2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a question, and I'm not sure where else to ask it.

Not to be a doomer or anything, but what do you think would happen if multiple states unironically tried to secede from the union again? Not like "Calexit," but a legitimate desire to secede? I ask because I'm not sure how much wokeism and neoliberalism the Southern and "flyover" states can take.

The left is beyond the point where they can create institutions. They won't try it because they want to follow the university and media model: take over existing powerful institutions from within, and leverage their power.

A lot of the recent talk about Civil War 2 leaves out an under-appreciated facet of the first one: the seceding states immediately formed a brand new country, the Confederate States of America. The CSA had its own President, constitution, capital, currency, and army ready to go within 2 months of seceding.

I'm marking time from February 1861, when the initial 7 states held the Montgomery Convention, to April 1861, when the attack on Fort Sumter happened. South Carolina seceded the earliest on December 20th, but setting up the CSA proper didn't happen until more states passed article of secession and attended the Convention.

The CSA moved to a permanent capital in Richmond VA in May. The setup above was "provisional" until they had their first elections in November 1861, so everything was fully settled within 9 months.

Part of what made this possible was that states were properly sovereign back then, and weren't reliant on the feds for everything. Part of this was a willingness to do real political compromises; another part was having a population that was accustomed to self-governance and forming their own local/state institutions. And a huge factor was not having federal barriers and gatekeepers to crucial parts of the economy; post-secession, the main thing they "needed" from the feds in their state was just the armories and forts.

Can you imagine a modern day leftist coalition trying to create and organize a brand new political institution that survives for 4 years like the CSA did?

Imagine it's just the west coast: CA, OR, WA. (Ignore the huge chunks of red rural and farm areas each has surrounding the urban metros; let's pretend they got the whole state to buy in.) Imagine the DSA idiots in a constitutional convention trying to work out a founding document. It would take them a month just to agree on the progressive stack and list everyone's pronouns.

For reference: CHAZ lasted longer than the CSA's actual Constitutional Convention, and their daily meetings never managed a single coherent document or agreement on how to govern the park they occupied. They were still bickering over what CHAZ/CHOP meant by the time the Confederates managed a whole system of government.

Now picture those leftists trying to name a provisional President, and eventually elect them, from the team that brought you the 2020 Democratic primaries. No one they'd pick would have the support of their splintered coalition. Now imagine that President puts out a call for 100,000 soldiers before they're properly elected. He'd get 500 Antifa LARPers out of Portland and they'd go home once the snacks ran out.

The CSA had their King Cotton economic engine. But for the WSW, the first thing that happens is every tech millionaire gets wiped out, because their assets are listed on US stock exchanges and their bank accounts are in US dollars. The tech idealists will advocate for bitcoin, the commies will advocate for scrip or barter, and the regular people will realize they have no hard currency to use. No matter what they settle on, their need for currency and the left's total inability to manage currency will destroy their economy. (Attempting to keep the USD will let the USA flood their markets with currency and drive them into hyper-inflation, no war needed.)

The Democrats can't coalesce long enough to nominate a "leader" under the age of 77 without dementia. Their 2nd in command is less likable than herpes and can't navigate politics without a pair of kneepads. Their politics are designed for factionalism and un-solvable identity battles.

You won't get non-sovereign, highly centralized, federally-reliant states to do anything other than throw a temper tantrum. It's too much work to leave and actually try to solve the problems they claim to care about.
 
The first time I voted in a Presidential Election was 2004. I voted for Bush over Kerry for two big reasons: Healthcare and the space program. Kerry's healthcare plan was just godawful, and one of the only things I liked about Bush was his very pro-NASA stance. And when it came to the War in Iraq, I thought that Kerry's withdrawal plan/timeline was really bad; I figured that "Well, we're there already ... If we pull the troops out too soon, then things could get even uglier. Fuck."

So yeah, I pretty much held my nose to vote for Bush that year, and he managed to piss me off beyond belief months within his second term. I've hated him ever since, for many reasons that so many others have already stated. Thinking about it now, maybe if we had gotten Kerry-- a charisma vacuum-- in 2004, then maybe we could have avoided 8 years of Obomber. Who knows; I guess there's no point in thinking about "what ifs."

