New York Post got their hands on a hard drive from Hunter Biden's laptop and shows Joe Biden lied about Hunter's dealings with Ukraine

Couple stories on the New York Post

nypost.com

Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad

Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine in…
nypost.com nypost.com
FBI has had the laptop for over a year already and didn't say anything. Remember when Trump got impeached for congratulating the new President of the Ukraine?

What the hell is the FBI doing?

Supposedly there is also a video of him engaged in a "sex act" and a couple of photo's of him. This is one is particular juicy

Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-40-48.png


Screenshot from 2020-10-14 18-49-19.png
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Peepeepoopoo Witch, Mojo Thief, (((Obar Lazcano Kamz))) and 129 others
Click to expand...
██████ said:
Rev up those pregnant Natalie theories. When was Hunter's latest kid born?
Click to expand...
Don't mind if do. I saw this timeline floated a couple days ago.

IMG_6961 (2).PNG

2015​
  • Beau Biden dies (May)
  • Hunter Biden and wife Kathleen Biden separate (Oct)
2016​
  • Hunter and Hallie begin dating (~Apr)
  • Kathleen files for divorce (Dec)
2017​
  • Hunter and Hallie go public (Feb)
  • Joe finds out when NYP calls him for comment lol
  • Hunter and Kathleen's divorce is finalized (Apr)
  • Hunter and Hallie "break up" due to detractors (Dec)
  • Hunter impregnates 19 year old Arkansas stripper Lunden Roberts (Dec)
2018​
  • Lunden Roberts gives birth (Aug)
2019​
  • Hunter sends World's Longest Text about how he can't be alone with Natalie (Jan)
  • Hunter and Hallie break up publicly for real this time (~Apr)
  • Hunter marries Melissa Cohen 6 days after meeting her (May)
  • Theoretical conception (~Jul)
2020​
  • Hunter finally pays child support to Lunden Roberts (Jan)
  • The birth of Hunter's youngest son is reported (Mar 28 )
Unfortunately, this timeline isn't very clean. The most suspicious part is the 6-day courtship with this South African woman, but the math doesn't work. Then again, with the resources of the elite, who's to say they wouldn't have hidden the kid for a couple months?

Here's a June 15 2020 tabloid article about the first sighting of the apparently unnamed baby. The baby should be 2.5-3 months old in this picture.

29543584-8415615-image-m-38_1591990322106.jpg

Very little publicity about the kid. Not even his name is public? Given who his grandfather is it seems strange to me. Here's a sad story about how Joe won't be able to meet his new grandson until quarantine is lifted.

Probably nothing, but it does stimulate the ol' noggin.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Parthenos, Allakazam223, EyelessMC and 13 others
Chickenfoot said:
You worried over nothing burger. They can just fax the papers just fine
Click to expand...

The point isn't that Tucker and Fox no longer have the information. The issue is that other parties got hold of that information. The documents were likely stolen so that the Biden campaign know what others have on them and can plan accordingly. For example they now have a better idea what they can lie about without someone appearing five minutes later with proof they are lying. Also lets them start planting disinformation to counter whatever Tucker has.

My question is who stole the information - some "private" contractor (who would likely still have FBI or CIA ties) or an actual intelligence agency. I'm sure some higher up at the FBI would say: "knowing what information someone has on a presidential candidate is a matter of national security. Obtain those files". Not to prosecute any wrong-doing found in them, of course.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Allakazam223, Robert Sanvagene, Sven and 10 others
Overly Serious said:
The point isn't that Tucker and Fox no longer have the information. The issue is that other parties got hold of that information. The documents were likely stolen so that the Biden campaign know what others have on them and can plan accordingly. For example they now have a better idea what they can lie about without someone appearing five minutes later with proof they are lying. Also lets them start planting disinformation to counter whatever Tucker has.

My question is who stole the information - some "private" contractor (who would likely still have FBI or CIA ties) or an actual intelligence agency. I'm sure some higher up at the FBI would say: "knowing what information someone has on a presidential candidate is a matter of national security. Obtain those files". Not to prosecute any wrong-doing found in them, of course.
Click to expand...
They probably have backup copies in case something like this happens. I'll say Biden has to be retarded if he thinks he'll win 2020 when he is more likely to lose hardcore.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Allakazam223, spiritofamermaid, TerribleIdeas™ and 2 others
Chickenfoot said:
They probably have backup copies in case something like this happens. I'll say Biden has to be retarded if he thinks he'll win 2020 when he is more likely to lose hardcore.
Click to expand...

