Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Paranoia Machine]

Saw this on r/pics

Okay, in all fairness, the "I Hump Penis" one is funny. I actually got a good chuckle out of how immature and dumb that is.
Big props if someone can think of something easy like that with "Biden. Harris"

 

[A skinny fat man]

>Brought Ivanka to the G7 summit

Literally who cares?

I'm not really sure what the problem with this is. Is he not supposed to travel to diplomatic meetings of powerful countries with his wife? That makes no sense.

Okay, in all fairness, the "I Hump Penis" one is funny. I actually got a good chuckle out of how immature and dumb that is.
Big props if someone can think of something easy like that with "Biden. Harris"

I got it.

"Biden. Harris"

 

[HTTP Error 404]

I'm not really sure what the problem with this is. Is he not supposed to travel to diplomatic meetings of powerful countries with his wife? That makes no sense.

Ivanka is his daughter. The thing being, they're absolutely fucking terrified at how involved his children and grandchildren are, as it's very obvious that the Trump family is going to be a political dynasty going foward.

This isn't the last President Trump we'll ever see.

 

[Gehenna]

Ivanka is his daughter. The thing being, they're absolutely fucking terrified at how involved his children and grandchildren are, as it's very obvious that the Trump family is going to be a political dynasty going foward.

This isn't the last President Trump we'll ever see.

Assuming he wins, that is, we could see a Trump Dynasty form. Alternatively, none may grasp the presidency but the family may remain a force of populism dragging the republicans towards it.

 

[Allanon]

I will hesitate to vote for any Trump other than Don. Not because I dislike his presidency or them, but because I just don't believe in political dynasties.

 

[Rakdos92]

I will hesitate to vote for any Trump other than Don. Not because I dislike his presidency or them, but because I just don't believe in political dynasties.

Desperate times demand desperate measures.

 

[Getting tard comed]

I will hesitate to vote for any Trump other than Don. Not because I dislike his presidency or them, but because I just don't believe in political dynasties.

I disagree entirely. We've done this Rome thing before and while the emperors after Marcus Aurelius deserve all the shit they get, theres a century or two between Augustus and Marcus that was a relatively good time.

Make Monarchy Great Again!

I swear to God if you spergs point out that Rome wasn't monarchy I will turn this car around so fast you'll get whiplash!

 

[Bakarina]

I will hesitate to vote for any Trump other than Don. Not because I dislike his presidency or them, but because I just don't believe in political dynasties.

If the policies are sound and they do not ride on the coattails of their father I do not have an issue with it in theory. Will also depend on who the dems throw up for the election. They aren't my first choice but if they are a strong candidate and can stand on their own as a strong candidate, why not

 

[President Joe Biden]

Yes, I know there's people here that run around giving variations of the 'people do not' arguments, but this post was designed for normal social media and real life interaction, not a degenerate anonymous shitposting board full of people who just found out they're allowed to use the no-no words. Not one of you talk like that on social media or to your parents over the dinner table.

That's where you're wrong.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Desperate times demand desperate measures.

Yeah, better have a Trump dynasty than a Bush dynasty or even worse, a Trudeau dynasty.

 

[Adamska]

I just watched this again and two things stuck out at me:

Spoiler: sperging

Spoiler: bit of sperging

View attachment 1668803
The Left is gonna be furious when they find out how many sentences the Golden Oreo commuted.
View attachment 1669121
1715 people, to be exact.

Spoiler: lot of sperging

View attachment 1669074
This, to me, is very telling. Ignore for a moment all of the facts, lies, half-truths, and political spin on things the president might have done, both good and bad. What is an impeachment?
View attachment 1668799

An impeachment is an accusation. The impeached person is now a defendant.

Impeachment is not the process (the trial) or the result (the verdict) of acting on the accusation.

The president cannot be tried by a jury of his peers because he has none. At no time are there any people in the country working in the same position with the same level of access, and certainly not enough living former presidents to fill an unbiased jurybox. Since we can't go small we go big. That's why Congress is entrusted with the impeachment process; it is presumed that a representative whole of the country is moral enough to put the pieces of the case together for the good of Republic. Upon completion, Congress issues a binding verdict.

