New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

Couple stories on the New York Post

FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-40-48.png


Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-49-19.png
 
Last edited:
Whorebanger crackhead Hunter Biden makes a more appealing candidate than Joe Biden ever has. I don't know if this will change many minds. Nobody but TDS people like Joe Biden, and they're not going to shift away from lunacy over something like this.
If Giuliani and Bannon's promises are to be believed, this is, as they say, just the tip.
 
Maybe I phrased the poorly. All the 'quality' papers and the TV channels have said it's Russian disinfo. Two right-wing Tabloids have covered it in a more or less unbiased way.
I may have just misread your post. It was early morning over here and I was reading the Farms over breakfast.

It makes sense that neither The Sun nor the Mail parroted the ZOMG RUSSIAN DISINFORMATIONS REEEEEEE narrative.
 
So are they just ignoring the fact that even the US intel agencies admit it's not Russian disinfo?
They're focusing on the initial statements all the FORMER intel agency staff said that this COULD be russian disinfo, while coincidentally not spreading the information about every alphabet bureau updating and saying it isn't.

Totally unbiased journalism we should all trust though, folks.
 
If Giuliani and Bannon's promises are to be believed, this is, as they say, just the tip.
If your election lasts for more than four months, consult the supreme court.

Yep. Even their lackeys in other countries are claiming the FBI have said it's disinfo, like Ed Hardy here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjzu1GrOomY
https://archive.vn/wip/Ds2Bv
View attachment 1686445

Almost everyone in the media in the UK is a slimy, lying little gobshite like Ed.
The utterly dystopic evil nature of the UK press makes me appreciate what [few remaining] freedoms Americans are privy to. Our press is garbage also, but not entirely. Like 99% shit, but dammit there is some hope... I hope.

(Urban legend is that Mao had sex with six virgins a day in an attempt to stave off death.)
He went about it the wrong way: its not the sex, its the blood! Drink drink drink from the menstrual cup!
 
That's the cock he used to fuck his dad's chance at a presidency to death.
It should have buried Joe's chance at the presidency, my deep seated cynicism still says Joe could win because people are idiots.
So are they just ignoring the fact that even the US intel agencies admit it's not Russian disinfo?
Yep. Had someone link a HuffPost article that completely ignored that. Still considers himself "informed".

Odds are good that Joe Biden could have had the "Chairman Mao's anti-aging" treatment and the media will cover it up, not that it would matter much since people would probably ignore it flat out anyway.

(Urban legend is that Mao had sex with six virgins a day in an attempt to stave off death.)
 
Yeah, you have point. Does anyone (like @It's HK-47) have the info and stats on those things?

I direct you to this post in Deep Thoughts:

Yesterday, I decided to look into early voting in Miami-Dade County. Earlier today after it updated, I decided to check again. Baris has been talking a lot about how due to the Cubans and Venezuelans becoming a solid red voting block towards Trump, Miami-Dade will shift to a lighter blue than usual. I personally believe it, but I wanted to give it a courtesy glance since Larry Scheweikart talked about early voting (granted some of the numbers he reported were off) and how well Republicans apparently were doing. Miami-Dade County is the most populous county and as such, voted the most in 2016 with 980,204 votes (archive). It was also the third most Democratic county in the state with Clinton winning 63.68% of the vote compared to Trump's 34.07%, a 29.61 point margin in favor of Clinton.

People talk about how early voting is going so well for the Republicans despite the Democratic advantage. I believe reading the tea leaf for early voting based solely on party break down is a massive head ache and not an issue I want to work myself up over, especially not compare it to previous years. But I was looking at the in-person early voting in Miami-Dade and boy was I shocked (picture from today),

In-Person Early Voting
View attachment 1686178

Vote By Mail
View attachment 1686177

The third column are Republicans, fourth columns are Democrats, fifth column are third-parties, and sixth column are Independents

In one of the bluest counties in the state, Republicans were beating Democrats when it comes to in-person early voting. Not Election Day voting, in-person early voting. Granted, Democrats have a significant lead in VBM, but that is to be expected. Even then, that lead is less impressive when you realize that they only have a twenty-two point lead of Republicans there. With that revelation, I knew it was worth looking into, so I made an exception into looking into early voting and broke down the percentage of Republican, Democratic, third-parties, and Independent,

Republican
90,308 / 236,009 = 38.26%

Democratic
87,849 / 236,009 = 37.22%

Third-Party
2724 / 236,009 = 1.15%

Independent
55,128 / 236,009 = 23.36%

Republican
95,910 / 372,516 = 25.75%

Democratic
177,400 / 372,516 = 47.62%

Third-Party
3878 / 372,516 = 1.04%

Independent
95,328 / 372,516 = 25.59%

After that, I combined the early voting and VBM total and got this,

Early Voting + Vote By Mail

Total = 236,009 + 372,516 = 608,525

Republicans
90,308 + 95,910 = 186,218
186,218 / 608,525 = 30.60%

Democratic
87,849 + 177,400 = 265,249
265,249 / 608,525 = 43.59%

Third-Party
2724 + 3878 = 6602
6602 / 608,525 = 1.08%

Independent
55,128 + 95,328 = 150,456
150,456 / 608,525 = 24.72%

A thirteen point lead between Republicans and Democrats is not impressive for Biden. They should be closer to thirty percents, not nearing single digits leads in biggest place for Democrats to make gains. They cannot afford such a significant bleeding. That said, the gap alone does not tell the whole story. There's still a significant Independent voting share happening and obviously the county is not turning red anytime soon. So let's break down numbers In Biden's favor to see if a shift really is happening.

