Isn't that basically what we do though? Even if it was some e-celeb like Ethan Ralph or Sargon, or even Chris Chan or DSP we'd be lovingly archiving all his leaked sex tapes and drug binges. Much in the same way some organisms feed infrequently but gorge themselves when they do eat, Kiwi Farmers love some person they've heard of messily self-destructing. Now you can argue if you're some sort of Communist pedotranny, that this is psychologically unhealthy but we are what we are.
And I like to think that, much like dung beetles, eye worms, and parasitic wasps, we're part of the ecosystem even if many find our lifecycle repugnant.
What's funny about it is that the Democrats in the media were stuck in the horns of a dilemma. Either they can talk about the allegations in detail and hope to discredit some of them but that means the ones they can't discredit will be widely known. Of they can push the SCRAM button on the Internet and refuse to discuss anything about it. However, that means that all the allegations will be seen as equally credible by anyone who knows about any of them. And all it takes is for Trump to allude to the more credible ones and people will eventually find out about all of them.
It's fucking brilliant really. Bannon and Giuliani used the Democrats' ability to shut down the story against them.
For what it's worth I think these things happened
1) The CCP gave Hunter Biden's company a massive bribe and Joe probably knew about it/got a cut
2) Hunter Biden walked around naked in front of his Beau's kids, i.e. Nathalie
I'm not convinced that Hunter Biden sexually abused Nathalie which Giuliani and OANN have alluded to without actually stating it outright. However, right now with Joe not campaigning and all sorts of shit now getting into the media, it's likely Biden will get the reputation hit for the whole lot. Also, the censorship of the story will likely backfire because people will assume that it is because the story can't be refuted.
Sure, but I wasn't criticizing KF for doing how they do. I was merely remarking that the perspective of he average person in the thread is different from the average normie who hears about or even keeps up on this stuff. The people here are crawling out of their own skin looking for bigger, badder drops to prove indisputably that Hunter and Joe are so corrupt that Joe may have to outright drop from the race, or utterly shatter his chances at election. Most people outside of KF are likely taking the drops like crack hits, following along like a soap opera or drama that gives them new things to be outraged by and talk about every day. As other people have discussed, the full dump method as done by Wikileaks in the past just doesn't work. Yes, people like KF get all that sweet data to pour over, but casuals a week from now will hear "A new email? -Oh, it's just from that release a week ago, never mind." even though it's 'newly discovered' because there's 33,000 emails and someone only just now found the one about murdering an informant. This way, even though it's all coming from the same singular source, it continuously feels like 'new bombshells!' (Furthermore, the smaller drops allow people to go over every part of it and learn about it without burnout/allow them to retain it, while a massive data dump will have people glance at it, forget most of it, lose interest, and wait for other people to highlight things for them)
He should still put the story up on the front page... some of it might be bullshit, but we know something for sure: Hunter Biden has a monster cock.
The headline could be:
"BREAKING NEWS: HUNTER BIDEN'S NUDES HAVE LEAKED AND HE IS CONFIRMED TO HAVE A MONSTER COCK!" or "BREAKING NEWS: HUNTER BIDEN IS A FOOT FETISHIST!"
I assume it's following the rule that 'celebrities aren't lolcows' and therefore aren't happenings on kiwifarms except when he gets fussy over 230 or something like that
My current tinfoil hat is that Biden was the only electable candidate the democrats had to offer, but they know full well his brain is failing. That's what's got Pelosi finally trying to set up the 25th Amendment council they've supposed to have been setting up for decades, conveniently allowing her to take a swipe at Trump as well. That way they can backdoor in a more socialist candidate.
Hunter selling access to the Whitehouse is kind of a wrench in the gears, but they probably knew it was coming, hence the push for early voting. "Too late to change your choice now, suckers!"
Impeaching Joe would accomplish the same thing, though, so no panic needed.
I had a discussion about that with someone IRL today, the conclusion we reached is that they really wanted Harris, probably because of her insane policies, but she dropped out of the race before the primaries so they couldn't even rig it for her. Thus, they forced through Biden, meant to be a trojan horse for whoever they chose as his VP, and had him pick Kamala. Thus, they hope to get in someone so extreme and hated that no one, not even her own party, would vote for her via a supposed 'boring' 'vote blue no matter who' candidate. It's the only reason I can find to explain why they just outright ignored Obama warning them that Joe is incompetent on top of being unfit, instead of grabbing someone like Bernie or even Warren.
Oh yeah, and a lot of people seem to be regretting that and are also retarded.
View attachment 1687980
Even if you type "can I" outside the US, "change my vote" is in the autocomplete.
It seems to me that it might be a good campaign move if Trump pointed out
how to change your vote in places, like the mail in ballot areas where you can cancel your ballot online such as OR and WA and I think CA.
Maybe it cuts both ways, bit consider all the polling done shows Democrats were overwhelmingly voting by mail and early with Trump hammering on voting on the day in person for the last three months it's more likely with all the searches for it that there are more democrats making that search than republicans. Whether they will follow through with that process, we'll find out, but the fact its trending on google makes me thing it's not a good sign for dems in general moving forward, and even if a small % of the people looking it up follow through it could make an impact.
Also, the trend started on/after the last debate(also when the hunter stuff started to drop) which tends to make me think the search is a benefit to Trump seeing as how that last debate went. Had a Bernie bro text me "Trump is slaughtering Biden right now" when I wasn't even watching it.
Historically, early voters are much more likely to be Dem voters. This is also true for primary voters. I don't know why this is, but it is. If you nuked the early ballots you'll likely do way more damage to Biden than Trump. Which is why the line from Dems every election is 'vote early'. Maybe so that you can't take it back when a surprise happens or a failed debate occurs, but it still remains that early voters are more likely to be Dems.
nypost.com
FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?
