Omit sarcasm, and times when I was using you technique of "misinformation."
Firstly, my technique of using "misinformation" does not involve trying to manipulate someone after making death threats to them. That you would even try to compare my technique of using "misinformation" for the purposes of protecting myself to your behavior of manipulating your way out of legal accountability for making death threats against me speaks volumes about just how corrupt you are.
You know what you said. I'm not going to play manipulation games with you. You want to be "Ms. Honest", post the fucking screenshots yourself.
She can't even acknowledge losing her lawsuits, they're all successes because she's "learned" something. As if filing false and frivolous lawsuits is really the proper way and the proper venue for learning law.
What the hell do you think lawyers who graduate law school do? Go out and file a bunch of lawsuits they win?
No, they either join a firm with people more experienced and learn how to apply their knowledge under mentors. Or they open their own practice and lose a bunch of times until they learn the process better.
You do realize that in every case either the Plaintiff
or the Defendant gets a judgment in their favor? So for every lawsuit out there with no pro-se litigants there is a lawyer who doesn't get a judgment in their favor.
Ah yes, the great Conspiracy Against Melinda. Are we still some Masonic entity or did you change it to something else? Because it makes far more sense that we all live in and/or are affiliated with Wise County, to do nothing but try to inconvience Melinda. Instead of just, you know, a bunch of autists coming together to laugh at some retard online. That's the whole reason the Farms were created. CWC who? Nah. It's all about Melly, because she is just so sooper dooper speshul. Have you told your therapist about these beliefs that the nefarious Wise County (Yes, THE Wise County) and that dastardly Joshua Connor Moon all got together in their little Masonic meetings and conspired on how to inconvenience Melinda? I'm sure they will totally agree with you.
Yes, I believe you all are Free Masons.
How do you consolidate your relationship with Marshall with that idea
In The Hebrew Bible the person who sins is the one who absorbs the guilt and blame for their sin. The person who was sinned against (victim) does not absorb the guilt and blame of the Sinner.
This is a big split in Goy and Hebrew thinking:
Goy thinking: Break up are always both people's fault
Hebrew thinking: The person who commits the sin in the relationship is to blame
Goy thinking: The victim of sin absorbs the guilt and blame of the Sinner
Hebrew thinking: The Sinner absorbs all the guilt and blame of his or her own sin
Goy thinking: Other people can make you sin
Hebrew thinking: Everyone is accountable for their own actions
Marshall is the one who committed the sin. That's why he can't issue me a divorce GET. What's he going to say against me? Whereas I on the other hand have plenty of reason to issue him a GET.
as well as how the lawsuits have been going?
Lawsuits are secular matters that involve other people
You can be TAMIYM and not prevail in secular lawsuits. The Torah does not promise legal victories as part of the blessings of The Torah.
Mostly because being TAMIYM relates to your own person choices. No one can control another human being (and shouldn't try). I can't control what judges and lawyers do. But their choices do not detract from my ability to be TAMIYM.
Were none of these choices wrong or are you merely speaking morally, rather than from an objective / success oriented viewpoint?
I don't believe my decision to marry Marshall was wrong. He came to me in the name of YHWH. He used the name of YHWH to gain my trust. Once he invoked the name of YHWH, he has a duty to treat me according to The Torah.
However, I also digress. There are evil Israelites who use the name of YHWH. But how to steer 100% clear of them is still something I am pondering. Is it possible that we just have to accept the fact that we can never 100% protect ourselves from the evil of others? Is it possible that we just have to accept that any time we intertwine our life intimately with another human being that we expose ourselves to the possibility of injury?
I don't think there is any 100% fail proof way to protect yourself from the evil of others. Psychology says you are to look for "Red flags" but then it also says "nobody is perfect". This is a moral contradiction in Psychology. If "no one is perfect" than they are saying you have to accept a certain degree of evil in everyone. But then when that evil affects a Victim they go and blame the victim for not spotting "red flags". So, in essence, this becomes a "just world bias". I think people just want to blame themselves to feel more in control when others hurt them/injure the. But I think the real truth is you can never 100% protect yourself from all evil
What I'm trying to clarify - are you saying you can do no wrong (no act perpetuated by you can be morally reprehensible/bad by default) or you can make no mistakes (nothing you do is ever a failed attempt)?
To me, TAMIYM means I do not make any
morally wrong choices. Each action I do toward others is morally correct, all the time, every day, consistently. I am incapable of sinning now because I have spiritually evolved past the point of being a sinner.
As a human, I am still capable of errors like grammar mistakes, misplacing my keys, paying a bill late because I forgot, overlooking some legal detail that results in a dismissal of my pleadings.
"Mistakes" v. "sin"