One of the core tenets of American justice is "innocent until proven guilty." It's cliche, but it's true. With that in mind, look at statements like Pelosi's "forever impeached" statement and then apply it to literally any other accused person that got acquitted, either at first or on appeal.

OJ Simpson? Forever a wife killer.
Micheal Jackson? Forever a kiddy diddler.
Lizzy Borden? Forever an axe murderer with daddy issues.
The Central Park Five? Forever rapists.

I'm not pushing any judgement here on the cases mentioned. I of course have my personal opinions on those people, but in the eyes of the law they have no debt to pay because they didn't commit a crime. You can't "forever be" what you never were - even if that "never was" is retroactively applied thanks to an appeal.

To bring it back home to the clip, I believe this represents one of the most honest insights into the mindset of the TDS Left.

To them, the accusation against Trump IS the proof of Trump's guilt. We see this sort of mob justice weaponized time after time in every facet of Current Year life; it's colloquially known as cancel culture.

The impeachment trial was correspondingly a mere formality to them, little more than theatrical paperwork. In their eyes, it has nothing to do with confirming the truth and everything to do with confirming their truth.

Since the process worked as intended but the Left didn't like the outcome it's now Trump's fault that he submitted a proper defense, thereby "breaking" one of their favorite tool in the toolbox, even though the Left has no one to blame but themselves.

TL;DR: Trump is like the big brother that didn't want to play Barbie with his annoying little sister, so the little sister broke all her dolls in anger while blaming her older brother for "making her do it."

You forgot the best part of this sobfest from the apes making these. Lisa should be in jail since she's violating and trying to influence a voter in the ballot.

Break the rules, that's what this zombie show that I don't know who watches says to do.

 

[TowinKarz]

Ivanka is his daughter. The thing being, they're absolutely fucking terrified at how involved his children and grandchildren are, as it's very obvious that the Trump family is going to be a political dynasty going foward.

This isn't the last President Trump we'll ever see.

I think they're envious that, unlike their chosen candidate, Biden, (and a lot of others too), he has a family that manages to just stay on the sidelines without turning into insufferable political baggage or corrupt coke-snorting buffoons.

The left can't stand that not only won't Trump step in a scandal, but, neither will any of his immediate relatives drag him into one either, through direct action or damage-control.

Remember how they roasted Baron? A kid? Who did literally nothing except spring from the loins of their own personal anti-Christ? Calling him everything from mentally unbalanced to a born sexual predator? With no evidence?

Or that they constantly harass Ivanka for not doing anything? Again, literally not doing anything? As in the half-dozen shrewish wives of current D Governors and Senators are trying to destroy her because if she successfully completes her tenure as a be-seen-but-not-heard First Lady? Holding a symbolic position without being an important cog in the machinery of government? Wrecking the precedent of politicizing the position?

Well, then their dreams of throwing their weight around Capitol Hill when their husband wins is gifted his Presidency in the future are dead on arrival, aren't they? You can hear the Karen's screeching :She's DISMANTLING FEMINISM RIGHT BEFORE OUR EYES AND WE CAN'T STOP IT!" between bottles of wine.....

Conventional wisdom for 200 years has held that a populist yokel President would be a disaster from stem to stern. Whining from the populace that the elite were ignoring them was met with a condescending "Look, this is just how government WORKS. We don't have the time to waste on obsolete rustbelters, we have a utopia to build. You don't like it? Tough. Only through carefully curated and polished figures can government flow, be happy it gives you ANYTHING. WHy, imagine how bad it would be if some random off the street had the office, he'd wreck the economy and blow up the world while you starved. We simply can't give you what you want, no one can, be happy for your table scraps for it would only get worse if you defy us." And when it turned out that a "guy off the street" was average at worst, even with everything thrown at him and anyone within six feet of him? Their worst nightmare came true: People who don't like the establishment have a proven viable alternative to the machine.

Ironically, if they would just focus on being popular themselves instead of trying to take down the opposition through every ratfuck measure in the book, they might actually succeeded.

