Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

I'm a lusty pagan, and I think the details of ones sex and intimate life with a partner are best kept off of a public internet forum.

ooh the hypocrisy!
The entire first post about Marshall and I was what the fuck I do with my own damn sex life.

So really, the issue here is that you all want to control WHEN and HOW my sex life is brought up.

It's low class, crass and sluttish

Oh the hypocrisy!
This is Kiwi Farms. It's a bar full of mouthy people. Why change the theme you all created and refuse to let go of?

There's nothing sluttish, low class or crass talking about mature adult content. I recommend you see a sex therapist if basic mature adult people conversations about sex make you uncomfortable. Including using scientific terms like labia, vagina, penis, testicles, etc in public.

Honestly, I could have described how we did anal, if I really wanted to be TMI.

However, I think the real issue is that your "Split Apart" (as you call him) is a party to this thread and you don't want him reading sexual stuff about me. I find this interesting because you are displaying righteous jealousy in doing that, which is contrary to other stuff I've seen about you. But at the same time, it's your man's responsibility not to lust if I engage in mature conversation. Not that I think he would lust so that's why I also felt free to speak it.

You insulted me in front of Marshall but you know what, it's Marshall's responsibility to respect me ultimately, regardless of what others say and do. Same principle.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
However, I think the real issue is that your "Split Apart" (as you call him) is a party to this thread and you don't want him reading sexual stuff about me. I find this interesting because you are displaying righteous jealousy in doing that, which is contrary to other stuff I've seen about you. But at the same time, it's your man's responsibility not to lust if I engage in mature conversation. Not that I think he would lust so that's why I also felt free to speak it.
The idea that anyone would be worried that their partner would be consumed in paryoxsms of lust upon reading anything having to do with the sex life of a mountain "Jew" is hilarious.
So really, the issue here is that you all want to control WHEN and HOW my sex life is brought up.
The downside of posting on a forum is that it is made up of people who have a lot of conflicting thoughts and some of those people just want to provoke you into humiliating yourself. The funny thing is you play into it almost every time, which I haven't seen in any other thread where the cow is present except for maybe @KhordKitty .
 
However, I think the real issue is that your "Split Apart" (as you call him) is a party to this thread and you don't want him reading sexual stuff about me. I find this interesting because you are displaying righteous jealousy in doing that, which is contrary to other stuff I've seen about you. But at the same time, it's your man's responsibility not to lust if I engage in mature conversation. Not that I think he would lust so that's why I also felt free to speak it.
This is hysterical. You obviously STILL have a thing for @Deadpool, and first off I don't get jealous of him over any woman. Secondly, he truly finds you a disgusting specimen of subhumanity. Thirdly, if you had been paying attention you would know that dead and I are not a thing, never have been, and in fact the thing is someone else.
I have no difficulty with names for body parts. Elbow or scrotum, it's all the same to me. I have labia on my face. More than one pair on a good day, amirite @Chariot Of Mara ?
 
There was no "debt slavery" or sex slavery in The Torah. Israelite men were forbidden from giving their seed to Goyim women and they are also forbidden from having sex with Goy women (Numbers 25; Tobit 4:12-13; Jubilees 25:5)

The Torah forbids making fellow Israelites slaves (Lev. 25:44). Israelites could only be hired staff/hired servants/indentured servants. They also had to be treated well, like family.

"‘If a member of your people has become poor among you and sells himself to you, do not make him do the work of a slave. Rather, you are to treat him like an employee or a tenant; he will work for you until the year of yovel" Lev. 25:39-40).

"Do not treat him harshly, but fear your Elohim" (Lev. 24:43)

"If your kinsman, a Hebrew man or woman, is sold to you, he is to serve you for six years; but in the seventh year, you are to set him free. Moreover, when you set him free, don’t let him leave empty-handed; but supply him generously from your flock, threshing-floor and winepress; from what Adonai your Elohim has blessed you with, you are to give to him." (Deut. 15:12-14)


Israelites could not be slaves to the Goyim. It's the other way around (Lev. 25:44). And that is fair, because Goyim are incredibly Wicked




Ok, you've asked this question so many times, so I'll just answer: yes, Marshall and I did anal.





Depended on my mood. But yeah, I did pelvic rocks when I'm on top. Why is this question important?!

