fierce confirmation battle as Republicans attempt to confirm Barrett before the election on Nov. 3.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has promised to put the nominee up for a vote, despite the objections of Senate Democrats -- who cite McConnell’s refusal to give Obama nominee Merrick Garland a hearing in 2016.

A source familiar with the process told Fox News that Oct. 12 is the target date for the beginning of confirmation hearings. This means that Barrett, 48, could potentially be confirmed by the end of the month and just days before the election.

Barrett, a former Notre Dame professor and a mother of seven, is a devout Catholic and pro-life -- beliefs that were raised as a problem by Democrats during her 2017 confirmation hearing to her seat on the 7th Circuit.

"The dogma lives loudly within you, and that's of concern," Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., told Barrett. She was eventually confirmed 55-43.

Trump was also believed to have been considering candidates including 11th Circuit Judge Barbara Lagoa. Trump had said publicly that he had five potential picks he was considering.

A source told Fox News that Trump had taken note of how “tough” Barrett was when she faced the tough confirmation fight in 2017 and had kept her very much at the front of his mind since then.

The source said Trump met her during the considerations on who to replace Kennedy in 2018, talked to a lot of people about her and wanted to keep her in place through the Kavanaugh vetting process in case there was an issue. Kavanaugh did face hurdles in his confirmation battle, but that came after his nomination was announced.

The source said that after Ginsburg died, Barrett was the only candidate he met and spoke with at length, although he made a few calls to Lagoa because some people were pushing him very hard to do so. But ultimately Barrett was always at the front of Trump’s mind to fill a Ginsburg vacancy.

Should she be confirmed, Barrett would be Trump’s third Supreme Court confirmation. That’s more than two-term Presidents Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush -- who each put two justices on the court.

Democrats have vowed to oppose the pick, but the Senate math does not appear to be in their favor. Republicans have 53 Senate seats and Barrett only needs 50 to be confirmed -- with Vice President Mike Pence acting as a tie breaker in such a case.

So far, only Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Susan Collins, R-Maine, have indicated they oppose moving forward with a confirmation before the election. Murkowski has since suggested she still may vote for the nominee.

Fox News' John Roberts, Mike Emanuel and Tyler Olson contributed to this report.

article end
---------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:
It's better than that. She's Catholic, not a Protestant which means she shares a religion with Hispanics. If Trump can peel off some Hispanic voters from the Democrats he can win.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...ins-hispanic-voters-florida-rattle-democrats/
https://archive.vn/B5T79

If I were him I'd make a 'Fuck the Cuban government, death to Communism' speech given that a lot of Hispanics in Florida fucking hate Cuba's Communist regime.
I don't know man, just because I grew up as a Catholic and so did a Mexican did not automatically make us brothers in practice; Certainly we were all cordial if we were at the same church, no real reason to be dicks to each other, but in practice (and much more common in the past) there would be an "Italian Roman Catholic Church, an "Irish Roman Catholic Church", and an "Mexican Roman Catholic Church" for everyone to pick and choose. There was nothing on paper forcing you to go to the one of your own ethnicity, but people just tended to do that, as those churches would have their own little traditions under the standardized Catholic ones that people identified with. Now this is starting to partially go away with time, no one really consciously thinks about it like they would have in the early 20th century, but you still see signs of that here and there. What I am trying to say is while technically we are unified faith, we seem to find a lot of ways to divide ourselves while still being unified on paper.

So point being, her saying "I'm Catholic too! Vote for Trump" is not going to do anything; Now on the other hand, if she shows actual piety and the right people make consistently dumb attacks on Catholicism in general because they are sperging out about her, then you might start seeing slivers of their votes going towards Trump because of her. And yes, shitting on Communism will probably do Trump well with the Cuban Baby-Boomers and Gen X.
 
So point being, her saying "I'm Catholic too! Vote for Trump" is not going to do anything; Now on the other hand, if she shows actual piety and the right people make consistently dumb attacks on Catholicism in general because they are sperging out about her, then you might start seeing slivers of their votes going towards Trump because of her. And yes, shitting on Communism will probably do Trump well with the Cuban Baby-Boomers and Gen X.

I'm not saying her saying 'I'm Catholic! Vote for Trump' is a winner, more that Democrat attacks on her for being Catholic might sway some Catholics to vote against them.
 
View attachment 1625021
Guys, only DEMOCRATS are allowed to have 3 letter initials!!!!
-RBG
-FDR
-JFK
-AOC
-KKK
Personally, I want to know how these people keep misspelling Ruth Bader Ginsburg's initials. It's not that hard to remember RBG, for fuck's sake and if these fuckers liked and respected her as much as they claimed, they would take a few seconds to proofread their dumbfuck twitter rants and then spot and correct an obvious mistake.
 
Personally, I want to know how these people keep misspelling Ruth Bader Ginsburg's initials. It's not that hard to remember RBG, for fuck's sake and if these fuckers liked and respected her as much as they claimed, they would take a few seconds to proofread their dumbfuck twitter rants and then spot and correct an obvious mistake.
It's supremely obvious that ACB has completely consumed their thoughts so that's why they're putting the B at the end.
 
Personally, I want to know how these people keep misspelling Ruth Bader Ginsburg's initials. It's not that hard to remember RBG, for fuck's sake and if these fuckers liked and respected her as much as they claimed, they would take a few seconds to proofread their dumbfuck twitter rants and then spot and correct an obvious mistake.
They're probably all mobilefags getting autocorrected by their phones and they're too busy frothing at the mouth to go back and fix it.
 