Republican
.3060 x .85 = 26.01%

Democrat
.4359 x .05 = 2.18%

Third-Party = 0%

Independent
0.2472 x 0.425 = 10.51%

Total
26.01 + 2.18 + 10.51 = 38.7%

Assuming that Trump loses a significant portion of his base, gets almost no Democratic crossover, gets zero third-party support, and gets trashed by Independents by fifteen points (and I factored in extra edges due to VBM), he still gains 4.6% compared to last year. That's a huge increase given Miami-Dade's population. Now let's look at Biden,

Republican
0.3060 x .15 = 4.59%

Democrat
0.4359 x .95 = 41.41%

Third-Party
1.08%

Independent
0.2472 x 0.575 = 14.21%

Total
4.59 + 41.41 + 1.08 + 14.21 = 61.29%

Assuming that Biden has Obama-level enthusiasm among Democrats, gets Republican crossover like what George H. W. Bush got with Democrats in 1988, he gets all of the third-party votes, and Independents flocks to him like birds migrating South, he is still losing over 2% compared to Clinton. In a county like Miami-Dade that is supposed to be one of his best places to win votes and in a state that is decided by tens of thousands of votes, he can't afford this kind of bleeding. Let's take a look at the margin in this worst-case scenario for Trump,

[Trump
38.7 - 34.07 = 4.63

Biden
63.68 - 61.29 = 2.39

4.63 + 2.39 = 7.02% swing towards Trump

If voting in Miami-Dade were to stop today and Election Day got cancelled, Trump would already have a 7.02 point swing towards him. That's already better than Mitt Romney's performance in 2012 (archive) and again, assumes the worst case scenario. It also does not factor in the seven additional early voting days left that will almost certainly widen the margin and Election Day where Trump supporters will be the vast majority of voters. With that considered, these are big numbers for Trump as in this scenario, he is only 22.59 points behind Biden. Just for fun, we'll also apply the results if Trump and Clinton had these same margins in 2016 (total votes, not early),

Clinton
980,204 x .6129 = 600,767

Swing
600,767 - 624,146 = -23,379

Trump
980,204 x .387 = 379,339

Swing
379,339 - 333,999 = 45,340

Total
23,379 + 45,340 = 68,719

Overall, Trump right now is looking at at the absolute worst 68.719 more voters from that county than last year and that is assume we do not see an increase in voters (which is going to happen). I am confident that Miami-Dade will see a double digit swing towards Trump, which would net him about a 100,000 voters just from that county alone. Heck, if current trends continue, we may see evidence of that before early voting ends. If there was proof that Cubans and Venezuelans were turning out for Trump before Election Day, this is pretty close to it.

I'll come back to it after early voting ends on October 31th and see if my predictions come true. Those who wants to bet on Florida for Trump can do so with a reasonable amount of confidence.

To me, this says that early voting is not going the way Dems want.
 
New Tweet from Bannon / War Room Podcast:

"THE DOCUMENTS The #BidenCrimeFamilly is owned by the #CCP and can never achieve power. Remember this loan rolled since 2013. This was how they funded every deal. Nothing @Fbi , #SEC? @CNBC don't y'all report on fraud?"
 

Attachments

  • ElNZ9LeW0AYwxlp.jpg
    ElNZ9LeW0AYwxlp.jpg
    187.2 KB · Views: 68
  • ElNZ-S8XUAEXtlf.jpg
    ElNZ-S8XUAEXtlf.jpg
    233 KB · Views: 62
  • ElNaI8OX0AYlM1h.jpg
    ElNaI8OX0AYlM1h.jpg
    215.4 KB · Views: 63
  • ElNaGGIWkAEmFTh.jpg
    ElNaGGIWkAEmFTh.jpg
    234 KB · Views: 64
  • vOmlOtb.png
    vOmlOtb.png
    255.8 KB · Views: 68
Yeah this right here is the question. Why the fuck is a wealthy and connected son of a former VP unable to get all the Top Grade CIA Nose Candy he fucking well wants? Crack is the drug of urban derelicts, not the wealthy elite.

You'd be surprised. Lots of people from really wealthy families end up doing crack, heroin, meth, ie the classic street drugs.

t. knew a literal heiress who loved crack
 
So how many people you think have been disappeared or jailed over this leak so far you guys think?
Depends, on the low-end I'd say somewhere between 13% to 14% and 50% to 88% on the high-end of the people responsible are either dead or in a CIA blacksite somewhere(lol at the idea that they'd ever end up in a civilian jail or prison of any sort in the US). In terms of absolute numbers I expect this to eventually lead to either the "disappearence" or death of at least 42069 people. :smug:
 
Last edited:
He does dime store strippeeers and Ho's instead of the mlre quality women someone with his family wealth and position should bring him.
Women still have standards. An instathot will drop their panties for any one of these fucks because drugs and sex are all they live for but when you hit the more conscientious types they'll likely balk because they value their standing and haven't had their senses fried by drugs.
 
Back