Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Chariot Of Mara]

I'm not going to respond to the components of your post because you merely repeated your assertions. You neither responded to what I posted nor did you advance your argument beyond your initial poorly supported claims.

Your claim is that Tora and CD contain or embody the notion of "gender equality". You have failed to demonstrate that this is the case. You repeatedly assert that commandments about ancient weights and measures support your position. You merely repeat this assertion as if the mere act of repetition will eventually persuade. There is neither scholarly support for your claim nor have you been able to support it on your own.

Even worse for you is that your contention is anachronistic and Eurocentric. You exhibit a complete ignorance of intellectual history. First-wave feminism grew out of classical liberalism which grew out of the European Age of Enlightenment in the 17th-18th centuries. There never was any such intellectual movement in the Near East and there still isn't today in numerous countries in that region. The Near East didn't produce the idea of sexual egalitarianism and it never could have. Lebanon and Israel are the only two democracies in the region and many of the countries of that region are ranked amongst the worst of the Global Gender Gap 2020 (http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf). Israel is the only standout of the region and was built on and is maintained by the principles of liberal democracy not Torah.

Your attempt to find and/or insert a political ideology that originated in the 1960s in the USA, namely second-wave feminism, into an ancient Semitic culture is ridiculous. It shows that you understand neither 20th-century US political history nor ancient Near-East anthropology.

But your claim has a fatal flaw that renders it stillborn. The claim that Torah dictates a sexually egalitarian society has repercussions which have not occurred to you. Given that the early Israelites were patriarchal, this would have represented another instance of disobedience to Yahweh's commandments. It would have been the first act of disobedience. This would have resulted in their punishment and it would have produced another instructive and edifying story in the Tanakh for future generations. There is no such narrative in the Tanakh nor is there any historical record of ancient Israelite society transitioning from patriarchy to egalitarianism.

Lastly, your writing is not only devoid of intellect and learning you have no understanding of English grammar, you don't know the meaning of many words you use, you lack the vocabulary to clearly express your banal and demented thoughts and have zero intellectual integrity.

You repeatedly claim that you want to "debate". Before debate can occur dialogue must occur. Dialogue requires a common understanding of word meanings, spelling and grammar, and intellectual honesty. Your posting activity barely rises to the level of dialogue let alone debate. You do such things as redefine words, assert A when our eyes see it's not-A and exercise no interpretational charity.

Basic stuff:

goy = singular
goyim = plural

Not a proper noun so capitalise only if first word of a sentence

Apostrophe is not used to form plural; it denotes possession of the noun or abbreviation

"Narcissism" is not a proper noun so capitalise only if first word of a sentence

Bless. Prepare for incoming screeching worse than her previous post. I particularly enjoyed her hypocrisy

“You have to recognize me as a scholar because of my horrible articles. And you have to pay attention to them. But I can choose to ignore any other scholarly source you bring up just because I don’t want to listen.”

And I’m gonna let you in on a secret. Her college education was in “This is a tree.” No debates. Barely considered a higher level of learning. She’s calling you a chimney blowing words without meaning because she doesn’t comprehend a word you say. As said before. She no read the good. She’s going to come back and whine that KF isn’t worth typing correctly and her autocorrect keeps changing things mid sentence. Her deity has probably cursed her phone at the amount of consistent mistakes she makes.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

I'm not going to respond to the components of your post because you merely repeated your assertions. You neither responded to what I posted nor did you advance your argument beyond your initial poorly supported claims.

Your claim is that Tora and CD contain or embody the notion of "gender equality". You have failed to demonstrate that this is the case. You repeatedly assert that commandments about ancient weights and measures support your position. You merely repeat this assertion as if the mere act of repetition will eventually persuade. There is neither scholarly support for your claim nor have you been able to support it on your own.

Even worse for you is that your contention is anachronistic and Eurocentric. You exhibit a complete ignorance of intellectual history. First-wave feminism grew out of classical liberalism which grew out of the European Age of Enlightenment in the 17th-18th centuries. There never was any such intellectual movement in the Near East and there still isn't today in numerous countries in that region. The Near East didn't produce the idea of sexual egalitarianism and it never could have. Lebanon and Israel are the only two democracies in the region and many of the countries of that region are ranked amongst the worst of the Global Gender Gap 2020 (http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf). Israel is the only standout of the region and was built on and is maintained by the principles of liberal democracy not Torah.