But that's why they go bonkers that they can't find any dirt, their power is vast, but, it can't create the one thing that they envy the most: Power through RESPECT instead of by compulsion, I.E> - loyalty.

Which means people will support you on their own volition and don't need to be bought or scared off..... if they'd cultivated such trust in the proletariat for their 50 years of institutional power, they might have had it by now, but instead, they became the out-of-touch plutocrats of every morality play on the corrupting influence of power... when the citizens finally rise up against you, "I AM YOUR KING" is the last, and least effective, defense.

That is the root of all their hate of Trump, and his "court" - they inspire LOYALTY, in only 4 years, when the previous King reigned for 60 years with an iron fist, but was forgotten overnight.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

I think they're envious that, unlike their chosen candidate, Biden, (and a lot of others too), he has a family that manages to just stay on the sidelines without turning into insufferable political baggage or corrupt coke-snorting buffoons.

The left can't stand that not only won't Trump step in a scandal, but, neither will any of his immediate relatives drag him into one either, through direct action or damage-control.

Remember how they roasted Baron? A kid? Who did literally nothing except spring from the loins of their own personal anti-Christ? Calling him everything from mentally unbalanced to a born sexual predator? With no evidence?

Or that they constantly harass Ivanka for not doing anything? Again, literally not doing anything? As in the half-dozen shrewish wives of current D Governors and Senators are trying to destroy her because if she successfully completes her tenure as a be-seen-but-not-heard First Lady? Holding a symbolic position without being an important cog in the machinery of government? Wrecking the precedent of politicizing the position?

Well, then their dreams of throwing their weight around Capitol Hill when their husband wins is gifted his Presidency in the future are dead on arrival, aren't they? You can hear the Karen's screeching :She's DISMANTLING FEMINISM RIGHT BEFORE OUR EYES AND WE CAN'T STOP IT!" between bottles of wine.....

Conventional wisdom for 200 years has held that a populist yokel President would be a disaster from stem to stern. Whining from the populace that the elite were ignoring them was met with a condescending "Look, this is just how government WORKS. We don't have the time to waste on obsolete rustbelters, we have a utopia to build. You don't like it? Tough. Only through carefully curated and polished figures can government flow, be happy it gives you ANYTHING. WHy, imagine how bad it would be if some random off the street had the office, he'd wreck the economy and blow up the world while you starved. We simply can't give you what you want, no one can, be happy for your table scraps for it would only get worse if you defy us." And when it turned out that a "guy off the street" was average at worst, even with everything thrown at him and anyone within six feet of him? Their worst nightmare came true: People who don't like the establishment have a proven viable alternative to the machine.

Ironically, if they would just focus on being popular themselves instead of trying to take down the opposition through every ratfuck measure in the book, they might actually succeeded.

But that's why they go bonkers that they can't find any dirt, their power is vast, but, it can't create the one thing that they envy the most: Power through RESPECT instead of by compulsion, I.E> - loyalty.

Which means people will support you on their own volition and don't need to be bought or scared off..... if they'd cultivated such trust in the proletariat for their 50 years of institutional power, they might have had it by now, but instead, they became the out-of-touch plutocrats of every morality play on the corrupting influence of power... when the citizens finally rise up against you, "I AM YOUR KING" is the last, and least effective, defense.

That is the root of all their hate of Trump, and his "court" - they inspire LOYALTY, in only 4 years, when the previous King reigned for 60 years with an iron fist, but was forgotten overnight.

Not for anywhere near 200 years. The rust belt didn't exist in 1820 and psychos like Andrew Jackson held power in the 19th century, with the main political issues of the day being slaughtering native Americans, grabbing land from Mexico, and slavery. The whole process of midwestern industries declining started in the 1970s, just before the Bushes and Clintons rose to power. The last 50 years might be right for this, at a stretch, but this period of history isn't most of the centuries long history of the Republic.

 

[RockPaper]

Never change, Comcast.

 

[Chad Holdenford]

Today in "Local Headlines"

Translation: Thousands of women take the streets to protest against Trump in the USA.
Protestants paid tribute to the Supreme Court progressive justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died in September.

