- Joined
- Feb 13, 2020
Oh puh-leeze, that's just the smaller part of the issue. The larger part, which clearly grinds Staph Infection's wheels so much, is work discrimination: there's just no demand for asexual hookers. I wonder why is that.
Stephanie Cianfriglia / Sapphire Crimson Claw / Yarrow Brown / the-ghost-fucker / transmascdruid / anarchoenby77 / darktwistedpussy / Druid of Endicot - Xe/xyr ghost-fucker, womb wizard, hand sanitizer sommelier, trans-boomer, violently abuses her elderly parents, has sexual fantasies about raping children
- Thread starter Hamplanet Fitness
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2018
Luckily for steph infection, she isn't actually asexual. Just a sexually repulsive and frustrated femcel that looks like an inbred downy.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2018
Christ don't even say it, she'll try and sell more saggy tiddy nudes again.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2018
Typical incel resorting to misogynist slurs when those stupid women don't know what's good for them. Oh Staphhy, you wouldn't happen to be an Onision fan, would you?
Lol
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2019
I thought it said “ghosts” at first. I thought she was just trying to hook a brotha up with a big titty ghost gf who can never block his laugh reacts. Of course she’s never nice to anyone and was just being a cunt for no reason.
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2020
Speaking of ghost sex, remember how she's going to a haunted hotel? Did any of us wonder why?
Additional content:
Still calling out using a happy family photo posted months ago
Posting an ordained clergy woman immediately after insisting she doesn't want to talk about Jesus
Is "gay" when she is interested in woman, despite being Totally 4Real Intersex NB
Still assuming all Christians are bigots, and that no gays are religious, and that Christians wouldn't be especially interested in "saving the soul" of someone dedicated to Satan
Got him to reply and he calls her sir.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2018
If it's the hotel I'm thinking of (some little inn place where supposedly if you stay in a certain room a ghost theoretically likes to climb into bed with the guests) it's extra funny, because not only does she want to fuck the ghost but she also knows it because she used to be thirsty for Zak Bagins or whatever from Ghost Adventures who stayed there.
Also big lol at Stapphy being continually mistaken for a man by all the politely confused 'bigots' she tries to interact with on Facebook.
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2020
I'm a tiny bit impressed she knows what Gilead is. Though I'm certain she learned it via osmosis the last few years and she has not actually read any books.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
Technically Jesus is a ghost. This dude is just trying to do some paranormal match making
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
Honestly, this is the point I always want to engage 'activists' on. Like, assuming I accept (I don't, really) that you can't be racist against white people, because discrimination/bigotry needs to be systematic, can you point out any law that exists specifically to discriminate against asexuals? I mean, you can't, just like you can't point out any widespread government/systematic oppression of asexuals. Someone not wanting to date you or joking that you're a robot doesn't make you oppressed.
That entire wikipedia page is 'sometimes people make jokes about us!' and 'there aren't enough asexy anime babes!'
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2018
Please do not lewd the Holy Ghost, Stapphy
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2020
The only thing I can SORT of think of is that married people get a few benefits in terms of taxes and whatnot. But if that's discrimination, then it's not about asexuals-- it's also against incels, and tons of normies who just don't find love or don't want to get married. Also, plenty of married couples don't have sex, or stop having sex. As long as you're both citizens, I don't think the state really cares if you're in love or fucking or not.
I can't think of any workplace discrimination that could happen against asexuals. If anything, it's the opposite. Gay people have been discriminated against at work because of bigotry. Women have been discriminated against in the workplace because of their marital status and the fear that they might get pregnant and take time off work. From a workplace discrimination point of view, employers would probably prefer it if their employees never hooked up, risked getting STDs that might require their insurance to pay, risked getting pregnant that might require maternity leave, or risked getting married, which might mean bringing your spouse onto their health insurance. Plenty of workplaces would probably love it if all their employees were single and sexless their whole careers.
Asexuality MIGHT bring some social stigma, in the sense that your parents keep pestering you to get a partner/get married/whatever, or because people say you're too ugly to get laid, call you an incel, etc. But that's not really discrimination, it's just rudeness. Incels aren't discriminated against, either. Maybe at work, depending on the culture, people might look askance if you're not dating or talking about sex, and that would probably bug asexuals and incels for different reasons. But nosy people at work =/= discrimination.
