Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[CatParty]

https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/21/newly-discovered-letter-shows-endocrine-society-urged-experimenting-on-trans-children/

In his recent townhall, presidential candidate Joe Biden endorsedexperimental, irreversible medical interventions for gender-confused eight-year-olds. His reflexive and indeed casual approval of medical child abuse illustrates how successful the transgender industry, including politicized elements of the medical profession, has been in obscuring the issues and normalizing the abnormal. A recently uncovered letter shows how the Endocrine Society (ES) in particular has deftly misrepresented scientific reality to advance the agenda of that lucrative and increasingly powerful industry.

Endocrinologists are experts in the function of hormones and therefore play a critical role in the industry’s “gender-affirming” medical model. Because sex is determined by chromosomes, imprinted during development, and unchangeable by hormones after the fact, actual sex change is impossible. So, this model employs experimental interventions to help children and adolescents look and sound more like the opposite sex. These “gender-affirming” medical interventions include powerful puberty-blocking drugs and wrong-sex hormones that can irreversibly damage a young patient’s body and future health.


Ethical physicians recoil from this model. They cite reliable research showing the interventions don’t solve gender-related distress and ultimately do more harm than good. To soothe their concerns and build a research base justifying the unjustifiable, the Endocrine Society has long been promoting federal funding for trans-industry “studies” that reach the opposite, politically correct conclusions.

California endocrinologist Dr. Michael Laidlaw has delved into the swamp of this politicized research to determine how the National Institutes of Health could have been persuaded to fund it. His efforts recently unearthed a 2013 Endocrine Society letter that combined scientific deception with political activism to overcome qualms about experimenting on gender-confused children.

The 2013 letter appeared over the signature of the Endocrine Society’s then-president Dr. Teresa Woodruff and was sent to NIH’s “LGBTI Research Coordinating Committee.” While the broader membership of Endocrine Society, which includes Laidlaw, was never notified of or asked to approve the letter, the letter urged more taxpayer funding for experimental interventions on trans-identifying patients, including children:

Systematic studies of pubertal suppression of children who express gender dissonance prior to onset of puberty are needed to assess the potential benefits and risks of preventing physical development contrary to the child’s perceived gender at puberty. … Research is required to develop appropriate pediatric formulations for hormone replacement therapy. … We recommend that appropriate financial resources be deployed to enable these [NIH] institutes to successfully implement the research plan on a long-term basis.

Perhaps anticipating the glaring ethical objections, the Endocrine Society obscured the issue by lumping together trans-identifying patients with individuals suffering from a physical medical condition called Disorders of Sexual Development (also sometimes known as “intersex”). The letter repeatedly called for more research into medical treatments for “transgender and intersex patients,” as though the two conditions are related and should both be subject to medical experimentation. In truth, gender dysphoria and DSD are wholly separate and unrelated.


There are no medical tests to diagnose trans-identification, more formally known as gender dysphoria. These patients have normal biological markers for their biological sex, such as chromosomes, anatomy, hormone levels, and other clear identifiers. Trans-identification is purely psychological — a “feeling” that he or she should be the opposite sex.

Disorders of Sexual Development conditions, however, are another thing entirely — cases of exceedingly rare, medically identifiable anomalies in which either the sexual anatomy is inconsistent with the chromosomal sex or is not male or female. This ambiguous anatomy — typically caused by genetic or chromosomal defects that lead to fetal hormone abnormalities during pregnancy — can result in a mistaken identification of sex at birth. Yet these anomalies are “medically identifiable deviations from the human binary sexual norm.” They do not constitute a “third sex.”

Even though trans-identification is psychological and DSD/intersex conditions are physical, the Endocrine Society repeatedly blurred the distinction in its 2013 letter. This deliberate confusion of psychological and physical conditions is central to the Endocrine Society’s radically unscientific denial that humans are either male or female. As stated in the letter in question:

A fundamental educational issue, particularly relevant to the healthcare needs of patients who have variations in sexual and reproductive development, is the entrenched view within society of the binary concept of gender.

