Law Justice Amy Coney Barrett Megathread

So the announcer at the rose garden announced her as she walked out with the president.

will find an article soon.

e: he official announced her as his third pick.

e2:

---------------------------------------------
Article Start

The long-term academic, appeals court judge and mother of seven was the hot favourite for the Supreme Court seat.

Donald Trump - who as sitting president gets to select nominees - reportedly once said he was "saving her" for this moment: when elderly Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died and a vacancy on the nine-member court arose.

It took the president just over a week to fast-track the 48-year-old conservative intellectual into the wings. This is his chance to tip the court make-up even further to the right ahead of the presidential election, when he could lose power.

Barrett's record on gun rights and immigration cases imply she would be as reliable a vote on the right of the court, as Ginsburg was on the left, according to Jonathan Turley, a professor of law at George Washington University.

"Ginsburg maintained one of the most consistent liberal voting records in the history of the court. Barrett has the same consistency and commitment," he adds. "She is not a work-in-progress like some nominees. She is the ultimate 'deliverable' for conservative votes."

And her vote, alongside a conservative majority, could make the difference for decades ahead, especially on divisive issues such as abortion rights and the Affordable Care Act (the Obama-era health insurance provider).

Barrett's legal opinions and remarks on abortion and gay marriage have made her popular with the religious right, but earned vehement opposition from liberals.

But as a devout Catholic, she has repeatedly insisted her faith does not compromise her work.

Barrett lives in South Bend, Indiana, with her husband, Jesse, a former federal prosecutor who is now with a private firm. The couple have seven children, including two adopted from Haiti. She is the oldest of seven children herself.

Known for her sharp intellect, she studied at the University of Notre Dame's Law School, graduating first in her class, and was a clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia, who, in her words, was the "staunchest conservative" on the Supreme Court at the time.

Like her mentor Scalia, she is an originalist, which is a belief that judges should attempt to interpret the words of the Constitution as the authors intended when they were written.

Many liberals oppose that strict approach, saying there must be scope for moving with the times.

Barrett has spent much of her career as a professor at her alma mater, Notre Dame, where she was voted professor of the year multiple times. One of students, Deion Kathawa, who took a class with her earlier this year, told the BBC she was popular because she involved everyone in discussions. He found her "collegial, civil, fair-minded, intellectually sharp, and devoted to the rule of law secured by our Constitution".

Another student told the WBEZ new site: "I feel somewhat conflicted because … she's a great professor. She never brought up politics in her classroom... But I do not agree with her ideologies at all. I don't think she would be good for this country and the Supreme Court."

Barrett was selected by President Trump to serve as a federal appeals court judge in 2017, sitting on the Seventh Circuit, based in Chicago. She regularly commutes to the court from her home - more than an hour and half away. The South Bend Tribune once carried an interview from a friend saying she was an early riser, getting up between 04:00 and 05:00. "It's true," says Paolo Carozza, a professor at Notre Dame. "I see her at the gym shortly after then."

Carozza has watched Barrett go from student to teacher to leading judge, and speaks about her effusively. "It's a small, tight-knit community, so I know her socially too. She is ordinary, warm, kind."

A religious man himself, he thinks it is reasonable to question a candidate about whether their beliefs would interfere with their work. "But she has answered those questions forcefully... I fear she is now being reduced to an ideological caricature, and that pains me, knowing what a rich and thoughtful person she is."

Her confirmation hearing for the appeals court seat featured a now-infamous encounter with Senator Dianne Feinstein, who voiced concerns about how her faith could affect her thinking on the law. "The dogma lives loudly within you," said Mrs Feinstein in an accusatory tone. Defiant Catholics adopted the phrase as a tongue-in-cheek slogan on mugs.

Barrett has defended herself on multiple occasions. "I would stress that my personal church affiliation or my religious belief would not bear in the discharge of my duties as a judge," she once said.