Your attempt to find and/or insert a political ideology that originated in the 1960s in the USA, namely second-wave feminism, into an ancient Semitic culture is ridiculous. It shows that you understand neither 20th-century US political history nor ancient Near-East anthropology.

But your claim has a fatal flaw that renders it stillborn. The claim that Torah dictates a sexually egalitarian society has repercussions which have not occurred to you. Given that the early Israelites were patriarchal, this would have represented another instance of disobedience to Yahweh's commandments. It would have been the first act of disobedience. This would have resulted in their punishment and it would have produced another instructive and edifying story in the Tanakh for future generations. There is no such narrative in the Tanakh nor is there any historical record of ancient Israelite society transitioning from patriarchy to egalitarianism.

Lastly, your writing is not only devoid of intellect and learning you have no understanding of English grammar, you don't know the meaning of many words you use, you lack the vocabulary to clearly express your banal and demented thoughts and have zero intellectual integrity.

You repeatedly claim that you want to "debate". Before debate can occur dialogue must occur. Dialogue requires a common understanding of word meanings, spelling and grammar, and intellectual honesty. Your posting activity barely rises to the level of dialogue let alone debate. You do such things as redefine words, assert A when our eyes see it's not-A and exercise no interpretational charity.

Basic stuff:

goy = singular
goyim = plural

Not a proper noun so capitalise only if first word of a sentence

Apostrophe is not used to form plural; it denotes possession of the noun or abbreviation

"Narcissism" is not a proper noun so capitalise only if first word of a sentence

Semper-fucking-fi to you. That was well thought out, researched, and delivered.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

There is neither scholarly support for your claim

Yes, there is. But I'm not going to show you those until you demonstrate the understanding of logic, facts and reason

Your claim is that Tora and CD contain or embody the notion of "gender equality". You have failed to demonstrate that this is the case. You repeatedly assert that commandments about ancient weights and measures support your position. You merely repeat this assertion as if the mere act of repetition will eventually persuade. There is neither scholarly support for your claim nor have you been able to support it on your own.

Even worse for you is that your contention is anachronistic and Eurocentric. You exhibit a complete ignorance of intellectual history. First-wave feminism grew out of classical liberalism which grew out of the European Age of Enlightenment in the 17th-18th centuries. There never was any such intellectual movement in the Near East and there still isn't today in numerous countries in that region. The Near East didn't produce the idea of sexual egalitarianism and it never could have. Lebanon and Israel are the only two democracies in the region and many of the countries of that region are ranked amongst the worst of the Global Gender Gap 2020 (http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf). Israel is the only standout of the region and was built on and is maintained by the principles of liberal democracy not Torah.

Your attempt to find and/or insert a political ideology that originated in the 1960s in the USA, namely second-wave feminism, into an ancient Semitic culture is ridiculous. It shows that you understand neither 20th-century US political history nor ancient Near-East anthropology.

But your claim has a fatal flaw that renders it stillborn. The claim that Torah dictates a sexually egalitarian society has repercussions which have not occurred to you. Given that the early Israelites were patriarchal, this would have represented another instance of disobedience to Yahweh's commandments. It would have been the first act of disobedience. This would have resulted in their punishment and it would have produced another instructive and edifying story in the Tanakh for future generations. There is no such narrative in the Tanakh nor is there any historical record of ancient Israelite society transitioning from patriarchy to egalitarianism.

Lastly, your writing is not only devoid of intellect and learning you have no understanding of English grammar, you don't know the meaning of many words you use, you lack the vocabulary to clearly express your banal and demented thoughts and have zero intellectual integrity.

That's a whole bunch of words that add up to NOTHING

You blab a bunch of hypothesis without facts

There's no need for me do anything but reassert what I said because all you did was talk around the quote I gave in CD in a big circle

You presented no evidence whatsoever that the quote I gave in CD was anything other than what is said: EQUALLY

Go read the quote again

Narcissism" is not a proper noun so capitalise only if first word of a sentence

Incorrect.