This would supposedly be similar to the entrenched view within society that the earth orbits the sun. But Endocrine Society and colleagues on the medical left — the people whose every move is supposedly dictated by science — challenge entrenched views no matter how silly and dangerous the revisionist narratives are. With its deceptive presentation in the 2013 letter, the Endocrine Society helped prime the pump for acceptance of those narratives in federally funded research.


Laidlaw was alarmed, if not surprised, by this letter:

It is clear that the Endocrine Society, through its president, was conflating disorders of sexual development with gender dysphoria in part to grab more federal dollars for ethically questionable research … There are serious ethical considerations to giving kids powerful hormones that block normal puberty and, in combination with wrong-sex hormones, lead to sterility. Why was the membership not informed of this letter? Why can it not be found anywhere on their website?

Former Endocrine Society president Woodruff, who signed the letter, specializes in preserving fertility for patients who must undergo fertility-endangering cancer treatments. In recent years, she has branched out to offer similar options to trans-identifying patients, including minors, whose normal reproductive functions will be destroyed by the medical experimentation she and Endocrine Society endorsed in the letter. Fertility preservation would be unnecessary in this context, of course, if radical doctors kept their drugs, their hormones, and their scalpels off the bodies of mentally suffering children.

This story has an ironic footnote. Now dean of the graduate school at Northwestern University, Woodruff is under attack from “transgender and non-binary” students who accuse her of vaguely defined insensitivity and neglect. On cue, Woodruff has begged forgiveness, proclaiming, “I am hearing your critiques and I have an open mind to the critiques and I have an open heart to what I’m hearing and the pain, and I pledge to work with all of you on each of these issues.” The mob, however, remains unmollified. Indeed, in 2020, it’s impossible to be woke enough.

The Endocrine Society is giving it a try. With pseudo-scientific jargon, political dogma, and a healthy dose of deception, the Endocrine Society is conditioning society to accept — and taxpayers to fund — manifestly absurd things. Truth is no longer a universally accepted value even among physicians and scientists. Young patients, and indeed human society, will pay the price.

 

[OttoWest]

And you know this whole tranny killing epidemic we have? 33 fucking trannies have been killed this year. Yes, 33!!

A quick look at the HRC numbers and there’ve been only 26 murders in the US this year— they’re lumping in Puerto Rico with their seven homicides to skew the numbers.

There’s also the fact they include “gender nonconforming” people under the murdered troon umbrella, such as Summer Taylor.



Except Taylor wasn’t even murdered. Taylor was the idiot killed after being hit by a car while protesting at night on the Seattle interstate. Taylor was a conventional dangerhaired white girl yet now she gets put in with impoverished crossdressing black men as a death stat because of her trendy enby label.

Then you have Brian “Egypt” Powers. According to the HRC, “Brian identified as transgender but continued to use he/him pronouns and his birth name.” So a regular ol’ cis man. Brian’s family even made t-shirts emblazoned with “Say His Name” to protest the lack of progress in his murder case. But no, Brian can’t simply be a gay or effeminate male murder victim— gotta rack up that count by transing after death.

Natoysha “Tony” McDade, who suicided by cop this past summer after stabbing a man to death, was a butch lesbian. McDade was another person transed after death. On a facebook post discussing her death, neighbors, friends, and family refer to Natiysha as “she” which lead to the hilarious exchange:


As usual I’ll do the numbers at the end of the year, but just from the above the HRC is getting more and more lax in its definitions in order to get the highest body count possible. 33+ would be a records for them (the number usually is in the mid to high 20s) so they’re going to milk every possible LGBT murder so 2020 can get that high score, sick fucks.

 

[SilkGnut]

If nothing else watching the push for more trannies continue mostly unimpeded is fascinating to watch.

It gives a unique (though horrifying) perspective in to how modern society works and what it values.

 

[ChaChaHeels:BlackOnes]

If they can put any vaguely GNC or danger haired LGBT person in their trans murder victim statistics, then we can put any vaguely cross dressed or knicker-wanking fetishist in our trans murderer statistics, right?

