2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Every time I see Brian Williams I can't help but think back to this. Lena Dunham knew that Brian would always come to watch the season premiere so she put in a scene where his daughter got her ass eaten out to fuck with him and her to express her dominance and basically dare anyone else to call it out for what it was.

https://www.vulture.com/2015/01/girls-sex-scene-marnie-butt-rimjob.html
https://archive.vn/SC3Hw



What lovely people.



Agreed. The best way to play it at this point is to dare the media to mute him. If they do it makes them look bad, if they don't he gets to make his case. It's a win/win. And, presumably, all the tech companies know that if they mute him and he wins there's going to be a bill to strip them all of their CDA§230 protections post-election.

Also, I don't know why Null is so worried about this. Any reform to CDA§230 is going to be 'You get it unless you're Twitter/Facebook/Google in which case enjoy getting bankrupted by lawsuits'. It doesn't take a genius to come up with some conditions that would fuck big tech and not affect anyone else. Just like the SESTA/FOSTA fucked Backpage and didn't affect anyone else.

Dunham literally has a cow thread on here, she's been widely known as gross since before the political situation got this bad.
 
Any reform to CDA§230 is going to be 'You get it unless you're Twitter/Facebook/Google in which case enjoy getting bankrupted by lawsuits'. It doesn't take a genius to come up with some conditions that would fuck big tech and not affect anyone else. Just like the SESTA/FOSTA fucked Backpage and didn't affect anyone else.
Unless Kiwi Farms ever got to be the size of Twitter and Facebook, in which case the country would have much bigger problems than Section 230.
 
Professional predictor Allan Lichtman and his 13 keys havr declared a winner. Why even have an election?


Notice how the video starts off okay but then dives into TDS and SJW faggotry headfirst.

Lichtman can shove those 13 keys up his ass.
 
Unless Kiwi Farms ever got to be the size of Twitter and Facebook, in which case the country would have much bigger problems than Section 230.

Yeah, I was thinking about this. It needs to be done like the anti-trust action against Microsoft. The rule should be like this

1) If you're small you can do what you like and you still get §230 protection
2) If you're large you can too unless a court case labels you an abusive monopoly
3) If you're an abusive monopoly you must act as a common carrier. A government regulator will hagride you with brutal statist oppression to try to catch you breaking the rules and if you do you lose §230. They'll subpoena your DMs and check them for wrongthink like they're the fucking Gestapo or some shit.

Incidentally, this set of rules applies to a lot of things. E.g. it's OK for a Mom and Pop store to discriminate against customers for any reason or no reason at all. If every store in the area decides to discriminate for one specific reason or if a monopoly does so that is not OK. The reason anti-monopoly legislation is called 'antitrust' is that a trust is an example of a group of businesses that collectively have a monopoly deciding to act in a way that is counter to consumer interests. Even Adam Smith was aware of this possibility.

So the baker in the case of the gay cake can decline customers for being gay because other stores will accept them. It's not OK for all stores in the area to agree to discriminate and it's not OK for a company with a monopoly to do so and the government is justified in intervening in that case. I'm not going to mention the most obvious US example of this because I don't want to alienate the 1488 crowd having already alienated the lolbertarian crowd.
 
Last edited:
Professional predictor Allan Lichtman and his 13 keys havr declared a winner. Why even have an election?
View attachment 1674495

Notice how the video starts off okay but then dives into TDS and SJW faggotry headfirst.

Lichtman can shove those 13 keys up his ass.
Yeah also even with his 13 keys it makes no sense because two of his keys he didn’t give Trump because of things that were the fault of Covid, downplaying Trump’s foreign policy actions, and underestimating Trump’s charisma (saying it only appeals to a limited range)
 
Yeah also even with his 13 keys it makes no sense because two of his keys he didn’t give Trump because of things that were the fault of Covid, downplaying Trump’s foreign policy actions, and underestimating Trump’s charisma (saying it only appeals to a limited range)
It kinda exposes the 13 keys for what they are, unscientific and subjective. They're always right because you can look at past elections and force them to fit. It has limited, if any, predictive power.
 