A proper noun is a SPECIFIC person, place, thing or idea.

Basic stuff:

goy = singular
goyim = plural

Not a proper noun so capitalise only if first word of a sentence

Incorrect. It is a proper noun: a specific group of people.

The boy went to the Druids.

The boy went to the Goyim.

Apostrophe is not used to form plural; it denotes possession

Never said it did. I don't pay for editors. I publish content.

Most people grow and mature as they get older and experience what works and what doesn't, but unfortunately Mel is terrified on a kernel level of being wrong in any way, shape, or form, which naturally precludes a lot of character development.

She is developmentally trapped on that angsty, edgy, know it all teenage level.

This is super late, but I found it really telling about Melinda's emoji maturity. This concept that she is address I here is one most people figure out in highschool or college. Melinda has been through numerous committed relationships, many resulting in children, one consanguineous, although we don't yet know if that one involved commitment.
She's approaching middle age, and still asking "if I get involved, is it possible that I might get hurt?"
Umm yeah, that's kinda how it goes. Although at some point in adulthood it becomes a more calculated risk. Spending time with someone, seeing how they live their lives, treat others. For example I won't date a lousy tipper.
How can a mother of 6 be so emotionally retarded?

Nah, you're just sick fucks who believe that being evil is "normal". You're so morally depraved you can't even consider the idea of being TAMIYM

Does it bother you that no man will ever love you

Besides the fact that many of my exes did in fact love me, not that I care anymore, because I left them, due to the fact that they didn't know how to respect a woman, much like you sick Patriarchal fucks...

I've never once said on this thread that I am concerned I can't find another husband to share my life with.

I don't need a man's love to feel valuable and whole. A relative adds to me life, it isn't my entire essence. I love myself and that is the way to wholeness.

Oh I'm sorry. Big thoughts like that don't compute in your head eh?

Hey, @TamarYaelBatYah, are you aware that your thread title still lists you as a"couple" with Marshall, and that this thread is not in fact YOUR thread, but held in tandem with your former partner, and assumes that you espouse his views. Interesting word. Espouse.
I wonder if there is something you can do about the thread title, which includes your name, shows up in search engines, and let's anyone readings it believe that you are still a partner to Marshall. We all know that either you are legally married by the state of va, and are lying about being divorced, or, you lied about being legally married, and all you need to be divorced is to say so. So which is it?

I'm not diner about the title. My relationship with Marshall was a piece of my life and any new relationship I would start in the future would have to include an explanation of why I left Marshall. Ive never hid my past relationships with any of my exes. I tell the story, they get to hear it.

My biggest obstacle to moving on is not my name posted on the Internet with Marshall. It's Marshall himself. I have to make sure he doesn't snap on me/go in a rage/get super mad if he finds out later on I married someone else.

Right now he's in denial that I'm leaving him. He just gives me blank stares

 

[White Baby]

Yes, there is. But I'm not going to show you those until you demonstrate the understanding of logic, facts and reason


That's a whole bunch of words that add up to NOTHING

You blab a bunch of hypothesis without facts

There's no need for me do anything but reassert what I said because all you did was talk around the quote I gave in CD in a big circle

You presented no evidence whatsoever that the quote I gave in CD was anything other than what is said: EQUALLY

Go read the quote again







Incorrect.

A proper noun is a SPECIFIC person, place, thing or idea.






Incorrect. It is a proper noun: a specific group of people.

The boy went to the Druids.

The boy went to the Goyim.





Never said it did. I don't pay for editors. I publish content.







Nah, you're just sick fucks who believe that being evil is "normal". You're so morally depraved you can't even consider the idea of being TAMIYM




Besides the fact that many of my exes did in fact love me, not that I care anymore, because I left them, due to the fact that they didn't know how to respect a woman, much like you sick Patriarchal fucks...

I've never once said on this thread that I am concerned I can't find another husband to share my life with.

I don't need a man's love to feel valuable and whole. A relative adds to me life, it isn't my entire essence. I love myself and that is the way to wholeness.

Oh I'm sorry. Big thoughts like that don't compute in your head eh?






I'm not diner about the title. My relationship with Marshall was a piece of my life and any new relationship I would start in the future would have to include an explanation of why I left Marshall. Ive never hid my past relationships with any of my exes. I tell the story, they get to hear it.