Who's idea was it to do butt stuff?
 
It becomes obvious over time if someone is smart.
But that's not at all what you called yourself, is it? You called yourself "brilliant". It's quite a bit more extreme then simple smartness. Even so, I think your brilliance leaves a lot to be desired.
Some people realize "I'm tall" or "I'm short". No different realizing "I'm smart".
I disagree. Tall and short are things agreed upon by your measurments, your smartness, however, is subjective. Unless, maybe, you take something like an iq test.
You know, because a girl can't be smarter.
No, it's because 3rd graders are just petty.
Look, it's like this. When I was in 3rd grade I went up against 3 very smart boys in a "Challenge 24" math competition. These were boys from wealthy families, had good nutrition and private tutors. I beat them on every round in a matter of seconds.
The only thing this proves is that you were, allegedly, smarter than your peers during your 3rd grade.
Sorry KF, you got beat to that by 25 years
Woe is us.
I was an A student in HS, while participating in athletics, extra curriculars and had a job.
In College I managed to graduate as a parent while in the Honors Program with a GPA of 3.5.

I repeatedly have figured out things about theology, human psychology and sociology without being taught. I have figured things out in my 20s many people don't realize until 30+. I figured out things in my 30s that many people don't realize until 50+.
Forgive me if I don't believe you. This is the exact kind of story I'd find if I were to browse r/Iamverysmart

But, hey, for your sake I hope this is right, and you are better at everything else than you are at law.
That's not intelligence. That's strategy/master manipulator.
Strategy and manipulation, by nature, require intelligence. Wisdom cannot opperate without intelligence after all.
"Genius is the ability to independently arrive at and understand concepts that would normally have to be taught by another person.”--Kant
I am 90% Kant never said that in any in his works, and this is taken from the wikipedia article on him, that didn't even make this into a quote. It's just some rando's thoughts on Kant after reading another person's book on Kant. So, it's a third-hand source that doesn't even quote Kant.
 
Honestly, smarter person wouldn't air their private life on farms this much.

You think this is my private life?

Name one thing that I have spoken about that KF troll didn't bring up first. Go ahead, hypocrite.

Or get this many claims thrown out of court as waste of time.

I disagree with this mentality.

Henry David Thoreau, the wise and intelligent philosopher, was thrown in jail because he refused to pay taxes on the grounds of moral principle.

It is better to stand up to the powers that be and not get the desired outcome than stand their like a coward and a pacifist saying nothing.

"And as for thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, whom thou mayest have: of the nations that are round about you, of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids."

Yup, no debt slaves at all in the Tanakh.

Fake Jew will always be a fake Jew.

Quit trying to hide Hebrew words with a KJV translation


The only thing this proves is that you were, allegedly, smarter than your peers during your 3rd grade.

People don't change these attributes. Who people are as children is who they grow up to be.


This is hysterical. You obviously STILL have a thing for @Deadpool, and first off I don't get jealous of him over any woman. Secondly, he truly finds you a disgusting specimen of subhumanity. Thirdly, if you had been paying attention you would know that dead and I are not a thing, never have been, and in fact the thing is someone else.
I have no difficulty with names for body parts. Elbow or scrotum, it's all the same to me. I have labia on my face. More than one pair on a good day, amirite @Chariot Of Mara ?

You're a lesbian?

I do not have a thing for Deadpool.


provoke you into humiliating yours

This sort of stuff doesn't humiliate me.

What humiliates me is when in in the grocery store and my preschool age son acts in a grocery store check out line 😳

Who's idea was it to do butt stuff?

Marshall. But I liked it. He was the first guy that I let do that too because he worked my emotional guard down to feel safe doing it.

Buy I made him wear a condom though because I'm concerned about bacteria and germs. Can pass to other parts of my body if he slips back in my vagina

We did it in the shower too though without a condom because soap and water was right there.

I encourage you to look up said stats and facts for yourself.

Reason I asked you was because I've never seen a study demonstrating that most men historically and today give birth without a midwife. The number of UC births is very very low
 
Last edited by a moderator:
👆 👆 👆 Patriarchy (male spiritual narcissism)

A woman isn't "used up" from having children. Pregnancy isn't something that happens to a woman. The idea that sex and pregnancy happens to a woman is a philosophy that goes back to Aristotle who taught that women were incubators for male seed.