If I was trying my hardest as the Biden campaign to throw the election, I would go full bore into the "white catholic women don't count" angle. Thankful for Biden he's too sleepy to fuck that up. Unfortunately for Biden that means he's not playing interference against the rogue supporters of his going that route.
Biden speaking now. Lying through his teeth, presuming that those teeth are actually his.

EDIT: Just now said -- I shit you not -- that if Barrett is confirmed and Trump is re-elected, women and minorities will have their right to vote taken away.
Ehh, close enough...
 
I am sure that was a huge factor in Trumps decision. For example, most of his female hires. I say most because Sandra Sanders.

I think she got it because her father is Mike Huckabee. Trump allegedly offered him the post of Ambassador to Israel which he turned down.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Huckabee#Trump_administration

Following the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Huckabee met with president-elect of the United States Donald Trump, whom he had supported for the Republican nomination after ending his own campaign in February. It was reported by The Daily Mail and The Jerusalem Post that Trump offered Huckabee the position of United States Ambassador to Israel. Huckabee denied the reports. He told Fox News that a possible cabinet appointment for himself was discussed but that he turned the offer down, saying, "I'm not sure it was the right fit."

His daughter Sarah Huckabee Sanders served as White House press secretary to President Donald Trump from July 2017 until July 2019.

Trump arguably owes Huckabee bigly because of the later dropping out and endorsing him. Mind you if you read the article he only did that formally after his daughter joined the Trump campaign as an adviser and Cruz dropped out.

https://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/04/politics/mike-huckabee-endorses-donald-trump/
https://archive.vn/4mZSG

Huckabee called on the anti-Trump forces within the GOP to give up on "the hapless 'Never Trump' nonsense."

Though Huckabee acknowledged he did not agree with Trump on some of his positions, he said the voters had spoken in Indiana on Tuesday -- and with Texas Sen. Ted Cruz out of the race, the path was clear.

"Much to my chagrin, the voters didn't accept my message, but his. I withheld an endorsement during the heat of the primary because it was the job of the voters to select the person they wanted more than me," Huckabee said. "Ted Cruz ended his campaign and it's time to end the strife in the party. That can start today with our unifying around the people's choice, Donald Trump."

Huckabee had not endorsed Trump, but did appear at an event organized by the Trump campaign in Iowa, and his daughter, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, joined the Trump campaign as a senior adviser after her father exited the race.

I think Huckabee's endorsement helped win over religious conservative types who were probably a bit wary of Trump. You also have to wonder if his daughter might not have pushed him to make an unreserved public endorsement.
 
So point being, her saying "I'm Catholic too! Vote for Trump" is not going to do anything; Now on the other hand, if she shows actual piety and the right people make consistently dumb attacks on Catholicism in general because they are sperging out about her, then you might start seeing slivers of their votes going towards Trump because of her. And yes, shitting on Communism will probably do Trump well with the Cuban Baby-Boomers and Gen X.
I think the impact will be libs going apeshit on catholicism will be more effective at depressing catholics coming out for Biden more than catholics going "oh boy a catholic" and then them coming out for Trump.
 
Sarah Huckabee Sanders was a great press secretary. I had a grade school teacher one year who got the exact same look on her face at the end of a long day as Sarah Sanders got at the end of a press conference, like she had heard enough and had no more patience with your weak shit.
 
I will never not get giddy at seeing the tantrums the Democrats and their useful idiots throw at literally everything the Republicans and Trump do. Everything is the end of the world to them and they're 100% wrong 100% of the time.

It's blatantly obvious what they want and it's always been the same thing: power. And when they don't have it they will do anything to get it back.

Edit: the only long term solution to the increasing divide between the cities and the rest of the country is for one side to secede. There is no one country solution to this as it's been proven that there is no compatibility between the two ideologies (for lack of a better term).
 
Last edited:
The avenue to protect the ability of women to get an abortion from state level legislation is spelled out right in the Constitution...a Constitutional Amendment.

Let's have this discussion about if it's moral or ethical to allow a woman to kill her baby or if it's ethical for the state to restrict what a woman does with her body, including any human life within.

So often, Democrats take such discussions out of the public discourse any try to impose their beliefs through judicial fiat. Much like abortion, I cannot fathom how the 1964 Civil Rights Act applies to faggots and dyke's.

This does not mean I do not understand the incantations that birthed such an abomination just that I believe the argument to be ridiculous. Not one legislature in 1964 would have believed their enumerated protections covered queers and it would have been considered a strawman to utilize such an argument to oppose the 1964 bill but here we are.

An additional point that frustrates me, is how a supposed right can be spun out of nothingness but an enumerated right (the 2nd Amendment) does not apply to the citizenry but is viewed by left leaning jurists as giving the state power in the very document meant to restrict it.

Putting this succinctly, convince your fellow man about an issue if you believe it to be in the moral or ethical right instead of appealing to nine robed person's who are right only because they are final.
Which is why the apex of lunacy is the screeching over the oppression of a "waiting period" for an abortion (not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution or Bill of rights), yet somehow the same waiting period and worse is a must for firearms despite being specifically written as something that shall not be infringed.

Dont even try to get these mongoloids to understand what the 10th Amendment means. That is what all of this is about.

Imagine the comedy that will ensue as well if these people end up using early 20th century anti Cstholic Klan rhetoric, you know its coming. As someone mentioned earlier there is a very likely chance one of them utters the term "Papist" on live television.
 
Back