My biggest obstacle to moving on is not my name posted on the Internet with Marshall. It's Marshall himself. I have to make sure he doesn't snap on me/go in a rage/get super mad if he finds out later on I married someone else.

Right now he's in denial that I'm leaving him. He just gives me blank stares

If this is how you treat someone with intelligent rebuttals to your arguments then I'm further convinced that any claim you make of being Totally Cited by actual scholars is a lie. You're not professional enough to work at a fucking McDonalds.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Yes, there is. But I'm not going to show you those until you demonstrate the understanding of logic, facts and reason

"I have proof. I'm not going to show you, but you should know that I have proof, and I'm not proving that I have proof."

 

[Spergichu]

Yes, there is. But I'm not going to show you those until you demonstrate the understanding of logic, facts and reason


That's a whole bunch of words that add up to NOTHING

You blab a bunch of hypothesis without facts

That's the Pot calling the Kettle black.

Besides the fact that many of my exes did in fact love me, not that I care anymore, because I left them, due to the fact that they didn't know how to respect a woman, much like you sick Patriarchal fucks...

I've never once said on this thread that I am concerned I can't find another husband to share my life with.

I don't need a man's love to feel valuable and whole. A relative adds to me life, it isn't my entire essence. I love myself and that is the way to wholeness.

Oh I'm sorry. Big thoughts like that don't compute in your head eh?

"NO NO THEY TOTALLY STILL LOVE ME AND I TURNED THEM DOWN! WHY WON'T YOU LISTEN STUPID GOY"

I'm not diner about the title. My relationship with Marshall was a piece of my life and any new relationship I would start in the future would have to include an explanation of why I left Marshall. Ive never hid my past relationships with any of my exes. I tell the story, they get to hear it.

My biggest obstacle to moving on is not my name posted on the Internet with Marshall. It's Marshall himself. I have to make sure he doesn't snap on me/go in a rage/get super mad if he finds out later on I married someone else.

Right now he's in denial that I'm leaving him. He just gives me blank stares

I'm sure this will end well for you and your children.

 

[Toasty]

My biggest obstacle to moving on is not my name posted on the Internet with Marshall. It's Marshall himself. I have to make sure he doesn't snap on me/go in a rage/get super mad if he finds out later on I married someone else.

Yeah, we all know how he treated your predecessor when she broke up with him. Destruction of property and physical assault. You have good reason to be concerned. I'd feel bad for you if you hadn't spent your entire time here defending his domestic violence.
You wondered earlier how to know that a potential partner wouldn't fail you. Looking critically at the breakdown if previous relationships is a good way.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

Yes, there is. But I'm not going to show you those until you demonstrate the understanding of logic, facts and reason


That's a whole bunch of words that add up to NOTHING

You blab a bunch of hypothesis without facts

There's no need for me do anything but reassert what I said because all you did was talk around the quote I gave in CD in a big circle

You presented no evidence whatsoever that the quote I gave in CD was anything other than what is said: EQUALLY

Go read the quote again







Incorrect.

A proper noun is a SPECIFIC person, place, thing or idea.






Incorrect. It is a proper noun: a specific group of people.

The boy went to the Druids.

The boy went to the Goyim.





Never said it did. I don't pay for editors. I publish content.







Nah, you're just sick fucks who believe that being evil is "normal". You're so morally depraved you can't even consider the idea of being TAMIYM




Besides the fact that many of my exes did in fact love me, not that I care anymore, because I left them, due to the fact that they didn't know how to respect a woman, much like you sick Patriarchal fucks...

I've never once said on this thread that I am concerned I can't find another husband to share my life with.

I don't need a man's love to feel valuable and whole. A relative adds to me life, it isn't my entire essence. I love myself and that is the way to wholeness.

Oh I'm sorry. Big thoughts like that don't compute in your head eh?






I'm not diner about the title. My relationship with Marshall was a piece of my life and any new relationship I would start in the future would have to include an explanation of why I left Marshall. Ive never hid my past relationships with any of my exes. I tell the story, they get to hear it.

