New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

Couple stories on the New York Post

FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-40-48.png


Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-49-19.png
 
Last edited:
It’s fake.

1. The story of how it was acquired is questionable at best, as at the time Hunter was living in California, not in Delaware. For a second thing, Rudy has a habit of claiming outlandish shit and then never backing it up.

2. The Post didn’t even bother to do any kind of investigation on the emails or the harddrive. I doubt Rudy did either.

3. The original hard drive isn’t available. Verifying the files veracity thus becomes difficult at best. The whole thing smells funky.

4. This would have been evidence available to the Senate Republicans when they did their whole nothingburger review, if the OG hard drive was taken into federal custody. It would have come out months ago.

5. This stinks of disinformation being fed to a gullible source (Rudy) by a third party of some kind.
Possibly. The real story is how tech and media platforms aren't even bothering to rebut it, like you just did relatively quickly and easily, and are instead wiping it from the collective memory in lockstep with the quickness.

Funny how that shit only works one way, eh? October Surprises are for people with (R) next to their names doncha know. Lying disingenuous half-truth garbage is perfectly ok as long as it doesn't involve certain people, causes, and organizations. Meanwhile, let's trot out another crazy bitch who is off her meds to accuse Cheeto Hitler of ultra-mega rape again. That's totes newsworthy.

Also, eat hat.
 
It’s fake.

1. The story of how it was acquired is questionable at best, as at the time Hunter was living in California, not in Delaware. For a second thing, Rudy has a habit of claiming outlandish shit and then never backing it up.

2. The Post didn’t even bother to do any kind of investigation on the emails or the harddrive. I doubt Rudy did either.

3. The original hard drive isn’t available. Verifying the files veracity thus becomes difficult at best. The whole thing smells funky.

4. This would have been evidence available to the Senate Republicans when they did their whole nothingburger review, if the OG hard drive was taken into federal custody. It would have come out months ago.

5. This stinks of disinformation being fed to a gullible source (Rudy) by a third party of some kind.
Did you learn nothing from the Eat the Hat saga, dude? Why are you still caping for these morons?
 
Possibly. The real story is how tech and media platforms aren't even bothering to rebut it, like you just did relatively quickly and easily, and are instead wiping it from the collective memory in lockstep with the quickness.

Funny how that shit only works one way, eh? Lying disingenuous half-truth garbage is perfectly ok as long as it doesn't involve certain people, causes, and organizations.

Also, eat hat.
They heard "Lies travel around the world before truth can get its boots on" and thought they had the power to end that.
 
And now the NY Post has been locked out of their own Twitter account
View attachment 1661993
:stress:

This looks bad even more.

Having to suppress actual news stories to win an election on the way of voting fraud and mail-in elections in 2020!

How the fuck do you fall asleep while smoking crack and/or meth?

It’s actually dangerous to do this, and I’m surprised Hunter Biden is still alive even considering this situation.

If Trump does not get re-elected because of this, it just goes to show that people still favor politicians that have drug issues, or having children that have drug-related issues.
 
Last edited:
The censorship has really reached Nineteen Eighty-Four levels recently. Keep in mind that in addition to this article being mass censored, the Merriam-Webster literally modified the definition of the word "sexual preference" to be "offensive" around 24 hours AFTER Barret used it during the SCOTUS hearing yesterday. They're literally changing the definitions of words now to make them offensive after they're spoken.
https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/10/14/sexual-preference-merriam-webster-dictionary-definition-offensive-amy-coney-barrett/
https://archive.vn/zvMkp
 
The censorship has really reached Nineteen Eighty-Four levels recently. Keep in mind that in addition to this article being mass censored, the Merriam-Webster literally modified the definition of the word "sexual preference" to be "offensive" around 24 hours AFTER Barret used it during the SCOTUS hearing yesterday. They're literally changing the definitions of words now to make them offensive after they're spoken.
https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/10/...onary-definition-offensive-amy-coney-barrett/
https://archive.vn/zvMkp
Or worse, they believe themselves to be the centre of the culture. If their stooges suddenly think it's offensive, then the dictionary ought to reflect that, because dictionaries describe words as they are used by society.