However, her links to a particularly conservative Christian faith group, People of Praise, have been much discussed in the US press. LGBT groups have flagged the group's network of schools, which have guidelines stating a belief that sexual relations should only happen between heterosexual married couples.

LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign has voiced strong opposition to Barrett's confirmation, declaring her an "absolute threat to LGBTQ rights".

The Guttmacher Institute, a pro-choice research organisation, declined comment on Barrett specifically, but said appointing any new conservative Supreme Court justice would "be devastating for sexual and reproductive health and rights".

To secure the position on the Supreme Court - a lifelong job - Barrett will still have to pass a gruelling confirmation hearing, where Democratic senators are likely to take a tough line, bringing up many of their voters' concerns.

Professor Turley thinks she will take it her stride, due to the "civil and unflappable disposition" she showed during the hostile questioning for the appeals court position.

"She is someone who showed incredible poise and control… her [appeals court] confirmation hearing was a dry run for a Supreme Court confirmation. She has already played in the World Series."

article end
---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------
Article Start

President Trump on Saturday announced he has chosen Amy Coney Barrett as his pick to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- a move that could significantly shift the nation's highest court to the right if she's confirmed by the Senate.

“Today it is my honor to nominate one of our nation's most brilliant and gifted legal minds to the Supreme Court," Trump said in the Rose Garden alongside Barrett. "She is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials and unyielding loyalty to the Constitution -- Judge Amy Coney Barrett.”

Trump announced Barrett, a judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, who had been considered by Trump for the vacancy left by the retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy in 2018. Trump eventually chose now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh instead.

Ginsburg, a liberal trailblazer who was a consistent vote on the court’s liberal wing, died last week at 87. The announcement sets up what is likely to be a fierce confirmation battle as Republicans attempt to confirm Barrett before the election on Nov. 3.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has promised to put the nominee up for a vote, despite the objections of Senate Democrats -- who cite McConnell’s refusal to give Obama nominee Merrick Garland a hearing in 2016.

A source familiar with the process told Fox News that Oct. 12 is the target date for the beginning of confirmation hearings. This means that Barrett, 48, could potentially be confirmed by the end of the month and just days before the election.

Barrett, a former Notre Dame professor and a mother of seven, is a devout Catholic and pro-life -- beliefs that were raised as a problem by Democrats during her 2017 confirmation hearing to her seat on the 7th Circuit.

"The dogma lives loudly within you, and that's of concern," Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., told Barrett. She was eventually confirmed 55-43.

Trump was also believed to have been considering candidates including 11th Circuit Judge Barbara Lagoa. Trump had said publicly that he had five potential picks he was considering.

A source told Fox News that Trump had taken note of how “tough” Barrett was when she faced the tough confirmation fight in 2017 and had kept her very much at the front of his mind since then.

The source said Trump met her during the considerations on who to replace Kennedy in 2018, talked to a lot of people about her and wanted to keep her in place through the Kavanaugh vetting process in case there was an issue. Kavanaugh did face hurdles in his confirmation battle, but that came after his nomination was announced.

The source said that after Ginsburg died, Barrett was the only candidate he met and spoke with at length, although he made a few calls to Lagoa because some people were pushing him very hard to do so. But ultimately Barrett was always at the front of Trump’s mind to fill a Ginsburg vacancy.

Should she be confirmed, Barrett would be Trump’s third Supreme Court confirmation. That’s more than two-term Presidents Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush -- who each put two justices on the court.

Democrats have vowed to oppose the pick, but the Senate math does not appear to be in their favor. Republicans have 53 Senate seats and Barrett only needs 50 to be confirmed -- with Vice President Mike Pence acting as a tie breaker in such a case.

So far, only Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Susan Collins, R-Maine, have indicated they oppose moving forward with a confirmation before the election. Murkowski has since suggested she still may vote for the nominee.

Fox News' John Roberts, Mike Emanuel and Tyler Olson contributed to this report.

article end
---------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:
Actually, we got those after the war by successfully suing the Brits for the damages those ships they gave to the Confederates did upon Union merchantmen and whalers.