Goy thinking: Children are "baggage"
Hebraic thinking: Children are "blessings"

Goy thinking: Divorced women with children are "damaged goods"
Hebraic thinking: Divorced women with children are blessed

Goy thinking: Children are a burden to pay for
Hebraic thinking: Children are assets to run a homestead

Goy thinking: A woman is less valuable after childbirth
Hebraic thinking: A woman is experienced and seasoned from childbirth and child-rearing

Goy thinking: After children its all down hill from there
Hebraic thinking: My body is set apart, not a garbage can


You may also just be saying some of this because you are under the age of 30 while making this comment. As men age and evolve (if they do), they are able to connect more with women on an emotional and companionship level. It's not all about sex later on down the road.
Evolved men tend to start thinking of other reasons besides sex that they want to be with a woman

An experienced and seasoned man or woman has a way of loving that can't be replicated by a person in their 20s



You sound like Anne Coulter now. Yuck. I can't stand that woman.

She likes to point out statistics for the children of single mothers, meanwhile completely ignoring the fact that plenty of narcissistic, greedy, corrupt, evil, messed up people come from two parent homes.




👆 👆 👆 Abusive tactic to silence victims







👆👆👆Gaslighting







👆👆👆 You're still blind and naked Goyim








👆👆👆 See, blind. You think you can do proper exegesis and you're just a FOOL






You're likely under the age of 30 making a comment like this. You lack the experience to have any other view.

Anyhow, I've only been married twice, dummy.
Ex-husband and Marshall (second ex-husband)





👆👆👆 Spoken like a true Goy ("If you don't get a W2 for it, it's not "work")

Most women of conservative religions are SAHM.






Maybe. I have enough muscle mass built up, I need to work on lowering my BMI/body fat percent. Usually it takes more repetitions of lower amounts of weights to do this.







👍👍👍








It's not a threat to anyone. Just illustrating the point that Pacifism defies basic concepts of self preservation.





Sometimes, yes. Under extreme stress or fatigue I sometimes cannot understand what I am reading.





it's "just don't speak". Sometimes my auto correct goes back and changes words in the middle of a sentence, after I've typed the second or third word, it's really annoying.

TURN ON MY EDIT PRIVILEGES ASSHOLES
Lol bitch you have six kids and you spend your day arguing with faggots online about being a kike. There's no narcissism in there moneygrip.
 
You think this is my private life?

Name one thing that I have spoken about that KF troll didn't bring up first
Okay, I’ll bite. Even working with just the last few pages. Your on again/off again with Marshall. Every announcement of leaving Marshall was brought up by you. If you’d not said anything kiwis wouldn’t have known about your relationship status. Your “amazing” feats in elementary school, high school, and college. No one asked about your maths competition.

In older news, pictures of your children failing to flip off the farms. Pictures of your abomination you claim as awesome to show off your horrible kitchen skills. Your laughable and expensive attempt at a book. Your claims that your mother and sister read the farms.

Those are just off the top of my head. If I bother to go through 600+ pages again of you spilling personal details we wouldn’t have known about if you’d never signed up for the farms, I’ll let you know.
 
Henry David Thoreau, the wise and intelligent

was thrown in jail because he refused to pay taxes
He's not wise or intelligent. He's just retarded. Smart person would have had realised it's better to pay taxes than rot in prison(unless maybe you are in denmark or something). Either way, there are still plenty of legal ways to not pay taxes, although difficulties arise, sure.
It is better to stand up to the powers that be and not get the desired outcome than stand their like a coward and a pacifist saying nothing
Sure, if you have any chance at success. Either way, if you want to "stand up to the powers", just hire a lawyer. Your case will be instantly 100% better. Hire a professional to do the work, and you can "stand up" all you want.
People don't change these attributes. Who people are as children is who they grow up to be.
You grow smarter, better, with age. Children are dumb. The most autistic adult will be smarter than most smart children due to many factors including education, life experience, more developted brain, etc.

Anyway, when are you filling the Rule 19 motion?
 
Lol bitch you have six kids and you spend your day arguing with faggots online about being a kike. There's no narcissism in there moneygrip.