What's it like to be the world's first successful brain donor?

They've already said they have back-up copies. The documents weren't stolen so that Tucker et al. wouldn't have them. They were stolen so that the people behind the theft would. Read what I actually wrote if you're going to quote-reply to me.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Christ on a crutch, Parthenos, Allakazam223 and 3 others
Overly Serious said:
The point isn't that Tucker and Fox no longer have the information. The issue is that other parties got hold of that information. The documents were likely stolen so that the Biden campaign know what others have on them and can plan accordingly. For example they now have a better idea what they can lie about without someone appearing five minutes later with proof they are lying. Also lets them start planting disinformation to counter whatever Tucker has.

My question is who stole the information - some "private" contractor (who would likely still have FBI or CIA ties) or an actual intelligence agency. I'm sure some higher up at the FBI would say: "knowing what information someone has on a presidential candidate is a matter of national security. Obtain those files". Not to prosecute any wrong-doing found in them, of course.
Click to expand...
no, my point is Tucker lost the originals (which probably will be destroyed) and every copy will be discarded as Russian forgery regardless of them having backups or not
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: derpherp2
Special Agent Punchy said:
Don't mind if do. I saw this timeline floated a couple days ago.

View attachment 1693574

2015​
  • Beau Biden dies (May)
  • Hunter Biden and wife Kathleen Biden separate (Oct)
2016​
  • Hunter and Hallie begin dating (~Apr)
  • Kathleen files for divorce (Dec)
2017​
  • Hunter and Hallie go public (Feb)
  • Joe finds out when NYP calls him for comment lol
  • Hunter and Kathleen's divorce is finalized (Apr)
  • Hunter and Hallie "break up" due to detractors (Dec)
  • Hunter impregnates 19 year old Arkansas stripper Lunden Roberts (Dec)
2018​
  • Lunden Roberts gives birth (Aug)
2019​
  • Hunter sends World's Longest Text about how he can't be alone with Natalie (Jan)
  • Hunter and Hallie break up publicly for real this time (~Apr)
  • Hunter marries Melissa Cohen 6 days after meeting her (May)
  • Theoretical conception (~Jul)
2020​
  • Hunter finally pays child support to Lunden Roberts (Jan)
  • The birth of Hunter's youngest son is reported (Mar 28 )
Unfortunately, this timeline isn't very clean. The most suspicious part is the 6-day courtship with this South African woman, but the math doesn't work. Then again, with the resources of the elite, who's to say they wouldn't have hidden the kid for a couple months?

Here's a June 15 2020 tabloid article about the first sighting of the apparently unnamed baby. The baby should be 2.5-3 months old in this picture.

View attachment 1693601

Very little publicity about the kid. Not even his name is public? Given who his grandfather is it seems strange to me. Here's a sad story about how Joe won't be able to meet his new grandson until quarantine is lifted.

Probably nothing, but it does stimulate the ol' noggin.
Click to expand...
Natalie's vsco account disproves the pregnancy theory.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Parthenos, Culinary Hindenburg, Creepuscular and 2 others
Hotel in Minsk said:
Texts from Natalie show she was depressed and begging to hang out with Hunter. Hunter's daughters would bring her to hang out without the mother's knowledge.

View attachment 1693287
Click to expand...
Even if Hunter were innocent and didn't do anything sexual to Natalie, this is still child abuse. This is emotional manipulation, and trying to poison her against her mother. Completely inappropriate.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Cereal Killer, Parthenos, 6thRanger and 13 others
Nahash said:
I've seen some mommy bloggers use the term folding clothes/laundry as a euphemism for having sex. Might be it.
Click to expand...
It's also where moms go to smoke their drugs. I knew a woman (who I broke contact with) who had a kid, and that's where she'd go to get high - the basement doing laundry. Also Hunter says he's in the bathroom at Whole Foods. Where else do dope fiends do their drugs? We've already seen the man hits the pipe while driving.