Yeah, I was thinking about this. It needs to be done like the anti-trust action against Microsoft. The rule should be like this

1) If you're small you can do what you like and you still get §230 protection
2) If you're large you can too unless a court case labels you an abusive monopoly
3) If you're an abusive monopoly you must act as a common carrier. A government regulator will hagride you to try to catch you breaking the rules and if you do you lose §230.

Incidentally, this set of rules applies to a lot of things. E.g. it's OK for a Mom and Pop store to discriminate against customers for any reason or no reason at all. If every store in the area decides to discriminate for one specific reason or if a monopoly does so that is not OK. The reason anti-monopoly legislation is called 'antitrust' is that a trust is an example of a group of businesses that collectively have a monopoly deciding to act in a way that is counter to consumer interests. Even Adam Smith was aware of this possibility.

So the baker in the case of the gay cake can decline customers for being gay because other stores will accept them. It's not OK for all stores in the area to agree to discriminate and it's not OK for a company with a monopoly to do so and the government is justified in intervening in that case. I'm not going to mention the most obvious US example of this because I don't want to alienate the 1488 crowd having already alienated the lolbertarian crowd.

I don't think there are many libertarians here. People were mocking the libertarian party a few pages back.
 
I don't think there are many libertarians here. People were mocking the libertarian party a few pages back.
There are different strands of lolbert. There are the Styx and Youngrippa59 types and then there are corporate types like Gary Johnson and Jojo and then there are the retards that want to sell drugs to minors.
 
I don't think there are many libertarians here. People were mocking the libertarian party a few pages back.
There are different strands of lolbert. There are the Styx and Youngrippa59 types and then there are corporate types like Gary Johnson and Jojo and then there are the retards that want to sell drugs to minors.
"If you ask a thousand libertarians what libertarianism means, you'll get a thousand different answers".
 
If I was Biden I would just bring up that whole Charity scam they where running.
He'll probably bring up at least one of the lesser known Trump scandals. The problem he'll have is that the more "real" Trump scandals are more mundane than being an agent of Putin or secret Hitler. My bets on the ol' Charlottesville dead horse getting brought up by the moderator/Biden to distract, it would be pretty funny if Trump brings up Richard Spencer's endorsement of Biden in response.
 
it would be pretty funny if Trump brings up Richard Spencer's endorsement of Biden in response.

Richard Spencer finally useful for something in his life? I'll believe it when I say it. I remember after the "Hail Trump! Hail Victory! Hail our People" clip someone did a fake Trump Tweet: 'Dopey Richard Spencer ruins his career because can't stop LARPing for five minutes. Sad"

<esprit d'escalier>
Incidentally, if you're trying to justify my scheme to a leftist then just describe monopolies and trusts as having 'institutional power' and said that racism and sexism are only bad when they are backed by institutional power. So Twitter has it and the baker in the gay wedding case did not. Evil Southern Democrats implementing legal segregation pre Civil Rights had it but some Alt-Right podcaster saying the N-word or making cookie jokes today do not. Kind of interesting that this is the case. It's like the principle isn't wrong they're just applying it in a very dishonest way. They portray woke Silicon Valley companies and MSM journos as being powerless and someone like Alex McNabb (archive) as powerful even though this is the exact opposite of the truth. If they were honest they'd admit the opposite is the case and what happened to McNabb should have happened to those woke companies instead.
</esprit d'escalier>
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
If there are any libertarians left, please identify yourself so we can continue to bully you mercilessly.
Forever relevant:

47zlclwbrnf21.jpg
 
There are different strands of lolbert. There are the Styx and Youngrippa59 types and then there are corporate types like Gary Johnson and Jojo and then there are the retards that want to sell drugs to minors.
There is nothing wrong with selling drugs to minors. It gives them a hands on lesson in impulse control
 
There is nothing wrong with selling drugs to minors. It gives them a hands on lesson in impulse control

Funny thing is, I'd agree with that if you said 'students'. Most people will smoke a bit of pot, stop, and be fine. A minority will end up wrecking themselves on the hard stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EmuWarsVeteran
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back