(Firstly, my children and I are celebrating a holiday called Sukkot. We don't do heavy work for 8 days. I have a little more free time this week. Secondly, my infant is going through a growth spurt and she is nursing the heck off of me and I have been at the computer a little bit more the last few days writing papers and taking frequent breaks in between writing.)

That aside, let's tackle the real issue here.

Patriarchy is, at it's core, Narcissism. It is predicated on the belief that men are entitled to power, extra marital sex affairs, and resources simply because they were born with a dick.

Here are all some of the attributes of Narcissism that correlate with the core of what Patriarchy is:

  • feelings of grandiosity (Men believe they are superior to women)
  • search for narcissistic supply (men believe they are entitled to emotional and sexual encounters with other people beside their wife)
  • gaslighting (men say they treat women as equals but they do not)
  • victim blaming (when men are caught cheating or committing a sin, they blame the wife instead of taking responsibility for their actions)
  • emotional witholding/stonewalling (when men in Patriarchy are confronted by their wives they say "stop nagging me"/ common misuse of a common Bible verse)
  • invalidation (in Patriarchy men dismiss women as "irrational", "emotional" people)
  • scapegoating (in Patriarchy men blame women for the ills of the world/"Eve did it")
  • Discard (in Patriarchy older women are discarded)
  • Dehumanization (in Patriarchy women are treated like sexual objects but also told to sexually repress)
  • Touch deprivation/skin hunger (in Patriarchy men see a wife as an as object, they are told it's socially acceptable to be emotionally disabled)



Okay, I’ll bite. Even working with just the last few pages. Your on again/off again with Marshall. Every announcement of leaving Marshall was brought up by you. If you’d not said anything kiwis wouldn’t have known about your relationship status. Your “amazing” feats in elementary school, high school, and college. No one asked about your maths competition.

In older news, pictures of your children failing to flip off the farms. Pictures of your abomination you claim as awesome to show off your horrible kitchen skills. Your laughable and expensive attempt at a book. Your claims that your mother and sister read the farms.

Those are just off the top of my head. If I bother to go through 600+ pages again of you spilling personal details we wouldn’t have known about if you’d never signed up for the farms, I’ll let you know.

I disagree.

  • KF brought up my relationship with Marshall. You didn't have to respond to things I said TO HIM on here. Like you all say, you could have just scrolled on by and not asked more questions
  • The history of me demonstrating strong intellectual capabilities was relevant to what was being discussed, prompted by a KF troll, not me
  • My children flipping off the farms was a response to you all talking shit about them. You know, your hypocritical double standard of having empathy for children fleeing from wildfires, but then you talk shit about my children. UH HUH
  • My book was brought up by a KF troll
  • The information about my belated mom and ex-sister was prompted by something a KF troll said.

Like I said, it is in response to discussions that I was already engaged in. Not out of the blue shit



just hire a lawyer

This is called a "just world bias".

You really should inform yourself on poverty in the USA. Not everyone can hire a lawyer. And I don't want to hear victim blaming like "it's that person's fault they are poor".

Secondly, I completely disagree with this thinking. People have rights because they are citizens, not because they are wealthy enough to buy a lawyer to assert those rights in court.

It's systematic oppression. You should NOT have to hire a lawyer to get your rights as a citizen. That is inherently WRONG

Anyway, when are you filling the Rule 19 motion?

Next week.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You're a lesbian?
Where do you get that idea?
I do not have a thing for Deadpool.
Almost every time you mention him it's within a sexual context. The next time I'm super bored I'll gather up all your creepy skeevy posts about him. You continually bring @Deadpool up, even though he rarely posts here anymore. It's ok if you are fixated, he's a wonderful, thoughtful man. I love him, so I understand if others do too.
Name one thing that I have spoken about that KF troll didn't bring up first. Go ahead, hypocrite.
No one asked you to publicly engage in relationship drama, or verbally abusing, even cursing your husband. Keep your dirty dishes in your sink, not all over your front lawn
 
(Firstly, my children and I are celebrating a holiday called Sukkot. We don't do heavy work for 8 days. I have a little more free time this week. Secondly, my infant is going through a growth spurt and she is nursing the heck off of me and I have been sucking my tits at the computer a little bit more the last few days writing papers and taking frequent breaks in between writing.)

That aside, let's tackle the real issue here.