Because our list will be *very* long.

 

[muh_moobs]

Aren't gas chambers a cheaper solution?

 

[Positron]

Michael Laidlaw is my hero. We need more doctors like him to speak against this consumerist, irrational, anti-biological turn of Medicine.

 

[Battlecruiser3000ad]

If only J. Mengele was born 100 years later, he wouldn't need to hide at all.

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

Dr. Teresa Woodruff, endocrinotomist

 

[round robin]

If they can put any vaguely GNC or danger haired LGBT person in their trans murder victim statistics, then we can put any vaguely cross dressed or knicker-wanking fetishist in our trans murderer statistics, right?

Because our list will be *very* long.

I would love to see the statistics for how many murders are caused by troons. Imagine defending a demographic that statistically kills more people than are killed themselves.

 

[break these cuffs]

If nothing else watching the push for more trannies continue mostly unimpeded is fascinating to watch.

It gives a unique (though horrifying) perspective in to how modern society works and what it values.

Every generation thinks they're the enlightened generation that has everything figured out. Shock therapy and lobotomies used to be cutting edge psychotherapy treatments. Shock treatment has actually made a comeback for very niche circumstances with severe symptoms that haven't responded to conventional treatment.

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

I would love to see the statistics for how many murders are caused by troons. Imagine defending a demographic that statistically kills more people than are killed themselves.

Trans homicides in the UK: a closer look at the numbers​

 

[ChaChaHeels:BlackOnes]

I would love to see the statistics for how many murders are caused by troons. Imagine defending a demographic that statistically kills more people than are killed themselves.

This is exactly the UK’s situation. It’s something like 12/7 over a 12 year period. I posted a bit about it on the Rachel McKinnon thread a few weeks back and promised to make a better data set (looking at cross dressers/full time transitioners and sex of victims etc) but I got distracted. Will do it this week tho.

And that’s just the convicted murderers, btw, without including attempted murderers, manslaughterers, troons too crazy to stand trial and those on remand.

Edit: it’s at least 13/8 now.
The 13 only counts those who were recognised as being under the stonewall umbrella at the time of the crime, it doesn’t include those with POGD - Prison Onset Gender Dysphoria.

 

[Don't Tread on Me]

Lol its nice to see an actual doctor step up and say "there are no medical tests here, this is psychology bullshit."

 

[OttoWest]

https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/21/newly-discovered-letter-shows-endocrine-society-urged-experimenting-on-trans-children/

In his recent townhall, presidential candidate Joe Biden endorsedexperimental, irreversible medical interventions for gender-confused eight-year-olds. His reflexive and indeed casual approval of medical child abuse illustrates how successful the transgender industry, including politicized elements of the medical profession, has been in obscuring the issues and normalizing the abnormal. A recently uncovered letter shows how the Endocrine Society (ES) in particular has deftly misrepresented scientific reality to advance the agenda of that lucrative and increasingly powerful industry.

Endocrinologists are experts in the function of hormones and therefore play a critical role in the industry’s “gender-affirming” medical model. Because sex is determined by chromosomes, imprinted during development, and unchangeable by hormones after the fact, actual sex change is impossible. So, this model employs experimental interventions to help children and adolescents look and sound more like the opposite sex. These “gender-affirming” medical interventions include powerful puberty-blocking drugs and wrong-sex hormones that can irreversibly damage a young patient’s body and future health.


Ethical physicians recoil from this model. They cite reliable research showing the interventions don’t solve gender-related distress and ultimately do more harm than good. To soothe their concerns and build a research base justifying the unjustifiable, the Endocrine Society has long been promoting federal funding for trans-industry “studies” that reach the opposite, politically correct conclusions.

California endocrinologist Dr. Michael Laidlaw has delved into the swamp of this politicized research to determine how the National Institutes of Health could have been persuaded to fund it. His efforts recently unearthed a 2013 Endocrine Society letter that combined scientific deception with political activism to overcome qualms about experimenting on gender-confused children.

