Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Nontransferable said:
Jay Marshall Moleman says that Nick can't legally represent his Texas-based LLC, that he used to file his amicus brief on behalf of, in a Texas court.

View attachment 1628735
https://archive.vn/ZZVDY
Click to expand...

Wolman has no legs to stand on.
A quick reminder that Wolman represented Doucette in his lolsuit with the Sons of Confederate Veterans and Doucette wanted to take the suit into California instead of North Carolina.
Your criticism is null and void, forum shopper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, Francis York Morgan, Kosher Salt and 7 others
Least Concern said:
I know! The word "fat" doesn't appear once in this document. Are we sure Nick really wrote this?

Is filing an amicus really a form of "representing" yourself in court?
Click to expand...
I'm following a few gun-related lawsuits in California, and I remember an anti-gun organization submitted an amicus brief. Amusingly, the federal judge (a 2A-friendly Bush appointee) told them to fuck off, with the message of, roughly, "the anti-gun defendant has more than enough ability to make his case, and doesn't need you."

More or less, it's just there to help inform or influence the court.
 
Least Concern said:
I know! The word "fat" doesn't appear once in this document. Are we sure Nick really wrote this?
Click to expand...

I had to proofread it.

"Nick, you can't call Monica fat in this document."
"Fuck you, yeah I can."
"You also can't call Ron a cuck and a manlet and a faggot."
"I reiterate, fuck you, yeah I can."
"Nick, you can't..."
"Fuck. You. Faggot."

I drank too much while fixing it.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, Exterminatus, Uranus Pink and 11 others
Spectre_06 said:
I had to proofread it.

"Nick, you can't call Monica fat in this document."
"Fuck you, yeah I can."
"You also can't call Ron a cuck and a manlet and a faggot."
"I reiterate, fuck you, yeah I can."
"Nick, you can't..."
"Fuck. You. Faggot."

I drank too much while fixing it.
Click to expand...
We have achieved true clownworld when the jarhead is proofreading for the lawyer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, Exterminatus, Uranus Pink and 6 others
Nontransferable said:
Jay Marshall Moleman says that Nick can't legally represent his Texas-based LLC, that he used to file his amicus brief on behalf of, in a Texas court.

View attachment 1628735
https://archive.vn/ZZVDY
Click to expand...
The only reason the LLC is relevant is because that's Nick explanation as to why he wrote the brief and the outcome of the case is relevant to his interests. He isn't representing his LLC cause it has never been part of the lawsuit. This shit couldn't be more straight forward.

I genuinely can't tell if these faggots are actually stupid or they are actively poisoning the well.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Exterminatus, SargonF00t, Uranus Pink and 11 others
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Riku and LawTwitter is Dumb
OneHandClapping said:
It's good to read it without Nick whispering sweet nothings into my headphones.

I might be being autistic, but this one sentence on page 7 seems weird, namely the "...but,".
View attachment 1628737

@Harvey Danger I know you're a grammar Nazi. What say you?
Click to expand...

Grammar fascist, thank you.

The words are right but the punctuation is wrong, the comma should be in front of the conjunction. If he wrote "...operative pleading, but the trial court" it would read correctly. Using a semicolon works better. You shouldn't have a comma after a conjunction unless you're adding a clause in there but, in this case, the clause ("which was not struck") was already placed earlier in the sentence.

For clarity's sake, it should really be split off into its own sentence: "...operative pleading. However, the trial court..."

Please convey my mild authoritarian disapproval to Nick, or to one of his many sock accounts on the Farms.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: 774, ConSluttant, Uranus Pink and 7 others
I didn't really pay attention to Nick when he started fighting with like 15 different lawyer people at once, so while that Jay dude's face looks passingly familiar, I can't remember what if anything memorable he's contributed. I'm just pretty sure he's not one of Nick's weird little hangers-on that respond to his every tweet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back