Patriarchy is, at it's core, Narcissism. It is predicated on the belief that men are entitled to power, extra marital sex affairs, and resources simply because they were born with a dick.

Here are all some of the attributes of Narcissism that correlate with the core of what Patriarchy is:

  • feelings of grandiosity (Men believe they are superior to women)
  • search for narcissistic supply (men believe they are entitled to emotional and sexual encounters with other people beside their wife)
  • gaslighting (men say they treat women as equals but they do not)
  • victim blaming (when men are caught cheating or committing a sin, they blame the wife instead of taking responsibility for their actions)
  • emotional witholding/stonewalling (when men in Patriarchy are confronted by their wives they say "stop nagging me"/ common misuse of a common Bible verse)
  • invalidation (in Patriarchy men dismiss women as "irrational", "emotional" people)
  • scapegoating (in Patriarchy men blame women for the ills of the world/"Eve did it")
  • Discard (in Patriarchy older women are discarded)
  • Dehumanization (in Patriarchy women are treated like sexual objects but also told to sexually repress)
  • Touch deprivation/skin hunger (in Patriarchy men see a wife as an as object, they are told it's socially acceptable to be emotionally disabled) BOOOHOOO IM SO OPPRESSED. IM NOT A SUITABLE MATE FOR ANYONE BUT A RETARD.

fix'd.
 
My book was brought up by a KF troll

Allow me to respond to this one, the rest of it is self-serving bullshit. Almost from the very beginning, you have bragged that you're an author, that you were writing a book that would be a sure-fire bestseller, that your book would be widely available at retailers. Over and over and over you brought this up. You did, no one else. We laughed, of course. And then the day came when your book was revealed to the Farms. And all of your claims turned to ash. It turned out your book was more like a pamphlet, that your book was pay-to-publish, that you spent 4 figures on it, that the price set by the publisher was so laughably high that actually selling the book is nothing but a pipe dream. Which is their whole business model. They don't make money by selling these pay-to-publish books, they make money from getting the authors to pay them to publish in the first place.

And it was hilarious. I'll note that you don't bring up your book very much anymore. It's a lot harder to brag about being an author when anyone can see for themselves just how laughable your finished product really is.

I keep meaning to buy the book and do a true review. It shouldn't take long, it's only 84 pages IIRC. Anyone can read the first twenty or so pages for free on google. It's an easy read, very pedestrian writing. Freshman English Comp level.
 
Patriarchy is, at it's core, Narcissism. It is predicated on the belief that men are entitled to power, extra marital sex affairs, and resources simply because they were born with a dick.
Patriarchy totally exists. That's why women win more divorce cases(in regards to keeping the child), why they can ruin lives of men with simple 3 words on twitter, why women can have rallies to celebrate them being born with a vagina, but men can't, more paid leave from work, etc. Yes, being a women must be tough. Too many priviledges to keep track off.
feelings of grandiosity
No they don't. But looking at recent feminism changes, women sure do.
search for narcissistic supply (men believe they are entitled to emotional and sexual encounters with other people beside their wife)
So do women.
gaslighting (men say they treat women as equals but they do not)
They do treat them as equals though. They arguably even treat them better than males even.
when men are caught cheating or committing a sin, they blame the wife
Literally never happened, unless the man has some sort mental dissability(or unless we are talking about middle ages or what not)
"stop nagging me"
Suprisingly women do that too. And what if the wife is "nagging" him too much? Must he answer the same way to make her displeased too?
Patriarchy men dismiss women as "irrational", "emotional" people
It's called science. Women tend to be more emotional then men.
"Eve did it")
I mean, she quite literally was the cause of human kind's banishment from heaven, but okay.
Patriarchy men blame women for the ills of the world
Citacion needed
Patriarchy older women are discarded
In what way?
Patriarchy women are treated like sexual objects
You clearly have never heard of fangirls. Their existance makes this sentance hypocricy.
told to sexually repress
Don't follow the religion which tells you things you don't like then.
in Patriarchy men see a wife as an as object, they are told it's socially acceptable to be emotionally disabled
Citacion needed
This is called a "just world bias".
No, it's called taking logical action to make sure your lawsuit won't be so easily dismissed
You really should inform yourself on poverty in the USA. Not everyone can hire a lawyer.
If you really have a good case, you'll find a lawyer who will do it pro bono. Alternativly GFM, and sites like that exist. Akilah used GFM to get money to pay off all her legal fees to Sargon, and she made quite a bit of profit too.
And I don't want to hear victim blaming like "it's that person's fault they are poor".
It kinda is their fault though. Get more than one job. Don't have more kids than you can financially support, save up money, don't spend it on junkfood, ect. In most cases, it's just people not willing to put in work and accept responcibility.
Secondly, I completely disagree with this thinking. People have rights because they are citizens, not because they are wealthy enough to buy a lawyer to assert those rights in court.
Nobody is taking away your rights. But it is a fact that pro se litigants almost always fail.
It's systematic oppression. You should NOT have to hire a lawyer to get your rights as a citizen. That is inherently WRONG
How has pro se filling been treating ya? 5 suits, 5 losses? Yeah, that's why you get a lawyer.
Next week.
I'll eagerly await

