Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 608 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,595
“purposeful availment”, that’s what Rekieta was getting at

Jurisdiction over Null himself and jurisdiction over the LLC (if it even is a party which it does not seem to be) would be different things, and even if jurisdiction exists, the proper venue might still not be Utah but Florida instead.
 
Yeah, I don’t think Rusty took Civ Pro and he knows jack shit about personal jurisdiction. I couldn’t make it all the way through the complaint, it is such a colossal turd. I mean, that piece where he basically tells the court that he doesn’t know where the evidence is for the song, but he could “probably” find it again. Judges don’t like looking for shit, either, Russ.

We've seen Russel try to flirt in his nauseating instagram comments. Remember him and fuckin, Pizza Slut? His idea of picking a woman up isn't too far removed from walking up to them and going 'How much?'

I kind of wish he would, maybe that chick would slap him or something. he uses a shitload of emojis flirting on ig. That somehow makes it even more gross.
 
Like Ratmouth knows how to flirt. Scratch that, can he actually flirt in the first place? I'm imagining him using a really bad pickup line thinking that's he's being super smooth only to have the woman reject him for being a creep.
"Hey, I sent you a cool DM 😎. Suck me my penis, or I'll sue you."
 
That's applicable to the old law. It was expanded in 2015.
“(3) (4) A person or No governmental entity in this state may not shall file or cause to be filed, through its employees or agents, any lawsuit, cause of action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim against another a person or entity without merit and primarily solely because such person or entity has exercised the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue, or right to peacefully assemble, the right to instruct representatives of government, or and the right to petition for redress of grievances before the various governmental entities of this state, as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and s. 5, Art. I of the State Constitution.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blasterisk
Look for your strongest legal arguments. Cases on point, relevant statutes in the jurisdiction, etc. it’s ”persuasive” if law review articles, treatises, cases from a different jrx, dicta, etc. afaik, he just talks about the articles like he’s got to explain to the judge what an Internet forum is. I don’t understand his objection to KF not being a “normal” forum - people post on it and read what other users post, sounds like a forum to me. If you had a strong legal argument, why the fuck you putting irrelevant news articles from random parts of the country? The fucker can’t even figure out service or jrx, I doubt null has much to worry about.
 
Quick question for legal eagles: is it normal to cite a newspaper or magazine article as he did in the injunction? (And likely his complaint too?). Just curious. Seems like only case law would be relevant but what do I know?
I'm not a legal eagle, but I'm 99% sure it isn't normal, and would be dismissed by a judge if he tried citing an article as precedent.

Russ is retarded, his lawsuit is just a pity party blog posting written in a format of a legal document.
 
This DOES raise an important question: Russ’ “flirting” style online is to send messages to women that almost always start with a banal greeting, compliment some body part (her smile if he’s feeling chivalrous, her tits if not), adds some badly-mangled dad joke in, then lists off what he believes are his positive traits:

He is disabled but “kicks its ass”
He works in an office building
He goes to a gym
He does music
He’s the nicest and coolest guy she’ll ever meet
Optional: he wants to venmo her money

Then he waits for her reply. If none is forthcoming, he sends a “guess you don’t like nice guys” fishing/guilting msg one day later. If rejected, he does the Nice Guy Bruised Ego Call, aka “shallow bitch”, “I was just trying to be nice”, “kill yourself”.

But what about in-person encounters? They have to be vastly different, one would imagine. He’s all talk online but a scared little rat irl. I can only assume he approaches a woman and asks for her name (always recommended by well-meaning lad mags, always fucking cringy when a man tries it on you), then introduces himself and begins rambling about his “music career.”

I would suppose, based on the review he left for the tanning salon, that he tries to segue into getting the woman’s social media info so he can chat her up online when he gets home. He’s made it clear in the past he feels self-conscious about talking in public and being misunderstood (mentions when he ranted there were no order kiosks at MacDonald’s), so it seems likely he’d want to shift the convo to DMs, where he feels more in control and can plan his words.

OTOH when he worked in an office it was reported he harassed a woman on another floor so much that she complained and he was told to confine himself to his own floor. So I can see him showing up in-person to where he knows the woman will be unable to leave (job, front desk, salon etc) and....what? Endlessly rambling about himself? Trying to fish for info on if she has a boyfriend? Presenting her with weird little gifts and then awkwardly standing there, expecting praise and then for her to initiate further conversation as payment for his “gift”? Directly asking for that Olive Garden date? Or does he mostly hang around and stare in a weird fashion?
 
I remembered something from the injunction motion and thought I'd note it: Russ doesn't really want kiwifarms taken down. He doesn't care about the women who allegedly suicided or those that might do so next (according to him). He doesn't care about anything other than himself, and he admits as much right here.
1601543874660.png
 
I remembered something from the injunction motion and thought I'd note it: Russ doesn't really want kiwifarms taken down. He doesn't care about the women who allegedly suicided or those that might do so next (according to him). He doesn't care about anything other than himself, and he admits as much right here. View attachment 1633830
“It’s a hellhole of irredeemable monsters who drive people to SUICIDE!!! It literally KILLS PEOPLE!!

So if you could just have the bits about me taken down, that would be fine.”
 
I remembered something from the injunction motion and thought I'd note it: Russ doesn't really want kiwifarms taken down. He doesn't care about the women who allegedly suicided or those that might do so next (according to him). He doesn't care about anything other than himself, and he admits as much right here. View attachment 1633830
lol like trying to have just his thread taken down would result in any less retaliatory measures than going for the whole site. Probably none either way aside from laughing at him since noone wants to fuel his victim complex and he cant do shit anyways
 
I've made two or three posts and have been lurking since last year. I just have to ask this now, since I could never find info on this: when did the drama happen with the girl that killed herself? Can someone link me to the posts in the forum where the situation unfolded? That'd be great. Thanks.

And I know this is annoying. Won't happen again.
 
Back