Inb4 it actually is a planted fake story by the Dems in a 1488D chess move to tar the Republicans as "The Party of tabloid bullshit" as they all come out of the woodwork to die on this hill.
 
Doesn't it seem to be a purposeful tactic that every time this Hunter Biden saga comes up and more shit gets brought to light, the media and big tech creates a chaotic sideshow to get the focus off Joe Biden and onto whatever they're directing us to?
Does this mean we should be on alert for a Happening, or at least another Totally Real Drumpf Bombshell cooked up by the Atlantic?
 
Or worse, they believe themselves to be the centre of the culture. If their stooges suddenly think it's offensive, then the dictionary ought to reflect that, because dictionaries describe words as they are used by society.
If they do believe that they truly are the center of culture, even then they don't believe that the word was genuinely offensive. It's just pearl clutching to try to make the other side look bad.
 
Last edited:
If they do believe that they truly are the center of culture, even then don't believe that the word was genuinely offensive. It's just pearl clutching to try to make the other side look bad.
Maybe I phrased it slightly wrong. The people at Webster are probably so TDS-infused that as they watch the hearings, they see this new usage and take the "offence" taken by the Dems at face value, & what usage could be more official than that used on the Senate floor of the most powerful English-speaking nation on Earth? They're too steeped in TDS bullshit to see the word games for what they are.
 
Possibly. The real story is how tech and media platforms aren't even bothering to rebut it, like you just did relatively quickly and easily, and are instead wiping it from the collective memory in lockstep with the quickness.

Funny how that shit only works one way, eh? October Surprises are for people with (R) next to their names doncha know. Lying disingenuous half-truth garbage is perfectly ok as long as it doesn't involve certain people, causes, and organizations. Meanwhile, let's trot out another crazy bitch who is off her meds to accuse Cheeto Hitler of ultra-mega rape again. That's totes newsworthy.

Also, eat hat.
Part of the reason why is because if it *is* true, then these emails likely came from a hack by Russian intelligence into Burisma earlier this year. The information therefore falls under the same sort of blanket ban on hacked documents being propogated that they implemented this year - it’s what kept the BlueLeaks site from getting retweeted. Twitter can and has been sued before for posting hacked information.

As for why they haven’t talked about it on major media outside of fox, the reason I gave in my points can be added to here - not only is it unverified but also the source is questionable if not flat out illegal. The person writing the article has also only written three articles for the NY Post - only about this. And that person is... a former producer/writer for Hannity. Not to mention the Rudy connection which automatically makes me go “are you serious?”

Without legal proceedings, (which is what’s happening with the trump sexual assault allegations) there’s pretty much no solid way to talk about this whole thing without potentially getting into massive legal trouble later on down the line. Fox doesn’t give a shit as they’ve basically put their entire legal defense into “it’s all entertainment programming not news programming” to dodge lawsuits relating to slander and libel when their hosts intentionally mislead or flat out lie about people. So far it’s worked for them.

That said there was and is other news articles talking about this that isn’t the Post, and are written about the post article in a much more even handed way. The Post is a Murdoch owned tabloid rag and anything they “break” the story on should be taken with a pinch of salt, if not a shipping container full of it when the reporter involved has these sort of connections to the people they’re getting the story from, and are almost 100% trying to push an agenda.

Saying all this and explaining why it’s bullshit though takes more time and effort than a simple retweet and cries of “we owned the libtards”, which is what most of this site does rather than taking a brief second to evaluate sources, motivations, etc. For a bunch of wannabe internet historiographers, kiwis are really bad about trying to keep their personal biases out of trying to determine what’s truth and what isn’t.
 
Back