My biggest obstacle to moving on is not my name posted on the Internet with Marshall. It's Marshall himself. I have to make sure he doesn't snap on me/go in a rage/get super mad if he finds out later on I married someone else.

Right now he's in denial that I'm leaving him. He just gives me blank stares

Have a seat. You got fucking owned.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Have a seat. You got fucking owned.

Not in the least bit. All he did was try to deflect from the sentence, grasping at straws.

And anyway, you have no education. Sit down and shut up

Yeah, we all know how he treated your predecessor when she broke up with him. Destruction of property and physical assault. You have good reason to be concerned. I'd feel bad for you if you hadn't spent your entire time here defending his domestic violence.
You wondered earlier how to know that a potential partner wouldn't fail you. Looking critically at the breakdown if previous relationships is a good way.

I don't feel pity for him yoking up a drug addicted crack head

And I don't need your pity either.

You're a Goy bitch

"I have proof. I'm not going to show you, but you should know that I have proof, and I'm not proving that I have proof."

He can't even handle one sentence correctly. When he can confront the quote I gave him we can proceed.

All he has done is try to deflect

He tried to deflect to marriage, a survey of other scholars and he even misquoted what fourth wave feminism is

He even tried to deny the Hebrew concordance words by repeating what I said. It was odd

When he's ready to actually confront the quote I gave him from CD we can move forward

If this is how you treat someone with intelligent rebuttals to your arguments then I'm further convinced that any claim you make of being Totally Cited by actual scholars is a lie. You're not professional enough to work at a fucking McDonalds.

You have absolutely ZERO college experience. You're a blind herd mentality bimbo who is easily duped.

There was nothing intelligent about his rebuttal

All he did was deflect from the quote I gave him

 

[Scarlett Johansson]

Hello Melinda. Do you like scary movies? Let's play a game

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

Not in the least bit. All he did was try to deflect from the sentence, grasping at straws.

And anyway, you have no education. Sit down and shut up

Where did I go to school? What kind of education do I have? You should probably not say shit you know nothing about. Oh wait. That’s your entire schtick here. Moron.

 

[White Baby]

You have absolutely ZERO college experience. You're a blind herd mentality bimbo who is easily duped.

There was nothing intelligent about his rebuttal

All he did was deflect from the quote I gave him

You're cute when you're proven wrong and humiliated in front of the entire website. If Marshall is reading this thread I wonder how he feels seeing you fumble every single point so spectacularly? Every single one of your replies, including your awful grammar, is the debate equivalent of this video. I'm tickled pink.

 

[Toasty]

I don't feel pity for him yoking up a drug addicted crack head

And what will you say when he yokes you up for not letting him go through your phone? Oh, wait, you won't. No speech without airflow when you are being choked. Tell me all about how spousal rape is peachy when he shows up uninvited, breaks your phone and yokes you up.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Here is the quote again. I don't want to hear deflection about another scholar. Don't want to hear a deflection to Wassen. Don't want to hear a deflection about the history of feminism. I don't want to hear a deflection about Tal Ilan being a second or third wave feminist

Confront the subject matter: the quote.

"The rule of incest is written for males but refers equally to women" (CD 5:9-11)

You're cute when you're proven wrong and humiliated in front of the entire website. If Marshall is reading this thread I wonder how he feels seeing you fumble every single point so spectacularly? Every single one of your replies, including your awful grammar, is the debate equivalent of this video. I'm tickled pink.

You're assuming Marshall would be agreeing with the other guy.

I don't really care either way. I don't care what Marshall believes. I've moved on.

Why are you so eager?

You seem awfully determined to try to score one against me for Marshall.
Oh wait, duh, you're the bimbo with the INTERNALIZED MISOGYNY. You go for points with the penis while trying to subvert another female. Typical Christian Goy that you are.

I saw you talking about Marshall's "cum" about 15 pages back, listing after him before we broke up. Typical Goy woman. Gotta latch on to an involved man huh? Emotional polygyny is your thing because you're sexist against your own gender.

You probably masturbated to Marshall's videos too

What sick fucks you Goy women are

 

[White Baby]

You're assuming Marshall would be agreeing with the other guy.

I don't really care either way. I don't care what Marshall believes. I've moved on.

Why are you so eager?

