New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

Couple stories on the New York Post

FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-40-48.png


Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-49-19.png
 
Last edited:
If it isn't concrete proof of corruption tied specifically to Joe and other higher ups people will be able to let Joe and the DNC off the hook with a myriad of excuses. Nothing else will break that delusion bubble, even if proof of a cover up exists.

People can justify a cover up, they cannot justify corruption.

It’s totally possible I’m just projecting, but I assume every politician is on the take, but not covering up a child rape.

I mean, well... not directly covering one up.


ETA: Trump doesn’t need to knock much loose for this to be a done deal.
 
Root is on the Cunnniham show now, and he keeps referencing the highest ranking Republican in the country.... That'd be Grassley? Followed by McConnell...

Whoo boy.
The highest ranking Republican in the country is the ghost of Abraham Lincoln.

Get HankCo. Detective Agency in on this.
 
If I had told you the country would be paralyzed from a slightly stronger than normal flu or that the country would be burning because some druggie died of neon neck, would you have believed me?

Welcome to 2020, where the clown world has merged with the real world.

Kek rides the Winds of the Chaos. Praise him and despair.

Praise Kek. Praise Chaos. Praise 2020. This fucking year is something else. Love it.

Ever have a phrase pop into your head and not leave, like a song?

"Nothing is true, everything is permitted"; has been bugging me for the past 5 years or so.

Now I know why.
 
What I really would like to know is.... where's Hunter, now?

Or has he already done the honorable thing and given himself a hot shot? If he wasn't before, he'd better be concerned every time he cops a bag; that's how junkies who snitch or get their dealers busted for being sloppy are dealt with.
 
What I really would like to know is.... where's Hunter, now?

Or has he already done the honorable thing and given himself a hot shot? If he wasn't before, he'd better be concerned every time he cops a bag; that's how junkies who snitch or get their dealers busted for being sloppy are dealt with.
"Hunter Biden was found dead this morning. Authorities believe the death to be a suicide by throwing himself down the stairs. The five gunshots to the back and hand grenade at the foot of the stairs are believed to not be related."
 
I'm gonna call BS, why wouldn't he just do that right away?
Trying to bait out an outright denial from the Biden campaign perhaps? According to Bannon, the NY Post had the metadata when they published the story.

Mr. Bannon: Rupert Murdoch’s team at the NY Post is as sophisticated and tough as there is in all media. They had the metadata and they signed off to go forward. The Russia excuse — and it is an excuse — collapsed when Fox verified the information with someone on the email chain. The Biden campaign has yet to say these emails or photos are not real. The reason? Hunter’s lawyer sent emails trying to recover the hard drive. These are real — the Bidens know they are real — and they are going to have to deal with that reality.

The fact that Biden's campaign still hasn't contested the emails' authenticity, and are now going into PR lockdown until the Thursday debate, makes me lean pretty strongly towards believing that the emails are authentic.
 
I'm gonna call BS, why wouldn't he just do that right away?

Lets say I accuse you of something. like you post on Kiwi farms and said something.

First you say you dont have a account.

I then prove you have an account.

Then you admit you have an account but you dont post.

I then prove you post here.

Then you say while I might have an account and I might post that one damming message is fake.

I then prove or have null prove its real

Then you say you must have been hacked and no nothing about it.

Basically why does you story keep chaning? it proves you a lair. and makes it harder for you to spin.

Also if the stuff is a hoax biden can sue the shit out of the new york post. But the counter suit would open biden up to discovery something they really dont want.
 
Lets say I accuse you of something. like you post on Kiwi farms and said something.

But what if Biden and the MSM just don't say anything? Like, they totally refuse to cover the topic, even if Giuliani stands in Times Square buck naked with a sandwich board saying "ASK ME ABOUT KETCHUP"? Then you've lost the week or so of coverage you could have gotten via the non-mainstream media about proofs of the emails' legitimacy. Admittedly I don't know much about timing media cycles.
 
Since all of social media were trying to DFE by deleting anything and everything related to the initial Biden leaks, people are speculating whether this will lead to 230 being repealed or restricted, leading to sites like KF being left to the wolves. It won't, just like how Net Neutrality ending didn't make people pay extra to access certain sites (like a cable/SAT package subscription), and how Article 13 didn't prosecute people for making/posting memes with copyrighted content.

Null worries about these things, and he certainly isn't wrong in doing so, but I sincerely doubt Twitter and Facebook will be nuked by Trump, nor do I think that the government will suddenly strip sites like KF of freedom of speech rights or take them down. Dorsey and Zuckerberg aren't saints, but they're also much lower on the totem pole. Trump would rather have Pelosi and Schumer grilled at a hearing than those two dweebs. They're just the catalyst for data-mining and disinformation campaigns, but without them, nothing changes. Another lapdog will take their place and do exactly the same, if not worse things in order to save face.

Trump fucks over his own online supporters if the changes aren't narrowed down to sites above an X million user threshold to differentiate big tech from little tech, small start-ups are also the main argument used against touching section 230.

I think it's inevitable that a user threshold will be worked in that excludes stuff like KF or that the_donald refugee site, it's the path of least resistance and Reps have no incentive to even fight that battle.
 
I hope this doesn't panic anyone important and cause them to think that making a big distraction is a good idea. I don't like the kinds of things that happen when certian people want to keep other things out of the headlines.
They already did right when this started and Big Tech decided to censor everything and make the story about Big Tech censorship instead of all the evidence linking Biden to corruption and federal crimes and his junkie son to both corruption and probably child rape. Right now they have to hope for a bigger story to come up and there isn't one without making one (be it more Big Tech censorship, an Arkansas-related suicide, or a false flag shooting done by a "white supremacist"). Trump getting the Chinavirus when he did was a godsend.
 
But what if Biden and the MSM just don't say anything? Like, they totally refuse to cover the topic, even if Giuliani stands in Times Square buck naked with a sandwich board saying "ASK ME ABOUT KETCHUP"? Then you've lost the week or so of coverage you could have gotten via the non-mainstream media about proofs of the emails' legitimacy. Admittedly I don't know much about timing media cycles.
It's harder to memory hole when there are new leaks popping up. Biden can say "lol debunked" and the public will forget but if there is something new for the rare reporter with balls to hound him about it will stay in the public consciousness. People that forgot will remember, and people that weren't aware will find out.
 
Ill take the hit, what happened with Ant? I thought it was a legit leak, if it wasnt wouldn't Jon Stewart have gone harder on the left?
The NY Post is actually the very same paper that broke that story, but interestingly, they'd been seeding that one for months prior to the big accusation. What made the whole thing suspect isn't that they had him dead to rights - that was expected, the Post is kind of old hat at this thing - it's that the initial leaks started to happen after Weiner put up the Honest Services Restoration Act.

It died in committee, but the bill was basically an attempt to crack down on financial malfeasance (bribery and such) by mandating that if an elected official had financial ties or familial ties to a given subject, they were mandated to disclose it or face strict penalties. At the time the scandal first started to surface, Weiner was in the process of trying to secure bipartisan support for it. Bam, cue scandal.

General belief among a lot of his staff at the time was that his sexts were leaked by the DNC (who largely opposed the legislation) to the Post (who would publish them) to make an example of him.
 
Back