Which is their whole business model. They don't make money by selling these pay-to-publish books, they make money from getting the authors to pay them to publish in the first place.
Why didn't she just put it up on amazon as a kindle version? They host for free, as I understand, and they only take 30-40% from a sale. Even Russell realised this was better than traditional publishing if you are poor.
 
Last edited:
You think this is my private life?

Name one thing that I have spoken about that KF troll didn't bring up first. Go ahead, hypocrite.






I disagree with this mentality.

Henry David Thoreau, the wise and intelligent philosopher, was thrown in jail because he refused to pay taxes on the grounds of moral principle.

It is better to stand up to the powers that be and not get the desired outcome than stand their like a coward and a pacifist saying nothing.





Quit trying to hide Hebrew words with a KJV translation








People don't change these attributes. Who people are as children is who they grow up to be.






You're a lesbian?

I do not have a thing for Deadpool.







This sort of stuff doesn't humiliate me.

What humiliates me is when in in the grocery store and my preschool age son acts in a grocery store check out line 😳






Marshall. But I liked it. He was the first guy that I let do that too because he worked my emotional guard down to feel safe doing it.

Buy I made him wear a condom though because I'm concerned about bacteria and germs. Can pass to other parts of my body if he slips back in my vagina

We did it in the shower too though without a condom because soap and water was right there.





Reason I asked you was because I've never seen a study demonstrating that most men historically and today give birth without a midwife. The number of UC births is very very low
I would think that most men that give birth do it at the hospital. I'd be shocked if any man gave birth outside of a hospital setting.
 
(Firstly, my children and I are celebrating a holiday called Sukkot. We don't do heavy work for 8 days. I have a little more free time this week. Secondly, my infant is going through a growth spurt and she is nursing the heck off of me and I have been at the computer a little bit more the last few days writing papers and taking frequent breaks in between writing.)

That aside, let's tackle the real issue here.

Patriarchy is, at it's core, Narcissism. It is predicated on the belief that men are entitled to power, extra marital sex affairs, and resources simply because they were born with a dick.

Here are all some of the attributes of Narcissism that correlate with the core of what Patriarchy is:

  • feelings of grandiosity (Men believe they are superior to women)
  • search for narcissistic supply (men believe they are entitled to emotional and sexual encounters with other people beside their wife)
  • gaslighting (men say they treat women as equals but they do not)
  • victim blaming (when men are caught cheating or committing a sin, they blame the wife instead of taking responsibility for their actions)
  • emotional witholding/stonewalling (when men in Patriarchy are confronted by their wives they say "stop nagging me"/ common misuse of a common Bible verse)
  • invalidation (in Patriarchy men dismiss women as "irrational", "emotional" people)
  • scapegoating (in Patriarchy men blame women for the ills of the world/"Eve did it")
  • Discard (in Patriarchy older women are discarded)
  • Dehumanization (in Patriarchy women are treated like sexual objects but also told to sexually repress)
  • Touch deprivation/skin hunger (in Patriarchy men see a wife as an as object, they are told it's socially acceptable to be emotionally disabled)





I disagree.