The 2013 letter appeared over the signature of the Endocrine Society’s then-president Dr. Teresa Woodruff and was sent to NIH’s “LGBTI Research Coordinating Committee.” While the broader membership of Endocrine Society, which includes Laidlaw, was never notified of or asked to approve the letter, the letter urged more taxpayer funding for experimental interventions on trans-identifying patients, including children:


Perhaps anticipating the glaring ethical objections, the Endocrine Society obscured the issue by lumping together trans-identifying patients with individuals suffering from a physical medical condition called Disorders of Sexual Development (also sometimes known as “intersex”). The letter repeatedly called for more research into medical treatments for “transgender and intersex patients,” as though the two conditions are related and should both be subject to medical experimentation. In truth, gender dysphoria and DSD are wholly separate and unrelated.


There are no medical tests to diagnose trans-identification, more formally known as gender dysphoria. These patients have normal biological markers for their biological sex, such as chromosomes, anatomy, hormone levels, and other clear identifiers. Trans-identification is purely psychological — a “feeling” that he or she should be the opposite sex.

Disorders of Sexual Development conditions, however, are another thing entirely — cases of exceedingly rare, medically identifiable anomalies in which either the sexual anatomy is inconsistent with the chromosomal sex or is not male or female. This ambiguous anatomy — typically caused by genetic or chromosomal defects that lead to fetal hormone abnormalities during pregnancy — can result in a mistaken identification of sex at birth. Yet these anomalies are “medically identifiable deviations from the human binary sexual norm.” They do not constitute a “third sex.”

Even though trans-identification is psychological and DSD/intersex conditions are physical, the Endocrine Society repeatedly blurred the distinction in its 2013 letter. This deliberate confusion of psychological and physical conditions is central to the Endocrine Society’s radically unscientific denial that humans are either male or female. As stated in the letter in question:


This would supposedly be similar to the entrenched view within society that the earth orbits the sun. But Endocrine Society and colleagues on the medical left — the people whose every move is supposedly dictated by science — challenge entrenched views no matter how silly and dangerous the revisionist narratives are. With its deceptive presentation in the 2013 letter, the Endocrine Society helped prime the pump for acceptance of those narratives in federally funded research.


Laidlaw was alarmed, if not surprised, by this letter:


Former Endocrine Society president Woodruff, who signed the letter, specializes in preserving fertility for patients who must undergo fertility-endangering cancer treatments. In recent years, she has branched out to offer similar options to trans-identifying patients, including minors, whose normal reproductive functions will be destroyed by the medical experimentation she and Endocrine Society endorsed in the letter. Fertility preservation would be unnecessary in this context, of course, if radical doctors kept their drugs, their hormones, and their scalpels off the bodies of mentally suffering children.

This story has an ironic footnote. Now dean of the graduate school at Northwestern University, Woodruff is under attack from “transgender and non-binary” students who accuse her of vaguely defined insensitivity and neglect. On cue, Woodruff has begged forgiveness, proclaiming, “I am hearing your critiques and I have an open mind to the critiques and I have an open heart to what I’m hearing and the pain, and I pledge to work with all of you on each of these issues.” The mob, however, remains unmollified. Indeed, in 2020, it’s impossible to be woke enough.

The Endocrine Society is giving it a try. With pseudo-scientific jargon, political dogma, and a healthy dose of deception, the Endocrine Society is conditioning society to accept — and taxpayers to fund — manifestly absurd things. Truth is no longer a universally accepted value even among physicians and scientists. Young patients, and indeed human society, will pay the price.

The Endocrine Society seems deeply confused. In 2014 they advised against females receiving any kind of testosterone therapy outside of treatment for HSDD. They reiterated this in 2019:

Yet somehow these guidelines are tossed out the window when prescribing testosterone to trans-identified women.

Aren’t the patients still biological females? Does The Endocrine Society think the side effects from testosterone suddenly halt upon entering a troon body?