Oi! You got a loicense for that privateering, mate?

Turns out they didn't.





Compromise, we leave him in the Mid-Atlantic gap to look for U-boats. He gets to take out his frustrations on non-existent Nazis, neither of us have to hear from him again, win-win!

If only the Confederacy would get the credit we deserve from the leftist, for destroying the barbaric institution of the US Whaling industry.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: FlappyBat

Oliver has becoming increasingly boring and predictable. Maybe he could put some of that effort we used to see from him into an investigation into the Bidens?

Oh...lol...right.

"Then RBG's ghost clapped"
View attachment 1627048

Mum? Is this an American child? Also I totally believe this happened.

Reminder that he was the first late night talk show host that encouraged Trump to run for president and went as far as willing to donate to his campaign.

Something he never made good on if I recall correctly.
 
Anglos really need to get their ilk under control. For all the mutt memes atleast it helps dilute the disgusting Anglo genes enough that we can enjoy some semblance of freedom and not be state mandated to own a loicense for every occasion and need.
Interesting fact, despite nominally cancelling the slave trade Anglos were a major supplier of funds (and some equipment, notably ships) to the Confederacy, even serving as the national equivalent of a money launderer for the Confederate cotton, and winning sufficiently for them to justify intervening on the Confederate side was pretty much the hope the Confederates pinned their victory to. When is cancel culture going to finally cancel the Anglo scourge for their financial supporting of evil Confederate Slavery? And when are patriotic Americans going to demand reparations from them for assisting in the killing of Americans by insurrectionists?

Edit: "The US realized that as well and made it clear that recognition of the Confederacy meant war and the end of food shipments into Britain." OI YOU GOT YOUR BREAD LINE LOICENSE?

There's a fascinating book called A World on Fire: An Epic History of Two Nations Divided. It's about the UK's role in the American Civil War. It covers how close it came twice during the american civil war to the UK and Union declaring war on each other (Which would've resulted in a disasterous two front war for the Union, as the British were not busy at this time, unlike the previous bouts).

It goes into detail about the ship building program and other parts. There was very little support from the UK government to either side during the civil war. However, Manchester and Liverpool depended on the Southern Cotton for their very survival, even leading to near starvation from the mills falling silent as the Union blockade tightened, the ships that were built, privately, were largely supported from these cotton mill empires desperate for the good stuff coming in as the UK economy at that time relied on the cotton industry to the tune of a staggering 15.6% of all imperial exports.

But then they swapped to Egyptian Cotton, and production was kicked up in India by about 1863/64 and support in t'norf melted away.


But as for Markle and Harry commenting on a US election, they can go fuck themselves. Harry doesn't have his own will from the way he's fucked off from the life of luxury to appease his brat of a wife. She refused to "lower" herself to general royal duties (sponsoring and patronning charities and actually setting up business) in order to flounce off with her fading beauty to try and restart a stalled acting career.

Now we're going to get some god-awful reality TV show out of them thanks to Soros, so at least the flaming fucking train wreck will be televised.

Not like Harry's an actual royal anyway (allegedly).
 
I'm also not sure why an ophthalmologist is parading themselves as an expert in body language

Because the eyes are the window to the soul. His many years of practicing medicine have given him an astute ability to recognize these microexpressions. He can clearly delineate, for example, the spectrum of subtle emotions people have in reaction to his very own self. Such as annoyance. Disgust. Fear. Or perhaps simply an exhausted resignation.
 
Are you sure they wouldn't try the rape playbook again? Kavaughn got it despite having a clean record. I don't doubt for a second these slimeballs would accuse her of raping a teenage boy or something. (How's that for irony?)

Women can't rape men in the left's world because rape is sexual assault plus societal power or some such. Which reminds me of a meme mocking those sorts of ideas, which tend to be believed by white women.

1601306655809.png

Reminder that your vaunted Barnes retweeted this .
1601183845195-png.1624250

What an idiot. Gun[t]nig[g]e[r] means it's an obvious deep cover Ethan Ralph a-log. He or she is probably trying to catfish him as we speak.

