This is the most confusing story in the world right now. The original shooting video shows him as the aggressor, very much acting like a BLM/antifa. The news station reports he's one of their contractors, but he's not licensed to work as a guard, but why in the hot buttered fuck would a news station lie about a murderer caught on camera being employed by them? What possible motivation would they have to expose themselves to that kind of liability and bad press? You would think that before running a story that makes them look that bad, they'd at least check on the HR records or whatever to make sure all their ducks are in a row re: the psychopath they hired.
The Denver PD is saying that he has no ties to antifa or whatever, and why would the PD lie in a way that's sympathetic to antifa? I don't think even the portland PD is that pozzed.
I've always heard that security guards are the people who wanted to be cops but couldn't pass even the meager qualifications for that. They tend to be either wildly incompetent or absolute powermad psychopaths.
This is, thus far, the most plausible explanation I've seen. The antifa reporter is the guy who was arrested with him, right?