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

So there is this app - Giggle, which markets itself as

a social app for girls/women/females who want a safe & secure social networking experience:

- For freelance work
- For roommates
- For travel accomodation and companion
- For support, activism, exercise, mentoring and much more!
- For personal relationships with like minded girls

Here's what hurts the feelings of male trannies:

Protected by both artificial and real intelligence to ensure a girls/women/ female only space

That's right, the app uses facial recognition to weed out men masquerading as women. From the developer's website:

How do we maintain a female only space?​

The aim is to create a safe and secure female only platform. Each time a new user attempts to register on the app, they are asked to take a “selfie”. This image is then sent via an API call to our partner, Kairos.

Kairos is a leading face recognition AI company with an ethical approach to verification, that reflects our globally diverse communities. Through computer vision and deep learning, they recognise females in videos, photos, and the real world.

In less than a second, the image is analysed. The AI does this by comparing the image in question with thousands of other images. From this, it determines the likelihood of the subject being female at a stated confidence level, based on the bank of past results. This information is received as a Json string showing the percentage likelihood of the subject being either male or female.

We have set the image confidence level at 95% for a female.

The image is also subjected to a “liveness” algorithm. The algorithm detects pixel-level patterns in a single selfie taken by the end-user. In this way, a user attempting to access giggle by taking the “selfie” of a female photograph is rejected, and access to the app is withheld by a kind message advising that they have not been verified.

Here I'm posting some 1-star REEEEEing reviews from buttblasted trannies and/or their allies for the enjoyment of fellow farmers.

⸜(രᴗര๑)⸝ ⸜(രᴗര๑)⸝ ⸜(രᴗര๑)⸝​

Shelley Pocock: This app is already very sketchy regardless of the "face verification" scan only working for some women or being problematic for transwomen. I had to try it a few times before it worked so they have my face now but even after struggling with that (seems to work if you have all your hair tied up) once I got passed the scan the app crashes completely. It'll take a lot for women to feel safe using an app like this regardless of non male presence. Edit: can't upload profile image

Alexis Malec: Trans exclusion isn't radical. Should update the description to be clear about your policies rather than hiding behind language that makes you seem inclusive. Trans women are women.

Kathryn Graham: Weird setup that feels more voyeuristic than safe. No onboarding to explain the profile setup. Lots of bugs, especially around uploading from gallery. And of course, reducing a woman to how she looks is demeaning.

Mazarin Hopkins: Gross transphobic app run by a gross transphobe. They say in their FAQ that trans women are welcome, but the creator has said they are not on Twitter. They say they want to create a safe space from misogyny, but they've only added to it by excluding women based on something they can't control. Re: So you believe the way to avoid misogyny is to exclude women who don't fit your definition? That's not a step forward, that's taking the side of the oppressors. This is not what feminism is.

Amelia Hund: This app is incredibly transphobic. Trans women ARE women. Excluding them sets a dangerous precedent and further others trans women. There is absolutely no reason to exclude trans *women* from the app other than blatant transphobia.

Condor: Peak equality is the exclusion of a whole sex. And judging from the other reviews, the actual application architecture isn't even done half-ass decent either. Is this what fourth wave feminism is nowadays? Oh boy, it's never been this good, has it.

Ian Hyzy: TERF app with awful security (look up the breach of data where they had members' addresses exposes) and their phrenology-based girl detection was fooled by a WATERMARKED photo taken from my ipad

Slynk Adink: Hi, actual Machine Learning engineer here. This is a disgusting use of facial recognition software. Not only is it exclusionary to many women, but it's easily tricked. A better application to create a safe space with AI would be to detect harassment before showing it to the receiving end and ban them. Rethink this all together before you're known as a TERF social network.

saki: Cis female who hates transphobia here this would be the awesomest app if it was trans inclusive. I hate to be defined by my genitals.

Destiny M: This app upsets me. The entire premise of this app is terrible. Not only does it force transgender women to go the extra mile of contacting the "giggle team," it also doesn't take into account women with masculine features. Honestly just a sexist, exclusionary, transphobic idea. Also, nice little section in the terms of service stating plainly that they can use and exploit any media you post on the app. Just a heads up.

