- Joined
- Jan 25, 2018
This man:I don't know my Bob lore. Who ruined Bob's professional life and put him in a debt hole? How did this shit occur?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This man:I don't know my Bob lore. Who ruined Bob's professional life and put him in a debt hole? How did this shit occur?
The phrase you're looking for is "waving the bloody shirt," an expression from Antebellum (post American Civil War) times, when people would use the bloody shirts of Civil War veterans and casualties for cheap political points.I've said it before and I'll probably repeat it until my dying-of-COVID-19 breath, but using a number as small as 213,000 among the hundreds upon millions of people that live in this country is such a sleazy appeal to emotion and a forefront example of using corpses as political chits.
It's terrible for the family and friends that have lost people to the disease to use the deceased like pawns. It doesn't make me agree with you, it just makes me angry.
They don't want you to remember this, but when Trump began restricting flights from China, the American Left insisted this was a racist move. Once they realized that measures taken to stop the Wu Flu could cut the throat of Trump's economy, they began insisting not enough was being done.Question to American kiwis: why are American leftists blaming Trump for the covid-19 deaths? Weren't the USA one of the first countries to go on lockdown? I get that you guys have people with TDS and all that, but what the fuck was Trump's fault in all of this?
I posted this in the Wu Flu megathread, but in response to Blobbo continuing to spout this retarded shit about lockdowns, I'll quote it here too:Especially if you are someone like Bob: all adult privileges (sans sex) with none of the responsibilities.
I was just reading what Tchaikovsky wrote about his Fourth Symphony, in a letter to his patron Nadezhda von Meck. This passage made me think of Bob:
"The fourth movement. If you can find no impulse for joy within yourself, look at others. Go out among the people. See how well they know how to rejoice and give themselves up utterly to glad feelings... Never say that all the world is sad; you have only yourself to blame. There are joys, strong though simple. Why not rejoice through the joys of others? One can live that way, after all."
Yet not only does Bobby fail to find joy in the enjoyment of others, he downright despises other people having fun. Here he tells someone she ought not be living a life:
View attachment 1640086
Someone joins the dots and realized why Bobby is so angry about Halloween getting supposedly canceled:
View attachment 1640093
Gimme gimme gimme!!!!
View attachment 1640081
If "everyone stays home" who's going to deliver supplies to you?
In short, shut the fuck up, Bob. You have zero idea of the logistical impossibilities related to a complete societal lockdown, and even if we could pull it off, it would never truly stop the coof. Maybe if you weren't such a fat diabetic fuck, you wouldn't be living in deadly fear of a disease that barely kills anyone of your age group, except the fat diabetic fucks like you.I fucking hate the lockdown cultists. They seriously think that it would be in any way possible to lock down the entire country and stop the virus before it ever got out of hand, and then we would have all been done with this months ago.
So it's thought experiment time.
First, let's isolate the problem to just the Wu Flu: Anyone who has the coof will basically be done with it in two weeks, so if they isolate for a month, they should be over it by the time they get back out to interact with anyone else. Thus, if the entire country isolates for a month, all cases will have burnt themselves out, and the pandemic will be done. Easy peasy.
But it's really not that simple. For starters, I can guarantee that most people will not have the supplies to last for a month without going outside. Preppers and others who live in disaster-prone areas are likely to have emergency food supplies on hand, but the overwhelming majority of the country will only have food to last a couple weeks at most. We already see the first problem with this plan, but obviously it's going to get worse.
This is where essential workers come in. Obviously, there need to be people providing the essential services that keep society running: food, water, electricity, transportation, telecommunications, medicine, and so on. Anyone who's working in any of these industries will have to go out and continue working, at the risk of spreading the coof to each other. But it's a necessary sacrifice to ensure that the rest of the country can properly isolate.
But then the question comes in: what's "unessential?" There are lots of workers associated with each of these industries, and they all have to keep working to ensure that things are still running. Going back to food, we have farmers, processing plants, truckers, and store workers all required to work to get food from the farm to the table. You've also got to get water to the farms, electricity to the processing plants and grocery stores, and fuel to the truckers and other workers, as well as gas for individual citizens' cars so they can keep buying food. That's a bunch more industries that are essential to keeping things running, along with other industries that support those, and so on. It gets to the point where you realize that pretty much no industry is unessential (except for journalists, probably). Sure, some people can transition to working at home, but not everyone is lucky enough to swing that.
So because we have so many people that need to keep working, a full countrywide lockdown would never have worked out. But let's assume that everyone had enough supplies to last a month, the electrical and telecom grids were automated well enough to stay running until the lockdown ended, and all these problems were fixed. We got the virus under control, and all it cost us was a month of our time.
The obvious follow-up question: what happens when one person with the Wu Flu comes into the country from another one, especially if they're not caught upon entry because they weren't showing symptoms?