So Dubya endorses Biden? GOOD. Fuck off, Bush family. Stay salty about Yeb! being the one child left behind.
2004 was my first Presidential election as well, and I also voted for Dubya. I too was worried about withdrawing from Iraq prematurely and winding up with horrible healthcare legislation. In hindsight, though, all the Bush winning re-election did was delay the inevitable - Obama got in and pushed thru the abomination that was Obamacare, and he withdrew from Iraq and that country fell to pieces (you could argue that was always going to happen, but that brings in the question about even going into Iraq in the first place).

The worst part is after getting re-elected Bush could've gotten ahead of both of these issues, but instead he decided to spend the political capital of his 2nd term mandate on...trying to amnesty millions of illegal immigrants.
 
She cant even vote though and she's not even an American citizen.

How can you fucking endorse a political candidate of a country that you are not even a citizen of? You don't see Americans saying "I endorse Boris Johnson" or whatever.

I endorsed Boris Johnson. I also endorsed Marine Le Pen, and I was happy as fuck when AfD got a seat at the table at the Bundestag, and I would absolutely smash Pernille Vermund's viking pussy. But I do agree that Ramsus Paludan is kind of a sped (but he would still make a better POTUS than Kamala Harris).
 
Not sure if someone has already made this point here or elsewhere, but what honestly is the point of Biden & Harris campaign? Seriously? They hardly answer any question fielded to them (and by hardly I don't mean diverting to the usual talking points that have pretty much nothing to do with the question, I mean flat out refusing to answer), they barely go to any rally or large gathering (virtually or physically), and they're hardly going to any "battleground" state.

Meanwhile, Trump is doing all of the above. Say what you want about the "Orange-man" but at least he seems to enjoy the stump.
 
The first time I voted in a Presidential Election was 2004. I voted for Bush over Kerry for two big reasons: Healthcare and the space program. Kerry's healthcare plan was just godawful, and one of the only things I liked about Bush was his very pro-NASA stance. And when it came to the War in Iraq, I thought that Kerry's withdrawal plan/timeline was really bad; I figured that "Well, we're there already ... If we pull the troops out too soon, then things could get even uglier. Fuck."

So yeah, I pretty much held my nose to vote for Bush that year, and he managed to piss me off beyond belief months within his second term. I've hated him ever since, for many reasons that so many others have already stated. Thinking about it now, maybe if we had gotten Kerry-- a charisma vacuum-- in 2004, then maybe we could have avoided 8 years of Obomber. Who knows; I guess there's no point in thinking about "what ifs."

So Dubya endorses Biden? GOOD. Fuck off, Bush family. Stay salty about Yeb! being the one child left behind.
Biden makes Kerry seem like a rockstar in comparison. Now we have a four-time beyond lackluster presidential hopeful whose entire appeal and campaign is centered around not being the other candidate. I thought Kerry had a lot more going for him than Biden does.

Hopefully Biden loses like Kerry did. Not only is Biden much weaker than Kerry, but Trump is much stronger than Bush.
 
Not sure if someone has already made this point here or elsewhere, but what honestly is the point of Biden & Harris campaign? Seriously? They hardly answer any question fielded to them (and by hardly I don't mean diverting to the usual talking points that have pretty much nothing to do with the question, I mean flat out refusing to answer), they barely go to any rally or large gathering (virtually or physically), and they're hardly going to any "battleground" state.

Meanwhile, Trump is doing all of the above. Say what you want about the "Orange-man" but at least he seems to enjoy the stump.
Because they don’t believe they need to campaign. Campaigning is something candidates do to win over people and Democrats, in their insanity to be the polar opposite of Trump, take pride in being elitist and anti-populist. They pride themselves on calling everyone a bigot and that the only salvation is to vote for them.
 
here comes the next "October Surprise"
1602365199329.jpg

Update: Nevermind, It's probably fake
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back