I can't think of any other avenue where discrimination against asexuals would even happen. When the cops pull you over, they don't know if you're having sex or not. Shop keepers can't tell, and thus can't deny service based on it. "Couples only" services don't discriminate against asexuals or incels, they just exclude people who aren't currently in a relationship.
I remember reading about Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and one of the arguments against it was that when soldiers are bonding with each other, and straight soldiers are allowed to talk about their girlfriends but gay soldiers aren't allowed to talk about their boyfriends or take part in the conversation, that creates a way that they are othered and excluded, and not "one of the guys." I can SORT of see this extending to asexuality, but only if there's a similar Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy in place. If everyone is talking about their sex life, and you say "I don't have a sex life because I don't want one," that is WAY different than being literally NOT ALLOWED to say anything about it. One is perhaps uncomfortable, but the other is actually discrimination.
I'm willing to accept that asexual people sometimes feel uncomfortable or judged, since we do have a prevailing assumption in our culture that romantic pairings are the key to happiness, and sex is very important to life, etc. But people are uncomfortable for all sorts of reasons, that doesn't mean it's Oppression or Discrimination. I also think "asexuality" is really just people with lower than average sex drives, or for whom sex just isn't as important as it is for other people. Maybe the end result is someone who never pursues sex, but I don't think it's a label that actually helps anyone. It's definitely not in the same realm as LGBT. But whatever, you do you, hypothetical asexuals.
Asexuality MIGHT bring some social stigma, in the sense that your parents keep pestering you to get a partner/get married/whatever, or because people say you're too ugly to get laid, call you an incel, etc. But that's not really discrimination, it's just rudeness. Incels aren't discriminated against, either. Maybe at work, depending on the culture, people might look askance if you're not dating or talking about sex, and that would probably bug asexuals and incels for different reasons. But nosy people at work =/= discrimination.
I can't think of any other avenue where discrimination against asexuals would even happen. When the cops pull you over, they don't know if you're having sex or not. Shop keepers can't tell, and thus can't deny service based on it. "Couples only" services don't discriminate against asexuals or incels, they just exclude people who aren't currently in a relationship.
I remember reading about Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and one of the arguments against it was that when soldiers are bonding with each other, and straight soldiers are allowed to talk about their girlfriends but gay soldiers aren't allowed to talk about their boyfriends or take part in the conversation, that creates a way that they are othered and excluded, and not "one of the guys." I can SORT of see this extending to asexuality, but only if there's a similar Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy in place. If everyone is talking about their sex life, and you say "I don't have a sex life because I don't want one," that is WAY different than being literally NOT ALLOWED to say anything about it. One is perhaps uncomfortable, but the other is actually discrimination.
I'm willing to accept that asexual people sometimes feel uncomfortable or judged, since we do have a prevailing assumption in our culture that romantic pairings are the key to happiness, and sex is very important to life, etc. But people are uncomfortable for all sorts of reasons, that doesn't mean it's Oppression or Discrimination. I also think "asexuality" is really just people with lower than average sex drives, or for whom sex just isn't as important as it is for other people. Maybe the end result is someone who never pursues sex, but I don't think it's a label that actually helps anyone. It's definitely not in the same realm as LGBT. But whatever, you do you, hypothetical asexuals.
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2020
I'm trying to parse through what I missed in this thread in the past few days and all I can say about the whole haunted hotel hokum is, quite simply:
"Ghost woman" my ass Staph, we all know you want to
"Ghost woman" my ass Staph, we all know you want to
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2020
Although I hate people with massive fucking trucks (seriously dude, if you turn wrong it's gonna be a 911 scene), this is just a guy minding his own business. Nothing wrong with being prideful of your country.
Imagine being photographed with no blurring of the face at all by Anonymous Asexual if they were from my 600 lb life.
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2020
Asexuals are going to start experiencing oppression if they keep insisting on going around saying they're "queer". The kinds of people who are dangerous to LGBT people don't know "the community" is supposed to include normies who don't fuck now. They'll hear "queer", they will assume the asexual is, you know, some kind of faggot or tranny and in exactly those words, and then they'll treat them like that. They could avoid all of that by just not identifying as queer.