We'd immediately be back at square one with who knows how many infected spreading it around, and we'd have to go back into another month's lockdown nationwide to let it burn itself out again. Even if we assume that all our systems could run automatically for a month, and even if we assume every single person in the country had enough supplies to handle a lockdown, I don't think it's reasonable to assume we could do it all over again in such a short period of time.
So at this point, if we assume that lockdowns are the only way to beat the coof, the only possible solution is for the entire world to go into lockdown. Yeah, good fucking luck there. Wrangling even a single smaller country is hard enough, but every single nation on the planet? There's no fucking way you could manage that. And yet, for some reason, our leaders tried to do just that, with devastating results.
If anyone has any holes they can poke in my reasoning here, let me know. I've spent a while thinking about the logic behind lockdowns, and my conclusion is that it's all fucking retarded. I don't think there's been a single case in history of quarantining a healthy population to fight a disease, but that's exactly what we did, and I still don't know why (aside from the obvious "never let a good crisis go to waste" tinpot dictators out there).
Are we just going to ignore Bob saying "everyone who matters has seen it or read a review" in regards to Cuties? Bad time to use a Bob-ism with "people who matter".
Probably because Amy Coney Barrett has been nominated to replace the notorious RBG on the Supreme Court. Barrett is a Catholic with 7 kids, and in left-world that means she's a super evil religious super-nazi that's gonna take away the gays' marriage and make wahmen live in the Handmaid's Tale.Why has Bob been going on about 'Christofascists' so much lately? Is it still 2007 and Bush is President, and creation vs. evolution is the hottest debate on the internet?
Fuck you MovieBob. You literally said a week or two ago that you believe in “bootstrapism for white people”, so as a white dude, what the fuck is stopping your fat fucking ass from practicing what you preach?
Why has Bob been going on about 'Christofascists' so much lately? Is it still 2007 and Bush is President, and creation vs. evolution is the hottest debate on the internet?
Being an adult is way better than being a kid. I have control over my life unlike when I was a kid.
Especially if you are someone like Bob: all adult privileges (sans sex) with none of the responsibilities.
It's absolutely hilarious. Bob reees like the low IQ smoothbrain he is over having nothing to do at first. Keep in mind that his favorite activity besides watching movies for children (and struggling to figure out how to not look like a mental child when loving it), is to play manchild games at a bootleg Dave and Busters. Probably while oggling the drunk wine moms and women there.Yet not only does Bobby fail to find joy in the enjoyment of others, he downright despises other people having fun. Here he tells someone she ought not be living a life:
View attachment 1640086
I just like the implication that it's a given that true intellectuals or whatever would be all over Cuties like a must watch movie. Chances are it's his verbal tics biting him in the ass but man, that could've been phrased better.At this point I'm just assuming anyone who defends Cuties has either not seen it or spent the entire runtime nursing a throbbing erection. I guess those are the "people who matter" now.
What kind of special retard defends cuties? So by his statement alone, that means Tulsi Gabbard and the majority of Congress are in a “idiot-bubble” when they are pushing for a federal investigation into Netflix and its Executives for child exploitation? Bob is a fucking retard and typical, he walks right into the pun of a joke.Now this is a choice burn. Seen in the wild once again. Bob is just on fire lately.View attachment 1640316
Bob, ultimately, has the mindset of an overgrown, petulant child. Summer and Halloween are things that can be fun for adults, but they aren't defining exclamation point moments of the year like they are for children.Except that Bob isn't taking advantage of that. All the things he does in his spare time (video games, angry Internet posts, going to the arcade + movies) could be done by a ten-year-old with inattentive parents. The only way he's using his adult privileges is that he doesn't need to worry about arcade staff asking about his parents or theater clerks not letting him to an "R" rated movie and being taken semi-seriously on twitter. Combine that with his inept attempts at being an adult (living semi-independently, "serious" political + film commentary, his culinary attempts) and you have someone who's opted into the worst of both worlds - no wonder he's so miserable.
Twitter Addiction is real.Holy fuck, I just saw the tweet of him crying like a bitch about how trump personally made china release covid and how his child time is ruined. This fucker tweets so much, we are already gone by that.
I know when I first got here you guys said we would probably hit 3000 pages before the election or something, but fuck damn. This guy tweets way too much.
Twitter Addiction is real.
The fact that he thinks he needs two accounts is reason enough to believe he has a problem.As of 10/04/20, he's sitting at 237,400 tweets. That's his main account. The "personal" account has about 2500, which isn't all that impressive, but it only goes back to April, and let's face it, he doesn't use it for much.
The fact that he thinks he needs two accounts is reason enough to believe he has a problem.
The Gibbering Insane Hatred is his public persona, that is all he has for fame and likes now.It would have been fine if we'd seen all the insane, gibbering hatred migrate over to the private account.