Lance Faltinsky: Terrible app. The premise of it is extremely discriminatory and flawed. They assume that you are "safe" because the app is for females only- which is a false assumption because females, too, can pose a risk to one another. This is very misleading and dangerous. Trans women need to go through an additional step to verify. Which sucks and doesn't help anything. The app also has authentication issues and the verification doesn't even work half the time and lets men in and biological women out.

Kate Anderson: The owner of this app is a terf and thinks she has produced AI to stop trans women using it. It's discrimination and breaks the equality act 2010 and Google's terms. I am trans and got past her terf AI. Trans women are women and don't have a look unlike terfs who all look like they have been sucking on lemons due to the 2/7 abuse of minorities they engage in.

Steeliest Llama: you cannot use an AI to verify someones gender, even humans can't do that. there is absolutely no way to do it with 100% reliability. you can't tell someone's gender by bone structure or by appearance, and I know this app doesn't work as intended because I, a non-binary person with some facial hair, got into the app and was "verified" as a woman. phrenology is bad, it is really not something you want to be using to attempt to verify someones gender. delete this app from the store.

Freddie David: This app could have been a cool concept considering how few spaces there are for women online, but the whole verification process is genuinely awful and based on bad science. I wish that, as a trans woman, I didn't have to take extra steps and out myself to the team behind the app just to gain access

Ainhoa Indurain: There is nobody in this app. You have to create a profile for each category, this is tiresome and makes no sense. And you go through it for nothing because nobody uses the app anyway. Also the gender identification part in the beginning is so transphobic and gendered...

Spencer Pearson: This app is exclusionary and poorly executed. Their "technology" is absolute bunk. I'm a man and I was able to get verified, why? Because their poor claims at technology is totally baseless. You can't determine someone's gender based on physical appearance. This app is transphobic and all around trash. I don't know how this app was green lit at all.

Sophie Wu: Insinuating that there is a way to tell if a woman is cis or trans through facial analysis is completely false, transphobic, and insulting. Also, you cannot claim to be inclusive of trans people if they have to go out of their way and use a different door. A social platform for only women is a good concept, but this way of implementing it is not.

Samuel Harroun: this honestly is just a bad idea in general. "gender identification technology," is not only transphobic, but also racist, as many races have such differrent facial structures from eachother. Facial recognition software is already so flawed when differentiating between people of non-white decent, and this is just taking that a step further.

skunkw0rxx: App's AI ia completely flawed and rooted in pseudoscience. As a trans woman I was verified just by extending my jawline. This app is completely exclusionary of anyone that doesn't fit it's predetermined "bone structure". Also, there is no user base in Korea.

Akira Saito: Honestly an ideal app, where else am I supposed to find phrenology, transphobia, and racism wrapped into one single app Also very willing to sell my data and sensitive/private information, which is a plus. The AI is utterly incompetent too, so fun!

Zadicus Cinch: This app is horrendously built to be transphobic, but it can't even do that right. I'm a fat guy with a big fluffy beard, and even *I* managed to get verified on the first go. This AI, the app, and especially it's creators are all transphobic maggot-breathed trash gobblers.

Iron Biscuit: I couldn't think of a more terrible way to exclude trans and masculine presenting girls ever. I look forward to the removal of your "verification" or the complete downfall of your app.

Luke Lawson: The gender verification structure is honestly just a terrible idea that excludes people and hurts their feelings. My boyfriend is a trans man and had no issue joining the app as well. You should probably rethink using modern day phrenology to "verify" someone's gender.

Luísa P: Pathetic. It's not trans inclusive if trans people have to go an extra step to participate. Not only this, but the fact that you guys collect all this data, biometrics and location and are authorized to sell it to basically anyone. To the ones who made this app: you should be ashamed.

Alex Scott: Gender verification is a terrible idea. As a black afab woman I was denied. Reeks of transphobia and honestly after reading up more about it, racism as well. Saying that trans women are welcome but making them complete an extra step that's different than everyone else is not cool. You should have put this through a LOT more internal review before releasing a public beta.