Not that that's relevant to Staph, of course, as they will avoid such hate crimes through their simple strategy of never leaving the house. Except for sexy ghost hotels natch.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
Punk is (not?) about how many jackets you own or what bands you listen to punk is fuck the man
Is this in response to us saying that Steph doesn't listen to punk music and is also a massive poser? Because Steph doesn't listen to punk and is a massive poser. Christ, can you imagine her listening to Fear? Or shit, imagine her listening to Crass and getting furious over their anti-violence rhetoric in their songs; Crass, a band who adorns many a battle jacket/vest and is well known for not charging money for their shows and only made money off of record sales.
... Funny how the industry kind of went the complete opposite on that, huh?
Oh God, don't tempt her.
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2020
Images in order: Above pamphlet
Picture of the Inn
Video of a pig. "You're a pig! *akward silence and pig noises* Hello! *Awkward silence and pig noises* I think this place is paradise." It sounds like her voice.
Video of a dog (same one on the cover). It stands still for a few seconds. It barks.
From their website:
It does sound like the one Boobwisker's was talking about. I bet she really just wanted to find the little boy ghost.
It looks like she spent the rest of the day on the internet since there are facebook posts like an hour after the Instagram thing. No paranormal posting or bragging about how she met a ghost, sounds like the Jesus guy's heartfelt prayers must have driven them all away
Maybe the Mastadon guys will be able to tell the tale of how she totally slept with a kawaii lady ghost, she seems like she's more open about witchy things there.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2020
I actually agree. With a few caveats:
- Staph Infection is using the same argument as habitual grifter Lardo Gags. Yes, disabled people, differently abled people, and poor people do deserve nice things and sometimes even frivolous things. That doesn't mean, however, that all or the majority of their spending should go towards "nice or frivolous things". So this doesn't apply to leeches like Staph Infection or Lardo Gags or pretty much any of the cows of this Grand Pasture.
- Being disabled doesn't have to mean being a useless fucking leech on society spending his/her days at home, being a retard on Twitter dot com and sperging at Jack Cucknugget Dorsey for not banning whoever on sight for committing wrongthink. Staph Infection should take a look at people like Lizze Velásquez or Ricky Berwick and feel deeply ashamed. Neither of them let their severe conditions define who or what they are.
- And of course she just wants to spend them gibs, taxpayers' money, like the good little UWU anarcho-commie she is.
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2018
View attachment 1692054
Images in order: Above pamphlet
Picture of the Inn
Video of a pig. "You're a pig! *akward silence and pig noises* Hello! *Awkward silence and pig noises* I think this place is paradise." It sounds like her voice.
Video of a dog (same one on the cover). It stands still for a few seconds. It barks.
From their website:
View attachment 1692071
It does sound like the one Boobwisker's was talking about. I bet she really just wanted to find the little boy ghost.
It looks like she spent the rest of the day on the internet since there are facebook posts like an hour after the Instagram thing. No paranormal posting or bragging about how she met a ghost, sounds like the Jesus guy's heartfelt prayers must have driven them all away
Maybe the Mastadon guys will be able to tell the tale of how she totally slept with a kawaii lady ghost, she seems like she's more open about witchy things there.
Price range $90-$110 per night. Not bad, but as Sappy has no money of her own....of course, this does not include travel and vast amounts of food. Place is beautiful though. Wonder what they thought of Sloppy Sappy and her stupid hats, pins, and t-shirts? Oh, and it's very close to a casino.
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2020
Many of her...lets call them arguments are essentially a corruption of completely valid ideas and philosophies. She just has to make them all about herself instead of people who they actually apply to. When she says "Disabled people should be able to spend their money on entertainment", she actually means "I shouldn't feel bad for wasting all my tugboat on this trip." When she says "Don't discriminate against LGBT!" she actually means "Stop making fun of my made up genders!".
30 minute drive from her town and a continental breakfast with room purchase. Probably won't add too much to the expenses unless she decides to hit a steakhouse alone. I'm guessing they're used to speds since their business model is pretending they have ghosts, listening to dumb made up stories is basically what they signed up for.
"She's a member of a fringe cult" cried the thiestic Satanist. "How can you trust fringe cultists to make decisions?"
Same shirt, same campaign, not fixed, just a second post on it.