Also never trust chicks with eyebrows like this lol:
1603971808214.png


Looks like the French media have gotten ahold of the story, this came up in my search for a photo of Natalie:
1603972000067.png
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Allakazam223, Robert Sanvagene, mr.moon1488 and 6 others
So this is coming from a finance professor who did a stint in China (HSBC Business School of Peking University Graduate School, Shenzhen) before he got fired for wrongthink:

Report on Biden Activities with China​

Key Points of the Report:
  1. Joe Biden’s compromising partnership with the Communist Party of China runs via Yang Jiechi (CPC’s Central Foreign Affairs Commission). YANG met frequently with BIDEN during his tenure at the Chinese embassy in Washington.
  2. Hunter Biden’s 2013 Bohai Harvest Rosemont investment partnership was set-up by Ministry of Foreign Affairs institutions who are tasked with garnering influence with foreign leaders during YANG’s tenure as Foreign Minister.
  3. HUNTER has a direct line to the Politburo, according to SOURCE A, a senior finance professional in China.
  4. Michael Lin, a Taiwanese national now detained in China, brokered the BHR partnership and partners with MOFA foreign influence organizations.
  5. LIN is a POI for his work on behalf of China, as confirmed by SOURCE B and SOURCE C (at two separate national intelligence agencies).
  6. BHR is a state managed operation. Leading shareholder in BHR is a Bank of China which lists BHR as a subsidiary and BHR’s partners are SOEs that funnel revenue/assets to BHR.
  7. HUNTER continues to hold 10% in BHR. He visited China in 2010 and met with major Chinese government financial companies that would later back BHR.
  8. HUNTER’s BHR stake (purchased for $400,000) is now likely be worth approx. $50 million (fees and capital appreciation based on BHR’s $6.5 billion AUM as stated by Michael Lin).
  9. HUNTER also did business with Chinese tycoons linked with the Chinese military and against the interests of US national security.
  10. BIDEN’s foreign policy stance towards China (formerly hawkish), turned positive despite China’s country’s rising geopolitical assertiveness.
Here is the report if you missed the previous links
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Parthenos, Allakazam223, druid and 25 others
The media wouldn't acknowledge the documents and other shit existed until Tucker Carlson talked about the documents being delivered to them got lost/stolen. Now the media, as usual, can't help themselves and now acknowledge they exist sko they can write articles in an attempt to dunk on a man who gets more viewership than all of them combined.

They played themselves.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Grumpy, Parthenos, Allakazam223 and 22 others
Pop pop fizz fizz said:
Futurama-Good_News_Everyone!.jpeg


Fox news might not be completely tarded after all...
Click to expand...
They're not stupid at all. I'm 100% sure it was part of their plan to get attention and trick the media into talking about the existence of documents as I mentioned a while ago. Their hatred for Tucker is strong since he speaks for the silent majority.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Grumpy, Parthenos, druid and 24 others
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: Allakazam223, Kel Varnsen, Allanon and 5 others
Fuck Y'all said:
but they're not original documents, so they will be discarded as Russian forgeries
Click to expand...
These aren't some hand-written letters from Joe Biden. They're print outs of emails, scans of documents, etc. Their authenticity doesn't depend on forensic examination but on corroboration from other sources, email recipients, etc. Tucker never said they were original documents. What he said was it means that "they are reading our texts". I.e. the documents were stolen for the information, not to remove some authentic manuscript from circulation or such. They were being couriered to him because if they're sent by email, uploaded onto Google shared drive or anything like that, then the intelligence agencies would know what they had.

It's possible that the thieves thought Tucker et al. were dumb enough to send the literally only copy they had and that the person who originally gave it to them couldn't give them new copies, but it's pretty unlikely. They were stolen so the Biden campaign new what he could and couldn't safely lie about. And perhaps to get a head start on discrediting them / building a legal defence.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Parthenos, Allakazam223, Kel Varnsen and 19 others
Fuck Y'all said:
but they're not original documents, so they will be discarded as Russian forgeries
Click to expand...
Even the originals will be discarded as forgeries. You could have a signed and notarised copy of a confession from Joe himself, with his fingerprints all over it, accompanied by a photograph of him holding the confession with the same day's newspaper, while he's getting a blowjob from a teenage hooker, on top of a huge pile of money in big bags marked "bribes", and it would still be called a forgery and fake news.

Or they'd call it a huge flex that totally owned orange man.

And they might not be wrong, in that instance...
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Parthenos, Allakazam223, Allanon and 19 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back