  • KF brought up my relationship with Marshall. You didn't have to respond to things I said TO HIM on here. Like you all say, you could have just scrolled on by and not asked more questions
  • The history of me demonstrating strong intellectual capabilities was relevant to what was being discussed, prompted by a KF troll, not me
  • My children flipping off the farms was a response to you all talking shit about them. You know, your hypocritical double standard of having empathy for children fleeing from wildfires, but then you talk shit about my children. UH HUH
  • My book was brought up by a KF troll
  • The information about my belated mom and ex-sister was prompted by something a KF troll said.

Like I said, it is in response to discussions that I was already engaged in. Not out of the blue shit





This is called a "just world bias".

You really should inform yourself on poverty in the USA. Not everyone can hire a lawyer. And I don't want to hear victim blaming like "it's that person's fault they are poor".

Secondly, I completely disagree with this thinking. People have rights because they are citizens, not because they are wealthy enough to buy a lawyer to assert those rights in court.

It's systematic oppression. You should NOT have to hire a lawyer to get your rights as a citizen. That is inherently WRONG






Next week.
Oh dear, I was specifically mentioning your break up. Kiwis made fun of your relationship, but you were the intial person to mention your break up with him here. Waaaaaay back in the thread. And then continued to mention every time you broke up or tried to divorce.

The rest of those seem to be in response to trolls. Don’t feed the trolls Mel. That’s how we get personal information. As for empathy towards your kids? Oh no, I’m not hypocritical. I previously said I don’t give a shit about the children affected by natural disasters nor your own children. I merely was making fun of you. Someone told you about all the kids affected by “your” doing and that you were celebrating deaths of children. You claimed you were not. We proved you wrong until you admitted some people like yourself and your kids are just born evil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viridian
(Firstly, my children and I are celebrating a holiday called Sukkot. We don't do heavy work for 8 days. I have a little more free time this week. Secondly, my infant is going through a growth spurt and she is nursing the heck off of me and I have been at the computer a little bit more the last few days writing papers and taking frequent breaks in between writing.)

That aside, let's tackle the real issue here.

Patriarchy is, at it's core, Narcissism. It is predicated on the belief that men are entitled to power, extra marital sex affairs, and resources simply because they were born with a dick.

Here are all some of the attributes of Narcissism that correlate with the core of what Patriarchy is:

  • feelings of grandiosity (Men believe they are superior to women)
  • search for narcissistic supply (men believe they are entitled to emotional and sexual encounters with other people beside their wife)
  • gaslighting (men say they treat women as equals but they do not)
  • victim blaming (when men are caught cheating or committing a sin, they blame the wife instead of taking responsibility for their actions)
  • emotional witholding/stonewalling (when men in Patriarchy are confronted by their wives they say "stop nagging me"/ common misuse of a common Bible verse)
  • invalidation (in Patriarchy men dismiss women as "irrational", "emotional" people)
  • scapegoating (in Patriarchy men blame women for the ills of the world/"Eve did it")
  • Discard (in Patriarchy older women are discarded)
  • Dehumanization (in Patriarchy women are treated like sexual objects but also told to sexually repress)
  • Touch deprivation/skin hunger (in Patriarchy men see a wife as an as object, they are told it's socially acceptable to be emotionally disabled)





I disagree.

  • KF brought up my relationship with Marshall. You didn't have to respond to things I said TO HIM on here. Like you all say, you could have just scrolled on by and not asked more questions
  • The history of me demonstrating strong intellectual capabilities was relevant to what was being discussed, prompted by a KF troll, not me
  • My children flipping off the farms was a response to you all talking shit about them. You know, your hypocritical double standard of having empathy for children fleeing from wildfires, but then you talk shit about my children. UH HUH
  • My book was brought up by a KF troll
  • The information about my belated mom and ex-sister was prompted by something a KF troll said.

Like I said, it is in response to discussions that I was already engaged in. Not out of the blue shit





This is called a "just world bias".

You really should inform yourself on poverty in the USA. Not everyone can hire a lawyer. And I don't want to hear victim blaming like "it's that person's fault they are poor".

Secondly, I completely disagree with this thinking. People have rights because they are citizens, not because they are wealthy enough to buy a lawyer to assert those rights in court.

It's systematic oppression. You should NOT have to hire a lawyer to get your rights as a citizen. That is inherently WRONG






Next week.
As a fellow racist, you don't really get to say that you're being discriminated against if you're being discriminatory
 
Back