You seem awfully determined to try to score one against me for Marshall.
Oh wait, duh, you're the bimbo with the INTERNALIZED MISOGYNY. You go for points with the penis while trying to subvert another female. Typical Christian Goy that you are.

I saw you talking about Marshall's "cum" about 15 pages back, listing after him before we broke up. Typical Goy woman. Gotta latch on to an involved man huh? Emotional polygyny is your thing because you're sexist against your own gender.

You probably masturbated to Marshall's videos too

What sick fucks you Goy women are

I'm still as Jewish as the day is long and I've never watched a single one of either of your videos. Instead I've been sitting here giggling for the last five minutes picturing you in that black ice video I linked, falling over and over again and screaming "I DON'T NEED ANY HELP", while the neighbors look on in concern.

You are surprisingly jealous about Marshall "Smackin Bitches" Castersen for having broken up with him. Still got a torch for the wifebeater, huh? Why don't you just get it over with and get back with him already if the dick was so good?

Also, my comment was "wash Marshall's cum off of your fingers, you're gunking up your keyboard" or something to that effect. Have you even changed your filthy sheets yet or are you hanging on to that delicious spic bootyhole funk to remind you of the better days when you conceived Marshall "Smackin Bitches" Castersen's child?

"The rule of incest is written for males but refers equally to women" (CD 5:9-11)

What is the point of this? Yes, you have discovered the rules apply equally to both sexes. That doesn't automatically make the religion or the culture egalitarian. Are you that dumb? (Trick question, don't answer.)

 

[Toasty]

What sick fucks you Goy women are

At least we didn't brag about our anal sex adventures in the shower with a guy after we broke up.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You are surprisingly jealous about Marshall "Smackin Bitches" Castersen for having broken up with him. Still got a torch for the wifebeater, huh? Why don't you just get it over with and get back with him already if the dick was so good?

In order to be jealous, there has to be love. And since I fell out of love with him a long time ago, it's not jealousy that you are reading.

It's moral principle.

Also, my comment was "wash Marshall's cum off of your fingers,

Exactly. Why would be even thinking about his cum?

At least we didn't brag about our anal sex adventures in the shower with a guy after we broke up.

What bragging?.

That was d-e-s-c-r-i-b-ing. Nothing wrong with that. It's no mystery here that I've had sex before

What is the point of this? Yes, you have discovered the rules apply equally to both sexes. That doesn't automatically make the religion or the culture egalitarian.

Ok, just let the contradictory nature of what you just said sick in for a minute

 

[White Baby]

In order to be jealous, there has to be love. And since I fell out of love with him a long time ago, it's not jealousy that you are reading.

It's moral principle.

There is no moral principle involved in repeatedly accusing various people in the thread of being infatuated with your violent mandingo. You can say the sky is red all you like but the truth of the situation is very plain to anyone with eyes.

Exactly. Why would be even thinking about his cum?

Because it's funny, and you're a nymphomaniac and admitted kinkster who fucked her cousin, so of course you'd go around drenched in all manner of disgustitude. Unlike you, I have the good sense to not desire wifebeaters in any type of carnal way.

Ok, just let the contradictory nature of what you just said sick in for a minute

The ten commandments and some laws apply equally to both men and women in the Tanakh. That does not magically undo the other misogynistic aspects of Judaism or the ancient Hebrew and Israelite nations. Your insistence on absolutes is downright autistic and it's the reason why a dude named "CyrusKissFanClub" absolutely trounced you on a humble kiwis farming website.

 

[Toasty]

I think Marshall deserves a break. He moved all the way across the country thinking he was going to hook up with a righteous woman who could help educate him on the finer points of Torah. What he got was a perverse proponent of incest, who had only a fantasy of Torah in her mind that she decided was true. Can't blame the guy for being jaded and ignoring the impostor who abused his affections

 

[White Baby]

I think Marshall deserves a break. He moved all the way across the country thinking he was going to hook up with a righteous woman who could help educate him on the finer points of Torah. What he got was a perverse proponent of incest, who had only a fantasy of Torah in her mind that she decided was true. Can't blame the guy for being jaded and ignoring the impostor who abused his affections

On the other hand, considering that he was abusive, we might almost say it was... divine justice that he ended up with someone so awful.