Nicole Rockwell: Transphobes made this app not inclusive to ALL WOMEN . Terfs ruin everything for women and for feminism as a whole go ahead and delete this review too I'll just keep making more infact I think im gonna tell every trans person to leave a negative review. In short die mad terfs.

Restless Dreams: How about you don't use phrenology? Outside of being transphobic and enforcing ridiculous notions of what "female" looks like, it also just doesn't work. Because it's not a real science. Plenty of cis women have been denied by the app and plenty of trans women have been accepted. Not all trans women look masculine and not all cis women look feminine. People of all genders have a diverse range of looks. Trying to narrow down womanhood to skull shape and facial features is just asinine.

CrabGF: The description claims to be for girls and women but this is misleading as they later in the comments claim this is a female only space. This promotes misogyny as well by reducing women to appearance. Transphobia should not be tolerated

Lauren Flynn: Quite frankly this "gender bio-lock" thing is incredibly discriminatory. trans girls, non-binary folks and people of other discriminated against genders also deserve a safe space. Also the amount of personal information it collects is just obscene.

Sophie Pejovic: Transphobic and infantilising. "Girls". Just say women! Women are not children, stop calling them "girls"! The verification system simply does not work. My full-bearded cis boyfriend got verified. Glad to know he's a 'biological woman'! Why bother having this disgusting terfy verification in the first place if it doesnt work? It's an extra step for trans women to make them feel like the "other".

Ty Zuniga: This app is horribly transphobic and is just a way to sell your biometric data for their own profit.

Willow Illg: The "female" recognition AI is a super terrible concept and reeks of phrenology and is inherently transphobic. If you can get in without it then what's the point, and if you can't it's gatekeepy and gross

Lauren G: Anti-transgender and misandrist. This goes in opposition to what feminism is.

Mildred Morgan: Gender verification is incredibly disrespectful and discriminatory. There is no saying what a woman looks like and your standards for femininity are disgusting. Just because queer people don't look the way you want them too does not give you the right to exclude them.

alex: Transphobic, mildly misogynistic garbage The idea that your womanhood can be quantified by how you look is repugnant. The name "Giggle" for a "girls"-only social media platform is also more than a little bit infantilising, no? And why all the pink? This is a 30-something marketing major's idea of an empowering product for women

Steve Wheeler: This is disgustingly transphobic and a particularly insidious attempt to commodify and sell your personal and private information. The language used on it is also grossly patronising and infantilising. Do not use this app.

VocaloidSocks: This wasn't created for women but is actually a TERF platform to hate on vulnerable women.Gross.

D F: Creepy eugenicist vibe.

Mario Sánchez Jiménez: TRANS RIGHTS

 

[George Orson Welles]

Mario Sánchez Jiménez: TRANS RIGHTS

I hate this generation so fucking much.

 

[KittyGremlin]

Imagine giving a fuck about some dumb app. The fact that only women can be there only makes it worse.

 

[Blimp]

Is "literally any other app for gender-centric random networking" not good enough? (lol of course not, GATEKEEPING). In 2020, there's probably a 1:1 split between lesbians and lesbians* on dating apps as it is, and even the most feministy of intersectional feminists will still clench her fists at words like "girldick". Actual lady testimonials in various forbidden subreddits show that extremely-online transwomen are aggressive as fuck when actual women deny them in even the most minor ways, which will lead into the whole acceptably-violent "die TERF" screeds

No shit an app is gonna filter this to girls-only, this sounds like it's targeting normal ladies that daydream about having a (90's) Babysitters Club troupe of some kind, and bringing transwomen in would ensure having to go through a mix of oversharing horny profiles that sexualize every aspect of their lives, much like every other platform. Normal women don't wanna see this shit, and are probably on this app TO get away from this shit

 

[Daddy's Little Kitten]

Why can't trannies leave us true and honest women alone?

 

[Vapewizard]

Normal women don't wanna see this shit, and are probably on this app TO get away from this shit

This app has been brought up in the tranny sideshow thread before and there's definitely already troons on giggle so yeah the whole thing is pointless.