He's moving back to bongland right?

Any day now.

To do what exactly? He didn't have a career in comedy in the UK, despite having the same politics as 100% of the comedy establishment, because he's not funny. Only when he moved to the US did he manage to land a job shilling for the DNC on Comedy Central.
 
However, Manchester and Liverpool depended on the Southern Cotton for their very survival, even leading to near starvation from the mills falling silent as the Union blockade tightened, the ships that were built, privately, were largely supported from these cotton mill empires desperate for the good stuff coming in as the UK economy at that time relied on the cotton industry to the tune of a staggering 15.6% of all imperial exports.
As always, it's a little more complicated than that. The largest and most numerous cotton mills were in Manchester, but Manchester mill owners (and more importantly, the mill workers) tended to side with the Union rather than the Confederacy. There were frequent strikes, and as cotton supplies diminished, the cost to transport them from Liverpool to Manchester increased massively (this is part of the reason the ship canal was built in the 1890s).

Manchester's mill owners had already started looking outside the US for cotton, and saw the civil war as an excellent opportunity to escape from increasingly expensive contracts.

Liverpool had strong links with the slave trade, being both a major port and a having a large shipbuilding industry, which supplied a great many of the ships used to transport slaves. Their cotton industry was less robust, but they gained favourable treatment from the confederates in return for supplying ships. Its industrial magnates saw the war as a potential way to overcome Manchester's industrial capacity, which had outstripped them for some time in both textile and steel production.
 
Is anyone surprised? Doing anything for women to them seems patronising or misogynistic. You get reeeeee'd at for holding doors open or generally helping like this. "Highly sexual", how? This guy is on another planet. For me, it's a small act worth no attention, but it's noticeable because it's a world leader adjusting something for someone else. Normally people in equivalent positions don't do anything other than make speeches and shake hands, everything from opening doors to adjusting mic stands is left for toadies and staffers to do.
The moment I learned that there was such a thing as "benevolent sexism", I realized that you cannot win with wokeists.
 
Reminder that he was the first late night talk show host that encouraged Trump to run for president and went as far as willing to donate to his campaign.

Wasn’t that because Hillary thought Trump would be the best matchup for her? I think I read somewhere that the mainstream media and a lot of late night comedians gave Trump a lot of press because they wanted him to win the primary so he’d lose the general to Hillary.
 
Wasn’t that because Hillary thought Trump would be the best matchup for her? I think I read somewhere that the mainstream media and a lot of late night comedians gave Trump a lot of press because they wanted him to win the primary so he’d lose the general to Hillary.

They did, when the Podesta emails were leaked they were talking about how Hillary and the campaign wanted Trump to be a "pied piper" of sorts to emerge as a leader in the pack, other choices included Ted Cruz and Ben Carson who were also running at the time. They originally planned their campaign around Jeb Bush because it was believed he was going to be the winner when the dust settled, they had to pivot hard when it became apparent Trump was stomping through the GOP candidates and crushing them left and right.


Yes it's from Salon but it does go over a bit about what the Clinton campaign was doing with their planning for Trump, the article was written just a few days after Trump won the election.
 
I’m wondering what they’re going to try and pull on the floor when things start in earnest.
To powerlevel a bit, I have a fairly distinct memory of sitting down with my head in my hands after watching a bit of the Kavannagh hearings. I think something about that shit pushed me from the “this is what you get for playing stupid games” frame of mind I was in after 2016 into “the rubicon has been crossed and the only way we return to anything close to sanity is by breaking their backs”. The masks have been off for a long time.
 
Last edited:

"How do you know her husband isn't abusive? Mrs. Barrett MUST prove that her kids adopted from Haiti are NOT being used to pick cotton on her invisible plantation!"

Ah, the usual kafkatrapping and guilty-until-proven-innocent gambit. Every day, Dems' actions become more hateable.
 
Back