These women really crave to turn America into this Handmaiden's Tale shit they're into, just for the I-told-you-so moment, don't they? If he could, he would have done that already.

 

[Josterman]

Looks like Towelhead Majid and his followers want to become mini Eichmanns with deportation conservative celebs to island somewhere like Madagascar plan made by Adolf eichmann
Does anyone feel like the language he is using is what proceeds a genocide ?

 

[Bad_Guys_are_Good4EVER]

Not for anywhere near 200 years. The rust belt didn't exist in 1820 and psychos like Andrew Jackson held power in the 19th century, with the main political issues of the day being slaughtering native Americans, grabbing land from Mexico, and slavery. The whole process of midwestern industries declining started in the 1970s, just before the Bushes and Clintons rose to power. The last 50 years might be right for this, at a stretch, but this period of history isn't most of the centuries long history of the Republic.

The thing about the slaughtering the natives, and I'm not saying this because I love Andrew Jackson, but the American Indians were going around raiding, killing and taking women who lived on the frontier. There was legitimate fear of the Indians running wild. Now, it wasn't all Native Americans who were doing this. But Andrew Jackson did the one thing that actually saved the American Nation from being land locked. And that was leading the fight at New Orleans and beating the British back so the truce that was signed months earlier could take effect. (This is the War of 1812 if you didn't know already.)

With taking land from Mexico, the Mexicans attacked American settlers in Texas and the people of Texas asked for America's aid. We only got involved when the people of Texas agreed to live under United States rule. Then America won the war with the capture of Mexico City, which meant that we then Owned ALL of Mexico. But being the generous nation that we are, we gave half of Mexico back after we paid off their nation's debt.

My point being that America isnt without flaws but we strive to be the best. Which is why we need to keep Biden out of office. Otherwise everything America has done will be for nought.

 

[Allanon]

I disagree entirely. We've done this Rome thing before and while the emperors after Marcus Aurelius deserve all the shit they get, theres a century or two between Augustus and Marcus that was a relatively good time.

Make Monarchy Great Again!

I swear to God if you spergs point out that Rome wasn't monarchy I will turn this car around so fast you'll get whiplash!

I'm generally against anything that the founding fathers were leery of. I wouldn't be for extending term limits either, because they wanted us to only have single term presidents as well. I understand the reasoning behind it: they abhorred the concept of there being a nobility or aristocracy class made up of presidential candidates or lifetime rulers, because they knew full well that people would vote for the familiar (ie; incumbents and their heirs) over policies, and would either unwittingly vote in themselves a pseudo-monarchy that turned the free vote into a joke or be manipulated into it.

I'm not 100% ruling out voting for another Trump, but I'd much prefer voting in someone like Rand Paul and/or Pence, and then later, possibly, voting in another Trump. The idea of just handing the reins to Trump after Trump is almost as scary as the fantasy the DNC had of running Hillary-Michelle-Chelsea-the two Obama daughters in a row, or even that + a bush between each democrat. "I'm related to a past president" should be a demerit, not a bonus, when running.

If the policies are sound and they do not ride on the coattails of their father I do not have an issue with it in theory. Will also depend on who the dems throw up for the election. They aren't my first choice but if they are a strong candidate and can stand on their own as a strong candidate, why not

In theory I could vote for another Trump, like Don Jr, but I'd be more likely to end up going third party unless I really, really liked the candidate. Especially if they run immediately after Don.

That's where you're wrong.

Mr. Biden you can't just drop the n-bombs at Thanksgiving, we keep telling you this It's racist now. And Hunter might accidentally record it on a phone he later breaks and loses at a repair shop.

 

[Chad Holdenford]

Looks like Towelhead Majid and his followers want to become mini Eichmanns with deportation conservative celebs to island somewhere like Madagascar plan made by Adolf eichmann
Does anyone feel like the language he is using is what proceeds a genocide ?

Mmm, yeah buddy, there was this Austrian fellow who also agreed to isolate undesirables for perceivedly ruining the land you live in.

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

https://twitter.com/SVNewsAlerts/status/1317643731374383104